The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86 https://t.co/7fzLzs2DDZ
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter120 posts
-
News86 articles
-
Facebook27 posts
-
Blogs21 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Overall, the discussions reflect a cautious engagement, with many participants referencing scientific sources like the 2004 study on USDA data, but also expressing skepticism about the magnitude and cause of nutrient declines. Words like 'serious', 'exaggerated', and references to 'data variability' illustrate a nuanced tone that balances concern with critical analysis.
Posts are divided; some acknowledge nutrient declines as supported by studies, while others question causation or data reliability.
Discussions show moderate interest, with many referencing scientific studies and questioning the implications.
Posts delve into methodological critiques, citing specific studies, and debating soil health, crop breeding, and nutritional data.
The discussion suggests some awareness of possible impacts on health and agriculture, but uncertainty remains about how significant these declines are in daily diets.
Abstract in brief
- The study compares USDA nutrient data for 43 garden crops from 1950 and 1999, finding statistically significant declines in six nutrients (including protein, calcium, and vitamin C), but no reliable changes in others.
- Overall, nutrient declines ranged from about 6% to 38%, and most individual foods didn't show clear differences from the 1950 data due to data variability.
- The researchers suggest that changes in crop varieties over time, possibly balancing yield with nutrient content, could explain these observed declines in nutrient levels.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyFruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughly the same. Fruits are especially high in sugar. What do you call a sugary food with little nutritional value? Candy. https://t.co/rpDGz2ptv2
Links https://t.co/4EudgBktm1 https://t.co/UFCvtXRYkl
Post sur mon Instagram https://t.co/E5cyyMFCd9 Sources : Mayer 2022 : https://t.co/IhPy8IF1m5 Davis 2004 : https://t.co/VIzWQPAIBM Ekholm 2007 https://t.co/0nSte5kRWn White 2005 https://t.co/o3T4iZAh3P
Another study looked at
Al igual que en la película, oímos a menudo estas quejas. ¿Qué hay de real? Pues hay estudios que demuestran una considerable pérdida de nutrientes en los alimentos debido a la degradación del suelo por sobreexplotación https://t.co/HPnSF6ddGw
All mentions
Micronutrient Supply: Insights on Vitamins and Supplements by Prof. Smollich
Deep dive into micronutrient supply with Prof. Martin Smollich on the risks of deficiencies in Germany. Explore the significance of supplements, changes in nutrient content, and findings from recent studies on…
Impact of Climate Change on Animal Morphology and Behavior
Immer mehr Tiere schrumpfen und das aus gutem Grund, denn in einem sich erwärmenden Klima macht es Sinn, einen kleineren Körper zu haben. Eine neue Studie zeigt, dass sich die Morphologie von Tieren wie Pinguinen und…
Soil Health and Microbiome Impact on Human Disease and Immunity
In this episode, Dr. Nathan Goodyear and Dr. Sabine Hazan explore how soil health influences the gut microbiome, chronic disease, and immune resilience. They highlight the importance of regenerative farming and vitamin…
Love the abundance thesis - but abundance ≠ nutrient density. USDA data show some crops now carry up to 90 % fewer key minerals than in 1950 (https://t.co/BNYjBIlBB6). No wonder the supplement aisle keeps booming https://t.co/Zs4OjqrbSQ
@lukecadell The nutrition decline is serious - 100% But just to add nuance to this claim: This claim comes from a study which analyzed nutrition data from 1950 to 1999 [1]. 1. https://t.co/RZzSCM4ifG
Source: https://t.co/z3tycb9gU8
The 2004 study cited (only one cited properly) does not support the claims in the article about soil health, which is their promotional thesis. The study also doesn't comment on whether differences are clinically significant. Since non-para stats rely on sign changes, this is esp important.
@dr_andrealove @DC4RFK For everyone who can’t use search engines. GE foods require more petrochemicals. Petrochemicals deplete soil health. Reduced soil health reduces nutritional uptake. https://t.co/QeCsG0XiX4 https://t.co/qbouNA7NI7 https://t.co/e4sJ8lm7eg https://t.co/ynlqPZTzb0
@FarmChicJodi @GregVerhasselt Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 Donald R Davis et al. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Dec.
Sources: https://t.co/9pofAwR3Sc https://t.co/HZugufVTYC https://t.co/5NCGQjKvns https://t.co/ElImc8kN8m
@agronomistag @AdamLasch1 @OldHollowTree There is clear evidence that the nutrient value of food has fallen over the past 50 years. https://t.co/Lye7j3JLcQ Also evidence that micro-nutrient deficiencies are widespread in practice. https://t.co/21nPHTD7Mm But no clear evidence (yet?) of deficiency on recommended diet.
@0xUltraInstinct @carmenleelau It does seem to be kind of true: https://t.co/ekSEVPPnQd However the 90% stat is for a certain subset of vegetables, and doesn't pass the sniff test. Also the original data is random government citations, so impossible to trace. https://t.co/COIUagRrP1 https://t.co/8iVDYPI9Bs
Post sur mon Instagram https://t.co/E5cyyMFCd9 Sources : Mayer 2022 : https://t.co/IhPy8IF1m5 Davis 2004 : https://t.co/VIzWQPAIBM Ekholm 2007 https://t.co/0nSte5kRWn White 2005 https://t.co/o3T4iZAh3P
Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999: Journal of the American College of Nutrition: Vol 23, No 6 https://t.co/sE6yaaVbmz
@RizomaSchool And vegetables have been bred for shelf stability and appearance + possibly are grown in different conditions than in the past so they have lower vitamin and mineral content https://t.co/Al7zvVFeKK
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 https://t.co/hThGashYUI
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 https://t.co/hThGashYUI
In 2004 a study of 43 vegetables were analysed comparing nutritional content in 1950 versus 1999. Calcium, phosphorus, iron, riboflavin, and vitamin C were all lower in 1999 with some only 6 per cent drop and others a 38 per cent drop. *Source https://t.co/nDgdtEvVe0
@pufadiluter https://t.co/r4EDW4N1db Sure! I've just started looking into this so I don't have a lot. Thats the paper for the second picture there, I can get the other one in the morning I can't find it right now
@jasperharl @ERM62 @sf2000b @CarnismDebunked https://t.co/0k8ClLwr1t
@jasperharl @ERM62 @sf2000b @CarnismDebunked Exaggerated scenarios
@NFTCriptoD70103 Não disse que eles não foram selecionados. Acontece que em relação a micro e macronutrientes eles são idênticos, com a diferença do aumento de gordura. Diferente dos vegetais, legumes e principalmente grãos, que estão perdendo nutrientes. https://t.co/9E1xc8Aea4
@ncdave4life @Willard1951 @GillesnFio @AGW_is_bad @Devonian1342 @Rabs1958 @Anvndarnamn5 @jpgcrowley @Anymous84861064 @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @S_D_Mannix @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 You need to do more research, e.g. - https://t.co/1vHfnffJrv - https://t.co/63l1VDINrg - https://t.co/kduMAUB9tv - https://t.co/Ljt4TwOzN7
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 https://t.co/7LRIOc6PYf
RT @kinoko_enfys: えー品種改良で耐寒性、防虫性、病気耐性、収量、味なんかをよくしていった結果としてそうなっちゃった説ない?と思ってたら、元の論文のアブストの結論がそんな感じだった https://t.co/CWpVpSiEGP https://t.co/aAb…
@JillBelch 'Conclusions: We suggest that any real declines are generally most easily explained by changes in cultivated varieties between 1950 and 1999, in which there may be trade-offs between yield and nutrient content.' https://t.co/z730FGVBEV
RT @kinoko_enfys: えー品種改良で耐寒性、防虫性、病気耐性、収量、味なんかをよくしていった結果としてそうなっちゃった説ない?と思ってたら、元の論文のアブストの結論がそんな感じだった https://t.co/CWpVpSiEGP https://t.co/aAb…
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 - PubMed https://t.co/XwzOvmDbly
えー品種改良で耐寒性、防虫性、病気耐性、収量、味なんかをよくしていった結果としてそうなっちゃった説ない?と思ってたら、元の論文のアブストの結論がそんな感じだった https://t.co/CWpVpSiEGP https://t.co/aAboG7pg3D https://t.co/Voa4E4tBtU
Plus all their vitamins are lower too because we wanted more sugar and shelf life. https://t.co/Xu4Dk9WnFC https://t.co/pqR2yKo4ma
@manoso_iqq @pran_dr https://t.co/GpSD9RLYwP 1. Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops 1950 to 1999. Journal of the american College of Nutrition, Vol. 23, No. 6, 669-683 (2004) 2.Composition of foods: raw, processed, prepared USDA Agriculture handbooks, 1950,
@nosweatswife https://t.co/U1fAFrIaGn
@Sazaron @AGAG_6 Il me semble qu'en 2004 nous en avions déjà de suffisamment bonnes. https://t.co/lceep72Ymh
@sergarellano
@juan_revenga @drop_of_chaos @farmagemma @lauracaorsi @beatrizcalidad @JulioBasulto_DN @Nutri_Daniel @jsanjosea @JesusSoriaD @Nutri_Sandra @gominolasdpetro @pzjarana (1) https://t.co/hglN5nrFb8 (2) https://t.co/AwgxpR4Beb (3) https://t.co/GL2A4sysyS (4) https://t.co/x87dfQpP9n
⬆️ 312
⬆️ 241
⬆️ 239
⬆️ 1
@stuartsmyth66 @cherofthenorth @KHefferon @thistlethecat @han_francis @GeneticLiteracy @Greenpeace https://t.co/ayAGxSBBC2
@MikeHudema This is called "hidden hunger" https://t.co/w4hZDZWgxE
@kelelaslung Cause Im bored and looking at quote tweets, no hate! But I would check these out, our food is actively less nutritious. https://t.co/nygGd51HOj https://t.co/KHqJJ56BQo
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
@EStafne @Botanygeek Another https://t.co/Ls2AK1BnOL
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
RT @KenDBerryMD: The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86
The human desire for food to be big, pretty, tasty, & fast led to a decrease in nutrient density https://t.co/fBt6nZXj86 https://t.co/7fzLzs2DDZ
@FarmChicJodi Not sure how he's defining "nutrient density," but drops in various nutrients are well documented. See https://t.co/2rxfaGXsxE and https://t.co/xA5cdNQOSF.
RT @WandlerChillums: @Markmid1 @samdknowlton https://t.co/HQHZXUCUFt Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999
https://t.co/1UDGgkvscP… Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999 https://t.co/Zybzdi1BzF
@mrc314 @lowcarbGP Get access rather than a paywall: https://t.co/YClEHMP4Po Add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles to promote scholarly communication
@wyadvd @lowcarbGP Pro: https://t.co/Lsv78kVFmH Con: https://t.co/agf5Yl27qm
@lowcarbGP https://t.co/Cwafyshpud "We suggest that any real declines are generally most easily explained by changes in cultivated varieties between 1950 and 1999"
RT @WandlerChillums: @Markmid1 @samdknowlton https://t.co/HQHZXUCUFt Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999
@Markmid1 @samdknowlton https://t.co/HQHZXUCUFt Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999
@MicWelshman @kylenabecker @guardian Plenty of sources on this https://t.co/bhE0QjkBjH
RT @SospechosoUsual: Al igual que en la película, oímos a menudo estas quejas. ¿Qué hay de real? Pues hay estudios que demuestran una consi…
Which also means that the animals grown on farms are also not getting enough nutrient dense foods either. Deep dive here: https://t.co/uOEQtvA0nG
Al igual que en la película, oímos a menudo estas quejas. ¿Qué hay de real? Pues hay estudios que demuestran una considerable pérdida de nutrientes en los alimentos debido a la degradación del suelo por sobreexplotación https://t.co/HPnSF6ddGw
@bitcoinand_beef @CarniClemenza not exactly the OP but "Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950-1999" has similar data, is very good and thorough and stays away from making causative statements (I lean toward the OP's explanation though personally) https://t.co/1cP0mftF5x
RT @HumanWhit: A 2004 US study found important nutrients in some garden crops are up to 38% lower than there were at the middle of the 20th…
A 2004 US study found important nutrients in some garden crops are up to 38% lower than there were at the middle of the 20th Century. https://t.co/6BBKyInSoZ
RT @mariaKhalusova: Did you know that the nutrient content of 43 garden crops declined between 1950 and 1999? Turns out that decades of op…
Did you know that the nutrient content of 43 garden crops declined between 1950 and 1999? Turns out that decades of optimizing for high yields, uniform appearance, and ship-ability come at a cost of both flavor and nutrition. https://t.co/H5zas9Z7uZ
@mirontboland @aaronhoyland https://t.co/fFV18lXBys
@RicardoMedinaCs @dnunezch @LuluRamirez13 @PedroCastilloTe Si leemos un poco, por citar un ejemplo la del istituto de Wichita en Kansas, se observa claramente que el valor de los nutrientes de varias frutas y verduras en los años 50 y los de ahora han disminuído considerablemente. https://t.co/rUF0Oi1BOs
@Ondrej_Snobl @m_Nevesta @MichalSojka10 https://t.co/gwAHmAhwL3, https://t.co/h83wzoCYcY apod.) . Pak je ještě spousta jiných faktorů jako třeba to, že ubývá živin z potravy (https://t.co/KmKIbEOp23, https://t.co/CAkZjnFhOl). Sice se člověk může snažit vyhýbat “prázdným” kaloriím, ale když i zelenina a ovoce má míň
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
@mge_de @MrSandoron @Schtevnikov @ProgAgrarwende @maithi_nk @Kurz_Gesagt lange frisch auszusehen, leicht pflückbar und besonders resistent zu sein. Durch diese Anbau- und Züchtungsmethoden verlieren Lebensmittel einen enormen Anteil ihrer Nährstoffe. Hier eine exemplarische Studie zum Thema https://t.co/2VsZMwavcb Weiterhin werden
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
RT @DoctorAnarchist: Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughl…
Fruit is no better than candy. Our food has less nutrients than ever before, however the macronutrients remain roughly the same. Fruits are especially high in sugar. What do you call a sugary food with little nutritional value? Candy. https://t.co/rpDGz2ptv2
@mell0wbr1ckroad Apparently it comes from a 2004 study (https://t.co/fr720KGL5R), and it's occasionally made headlines in publications such as the BBC, Politico, Nat Geo, Scientific American, etc., over the last 5 years. I can't imagine that the situation has improved in the last 20 years.
@ncdave4life @MustBeJoshing @Climatehope2 @Winston43105474 @ItsTheAtmospher @priscian @Dannyboy7293 @Jaisans @WillWat6 @Ceist8 @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @jbonbon91 @EricWil06256732 @JimBowersclimb @DarthFeodor @TWTThisIsNow @glinch72 @BradPKeyes @atherton_chris @3GHtweets @DGinCheshire @BointonGiles @TobyRayEnglish @AuroriaTwittori @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Willard1951 @Anvndarnamn5 @BailFund_Brawl @AristotleMrs @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @ammocrypta @DTGvmd @wille99 @PaulDFarrar @TheDisproof @Veritatem2021 @Data79504085 @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 @drochir_thonnuk @paulp1232 @ShroedingerBird @J0aquIm_B4rb0s4 @Sky48115666 @0Sundance https://t.co/bhE0Qjl99f
@raymond_glass @Veritatem2021 @ncdave4life https://t.co/bhE0Qjl99f
@Veritatem2021 https://t.co/bhE0QjCcbf
@Vertumne1 Ca ressemble à celle-ci : https://t.co/rueGI3D0f1
Me quiero volver chango. Este estudio (que no van a revisar) revela que la calidad de las verduras viene en declive desde hace varias décadas. Comer verduras es menos nutritivo ahora de lo que era antes. https://t.co/Sy1rLUgx1N
https://t.co/HFc9ssCn3y
@AWP_BackCountry @copseworker @CEN_HQ From the actual paper cited in that article https://t.co/1NdRoJRp1O https://t.co/Qc5Ub8jVxi
@Diharack Uno de los artículos citados menciona esto claramente pero el artículo del NG pasa de puntillas sobre el asunto, porque eso no se va a arreglar, hay mucha gente a la que dar de comer (el artículo es este: https://t.co/68OwBLIcLD )
Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999 https://t.co/WOSprp6OqU
RT @arguablywrong: @gcochran99 @JesseLucasSaga @nomanautomaton @eigenrobot @ujkf99 This is the best data I’ve seen on it: https://t.co/KMa…
@BowTiedHandyman I’m going to be that guy and say “Google it” But https://t.co/p4fG9xt8Td
@gcochran99 @JesseLucasSaga @nomanautomaton @eigenrobot @ujkf99 This is the best data I’ve seen on it: https://t.co/KMaMaAhd6F
@ozlemyildiz1881 https://t.co/Qn31mCt0c7
RT @HarmlessYardDog: Links https://t.co/4EudgBktm1 https://t.co/UFCvtXRYkl
RT @HarmlessYardDog: Links https://t.co/4EudgBktm1 https://t.co/UFCvtXRYkl
Links https://t.co/4EudgBktm1 https://t.co/UFCvtXRYkl
@SSTSundhed Nogle forskere mener at én af flere årsager til øget overvægt blandt andet kan være CO^2 mængden i atmosfæren. Planter dyrket i CO^2 mættet miljø har færrere proteiner og vitaminer over vægt. https://t.co/ZMGAMm5lsp https://t.co/Apnl7sKZxs Personligt ansvar...
@MoonJoo4U Nogle forskere mener at én af flere årsager til øget overvægt blandt andet kan være CO^2 mængden i atmosfæren. Planter dyrket i CO^2 mættet miljø har færrere proteiner og vitaminer over vægt. https://t.co/ZMGAMm5lsp https://t.co/Apnl7sKZxs Personligt ansvar...
Journal of the American College of Nutrition- Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999: https://t.co/PgcazF90DU
Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999: Journal of the American College of Nutrition: Vol 23, No 6 https://t.co/vUg5w94TRR
@QuantumTessera @evan7257 Here's the cited source. https://t.co/Syd0KgqGkL "We suggest that any real declines are generally most easily explained by changes in cultivated varieties between 1950 and 1999, in which there may be trade-offs between yield and nutrient content."
RT @bateko71: Defecto de nutrientes en 43 cultivos y posibles causas. La principal exceso de carbono atmosférico. https://t.co/f3BVUVgpAd
Defecto de nutrientes en 43 cultivos y posibles causas. La principal exceso de carbono atmosférico. https://t.co/f3BVUVgpAd
Another study looked at
@dmmfll What do you think about the claim that modern agribiz's soil depletion and preference for high yield cultivars have lowered nutritional content of fruits + veggies compared to what we had 50 or so years ago? https://t.co/Fg7oBykX79
@jmmulet Según dicho programa uno de los defensores de tal escenario es el señor Donald R. Davis. Expone sus "hallazgos" en el artículo del 2004, "Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 Garden Crops, 1950 to 1999". Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 23(6), 669–682.
@F_Guesdon_1 @Botanygeek @OnParrAgra In many places, nutritionist is not a protected title. The article references a study in the Journal of American College of Nutrition where there is no consistent trend for individual foods. Sometimes nutrient content was higher, sometimes not. https://t.co/U2AKM6FvcV
RT @hexaOrthorexia: #followerpower Suche Langzeitvergleiche zu Nährwerten von Gemüse/Obst wie hier: https://t.co/WMxV1MglzK bzw. https://t…
RT @hexaOrthorexia: #followerpower Suche Langzeitvergleiche zu Nährwerten von Gemüse/Obst wie hier: https://t.co/WMxV1MglzK bzw. https://t…
RT @hexaOrthorexia: #followerpower Suche Langzeitvergleiche zu Nährwerten von Gemüse/Obst wie hier: https://t.co/WMxV1MglzK bzw. https://t…
#followerpower Suche Langzeitvergleiche zu Nährwerten von Gemüse/Obst wie hier: https://t.co/WMxV1MglzK bzw. https://t.co/g3s76jfFfk In DE und CH soll so etwas vor einigen Jahren auch gemacht worden sein, ich finde aber die entsprechenden Arbeiten nicht. Danke!
@scottpaul6658 @medrazic 1) Les articles originaux scientifiques cités par Cash investigation datent de 1997 Mayer et al. et 2004-2007 Davis. Rien de nouveau sous le soleil. Ça fait un moment que j'ai analysé ce sujet https://t.co/dGILqaPxea
@ArakasiAcoma @Mekkiceh @DurocYann cf. Donald R Davis et Al. Changes in USDA Food Composition Data for 43 GardenCrops, 1950 to 1999 in Journal of the American College of Nutrition 23(6):669-82 · December 2004 https://t.co/ooMBEQN4ER
@FarmChicJodi Hello, Jodi. This is the journal article that was behind the blog piece: https://t.co/ptqm9LqjIU
KM
DM
BB
T
PK
EC
Q
S
D
GQ
JR
JB
RH
AM
FO
N
EW
L
FG
ᵢ
TR
OK
MJ
GR
K
S
ぱ
MP
上き
A
CD
VC
Y
DP
OR
R
L
LZ
A
B
E
GD
CC
FC
LJ
RP
TP
TP
V
L
SS
JS
SB
B
OK
A
MO
H
A
MK
R
E
D
IT
HC
SG
KM
S
MW
C
LL
UC
KM
AP
CA
?
BS
DF
M
K
FA
DC
T
CA
O
AC
HC
BB
AW
EG
MB
C
DD
PB
I
CR
C
JS
AV
JA
CB
I
E
PD
H
LQ
HI