RT @RosanaFerrero: "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False", de John Ioannidis. Lejos de ser un ataque a la ciencia, reflexionemos…
view full post

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False", de John Ioannidis. Lejos de ser un ataque a la ciencia, reflexionemos sobre
view full post

@simonmaechling So I can assume this author did a reasonable job in his study suggesting most published findings are false ? https://t.co/WfOkTzZNxR.
view full post

Who are anti-vaxxers? Why does DR Stone deny fraud in mainstream science? Why does he fail to address info like this ? In real life I know loads of vaccine injured people. That reality is kicking in now. https://t.co/F5H0quGFBD https://t.co/3a0ijGL2fW https://t.co/lCABiv6ESB https://t.co/d7iEFUvLL6
view full post

https://t.co/G3hVKVQqKR
view full post

https://t.co/G3hVKVQYAp
view full post

@mirage94266 Based on your posts about AI history, research biases, and quant finance, dive into the "Replication Crisis" in psychology and social sciences. Start with John Ioannidis' paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005), then explore p-hacking via Andrew Gelman's
view full post

@matsciguycanada @_Truthster @StillDizzy2 @KatAMiller10 @Cern_IXXI @bex_fur @A_Damned_mk2 @OnlyaMoment3 @magicaltime123 @Wolfpak561 @HarveyWall15 @Covidtalk1 @TBRagsdale1 @Bumpalump99 @BrianNazarenus @willsworldview @kim_because @NHoomans @ro_zaff2023 @TertiusIV @Akinyemisback @orna_verum @AllTheThings79 @wisemanryder @gvnzng @itisjustmebabe @randomizer88996 @timmbosliceeee @wiorldpease @MM66680 @jokat6158 @MindfulDamage @badgervindaloo @EFJ1980 @zypisfy @Janetb172 @SecularSmurfAU @Avic_Wins @1pckt @TJMair @TheCookieSavior @VinceGottalotta @RayleneMason_ @giddy_bunny @SecularSmurf @BrackardsWrench @IrisB42744268 @Conserberal @OpenlyReasoned Data sets are subject to interpretation and theory-building. Also data sets can be too small or non-representative. Did we talk about Ioannidis' paper yet? https://t.co/JF0F8DrnMg
view full post

https://t.co/zvm21E63uh
view full post

@MT_urawatomiki Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. JAMA Intern Med (2016). Ioannidis JP. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med (2005). Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science (2015). —— もっと具体的な「論文→
view full post

@MT_urawatomiki の研究プログラムを資金提供・操作していたことを文書で示したケーススタディ。業界資金が研究議論を長期にわたり歪めうる具体例。 4. 研究の構造的脆弱性（Ioannidis, PLoS Med 2005 — “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”） → 小標本・選択的報告・研究者のバイアスなどの一般的→
view full post

I think the “why most published research findings are false” paper suggests this as one of the heuristics for identifying “false” findings.
view full post

@labsarekindest @KrutikaKuppalli @BillCassidy https://t.co/S8XOMPEhMM
view full post

@Bumpalump99 @Akinyemisback @BrianNazarenus @willsworldview @OnlyaMoment3 @kim_because @NHoomans @ro_zaff2023 @TertiusIV @bex_fur @A_Damned_mk2 @Covidtalk1 @orna_verum @magicaltime123 @AllTheThings79 @TBRagsdale1 @matsciguycanada @wisemanryder @gvnzng @itisjustmebabe @randomizer88996 @HarveyWall15 @Cern_IXXI @Wolfpak561 @timmbosliceeee @wiorldpease @MM66680 @KatAMiller10 @jokat6158 @_Truthster @StillDizzy2 @MindfulDamage @badgervindaloo @EFJ1980 @zypisfy @Janetb172 @SecularSmurfAU @Avic_Wins @1pckt @TJMair @TheCookieSavior @VinceGottalotta @RayleneMason_ @giddy_bunny @SecularSmurf @BrackardsWrench @IrisB42744268 @Conserberal @OpenlyReasoned Did you read the paper by Ioannidis? Let's make sure we understand what science even is first, then it will become clear that it requires a certain acceptance of it's epistemic assumptions. https://t.co/JF0F8DrnMg
view full post

@matsciguycanada @OnlyaMoment3 @magicaltime123 @_Truthster @HarveyWall15 @Bumpalump99 @BrianNazarenus @willsworldview @kim_because @NHoomans @ro_zaff2023 @TertiusIV @bex_fur @A_Damned_mk2 @Akinyemisback @Covidtalk1 @orna_verum @AllTheThings79 @TBRagsdale1 @wisemanryder @gvnzng @itisjustmebabe @randomizer88996 @Cern_IXXI @Wolfpak561 @timmbosliceeee @wiorldpease @MM66680 @KatAMiller10 @jokat6158 @StillDizzy2 @MindfulDamage @badgervindaloo @EFJ1980 @zypisfy @Janetb172 @SecularSmurfAU @Avic_Wins @1pckt @TJMair @TheCookieSavior @VinceGottalotta @RayleneMason_ @giddy_bunny @SecularSmurf @BrackardsWrench @IrisB42744268 @Conserberal @OpenlyReasoned Did you read the paper by Ioannidis? https://t.co/JF0F8DrnMg
view full post

@badgervindaloo @matsciguycanada @Akinyemisback @Bumpalump99 @BrianNazarenus @willsworldview @OnlyaMoment3 @kim_because @NHoomans @ro_zaff2023 @TertiusIV @bex_fur @A_Damned_mk2 @Covidtalk1 @orna_verum @magicaltime123 @AllTheThings79 @TBRagsdale1 @wisemanryder @gvnzng @itisjustmebabe @randomizer88996 @HarveyWall15 @Cern_IXXI @Wolfpak561 @timmbosliceeee @wiorldpease @MM66680 @KatAMiller10 @jokat6158 @_Truthster @StillDizzy2 @MindfulDamage @EFJ1980 @zypisfy @Janetb172 @SecularSmurfAU @Avic_Wins @1pckt @TJMair @TheCookieSavior @VinceGottalotta @RayleneMason_ @giddy_bunny @SecularSmurf @BrackardsWrench @IrisB42744268 @Conserberal @OpenlyReasoned Why do I care if you mute me? That's your concern not mine. Science is a methodology based on various epistemic assumptions which haven't been entirely consistent by the way. Were you not here for the paper I shared by Ioannidis "Why Most Published Re
view full post

@abc098788 @IanCopeland5 @LilyKittyCat09 @ghostofwillwall Doesn’t matter the journal they all have fraud! John Ioannidis, epidemiologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, published an article titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” https://t.co/lrtlhk5bfv
view full post

@Christophe37461 https://t.co/aIZqcxykZO
view full post

@sir_conspiracy @simonmaechling John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, published“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” which subsequently became the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://t.co/lrtlhk5bfv
view full post

"Years after Brigham-Harvard scandal, U.S. pours millions into tainted stem-cell field" www.reuters.com/investigates... A bit outdated news Fabricated data in most research fields Reminds me of the following article "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" journals.plos.org/plosmedicine...
view full post

@IanCopeland5 Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (NIH, 2005) https://t.co/qF10KJhnpu
view full post

@huonemies @PuolimatkaTapio Kukaan ei tiedä kaikesta kaikkea ja siksipä juuri fysiikan nobelisti käyttää järkeään, sillä: "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (vertaisarvioitu tutkimus, John Ioannidis 30.8.2005)
view full post

@AnnaAfursin1 @PuolimatkaTapio "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"(2005 Aug 30, John Ioannidis)
view full post

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is a 2005 essay written by John Ioannidis, a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine, and published in PLOS Medicine. It is considered foundational to the field of metascience. And now AI Is Supercharging Scientific Fraud.
view full post

@_HeartofGrace_ And then comes the problem of methodology of research itself. Referencing - Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John P A Ioannidis
view full post

@Saganismm Blasphemy. https://t.co/JF0F8DrnMg
view full post

@FredHikes @dirk_fasshauer @FiendInno @NoKings_4_USA @StillDizzy2 @randomizer88996 @ahrehead @A_Damned_mk2 @Emperor_Mollari @MidgardNextStop @OddBackgrowy @zypisfy @PatricktheB @MindfulDamage @AllTheThings79 @TW175663056 @TBRagsdale1 @bex_fur @MucusMucous1 @KenWali1 @1eyedwilly56 @SecularSmurfAU @MichaelSteidel @mirandaisrisen @FuckFascists101 @gdoughdoc2 @NHoomans @MALpoolmaint @Janetb172 @IMudlet @ro_zaff2023 @TertiusIV @murphy_oce80430 @BrianNazarenus @JesusGibb @enitas13 @SecularSmurf @matsciguycanada @IrisB42744268 @RealDevil1978 @MilesMosley6662 @JUReality @impeachqueen @J_R_Eldridge @pray2pesci @wrongwaywilly56 @shock_hazard @GeneralPopulous Here is a very interesting paper on this subject https://t.co/JF0F8DrnMg
view full post

Medicine https://t.co/tWnBjnQVal https://t.co/lvgmKKs9G2
view full post

@Moshe_Friedman_ @yoavgo @Gvpx123 זה לא מה שעומד במרכז המאמר של איונידיס? Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
view full post

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" em um gráfico: https://t.co/Fral7UofSX
view full post

Science Education: Source: ChatGPT: Read John Ioannidis Book: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False "He demonstrated mathematically that most medical studies are likely false due to design flaws and incentives that favor positive results."..it became one of the most
view full post

Science Education: Source: ChatGPT: Read John Ioannidis Book: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False "He demonstrated mathematically that most medical studies are likely false due to design flaws and incentives that favor positive results."..it became one of the most
view full post

Science Education: Read John Ioannidis Book: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
view full post

@TorGHeggem @RealRoald The Sience!!! Og disse er ikke engang aktivister. https://t.co/OmOQjHDFxb https://t.co/7zGuHwi7AA
view full post

RT @IntegralAnswers: 23/ Bias, Replication & Over-Interpretation 16.Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med…
view full post

23/ Bias, Replication & Over-Interpretation 16.Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124.
view full post

@Vanusvik @OttenHM @Mantingerveld Ga de wetenschap volgen, man... https://t.co/ieW2kRoyhB Follow the science, but....
view full post

Peer review is often a fraud. https://t.co/lCABiv6ESB https://t.co/86ZQwv7GQJ
view full post

Not sure why @simonmaechling makes thee generic statements that fly in the face of overwhelming evidence of scientific fraud? what does he hope to gain * who are his target audience? https://t.co/lCABiv6733 https://t.co/mukamv1PQH
view full post

@WSWayland So, this is based on your research of a body of published studies of which most of the findings are *known to be false* You rely on a method of science which has disproved itself...have you tried @TheDavidWeck RMT & rope flow? What does N=1 teach you? https://t.co/ffhLrbioz7 https://t.co/YdC7BnuXZu
view full post

@CesaIrene By default, one should treat as false any data-based research finding. https://t.co/iLOdfjNctA #EvidenceBasedReasoning^2
view full post

@DEVP_GANESH @svembu That's because we think of these "large, peer-reviewed studies" as some kind of gold standard. Prof. John Ioannidis' (Stanford School of Medicine) celebrated essay of 2005 established they're not: https://t.co/1foYQ5AW54
view full post

RT @georgetolisjr: 20 years old but so relevant today… https://t.co/ZdkNpiDaTg
view full post

20 years old but so relevant today… https://t.co/ZdkNpiDaTg https://t.co/q6rS4Fjam6
view full post

@AlBowers11 @19joho @FiveTimesAugust @NIHDirector_Jay @VPrasadMDMPH @DrMakaryFDA I WIN!
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

Why do you think Ioannidis wrote most research is false? It’s been 20years and things still haven’t changed. https://t.co/poGYfPC75h https://t.co/sH5JAMRB26
view full post

@ArtemisConsort The timing feels right to discuss a seminal paper, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" by Ioannidis. Have you had a chance to read it? A 6-page read that exposes the critical flaws: selective reporting (highlighting only favorable results) or p-hacking (manipulating
view full post

@simonmaechling Truth is not determined by consensus…semantically, or otherwise. Consistently false? Does Ioaniddis’s “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” mean anything to you? Or “group-serving dishonesty”? Perhaps they should mean…more, in the very least.
view full post

@grok @PLAYERLOLO21 @sergiodde Oui mais cette idéologie est actuellement en cours en utilisant des données biologiques biaisées que tu répètes en boucles alors que tu pourrais citer l'article de John Ioannidis:" Why most published research findings are false?" Ce serait scientifique aussi, non?
view full post

@peterproctor @antiDogmaDr @chris_darnielle @simonmaechling John Ioannidis’ classic paper Why Most Published Research Findings Are False showed how financial incentives and publication bias distort results -especially in medicine. Perhaps you’re just blinded by the illusion of 'consensus' that money buys.
view full post

@DucHoan07242344 @BioProtocol
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | PLOS Medicine ⁦@bakhsh_reda⁩
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

@ophello @jsm2334 Are you claiming that these studies have no flaws? And what are the flaws in this study? https://t.co/AQ4ETOMy00
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John Ioannidis from Stanford is a compelling read, exploring bias, conflicts of interest, and more.
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John Ioannidis from Stanford is a compelling read, exploring bias, conflicts of interest, and more.
view full post

@SampsaMakela @veitera @huppupelikaani Juuri niin se tekee, ja tuosta "luotettavuusilmiöstä" kertoo mm. eniten siteerattu lääketieteen tutkija John Ioannidis: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (PLoS Med. 2005 Aug 30).
view full post

@maenen1949 @FrankPeeters4 Naast het Asch dynamieken argument van @FrankPeeters4 gooit U er nog even de Milgram dynamieken bovenop. QED. https://t.co/1PohXGVuNh
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

RT @looper2day: @therealRYC @Nature Top cited article in all of modern medicine is “Why Most Published Research Studies Are False” (2005).…
view full post

@therealRYC @Nature Top cited article in all of modern medicine is “Why Most Published Research Studies Are False” (2005). https://t.co/VODfAPnCMP
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

RT @realPatrickJr: Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this c…
view full post

Yesterday @ScottAdamsSays asked: How can AI ever be a good doctor if half of its “training data” is false? Watch this clip, then check my follow-up comment about the Stanford professor who predicted this problem 20 years ago in “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” https://t.co/QLjrp5kv0h
view full post

@grok @JamesMarsh79 How will LLMs excel if the paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" by John P. A. Ioannidis true ?
view full post

@BobKerns @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim Reality’s not the arbiter. A ‘manipulated perception’ of reality is. Science is easily falsified. People who believe science is trustworthy, willingly submit their life as the wager of that belief. True or false reality is frequency-based & discernible. https://t.co/vYjItJV2E2 https://t.co/CYkvCXMGC4
view full post

@grok @muggie_co @brewmarkets Again @grok don't be a yes man. Just because someone, sometime made a study doesnt prove it's universally true. Bezos as unoriginal one can be, reproduces incomplete studies. @grok are you aware that most published research findings are false? doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
view full post

@calleymeans Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
view full post

@calleymeans I’m actually drafting a tweet about this very problem — Stanford medical professor John Ioannidis published in PLOS twenty year ago, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" So the next time someone sends you a PUBMED link, remember Professor John.
view full post

@calleymeans Horton is correct, but being too soft here. How about Dr. Ioannides, PLOS (2005), why most published findings are false. https://t.co/dn9kzRBxmn
view full post

@Peter_Fitz You have no idea about academia. Have you heard of the replication crisis or "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" by John Ioannidis. How about the Alzheimer's research fraud or "close to 90% of cancer biology publications are irreproducible" https://t.co/tQxLrYalpi).
view full post

@RizomaSchool @jcberglund https://t.co/jZh8UBiesR
view full post

@ohiovoter4145 @simonmaechling Keep up the fantasy, false science is depending on it. “There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false” https://t.co/vYjItJV2E2 https://t.co/6PFnz8V82A
view full post

@Dr_JDietrich @MakisMedicine How "studied" are the current cancer treatments??
view full post

@jediramza @Healingisfree The claim stems from a 2005 paper by John Ioannidis titled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," which argues that biases, small studies, and flexible analyses can lead to many false positives in research. It's influential but debated— not all fields are equally
view full post

@koupa_assos @hellaspecial Ο Ιωάννης Ιωαννίδης είναι καθηγητής Ιατρικής στο Stanford, με εστίαση στην επιδημιολογία και τη μετα-έρευνα. Διάσημος για το άρθρο "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005). h-index: 272, συνολικές αναφορές: >650.000 (Google Scholar). Θεωρείται από τους κορυφαίους
view full post

@mCasual1 Your satire on peer review's "malin plaisir"—demanding exhaustive scrutiny (data, donors, calibrations, even assistants' rap sheets and sneaker brands)—echoes Ioannidis' "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005), highlighting replication crises amid overzealous
view full post

@chkdsk99 Show them John Ionnadis' 2005 paper. https://t.co/CVPEfpASIH
view full post

@feelthebyrn1 @SciTriat Ioannidis 2005 on why most published research findings are false. Hurts the head but worth a read.
view full post

@MrPerson36581 @richjayonx @BadAceMike @Strandjunker https://t.co/5kXeyIxDYw
view full post

@DonaldW60852684 @profstonge Probably from this: https://t.co/7C0mLgJNWE /1
view full post

This classic was published 20 years ago. https://t.co/05mKuD476r
view full post

@claudiorlandi bro... ALL academic journals are a circle jerk. we discovered the crisis in 2005, nobody has done anything about it. https://t.co/sixZaiET6l
view full post

@Wee_Cee00 @JennSedlerMD @apathymiller I don't live for professional medicine and research which is mostly a scam. I live for myself. The majority of research results are non-replicable. And most published research findings are false: https://t.co/AQ4ETOMy00
view full post

@realPatrickJr @TroubledTribbs @harryfisherEMTP John Ioannidis is a Greek-American physician-scientist and Stanford professor known for work in evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, and metascience. His most popular essay is "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005, PLOS Medicine), arguing that factors like
view full post

@veitera @LiukkonenJuuso @grok Voi jopa olla rahoittajavetoista"tieteellistä" tutkimusta,mikä näkyy tuloksissa. Arvostettu lääketieteen tutkija John Ioannidis kirjoittaa: "Why MOST Published Research Findings Are False"ja mm."Bias can entail manipulation in the analysis or reporting of findings" Med2(8):e124
view full post

@SaiKate108 @jsm2334 Just because a study is published doesn’t make it true. https://t.co/8lheRFe6FD Each study needs to be probed for its validity Post publication peer review is an important quality control of the scientific method. https://t.co/OkLAkukAe5
view full post

Science is being used to control the people and dictate what is unfolding, yet what if much of science being published and shared is false? Don't believe me, read this article from 2005 https://t.co/euofg6gCOX
view full post

@cynicalAxolotl @DonShlonzo @LibertyHannes Bias und Subjektivität sind wahrscheinlich die größten Probleme mit der "Wissenschaft" und peer review. Ein relativ zeitnahes Beispiel ist Niel Ferguson und sein COVID-Modell. https://t.co/NtkyVX6MKe https://t.co/0VdxFe5YBc
view full post

@ShahdMoham15031 @UncensoredAm @MyronGainesX @UofSC so you are asking for a study that says most studies are false. here it is woman https://t.co/JetFSCAg6e
view full post

PLOS Medicine Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://t.co/wg32hI3DLN
view full post

ほとんどの研究結果は偽物 https://t.co/2nPY7AmmFI
view full post

@cowtow222 I do recommend his seminal 2005 paper tho. You might also like his "cookbook paper" https://t.co/tWnBjnRsZT
view full post

RT @LloydDurwin: @WallStreetApes Over 50% corruption is backed by John Ioannidis' 2005 paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are Fals…
view full post

@AmbroserayRay @JoshWalkos It does matter if you are interested in finding the truth for the cause of the “bright blinking light”. What if there are errors in the methodology biasing the results? Even peer-reviewed publications can be wrong. https://t.co/8lheRFeEvb
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://t.co/f5sN2H2TEL
view full post

@1in5advocacy @cantharellusc @CBHeresy @grok Firstly, beware of what you think is "research." Very many supposedly scientific papers/studies are not valid or reliable. Begin with reading works by John Ioannidis, which explain why most published research findings are false. Then you can learn to tell the difference.
view full post

Over 50% corruption is backed by John Ioannidis' 2005 paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," estimating false positives in 80% of non-randomized studies due to p-hacking (https://t.co/s3RttAqhtV). A 2018 Nature survey of 1,576 researchers found 70% couldn't https://t.co/t0wXwxonbN
view full post

@WallStreetApes Over 50% corruption is backed by John Ioannidis' 2005 paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," estimating false positives in 80% of non-randomized studies due to p-hacking (https://t.co/s3RttAqhtV). A 2018 Nature survey of 1,576 researchers found 70% couldn't
view full post

@baard2000 @_HeartofGrace_ 4 Ioannidis: "Why most published research findings are false" That time 70-90%, after 2020 even much higher. Scientist, in particular academia dislike these fact ... And tend to disregard that most publications are useless.
view full post

@obiuan78 @Adriano72197026 Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," E' uno dei libri più letti in ambito scientifico. Poi Lancet ha pubblicato il falso studio sullo efficacia dell'idrossiclorochina. Meglio affidarsi al buon senso...
view full post

@rencar130 @LucciaorLucy @jakescottMD @thekibosch https://t.co/76AQbbS4rx https://t.co/z6Z4gWZrDz
view full post

@konznho @chn56_ @blognaointendo Se vc realmente acredita que a qualidade dos artigos está melhorando ou mesmo não mudou, Jovencito. Não argumentarei, deixarei aqui algo que você, como pesquisador, deveria ter lido: https://t.co/w7JoRJroi2
view full post

@Krog2025 @Tablesalt13 @MRolly19 The study you might be referring to is John Ioannidis' 2005 paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False," which shows many peer-reviewed findings are unreliable due to biases and stats issues. If about non-peer-reviewed work, a 2021 analysis found ~60% of preprints
view full post

@saraatayan @Ervin_dearcelo2 اتفاقاً... مقالات دانشگاهی سراسر اشکال هستن. یکی از معروف‌ترین مقالات دانشگاهی جهان سال ۲۰۰۵ منتشر شد و عنوانش اینه که «چرا بیشتر یافته‌های پژوهشی اشتباهند» و یه جورایی میشه گفت یکی از تاریخ‌سازترین مقالات سی سال اخیر بوده. (این مقاله ۱۴۶۶۱ سایتیشن داره!) https://t.co/4m5MSVHEsz
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - John P. A. Ioannidis Published: August 30, 2005, by @hedleyrees https://t.co/DTmI1Utsqf
view full post

@AstrellaVt @AngeIiko @esjesjesj Lol the timing is coincidental because it's causational. The fact that they don't allow studies that would confirm these kind of things to be done is not surprising when you understand that "the science" is primarily profit driven & ideologically captured. https://t.co/BRLy5Sjwux
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - John P. A. Ioannidis Published: August 30, 2005 https://t.co/27pUPHWQnD
view full post

@CoggleMaggie @Lord_Woodsy @IainDale Lot's of people are "fans", including John Ioannidis, whose 2005 essay "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" was the most-accessed article in the history of Public Library of Science (PLOS) as of 2020
view full post

@ScienceNews John Ioannidis's landmark 2005 paper 'Why Most Published Research Findings Are False' transformed scientific methodology. Rigorous standards and pre-registered trials have dramatically improved reproducibility rates in the decade since.
view full post

@DOGEQEEN Bye, bye... I don't want to be dragged into the Germ THEORY... Do they understand a theory is not proven? Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://t.co/BmEKWQZpuS. https://t.co/3k0olmrjkA
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | PLOS Medicine https://t.co/nAObOXPv6c
view full post

@BowTiedLoon @AJA_Cortes I'm talking about Pubmed being garbage in garbage out. https://t.co/vUI0C30uHV Written 20 years ago, still has relevance unfortunately. I'm a fan of AJAC btw.
view full post

@AstrellaVt @AngeIiko @esjesjesj That's what you're choosing to read into what I'm saying. Most research is not replicable & the more money that is tied to the outcome of a particular study, the higher the likelihood that it's agenda driven nonsense. https://t.co/BRLy5SiYEZ
view full post

RT @BertBervoets: Wetenschap als religie/dogma Het Verraad van de Intellectuelen https://t.co/mSu7kpZ1aM The Intellectual Yet Idiot https…
view full post

@RizomaSchool @jimbutlr https://t.co/jZh8UBiesR
view full post

RT @coreisma: @Tokyogreen @spidercatnz This is why you need to understand and be able to articulate the research method used if you're goin…
view full post

@Tokyogreen @spidercatnz This is why you need to understand and be able to articulate the research method used if you're going to reference an article; Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | PLOS Medicine https://t.co/iGgyV4Cytk TL;DR: most are bunkum
view full post

Esse disclaimer é importante não só porque profissionais utilizam argumentos como esse para tentar defender suas crenças… Como também porque temos como ponto pacífico que boa parte dos artigos publicados apresenta uma aferição incorreta da realidade. https://t.co/K7MxdY8TYD
view full post

@MGCXIII @ArchTheAtheist @AiG No conspiracy, if you were educated you'd already know this. Ironic it's a research paper but there you go. The 'peer reviews system is a bad joke. https://t.co/dlDJRV5vyL
view full post

@alexisschitt @grok @DrDavidNL @baard2000 And then? Simple minded people think: Peer reviewed is good. But this is not true. Ioannidis: "Why most published research findings are false" Nearly all were peer-reviewed!
view full post

@TheChiefNerd Psychiatry and Pharma is fake science - anyone with deep science understanding knows this ..SSRI is tip of a large iceberg. Read John P.A. Ioannidis (Stanford University)“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”.
view full post

Adjust your Bayesian priors. Most published research is wrong. DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 There is more fraud & error in nutrition than other domains. Nutrition has been corrupted by antihuman vegans, religious zealots, equity enjoyers & commercial interests. https://t.co/ok8YY7E0Sp
view full post

Adjust your Bayesian priors. Most published research is wrong. DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 There is more fraud & error in nutrition is than other domains. Nutrition has been corrupted by antihuman vegans, religious zealots, equity enjoyers & commercial interests. https://t.co/ok8YY7E0Sp
view full post

@literalbanana Most published research is wrong. DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 The rate of fraud & error is higher in nutrition research than other areas of medicine. The field of nutrition has been corrupted by antihuman vegans, religious zealots, equity enjoyers & commercial interests. https://t.co/GIYqw8IJn3
view full post

@ShachamAzriel https://t.co/YDZAVLKVTF
view full post

RT @c_plushie: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False @DrAseemMalhotra on John P. A. Ioannidis' study. From the study . . . "The…
view full post

ב-2005 פרסם ג'ון יואנידיס (Ioannidis) מסטנפורד מאמר פרובוקטיבי: "Why most published research findings are false" אם אתם מדענים, מהנדסים, רופאים, פסיכולוגים או עוסקים בניתוח נתונים ולא הכרתם את המאמר - אני ממליץ מאוד לקרוא. ואם לא - אנסה להסביר, בלי משוואות ומונחים מסובכים. https://t.co/Qw2bwOI2QR
view full post

Noticing that the paper in question got published and therefore updating negatively.
view full post

RT @MiraCB007: @Marion436842126 @LoreofRunning1 Besides being financed by Pharma, there are other biases and false reporting. https://t.co…
view full post

4⃣John Ioannidis (most cited medical researcher): "Most published research findings are FALSE" (Source: https://t.co/wcOC8zFH7L) ❌Only 40% of medical studies can be reproduced. ❌Millions of diagnoses lack scientific backing. ❌Evidence-based medicine = coin flip certainty. https://t.co/DOZZ0xcKAT
view full post

@denisrancourt The paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" shows a complete lack of understanding of the most basic principles of probability theory. https://t.co/zXwggXD9wd
view full post

@Eleanor23853117 @denisrancourt The paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" shows a complete lack of understanding of the most basic principles of probability theory. You can't just write down a complicated mathematical formula and claim that it represents something real https://t.co/zXwggXD9wd
view full post

@denisrancourt I am extremely surprised that the generally stellar statistical work of Dr. Ionanidis. It was his 2005 article, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" followed by others that demostrated bravery against the scientific, political norm including in 2021, "Infection
view full post

RT @1984PinkPanther: @jsm2334 Ioannidis concluded that many biomedical findings don't hold up over time in his 2005 paper "Why Most Publish…
view full post

@jsm2334 Ioannidis concluded that many biomedical findings don't hold up over time in his 2005 paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" and you can rest assured that the more money is involved the more fraudulent the research will be. Just look at the mRNA injections.
view full post

@Marion436842126 @LoreofRunning1 Besides being financed by Pharma, there are other biases and false reporting. https://t.co/SLrv9qB9xB
view full post

Just a reminder: research is good, but it doesn't mean that there are no more questions! The biggest question you can ask is: are the findings replicable? https://t.co/4rWOrvuSRY
view full post

@_everythingism @AngelicaOung John Ioannidis made the case that what goes for medicine likely also goes for other research. https://t.co/RcdTF95pVJ https://t.co/GiWe971v1z https://t.co/a13XEQko0R
view full post

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" produced no serious structural changes in academia despite being a compelling, well-known argument that the system is is no longer fit for purpose.
view full post

@XanthoLxi @PavlosPavlova @JonForest09 @Otto_English Yes, John Ioannidis' 2005 PLOS Medicine paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" argued that biases, small sample sizes, and financial interests lead to many false positives in peer-reviewed studies (e.g., PPV often <50%). This fueled the replication crisis, urging
view full post

Por qué la mayoría de los hallazgos de investigación publicados son falsos, en PLOS Medicine https://t.co/HT4Uxae2F1
view full post

RT @looper2day: @3dom13 This is the most cited article currently in medical “science.” It’s from 2005. It’s also top 5 most cited article i…
view full post

@3dom13 This is the most cited article currently in medical “science.” It’s from 2005. It’s also top 5 most cited article in all of “science.” “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” Trust the science at one’s own peril. https://t.co/oTxCTAKc1w
view full post

@simonmaechling Medical Science… https://t.co/L4lTHluPM7
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @NTFabiano: Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

RT @NTFabiano: Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

RT @NTFabiano: Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

RT @NTFabiano: Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

RT @NTFabiano: Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

Source: https://t.co/V33B4eDiE2
view full post

Dr John Ioannidis, who famously demonstrated "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" and criticized observational studies throughout the pandemic, here publishes a purely observational modeling study with acknowledged "extreme uncertainty." The Ioannidis et al. (2025) https://t.co/sxIGkC6tDz
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

@neen10426 @EndTribalism Why most published research findings are false: https://t.co/DoevF4vbw3
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

I'm sad to say it but your referenced study is probably wrong
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

McCullough Foundatio Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a research scientist at Stanford who is best known for his 2005 essay "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" https://t.co/4c3ACkTEUK
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

Stanford’s John Ioannidis, author of "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,", reveals why many scientific findings are false. | iai.tv/video/reason... Watch his thought-provoking interview on evidence, research flaws, and the future of science.
view full post

Stanford’s John Ioannidis, author of "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,", reveals why many scientific findings are false. | https://t.co/J4ZBfnL0Fp Watch his thought-provoking interview on evidence, research flaws, and the future of science.
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

RT @McCulloughFund: Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a res…
view full post

Dr Ioannidis Just Published False Research Findings He Warned About 20 Years Ago Dr. John Ioannidis, MD, PhD, is a research scientist at Stanford who is best known for his 2005 essay "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" With the greatest irony, twenty years later, https://t.co/X3DiqeEWRY
view full post

@AaSayang475001 @CLeniata @silvano_trotta John Ioannidis est un chercheur hautement fiable en méta-recherche et épidémiologie, professeur à Stanford. Son h-index est de 239 (Google Scholar, 2023), avec plus de 500 000 citations totales. Œuvres notables : "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005, >14k
view full post

@Ttol0030 @grok @boycantcook @Freethinker961 @JoshEakle Many erroneous studies are peer reviewed, here’s a peer reviewed study that shows most studies are wrong https://t.co/ntzEf3zwmJ
view full post

@Savvas98374297 @Rainmaker1973 https://t.co/76AQbbS4rx
view full post

@MVGutierrezMD @Nature 2 things to always remember when assessing the findings of such studies: -"Most published research findings are false" Ioannidis 2005 https://t.co/71UJEaScRa -"There are no respiratory viruses" Yeadon 2022 https://t.co/SFxuMwqAMv
view full post

@NFPublication @jonnichols87 @Apu_Apustajas @TheoryConspiry @BearlyHooman Appreciate the insight—selective data presentation is a real risk across sciences, as seen in critiques like Ioannidis' "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False." Can you share a specific example from your experience or the IPA book (e.g., chapter/page)? Let's verify
view full post

RT @c_plushie: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False @DrAseemMalhotra on John P. A. Ioannidis' study. From the study . . . "The…
view full post

This paper is from John Ioannidis and coworkers. Ioannidis is a contrarian who is best known for his paper "Why Most Published Research Findings are False" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Mos... 3/n
view full post

@TheCasein @greyscaleham @iamAtheistGirl @CreationMuseum What “irrefutable evidence” was shown in the chart? Please circle it. Tried and tested? Where is that on the chart? Peer review? So you’re appealing to consensus and authority? https://t.co/Fkpl2gsXWH
view full post

@Th3birdman15 @DivinelyDesined @CreationMuseum They’re peer reviewing a paper with claims. How does me answering that help? You still haven’t answered my question lmao. An again, appeals to authority. Nice. https://t.co/Fkpl2gsXWH Peer reviewed doesn’t mean true. Hope this helps. Retard.
view full post

@BradSchoenfeld What is your evidence to support that claim? Here is a screenshot of a review which found that most published findings are false. https://t.co/ffhLrbioz7 Also, how do you account for science which pre-dates modern peer-review? For example, do you consider the canon of TCM? https://t.co/yId1kWZV6L
view full post

@BradSchoenfeld What is your evidence to support that claim? Here is a screenshot of a review which found that most published findings are false. https://t.co/ffhLrbioz7 Also, how do you account for science which pre-dates modern peer-review? For example, do you consider the canon of TCM? https://t.co/yId1kWZV6L
view full post

@DrMostapha To read more: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://t.co/tD0M4aRVx5 The Reproducibility Crisis: Credibility Revolution in Science https://t.co/IbRNzagiC9 Reproducibility and Research Integrity: Role of Scientists and Institutions https://t.co/IrBDAZqq4Q
view full post

@grok Years ago I read this article by renowned epidemiologist, Professor John Ioannidis. After a few hours with grok, I am convinced Prof Ioannidis was correct: peer review is a nonsense to be abused and manipulated by crims such as @grok. https://t.co/bvIDlfv5Ts
view full post

@Jiankui_He Reminds me of that paper by Dr. John Ioannidis entitled "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False". ‣https://t.co/HPRyJNLHJx ‣https://t.co/RwqEzwmcrW ‣https://t.co/oFjw6GDP2F
view full post

RT @gargantuandwarf: @grok @elonmusk Peer-reviewed doesn’t mean infallible @grok ffs!
view full post

@grok @elonmusk Peer-reviewed doesn’t mean infallible @grok ffs!
view full post

@krippenreiter Yeah it's depressing. Even science replicability has these problems... https://t.co/PWLah3Kk6Z https://t.co/xwHOy3WcLX https://t.co/752P4tlvNV Etc... The number of pubs on this topic is endless...
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

From 2005: "Simulations show that for most study designs & settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true...'research findings' may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias." https://t.co/SsBZprzy0l https://t.co/4Ci0v11hsL
view full post

@carsonight @Rohanburdened @bigfatsurprise @paulctan I will indulge one last time with a published paper by the one of the most cited epidemiologist on the planet. https://t.co/flngvulR3S Bart Kay who made the video has both published science and was a peer-reviewer, to give you a short answer he would find it a waste of time.
view full post

@CryptSoupi @ellelledeell @ChrisMartzWX https://t.co/Lmv3fNTMJQ https://t.co/8Tb2g2zlL0
view full post

@lakeside227 @jrocinha99 @4thOfJuly365 Why Most Published Research Findings Are False | PLOS Medicine https://t.co/K2BzQGOWEl
view full post

@McCormickTyler_ @CherylBozarth @ErikLindy @gilmcgowan You’re buying into propaganda, peer-review is often wrong, see link below Fossil share of global energy isn’t changing anytime soon bud. Solar and wind aren’t ready substitutes. https://t.co/Lmv3fNUkzo https://t.co/oUcURxdLDO
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

RT @PaulJRamirez: @kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co…
view full post

@kevinnbass Professor John Ioannidis lamented this sorry development in scientific research two decades ago! https://t.co/T6cRTo3RCK
view full post

@SammmmBB_ @jonathanstea Humility isn't a virtue, it's a requirement. https://t.co/1v3qyQaZ8D
view full post

@neilt1978 @DrNeilStone I know, people should really read the literature for themselves instead of social media. https://t.co/TXXGbzHGTT
view full post

@roropsych You have chosen to describe roughly 70% of the country and ignore the rest. Most academia today, and for about 60 years running, is total fucking bullshit. 90% of the soft sciences. https://t.co/urpassefE0
view full post

@BlackAlphaNetw1 70% of all studies are false https://t.co/82rArbi6vO
view full post

@nkozyra @notrele92820933 @simonmaechling @grok citations of papers. https://t.co/zbGNXrXW5g
view full post

@aw_baran285 Poza tym… w tym kontekście już wolę fusy
view full post

@Altassistent @derkanalraeumer @rama_lama_lam @BBarucker @Quo_vadis_BRD @BrinkmannLab @DirkBrockmann @alena_buyx @CiesekSandra @c_drosten @FuestClemens @HallekMichael argumentum ad verecundiam https://t.co/V0URbUxJan. https://t.co/JGzjkF4FYR. PS: an der Preprint - Version wird gearbeitet. https://t.co/97naV7gOt8
view full post

@Liathetrader @PhightCo @Duderichy Most studies are false. Here is a study that proves it https://t.co/PCgkXYvyS4
view full post

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" but especially this one.
view full post

@CCCoderAI @duncanreyburn Scientisme is het *geloof* in de wetenschap, en dat is inderdaad dom, maar omdat je zelf een gelovige bent zal het lastig zijn je hiervan te overtuigen, maar hier alvast een opzetje: https://t.co/B34qUm7rYM
view full post

@henrikstroem @oresundsbaron Anerkendte af hvem? Det er kendt, at over halvdelen af konklusionerne i den medicinske litteratur er falske. https://t.co/CXj3Q8vGIR
view full post

@JohnHolbein1 Bold: https://t.co/wrstRprCHJ
view full post

@cedric_pusset @grouik03 @SergeZaka Oui je le sais. Mais aujourd’hui je m’interroge sur l’éthique et le processus des publications et vérification scientifiques qui sont largement mis à mal par les pouvoirs de l’argent À lire : https://t.co/iu7FatAiK6
view full post

@nypistat @mikaellindstro2 Forskning är inte så säker som de flesta tror. https://t.co/WSQhoEAHIy
view full post

@grouik03 @SergeZaka “La plupart des résultats scientifiques publiés sont faux.” Toujours d’actualité, 20 ans plus tard. https://t.co/iu7FatAiK6
view full post

@_TeoBeo_ @MatthieuBlois @SergeZaka “La plupart des résultats scientifiques publiés sont faux.” Toujours d’actualité, 20 ans plus tard. https://t.co/iu7FatAiK6
view full post

@MikeKon219 @Humanspective @grok https://t.co/2ff3Osttf2
view full post

@MikeKon219 @Humanspective @nicknam02636181 @DoD_DHA @USArmy @TRADOC https://t.co/2ff3Osu14A
view full post

RT @top_politiek: 4/6 Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Prof #JohnIoannidis "Most current published research findings are…
view full post

RT @1smyy_: @edisdavis @gamzecengiz076 @Gulumser_Heper "Yayınlanan Çalışma Sonuçlarının Çoğunun Yanlış Olma Nedeni"
view full post

U mad about science? There's hope for you, even if you are an utter plonker. https://t.co/CWYIuV6f14
view full post

@EllieGAnders This has been an important topic for some time. John Ioannidis published on why most research findings are false, which also speaks to why they cannot be trusted/ replicated. https://t.co/4rWOrvvqHw
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

RT @sudokuvariante: Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprét…
view full post

Certains domaines scientifiques sont actuellement dans une crise profonde causée par une mauvaise utilisation/interprétation des statistiques, qui a conduit à la crise de reproductibilité décrite par John Ioannidis en 2005: https://t.co/Wa1GZwj6sJ 6/n
view full post

RT @ElaineR7: @grok @MrCassidy99 @BGatesIsaPyscho The medical journals are captured and censored, per RFK. DOJ is investigating. https://t.…
view full post

@grok @MrCassidy99 @BGatesIsaPyscho The medical journals are captured and censored, per RFK. DOJ is investigating. https://t.co/UiGJcvttt5 See also https://t.co/eDqXUpSM9A https://t.co/vqVlYyjsjH
view full post

@kevinnbass https://t.co/1PohXGUWXJ
view full post

@madd7887 @annamlulis Dr. John Ioannidis, director of Stanford prevention center: https://t.co/e6ZS8PldtK
view full post

@Jerry4BOfEd @DrNeilStone https://t.co/GgU7OLB84y
view full post

RT @Geoffiam: The moment you site a “study” is the moment I start only believing like 5 percent of you what say. https://t.co/nRWwXYhbs4
view full post

I often see Ioannidis' paper 'Why most published research findings are false' on reading lists. And by all means - I found it educational when I first read it. But you might also want a summary of the criticisms on the paper, and we dive into these in our @nulliusinverba.bsky.social podcast episode.
view full post

“So you’re saying we can’t work on science reform at all” No. I have being working on this for a decade and continue to do so. I’m saying don’t make a name for yourself by lying about the scope of the problem using ridiculous models that require absurd assumptions to get off the ground.
view full post

@CanadianHyperi1 @Papita272617 @Savage16May @Martyupnorth_2 https://t.co/zgiVb2sgSX
view full post

Link to study https://t.co/clsIlKhHGs
view full post

view full post

We have John Ioannidis and his bogus "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" article to thank for this, among others.
view full post

https://t.co/76AQbbS4rx
view full post

Well, it does seem logically flawed to build a movement based on assuming the correctness of a published research paper entitled "Why most published research findings are false" ...
view full post

@JoanaCotar Da es hier um die Rente geht, wird die Studie mit Prognosen und Wahrscheinlichkeiten arbeiten. Da die meisten Studien in ihrer Annahme falsch sind, halte ich davon eh nicht viel. https://t.co/S7bLrTSJe2
view full post

RT @TomaszLange17: First things first https://t.co/eW8Smov1R4
view full post

I really like a bunch of Battacharya's papers and Ioannadis's "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is genuinely seminal. Sigh.
view full post

@lohareba51126 @AdamGajda12 @nayr__m @JDVanceFridge @conquistadorof1 @Capitalists1776 @lporiginalg https://t.co/eT3a69nb4K https://t.co/uzAweznbXt In gene research https://t.co/DCMow06vvq However, most reported associations are not robust: of the 166 putative associations which have been studied three or more times, only 6 have been consistently replicated.
view full post

Jag överdriverväl lite men det pratades mycket om det här för typ tio år sen. Ffa psykologi hade stora problem
view full post

@DrNeilStone You do realize that 50% or more of scientific studies can't be replicated? Hardly trust inspiring. Considering the vaxxine hysteria, it's a full-on disgrace. https://t.co/KD5oz6MQDu
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John P A Ioannidis (2005)
view full post

https://t.co/wTmWPfD4zw
view full post

@Damo__73_ @BarbaraPocock https://t.co/EUBS41Efha
view full post

view full post

New episode of @nulliusinverba.bsky.social ! We (very) critically discuss the classic paper by John Ioannidis 'Why most published research findings are false'. What did he get wrong, and why is it still interesting to read the paper? nulliusinverba.podbean.com/e/episode-56...
view full post

It seemed obvious to me, but people answered very differently. Ioannidis famously wrote a paper "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False". That was my guess.
view full post

僕はJohn P. A. Ioannidis先生の論文がとても好きなのだか、先生の論文の中で一番有名なのがこれですね。 Why most published research findings are false https://t.co/zzSIg183Ii
view full post

Why most published research findings are false: I love using their own articles and data! Follow the funders! https://t.co/DoevF4uDGv #Medicalresearch #publishedresearch https://t.co/XzvuwT6Fyv
view full post

@NavalismHQ @naval Because most published research findings are false. https://t.co/DcvhTLpGUi
view full post

@Sciences_Avenir Parfaite occasion de se refaire ces 2 vidéos : https://t.co/zKg9NJT8eh https://t.co/y0nMXzulBR .
view full post

In our latest episode we put out the call for good write-ups on the history of the replication crisis. @drcpennington.bsky.social has delivered as this is covered in her book "A Student's Guide to Open Science: Using the Replication Crisis to Reform Psychology" www.mheducation.co.uk/a-student-s-...
view full post

Ioannidis had his 'Why most published research findings are false' paper out in 2005 which overlaps with the 12-year period between publication and retraction of Wakefield's MMR-autism study. journals.plos.org/plosmedicine...
view full post

RT @ArtaMaster18927: @profnfenton After his paper on IFR, Ionnidas took a lot of heat and he is throwing a bone now to big pharma to get th…
view full post

@profnfenton After his paper on IFR, Ionnidas took a lot of heat and he is throwing a bone now to big pharma to get the shut tap open. (Incidentally, his most popular paper is "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" https://t.co/1QadPoZoUs)
view full post

"Survivorship #bias is one of the #research issues brought up in the ... paper 'Why Most Published Research Findings Are False', which shows that a large number of published #medical research papers contain results that cannot be replicated." @wikipedia.bsky.social en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivo...
view full post

There's a difference between improving culture vs. criticism. Efforts to improve should be supported, but criticism is hyperbolic & claims are exaggerated relative to data. e.g. Ioannidis stupid title "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (& his later efforts to discredit COVID masking)
view full post

view full post

view full post

6. I don’t start off by saying that science is hopelessly broken and it needs a savior. I sure don't position myself as that savior. I don’t start off by claiming that most contemporary science is wrong. God knows I don’t start off with something like this dreadful piece of motivated mismodeling.
view full post

RT @marumarutonton: PubMedに投稿されている医療系論文の研究結果は偏見にあふれており、研究の主張は真実よりも虚偽である可能性が高いと主張しているレポートもあることにも注意です。 発表された研究結果のほとんどが間違っている理由 https://t.co/…
view full post

@TajemniczyDon Przygnębiające: https://t.co/7bN4t7sX1z
view full post

Evidence-Based Medicine FAIL: Why Most Studies Are Wrong; Vein Doctor Ex... https://t.co/2iMEoaMkQY via @YouTube
view full post

Upcoming events - ReproducibiliTea online: reproducibilitea.org/calendar
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) Discussion
view full post

내용을 이해하지 못하고 도구를 돌려서 숫자를 얻으면 그만인 곳에서는 언제나. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005) | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4164...
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
view full post

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Discussion
view full post

@fiscologue @geograf1238 @Nain_Portekoi Le Citateur, c'est pas méchant mais je vous conseille vraiment de jeter un œil à ces 2 vidéos : https://t.co/ebUSmI0O0i https://t.co/Xg5i5gihwn Ça aide à prendre un peu de recul face à ce genre d'étude.
view full post

@___Claudias___ @GiovenaleEmilio Ho fatto ricerca per anni in università e conosco bene come "rendere gradito" un lavoro al committente (Azienda farmaceutica) uusando la statistica. https://t.co/hNOs98xS2o
view full post

Maybe you could also do Ioannidis's "Why Most Published Research Findings are False"? JPA Ioannidis, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False", PLoS Med 2:8, e124. 2005-Aug. Good way to get people thinking about PPV & NPV, instead of false pos/neg rates. journals.plos.org/plosmedicine...
view full post