J Emerg Med November 2005 PMID 16243207

Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Thomas G Costantino, Eric C Bruno, Neal Handly, Anthony J Dean

Mentions

7
Peak: 2 in Jul 2017
across 3 sources since Jul 2017

Extended reach

20,585
potential audience

Total likes

16

Video views

7,943

Mentions per month

Jul 2017 – Feb 2025

Where it's discussed

  • Blogs3 articles
  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Most discussions praise the study for confirming ultrasound's role in diagnosing AAA, with phrases like 'accurately detects' and 'reliable in diagnosis' highlighting positive reception. The tone emphasizes both validation and potential for clinical practice, which explains the high agreement and impact scores, while moderate interest and engagement scores suggest some posters find it important but are not deeply involved in critical debate.

AgreementStrong agreement

Most discussions express strong agreement with the article's findings, emphasizing its validation of ultrasound as a reliable diagnostic tool for AAA.

InterestModerate interest

While the overall interest is positive, some comments are somewhat neutral or procedural, showing moderate curiosity rather than deep fascination.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments often reference the study's methodology or implications, indicating active engagement, but rarely delve into critical analysis or broad implications.

ImpactHigh impact

Many posters highlight the significance of the study for emergency medicine, suggesting it could change practice or improve patient outcomes, reflecting a high perceived impact.

Abstract in brief

  • This study found that emergency medicine residents using ultrasound can accurately detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and measure their size, with high sensitivity and specificity, showing strong correlation with radiology measurements.
  • Out of 238 ultrasounds performed, 36 were positive for AAA, and the average diameters measured by ultrasound and radiology were very close, with only a small average difference of about 4.4 mm.
  • The results suggest that with proper training, emergency medicine residents are reliable in diagnosing AAA and assessing its size, which is crucial for emergency decision-making.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Dan Kim
@dan___kim · X

Aorta paper #3: @TomTempleUS et al. Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. @jem_journal 2005.

Feb 13, 2025 · 2 likes · 1 share · 5,710 followers View post →
Syed Shahrul Naz
@drshahrul80 · X

RT @dan___kim: Aorta paper #3: @TomTempleUS et al. Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm…

Feb 15, 2025 · 1 share · 6,929 followers View post →

All mentions

Syed Shahrul Naz
@drshahrul80 · X

RT @dan___kim: Aorta paper #3: @TomTempleUS et al. Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm…

Feb 15, 2025 · 1 share · 6,929 followers View post →
Dan Kim
@dan___kim · X

Aorta paper #3: @TomTempleUS et al. Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm. @jem_journal 2005.

Feb 13, 2025 · 2 likes · 1 share · 5,710 followers View post →