Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Comments reveal a generally positive reception, with many users highlighting the robustness of the meta-analysis and its implications for reducing prejudice through intergroup contact. Phrases like 'great meta-analysis', 'drives home the point', and 'help your colleagues' indicate active engagement and recognition of the study's importance within the social science community.
Most discussions acknowledge and support the findings of the meta-analysis, emphasizing its reliability and usefulness in social science research.
Participants display high interest by sharing detailed insights, screenshots, and emphasizing the significance of the study.
Conversations involve sharing examples, discussing methodology, and referencing related studies, indicating moderate engagement.
The discussions suggest the paper's findings could influence future research and social understanding, though mostly within scholarly contexts.
@tszzl Yet intergroup contact reliably reduces prejudice and de-escalates conflict. Meta-analysis of 515 studies shows how general this effect is. The trick is to have the *right* kind of contact. Not that hard to do, but drive-by tweets ain’t it. https://t.co/60nhu9GfEf
@Monices_Pieces @LabelFreeBrands I can only tell you what the science says. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://t.co/tkqGHamKkx
See, for example, this systematic meta-analysis of over 500 studies: https://t.co/SklsHZe9lH
@conor64 Not sure what you are looking for, but this paper came to mind https://t.co/j0FbiQp8PP
A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory https://t.co/X8VL9iyN9O
@educatedandfree @jonathanbfine Regarding reproducible social science findings, my favorite example is this paper. https://t.co/c8k6BoKyNi 3/4
I will audit all references next week and share my findings as a standalone post. Paper: ideas.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/u... First 2 screenshots are from the book, the rest are from the paper, they continue in the next post but you'll get the idea without having to read them all:
Just including more screenshots from the paper to drive home the point:
Sure! The paper is called "A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory" (links & screenshots at the end), it's the reference #34 in chapter 6 of the book. In very short terms, intergroup contact theory proposes that contact between diverse groups lowers their prejudice against each other.
@elonmusk “This meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice.” Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
⑤ 明日読む論文 - Tassinari M, https://t.co/PcvxngBSqH, 2022 https://t.co/kmvSK44ARq - Pettigrew, T. F. https://t.co/PcvxngBSqH. ,2006 https://t.co/dGjrR1yhb0
@qwert_burner @Philosophi_Cat @ElijahSchaffer Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
@ty4sharingdat @Danalasdos @Encryptopia @Philosophi_Cat @ElijahSchaffer Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory https://t.co/gu96NDrgCi
@tszzl Yet intergroup contact reliably reduces prejudice and de-escalates conflict. Meta-analysis of 515 studies shows how general this effect is. The trick is to have the *right* kind of contact. Not that hard to do, but drive-by tweets ain’t it. https://t.co/60nhu9GfEf
@GordonHodsonPhD Great meta-analysis and overview of ICT research… https://t.co/c8k6BoK0XK
See, for example, this systematic meta-analysis of over 500 studies: https://t.co/SklsHZe9lH
@JamesCantorPhD @Tom_reves_semme Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/vAHsdlcfO2 Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
@Tom_reves_semme Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://t.co/tkqGHamKkx
@Monices_Pieces @LabelFreeBrands I can only tell you what the science says. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://t.co/tkqGHamKkx
@JamesCantorPhD @HamesRaymond Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/vAHsdlcfO2 Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
@HamesRaymond Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://t.co/tkqGHamKkx
@PraxisProfD @benjaminheddy Yes! Thank you, I just found https://t.co/7w1Z5uipYt which also helps!
RT @jonathanstray: @conor64 Not sure what you are looking for, but this paper came to mind https://t.co/j0FbiQp8PP
@conor64 Not sure what you are looking for, but this paper came to mind https://t.co/j0FbiQp8PP
A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory https://t.co/X8VL9iyN9O
@job1535 @JLoons20 Some articles that discuss this: https://t.co/xF2jSVISMf https://t.co/dYGk94Nbhy https://t.co/sMgjpIPF4r
JS
JC
RF
LS
MH
KE
む
AS
JB
L
DG
CB
NF