【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
May 2019 – Aug 2025Where it's discussed
-
News40 articles
-
X / Twitter39 posts
-
Facebook12 posts
-
Blogs5 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect acknowledgment of safety concerns about high protein consumption, with some referencing scientific studies and thresholds like 'exceeding 35%' or 'maximal safe intake of 3.5-4.5 grams per kilogram,' indicating moderate engagement with the publication. Words like 'danger,' 'risks,' and references to research imply a cautious tone that emphasizes the health implications of excessive protein intake, contributing to a moderate overall impact.
Most discussions acknowledge the risks of high protein intake, aligning with the article's caution about safety thresholds.
Participants show moderate interest by referencing specific research, safety guidelines, and scientific studies.
Comments tend to be brief or refer to external sources rather than deep personal analysis, leading to a neutral engagement level.
The conversations highlight awareness of health risks and suggest practical guidelines, indicating a moderate influence on understanding dietary safety.
Abstract in brief
- There is ongoing debate about whether increasing dietary protein is safe and beneficial for weight control and muscle growth, with some health advice promoting high-protein diets despite limited scientific evidence on safety.
- The key concerns involve the body's ability to absorb amino acids efficiently and the liver's capacity to process excess nitrogen, which can be overwhelmed by very high protein intakes and lead to health issues like hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, or even death.
- A safe and sensible maximum protein intake is suggested to be around 25% of total energy (roughly 2-2.5 g per kg per day), which is lower than the maximum biological safe limits, thereby reducing risks of toxicity and aligning with the body's needs.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyIJSNEM Classic - now available in Full Access. Nomination by @proftipper "This protein paper is one I’ve used many times to help develop presentations and cited in papers" https://t.co/1HDPMGgMFN
『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死(「ウサギ飢餓症候群」)に至る危険がある、としている https://t.co/GqzaxnfcaQ
参考 https://t.co/KeX6Jd0RJj
@DoctorTro @tednaiman do you mean an acute study only. I think for chronic intake, levels above 35% protein could raise issues. https://t.co/u7PiLG9aCE).
@MactatorMaximus @2Min_Keto @ADreyzen @KetoCarnivore @raphaels7 @LogicalLynx @meloegirl @EatLandSalmon @OZmandia @Karageorgos15 @tednaiman @dramerling @DikemanDave @Mangan150 @robbwolf @TuckerGoodrich @puddleg 'Maximal Rates of Excretion and Synthesis of Urea in Normal and Cirrhotic Subjects.' to the results you should add 1 gr/kg structural. A good paper is Bilborough and Mann 2006 A Review of Issues of Dietary Protein Intake in Humans.
All mentions
Fats as the Body's Primary Energy Source in Human Evolution
Fats have been wrongly demonized in the past. This video highlights the crucial role of fat in our body, how our digestive system is adapted for fats and meat, and the essential nutrients provided by fatty meats. It…
Role of Fat in Protein Digestion and Metabolism
Fats promote gallbladder and pancreatic enzyme release and protect proteins from being used solely as energy. If you're curious about how to increase fat intake, which fats are best, and the effects of low fat…
@BadDietTakes "Dangers of excessive protein, defined as when protein constitutes > 35% of total energy intake, include hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, hyperinsulinemia nausea, diarrhea, and even death (the "rabbit starvation syndrome"). https://t.co/lBPcND9YbX
@The_Angu @bizlet7 @castizofuturism @spandrell4 here's the first hit i get on sources: https://t.co/UlF5PoEzVO i recommend consensus(dot)app for quick overviews btw
@SteveHamel16 @RealLiveAxel @KenDBerryMD https://t.co/48LqQA82Cy
@RealLiveAxel @SteveHamel16 @KenDBerryMD Sure, https://t.co/48LqQA82Cy From the abstract "Dangers of excessive protein, defined as when protein constitutes > 35% of total energy intake, include hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, hyperinsulinemia nausea, diarrhea, and even death (the “rabbit starvation syndrome”).
@viprabuddhi @Manchu__ Insect protein is too lean, it can lead to protein poisoning. Humans need to consume their protein w a fair amount of fat https://t.co/yeF5pDAlc5 https://t.co/PTkRUVXHMw
@HarrisonSea Here is a good article: https://t.co/LgZ4prH3Vs
参考 https://t.co/KeX6Jd0RJj
@DoctorTro @tednaiman do you mean an acute study only. I think for chronic intake, levels above 35% protein could raise issues. https://t.co/u7PiLG9aCE).
@kksft @komomo_Com https://t.co/hkBiiadGfp ウサギ飢餓ではむしろ高インスリン血症になる。これはむしろタンパク質摂取の過剰で「糖新生が亢進しすぎている」ことを意味する。 抑制しないといけない。
@maiti_86 @morningdietapp @yukwest69684489 @Jimo0404 @chototsumoushin @KDf0y 失礼、ウサギ飢餓はケトアシドーシスではありませんでした。 しかし、タンパク質過剰は高インスリン血症を引き起こすようです インスリン分泌が血糖依存で制御されるのであれば、前段階として高血糖になった結果、過剰にインスリンが分泌されたものと思われます。 https://t.co/B3xg9uVybm https://t.co/asuYeliKMH
@CarnivoreWhisp @SBakerMD Dangers of excessive protein (> 35% of energy) include hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, hyperinsulinemia, nausea, diarrhea, and even death (the “rabbit starvation syndrome” https://t.co/xWGrRcjAVf
@Thamno @aNorseView @DanielBerglind @ScepticalDoctor Good info on protein intake https://t.co/oKg3iTyfC5
[1] https://t.co/aB9esbQDZ7 [2] https://t.co/w1yyTqAc6F [3] https://t.co/1UKZEA2MgH [4] https://t.co/Vnae8CK8DH
@exfatloss @donlayman @Chloe_mrng https://t.co/kTrqd9D95o
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
【肉じゃなく脂を食べる】 @kojija さん著 Primal Diet 高タンパク❌ 過剰な窒素を尿素に変換する肝臓の能力を超過 Pが総エネルギーの35%超で
摂取カロリーの35%を超えるタンパク質摂取は、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニウム血症、下痢、嘔吐、死亡(ウサギ飢餓症候群)を引き起こす。 やはり高タンパク食は人体に危険。 A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans - PubMed #ケトジェニックダイエット https://t.co/ficJ07NzBi
RT @yasu0804: 『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死…
RT @yasu0804: 『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死…
RT @yasu0804: 『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死…
RT @yasu0804: 『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死…
RT @yasu0804: 『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死…
『A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans』によると、タンパク質が総エネルギー摂取量の35%を超える場合、高アミノ酸血症、高アンモニア血症、高インスリン血症、吐き気、下痢、さらには死(「ウサギ飢餓症候群」)に至る危険がある、としている https://t.co/GqzaxnfcaQ
@tednaiman @Renu95393728 @andreivolt @JoeyDevlin_ Get access rather than a paywall: https://t.co/dpjUB07pX9 Add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles to promote scholarly communication
@Renu95393728 @andreivolt @JoeyDevlin_ Theoretical maximum safe intake of protein in humans is in the 3.5 to 4.5 grams per kilogram of ideal body weight range (1.6–2.0 g/lb) and most people never come close to this…I recommend 1 g/lb of ideal body weight and this is never a problem. ☺︎ https://t.co/ze9A5xOTbF
RT @IJSNEMJournal: IJSNEM Classic - now available in Full Access. Nomination by @proftipper "This protein paper is one I’ve used many times…
RT @IJSNEMJournal: IJSNEM Classic - now available in Full Access. Nomination by @proftipper "This protein paper is one I’ve used many times…
RT @IJSNEMJournal: IJSNEM Classic - now available in Full Access. Nomination by @proftipper "This protein paper is one I’ve used many times…
IJSNEM Classic - now available in Full Access. Nomination by @proftipper "This protein paper is one I’ve used many times to help develop presentations and cited in papers" https://t.co/1HDPMGgMFN
@Tom_Sam_son @CarnivoreMD There are definitely more than one cause for kidney stones, but usually Harvard is a pretty reliable source for nutrition. Here’s another one from PubMed. https://t.co/4x000C5G3m Unfortunately you have to pay for the full article, but it does into some detail in the abstract.
@MactatorMaximus @2Min_Keto @ADreyzen @KetoCarnivore @raphaels7 @LogicalLynx @meloegirl @EatLandSalmon @OZmandia @Karageorgos15 @tednaiman @dramerling @DikemanDave @Mangan150 @robbwolf @TuckerGoodrich @puddleg 'Maximal Rates of Excretion and Synthesis of Urea in Normal and Cirrhotic Subjects.' to the results you should add 1 gr/kg structural. A good paper is Bilborough and Mann 2006 A Review of Issues of Dietary Protein Intake in Humans.
@og_BYU @Nutradvance I'm not sure because most studies do not consider possible adaptations, effect on training, genetics, etc. but a nice discussion here. See section on "Maximal Rate of Urea Synthesis and Excretion": https://t.co/59OcCiZsmk
金ダ
I
ぽ
Kカ
JS
MD
F
LA
AC
D
BB
ま
飯M
L
J
MF
PM
ル
エ
E
さダ
SN
ち
Nひ
に
マ
う
SB
L
TN
BT
JB
KT
SS
K