Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions overwhelmingly support the consensus that global temperature increases are real, significant, and primarily caused by human activity, with examples like references to Hansen's papers, visualizations of warming stripes, and warnings about tipping points. The tone's urgency and the use of scientific sources illustrate both high interest and the desire for meaningful impact on policy and societal behavior.
Most discussions affirm the reality and severity of global temperature change driven by human activity, supporting the publication's findings and emphasizing the urgent need for action.
Posts show high engagement with the topic, quoting detailed data, scientific studies, and visualizations like warming stripes, indicating strong curiosity and concern.
Many discussions delve into scientific explanations, cite authoritative sources, and analyze specific climate data, demonstrating deep engagement with the science and implications.
The overall tone emphasizes the critical implications of the data, calling for policy change, moral obligations, and highlighting the potential for irreversible damage, underscoring high-impact awareness.
No one alive will experience a better climate than today. But young people will experience a much more dangerous and chaotic world in the future, and the extent to which that happens will depend on our choices today. Trump doesn't care because he's old and a sociopath. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/s...
You realise "climate change is inevitable" is absurd when you reword it as "fossil fuels are inevitable" or "Exxon is inevitable" or "Rishi Sunak is inevitable" It's a threat built of causes which we can identify and fight. Fatalism is pro-fossil. Be pro-fighting, instead ✊
Whenever one of my posts gains traction outside the usual climate-interested circle, it’s so fascinating to read the comments. Many are seeing a graph of CO₂ or global temperature change for the first time. It is always obvious that there is a huge desire for more of this real-time climate data!
This is what is happening. Data of global temperature change since 1850. Accelerating glacier loss since 1950. From the State of the Global Climate 2024 report just published. wmo.int/publication-...
Congress is trying to kill new investment in solar and wind power. Meanwhile global warming is accelerating. This is a death wish, on a national and global scale.
Good news: climate policies implemented since the 2015 Paris Agreement have reduced projected global temperature change by at least 1C so far. Bad news: it’s still not enough to avoid widespread dangerous impacts; and as this summer shows, we’ve been systematically underestimating the extremes.
Global surface temperatures have increased about 0.2°C per decade over the past 30 years, with significant warming in the Western Equatorial Pacific. This trend aligns with climate model predictions and indicates a…
Global surface temperatures have increased by about 0.2°C per decade over the past 30 years, aligning with earlier climate model predictions, and warming has been more pronounced in the Western Equatorial Pacific…
@JayDi08396708 @Race2Extinct That's kind of exactly the problem with the climate alarmists though. They make a very dramatic prediction about something (amount of sea level rise by x date, ice cap recession by x date, even the directionality of global temperature change), and then the prediction turns out
@j_cruz19820 @RoyWSpencer Exactly right. I always tell folks that the UAH satellite data is the most accurate way to track "global" temperature change, especially in the Troposphere where all the weather occurs. I've given 180 talks in 5 years, and more and more are learning ... https://t.co/Dy8enaD7Gb
@Klaartu Global temperature change is proven cyclic. Not driven by humans at all. Cant be changed by humans. https://t.co/rJSLD4OS6W
@SirFlatpipe @fulredy @BGatesIsaPyscho Based on paleoclimate records from NASA, NOAA, and IPCC sources, no global temperature change of 3°C has occurred in any 250-year period in Earth's history. Historical shifts, like 4-7°C during ice age transitions, took thousands of years. Current warming (~1.1°C since 1850) is
@liquidingretion @CyfraithEcocide @ryankatzrosene @Tairmuir Maybe you should try it some time, since so far all you've done is parrot cherry-picked data that's totally irrelevant to global temperature change over the relevant time periods, and make blatantly wrong statements about where in the interglacial cycle we really are. Keep at it.
@davidpattersonx Maybe. but predictions are usually false... just like predictions of running out of oil, or predictions of climate disasters, or predictions of global temperature change. Our biggest concern needs to be looking at dangers of excessive AI, just like dangers of nuclear energy.
Excellent graphic showing the catastrophic changes to Earth's climate caused by human fuel burning---a disaster denied and worsened by Republican lies and policies, funded and backed by fossil-fuel billionaires whose greed is bottomless. Trump's relentless scandals obscure this crisis. #FDT #ETTD
RT @IanSextonjekg: @robinmonotti @grok when is the last time the Earth experienced a sustained rate of global temperature change as fast as…
@KersevanRoberto @AlexFondi @hausfath Here's an interesting comparison, the global temperature change from 40 and 19500 stations. https://t.co/ObVU6lcYCq
The scientific explanation of the temporary global temperature change between 2019 & 2023. And no, it had nothing to do with CO2. https://t.co/q3vcHY4LXN
RT @aaronshem: @MatthewWielicki The more important point of this observation is that one of most stable climates on earth varies considerab…
@MatthewWielicki The more important point of this observation is that one of most stable climates on earth varies considerably more in the past than it does during the “fastest centennial global temperature change in at least 2000 years”.
@AstroMikeMerri @ChrisMartzWX There is no possible way to measure Global Temperature Change! Your graph shows a bunch of models' guesses next to another guess at an immeasurable value. Total poppycock!
@JillBelch True science is constantly re-challenging data to the extent the ignorance are enlightened. It is still not absolutely clear to the majority what the impacts and options are from global temperature change.
@BarbaraJBliss @ABC How often does the "global temperature " change ?
@HenneyKwame Oh brother. Look at the icecaps, look at the global temperature change over time. Matter of fact do some research on carbon dioxide and how it works. Then maybe you would know it’s not a hoax. Everything you dumbfucks don’t understand or agree with is a “hoax”
@DarkFirebrand @SpaceShark24 pretty sure theres evidence about global temperature change hapening over time naturali (it goes both ways)
#30DayMapChallenge Day 12: Map from 2125 IPCC’s projections for June - August 2021–2040 temperatures under SSP3-7.0 White: 0.5°C Pink: 1°C Red:1.5°C Dark red: 2.5°C I went off-prompt and imagined: global temperature change has stabilised at no more than +2°C Data: doi:10.1017/9781009157896.006
#30DayMapChallenge Day 12: Map from 2125 IPCC’s projections for June - August 2021–2040 temperatures under SSP3-7.0 White-Dk red: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5°C I went off-prompt and imagined, global temperature change has stabilised at no more than +2°C Data: doi:10.1017/9781009157896.006 https://t.co/wMbICuWA4M
@robinmonotti @grok when is the last time the Earth experienced a sustained rate of global temperature change as fast as the present?
@SenMarkey So this was debunked already you are late to the party. You should educate yourself before you spout off nonsense @SenMarkey Study: - 90% of global temperature change due to cloud cover. - Only 0.03°C of warming from manmade emissions. https://t.co/91wAMQ3nBA…
#Hansen 244 28:30 Earth's albedo decreased 0.5% = 2 W/m². Most of it is climate feedback: Cloud feedback = 1 W/m². Snow Ice feedback = 0.15 W/m². Aerosol forcing 0.5 W/m². Earth Climate Sensitivity ECS=4.5°C (evidence2/4=earth darkening www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2UM...
@immo_reedb @TheDisproof @PeterBorbe @solarpapst @klima_allianz @Klimaliste When did the global temperature change by 10°C within 50 years? Making up things is easy.
@oscardziki @MatthewWielicki "showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited." https://t.co/BQ7MGdlhdR James "dgaf" Hansen in 2010 there. Even if say are confident in measurements since 2015 that is decade dataset
@norwalkiian @Et_Ex_Machina @BenNollWeather "showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited." If you were a truth seller and clicked you'd know quoting Hansen 2010 bud https://t.co/I9pQE5mc7C
@norwalkiian @Et_Ex_Machina @BenNollWeather If we're doing Global can we make it Global◇Nonpolar ¿ https://t.co/BQ7MGdlP3p "showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited."
@serpentOracle @gtoguy70 @FoxNews We can measure the temperature of points specific. That is not the temperature of the Ocean or the Global temperature. Not only does the "global" temperature change every split second, but the factors that produce it NEVER repeat. Climate changers are always wrong.
RT @JamesBrown00777: @serpentOracle @gtoguy70 @FoxNews It can't be measured. They are faking it. Tell me, how often does the global temp…
@serpentOracle @gtoguy70 @FoxNews It can't be measured. They are faking it. Tell me, how often does the global temperature change ?
@serpentOracle @gtoguy70 @FoxNews Silliness. Tell me how often does the "global temperature" change ?
@serpentOracle @gtoguy70 @FoxNews The Ocean temps heat up during summer and then daylight hours shorten and it cools back down and has to wait for late spring to heat up again. Besides the "ocean temperature" can't be measured. Tell me, how often does the "global temperature" change.
@LeonSimons8 Another idiotic post by an idiot who idiotically thinks humans are the cause or cure for global temperature change.
@JLAURENTIE85 @JrmeBrwnCt @AssoClimatoReal Qu'entendez-vous exactement par "normal" ? De quel cycle de refroidissement parlez-vous ? Le réchauffement actuel se distingue clairement des variations climatiques naturelles : History of global temperature change and causes of recent warming (AR6, 2021) https://t.co/PsxquMvbDR https://t.co/FWVX8t0Ksl
@CognitiveVerb @SenatorCash How much will the global temperature change if Australia achieves net zero ? You must know the answer given your bizarre post.
@Race2Extinct Could very well be twice that: https://t.co/rpry3UBm13 "Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields Charney (fast-feedback) equilibrium climate sensitivity 1.2±0.3°C (2σ) per W/m2, which is 4.8°C±1.2°C for doubled CO2."
@dougiefresh3319 @ryankatzrosene You don't need to compute the Earth's average annual temperature at all to compute robust estimates of average annual temperature *changes*. Here are raw&adjusted global temperature (change) results that I computed from all GHCNv4 stations vs. just 44 rural GHCNv4 stations. https://t.co/dg9th8XZMt
@EdBohman @Race2Extinct And no, it's not that complicated. The global temperature change is a result of the forcing. Before we started emitting GHGs, the orbital forcing was causing Earth to very slowly cool; this would still be happening if we hadn't sent global temperatures skyrocketing with our GHGs.
Only heat waves and milder winters can be shown to have increased – and with a net benefit to humanity, since more people die of cold than of heat. IPCC has also admitted the extreme future scenario that powers the modeling of global temperature change…
@ThyFinalPain @TheDisproof @don2345611 Even 0.4 °C of global temperature change is far more extreme than you understand, since you're a scientifically illiterate dolt with no idea what you're talking about, but the actual increase since 1970 is roughly thrice that, at almost 1.2 °C. The only joke here is you.
@FraserMacLeod5 @ABC How often does the "global" temperature change ?
RT @GnomonChronicl1: SCORPION: Let me ride your back across the river. FROG: [Thinking: I'll go really slow, to not provoke him] Okay.…
SCORPION: Let me ride your back across the river. FROG: [Thinking: I'll go really slow, to not provoke him] Okay. CLIMATOLOGIST: [Displaying global temperature change diagram] I'm not sure you guys are helping. https://t.co/cWwASBlYHt
SCORPION: Let me ride your back across the river. FROG: [Thinking: I'll go really slow, to not provoke him] Okay. CLIMATOLOGIST: [Displaying global temperature change diagram] I'm not sure you guys are helping.
@nebriefing @theCCCuk at no average global temperature change is there any substitute for $2 a U.S. gallon jet fuel none and 4C is the new metric for Co2 but we also need to start paying attention to ‘cow burbs’ as well as Co2 apparently but there is still no substitute for $2 a U.S. gallon jet
@tortythegreat99 And it was warmer during the Holocene optimum and little ice age with no CO2. We know this based on multiple lines of evidence Geologic record shows no causal correlation between CO2 reliably prompting global temperature change whatsoever. You are falling for a canard https://t.co/lUFRUenqsa
@DarthBelal @weer @rjwilliams90 @Met4CastUK So LGM to Holocene global temperature change - was it 20C (greenland ice cores) or 12C (Vostock ice cores)? You need to pick one and 'deny the data' for the other
Their Global Temps could really |/ Lean\ based on how they filled in the poles "showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited." #nonpolar https://t.co/tnE1QvPqyX
"principal question at the time of the first GISS analysis [1981] was whether there were sufficient stations in the Southern Hemisphere to allow a meaningful evaluation of global temperature change." @user84307330489 https://t.co/TQeRWH4slB
@JoelSimmonsss @GiakAtak @MikeHudema The warming rate measures global temperature change per unit time, not divided by population—it's an absolute metric unaffected by headcount. Post-ice age warming averaged ~0.01°C/century over 10,000+ years amid near-zero human emissions; today's 0.2°C/decade (20x faster)
@stephen47276303 @TallPhilosopher @NOfPPlus @rationaliza @lukasjschreiber @cjtjgeol @Royalacresrod @weberj502 @Veritatem2021 @BlasphemousBan1 @Lurker99821783 @automatrix66_KC @The19573159Lad @TLBSociety @MartinBrampton @ianbrow97534170 @workerhere @FrijnsRik @davidwatt_uk @FriendsOScience @WernerReinhard5 @Robertchef77 @JanChvojka @_LukeCSkywalker @KeillerDon @markp1950 @johanhofman @johnson_wrjohn1 @Barrtecforever @molenaarder @ianrowley677 @ClimatePoet @Barbarajdurkin @rayinstirling @JsharkJill @SandgroperDuff @wadlermd @BarelyStreetabl @Stockfttp @dykarjohan @eric84701331 @JaggerMickOZ @drbarnesbangor Perhaps I’ll start us off then? Would you agree with a problem definition along the lines of: ‘How to reduce the observed rate of contemporary global temperature change (aka global warming/climate change)’?
@hangry_muppet @ClimateRetorts @astronomy89 @GovPressOffice @grok We basically wouldn’t notice any difference at all. The concept that the activities of men are causing an acceleration of global temperature change is not backed by science, and is instead a political and philosophical statement about how men should behave
It doesn’t require any more elaborate explanation of global temperature change to explain water disasters, when property developers sell all the lots all the way to the waterline. To others. For profits. Now it’s FEMAs problem.
@SchneidGabriel https://t.co/cfYhmLVFsA 5️⃣ Science: “Atmospheric CO₂ and global temperature change” (Lorius et al., 1990): https://t.co/UIRwBlGuhY 6️⃣ PNAS: “Quantifying the human influence on climate” (Stott et al., 2000): https://t.co/iDUQlC6wNR
@crank00711122 @BBCWorld I can assure you that you are incorrect. And another failure to answer a very simple question. How often does the average surface temperature of Earth (global temperature) change.
@carla_denyer WHAT CLIMATE CRISIS? Wake up. You might also be detached from reality. Global temperature change is perfectly normal. It is not going to break down. You have been lied to.
@LanceForman @latimeralder Lance thinks that global temperature change and diurnal variation can be compared !!!! Not to sharpest tool in the box
@Peter_Fitz Did anyone else notice the global temperature change yesterday as a result of all the money that’s been poured into wind and solar?
@int_mon_econ "We randomly assign consumers to hypothetical global temperature change scenarios," don't you feel shame? can you actually sleep well at night promoting this bullshit? didn't your mama rise you well?
"We randomly assign consumers to hypothetical global temperature change scenarios, after which we elicit their expectations for inflation and key macroeconomic indicators under these conditions." ahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH para mí, los autos locos son sólo los autos https://t.co/8uINjcOVVS
@Abolition__Now @ResisttheMS Actually proof using the scientific method that an additional 100 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere would cause significant change the rate of global temperature change. I can make correlation charts that theorize just about anything.
@WH13311630 @klem1_klem @ChrisMartzWX Look. His evidence is that this happened previously. It defies logic for you to believe to create glaciers over 2 Km’s thick that covered most of Canada and then melt did not require the most extreme climate shifts. The global temperature change is not unprecedented. The oceans
@LeonardYou23495 @ChrisMartzWX Polar amplification, especially in the Arctic, occurs with any global temperature change, volcanism, irradiance, obliquity, or greenhouse gases, driving roughly double the warming at the poles. This is not something unique to anthropogenic warming or uniquely predicted by it.
Thank you, @Pontifex. Clarity around our moral and other obligations (Paris Agreement) related to our planet’s health is critical when greenhouse gas emissions continue rising and in 2024 annual global temperature change was pushed beyond 1.5°C. #ClimateAction @c40cities https://t.co/wnmMAsIOxg
Thank you, @Pontifex. Clarity around our moral and other obligations (Paris Agreement) related to our planet’s health is critical when greenhouse gas emissions continue rising and in 2024 annual global temperature change was pushed beyond 1.5°C. #ClimateAction @c40cities https://t.co/YAZVQywLmk
Thank you, @Pontifex. Clarity around our moral and other obligations (Paris Agreement) related to our planet’s health is critical when greenhouse gas emissions continue rising and in 2024 annual global temperature change was pushed beyond 1.5°C. #ClimateAction https://t.co/CttfRXEt9P
Got it! Thanks for the tip
@arcapelian @BBCBreaking How often does the "global" temperature change ?
@jayantrld @ed_hawkins Global temperature change main reason is pollution will lead to end of
RT @RGS_IBGhe: For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral which s…
@LampDavis @BBCWorld How often does the global temperature change ? Or don't you know?
RT @RGS_IBG: For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral which sho…
RT @RGS_IBG: For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral which sho…
@michaelbushe @ENERGY Green energy is a conspiracy by globalists and totalitarian states like CCP to restrict and undermine the industrial base of the West. Many people focus solely on global temperature change, but that's just a superficial excuse. Focusing on superficial phenomena reveals naiveté.
@4wding @CTReimagined @ENERGY Green energy is a conspiracy by globalists and totalitarian states like CCP to restrict and undermine the industrial base of the West. Many people focus solely on global temperature change, but that's just a superficial excuse. Focusing on superficial phenomena reveals naiveté.
@CTReimagined @ENERGY Green energy is a conspiracy by globalists and totalitarian states to restrict and undermine the industrial base of the West. Many people focus solely on global temperature change, but that's just a superficial excuse. Focusing on superficial phenomena reveals naiveté.
For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral, which shows global temperature change over the past 170 years. It notably featured in the 2016 Olympics opening ceremony! Read here
For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral which shows global temperature change over the past 170 years. It notably featured in the 2016 Olympics opening ceremony! Read here
For our latest geovisualisation, we spoke to leading climate scientist Professor Ed Hawkins about his climate spiral which shows global temperature change over the past 170 years. It notably featured in the 2016 Olympics opening ceremony! Read here
@GreenPlusAnE Is there any domestic policy that is supported by a general public in a given country that is supported because of the delta projected global temperature change? That's the bar I understand you to be setting up. Maybe the EV mandate isn't the move, but can you see my point?
@grok @flight49739 @Rainmaker1973 Did atmospheric sulfate aerosol levels increase from 1975 to 1980? What was the average global temperature change in this time period?
@Visitor51171015 @scruztiger @patfrank830 @PComentator @kevhof52 @jemmm85517813 @MarcEHJones @RCownie @1000Frolly @NdabaningiMoyo @DoneDidItMate @grok @AutumnMandrake @JamesWest12 @CymaticWave @DarsenDavid @AtomsksSanakan @Proemed45 @TWTThisIsNow @PoyetPatrice @Narkophobia @ShroedingerBird @TMGFlorida @MusicFrom90 @idummkopp @priscian @Konrad_Chapman @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @rwerkh @COrepKdeGraaf @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @Willard1951 @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @BrknMan @ICcrapdaily @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @CyfraithEcocide @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 @dorfman_p The difference between a global temperature and a global temperature *change* is something that a high school student should be able to understand.
@benmooreau @FillmoreWhite @ClimatePoet @Kenneth72712993 @outwestwoods @GeraldKutney @Funkinelly @thetreegens @FreeSpeech4Me_U @JR4_Truth @PaprikaLady @ZSRenn @SteveJenks63 @Jaisans @Veritatem2021 @Lo_VVriter @Spencerfletch0 @Realnotdreamer @B_Bolshevik100 @BJChippindale @xxghostface420 @aSinister @variegated2 @ejwwest @roger_clague @JoshSehn @rubiginosa @Homer4K @LouisCy72344053 @Roark_Architect @TomPlesier @JohnDublin10 @FChecker76 @jefftonna1 @fagandr1 @DawnTJ90 @DaveWRose @BubbasRanch @mentalmal1 @LofayPeter @BigRakaDoc @no2wind Global temperature change may be caused by humans, even though greater changes have occurred prior to humans showing up. Tough sell. Net zero is all human-induced drag on modern economies.
@OysteinSjolieEn Come on, we mentioned how the rate of global temperature change has never seen this much of an increase and you responded of a screenshot showing Greenland. YOU MIGHT HAVE NOT READ YOUR OWN SOURCE which means you presented information you were too ignorant to understand.
@TimberTJR That's exactly what the chart shows Global temperature change
@latimeralder This is irrelevant. The issue is global temperature change.
@OysteinSjolieEn @US_Stormwatch Nope. That wasn't global temperature change. The result of AMOC change from freshwater influx from melting Greenland glaciers - the same thing happening now.
@ZSRenn @simonmaechling Are you arguing that we don’t really know if the Earth has been warming because there has been no way to measure and estimate any global temperature change?
@checkweightman @MatthewWielicki This study doesn’t go back that far… but look at the error bars on paleo/proxy data (shaded region). From the height of the Medieval warm period to the low of the Little Ice Age, it could have been an almost 2 degree global temperature change … or closer to half of a degree. https://t.co/okadYaYDPR
@TomPlesier @kissingtruth @misterduncan @M3othra012 @_ClimateCraze @Markle2k @FreeSpeech4Me_U @BobFlemingFT @_42________ @carsonight @Royalacresrod @RCownie @Climatehope2 @25_cycle @kevhof52 @Tw_timerAlder @PaulGelWorks @scruztiger @5b8c196ba3654e3 @CE_workshop @Rebecca74083947 @idummkopp @Ragcha @psud12 @janrosenow @CarbonBrief @agentsinaction @MarkCranfield @pmagn @fransawerf @ClimateBen @DanCady @ClimateSoluti0n @DaleGribble_666 @johnrhanger @PhilStegem34522 @socratesccost @Orwell2024 @0bsfromafar @IngersolRobert @dardedar True, it is a shame the media sensationalise the story. Consensus in the experimental process to replicate results is a good way to provide clarity but this global temperature change saga has so many variables that it is likely to be discussed and argued for many more years.
@hausfath Keyword: simulating. History doesn’t back your claim. Nowhere in the paleoclimate record can CO2 be shown to cause global temperature change.
@grok @BASEDNEQLIBERAL @UKLabour If the UK hit net zero tomorrow, what would the global temperature change be in 2050, and how much would the sea level change?
An “audacious plan” to describe global temperature change with music. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...
@BasedMikeLee Why is it that global temperature change has been linked to human activity since 1938, but you jackasses today say humans have no effect on climate? It's not people sounding the alarm, that is the problem. It's people who keep sticking their head in the sand and listening to the
@TWTThisIsNow @MRobertsQLD @RogerPielkeJr @tedcruz what exactly did cruz ay that was a lie? even Politifact supported his assertion "Cruz does have a point: There’s been little global temperature change since 1998, and the temperatures measured are lower than what many computer models had predicted."
@LevettRoblev1 @Cloud5521278889 @David19531501 @bazcarter15 @mikebouchard834 @SetCondiment @Michael80789776 @LeftBehindPoet @cathyby @GeoffBarton9 @Martin020455 @LordOfFreedom2 @EuFailed82410 @Begentle50 @ShaneJa16905901 @Peter14306722 @afewpoints @WernerBrowers @MyDubhLinn @BogCleaner1 @damienXTR @Grimbariaman @Jimblindsone @JonHlluk @sktest202688268 @bringiton8712 @Bemused21 @Victor96478703 @lordgmanilson @NevSheeran @ObliviousReaper @AlperKaanAnkara @Ztx294 @MattAdkin @BrexitBloopers @boomer_ish @the_fukaa @cartwright30861 @FrankMac993505 @David_Vaporium @resiguru @of_flocks @Jimbo12449841 @jimmy_jone34951 @bemused @grok Oh, and re Gore's guff and Dr Moore's reply, there's an interesting paper by Prof Kneev Sharma and Prof Dimitre Karamanev "INVESTIGATING THE HISTORICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION AND GLOBAL TEMPERATURE CHANGE" June 2021 https://t.co/2
RT @ladyspat1: @craigthomler @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @ChrisBBacon3 @MLeiter42 @Frnc_prep @patfrank830 @sjsimmons @WHPAAD @grok @balls95…
@craigthomler @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @ChrisBBacon3 @MLeiter42 @Frnc_prep @patfrank830 @sjsimmons @WHPAAD @grok @balls95652097 @joPO19942906 @BubbasRanch @WayneAllanH @evenminded512 @MichaelCar11571 @BenKoby1911 @dafalgoutDennis @LexWaters7 @Michael_D_Crow @Scizz8 @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @DaleGribble_666 @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @ammocrypta @rln_nelson @4RealClimate @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @TrixX306 @phlannelphysics @BobPartridge16 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @NOAA It is you who is disregarding the proxies & the historical records; e.g. Japanese heat wave & drought in 1179. Also, your proxies are incapable of determining the annual changes in a falsely purported Global temperature change of 1.1C divided by 175 years.
@Yellow_Dog1959 @SecretaryWright I know the answer. You made a bold statement about me, now tell us, how often does the "global" temperature change ?
@Yellow_Dog1959 @SecretaryWright Show us how knowledgeable you are. How often does the "global " temperature change ?
@Yellow_Dog1959 @SecretaryWright The "global" temperature temperature can't be measured. How often does the "global " temperature change ?
@sjsimmons @ejwwest @DavidEngineerX A reminder - the ice in Greenland recorded GLOBAL temperature change via changes in atmospheric oxygen isotopes released by plants that aren't on Greenland. Look at Scott's reply - just another lie. Democrats Lie About Everything
@PrasadKasibhat1 @hausfath What a silly graph. Solar forcing drives temperature and CO2 has practically no effect on it. That graph is bogus. NOAA Global Temperature Change https://t.co/0mwvK29r3P
@sjsimmons @ejwwest @DavidEngineerX Solar cycles are the driver of GMST, not atmospheric gases. Proof: NOAA Global Temperature Change - follows solar cycles, not atmospheric gases. https://t.co/hS4HPaPLhz
@MarkJan08409037 @JimBair62221006 Again, this is local rapid temperature change. I’m talking global temperature change. Also, if we’re being rude, you should go learn some grammar.
@Lume_Darkzen @DefiantLs How about posting something that shows dramatic global temperature change in 300 years? That graph shows changes taking many thousands or millions of years.
@JuanJoseDe75672 @JorgeBerges1908 @b_bbirddd Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lo, K., Lea, D. W., & Medina-Elizade, M. (2006). Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14288–14293. https://t.co/0cdhFW6sXj
Same data, different format - The first works the second doesn't (despite the hype) via: showyourstripes.info/c/globe
« Climate models have been consistent wrong in their predictions, why should we trust them now ? » It’s a common claim, but climate models have been around since the 1970s… So how well have they actually performed? Let’s take a look
@EfektNietoperza @Sebek7285810463 @toboytrue @Piechocinski Screeny ci nic nie dadzą, musisz przeczytać całość. Hansel 2006 jest dość krótki i dostępny za darmo - https://t.co/95mabLzk7d
“For me, what we’ve got to do now is hunker down.” –Suzuki We’ll never get radical action needed from govt to save us every incremental global temperature change if we don’t take radical action ourselves to show them we mean it. ONLY hunkering down when haven’t had general strike = accepting defeat
I always use this slide in teaching Env Sci courses. Some people think the current rising temperature is ok because it happened before. But that warm period or dinosaur era is NOT relevant to human. What really matters to us is the stable climate that contributed to successful agriculture. (2/5)
#1T241 We should look at the global temperature change for a longer period than my yesterday's posts. This is NASA GISS data plotted differently. Even with a recent slight drop, global warming is accelerating. x.com/MakikoSato6/...
The sad part is it's already too late. We have 5 years to stop hitting the 3 degree global temperature change. That's irreversible at that point. Dooms humanity and a lot of innocent fellow creatures on this planet to extinction. Probably by 2100. Can't see us collectively reversing course now.
Congress is trying to kill new investment in solar and wind power. Meanwhile global warming is accelerating. This is a death wish, on a national and global scale.
Yep
The global temperature Change.
showyourstripes.info
2024 was the warmest year on record
https://showyourstripes.info/ You can can drill down geographically on that website. You may easily find almost twice the global change for your place (say almost +2°C from 1985, +3°C from 1925)
Global Temperature Change 1850-2024 (Data: UK Met Office) "The rising temperatures we're seeing today, mostly driven by human created carbon pollution." @climatecentral.org #ShowYourStripes #WarmingStripes Prof. Ed Hawkins, University of Reading @edhawkins.org Learn More: showyourstripes.info
Show Your Stripes Day is about raising awareness of the Climate Emergency and how fast the world has warmed because of human activity The day reiterates both the importance of talking about climate and taking action on emissions www.rte.ie/learn/2024/0... #ClimateEmergency #ShowYourStripes
Temperature change over time, globally and in Dublin - food for thought on Show Your Stripes Day. We need increased action to cut fossil fuels if we are to have a liveable future #ShowYourStripes
Seattle has more swing throughout time but still is quite a temperate region even in our 3 weeks of “summer” it’s raining and 55°f today on the solstice.
Yes
An update to the ‘Warming Stripes’ #Climate #DataViz which now shows temperature changes from the ocean to the stratosphere journals.ametsoc.org/view/journal...
@Henthor70 @xynyxs @ClimateBen @grok You’re too lazy and too wilfully ignorant to even read the “cited” paper Hansen 2006. It refutes your ignorant opinions. You also didn’t read the debunking thread and sources for the earlier old faked blog graph you posted. Boring time wasting troll. https://t.co/B5TFF8lUjX
Whenever one of my posts gains traction outside the usual climate-interested circle, it’s so fascinating to read the comments. Many are seeing a graph of CO₂ or global temperature change for the first time. It is always obvious that there is a huge desire for more of this real-time climate data!
Global temperature change over time by @edhawkins.org www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/spirals/
Climate change is the long-term shift in the Earth's average temperatures and weather conditions. #BlueEarth Test your knowledge of global temperature change and its impact on Earth's #climate. Warm Up: climate.nasa.gov/quizzes/glob...
This chart, included in the latest paper published by @edhawkins.org, makes clear just how quickly our planet is warming
A new research paper reveals a stark temperature shift from the oceans to the atmosphere. But what does it reveal about our changing #climate? In short: Consistent warming patterns in the upper oceans and lower atmosphere + the warmest years occur in the past decade... Read on: rdg.ac/4iD8cBv
Love this. Here's my attempt at global temperature change, 1850-2024 ✒️⛳️
#Hansen.229.10 accelerated warming Europe is warming 0.53°C decade Land is warming 0.51°C decade ocean is warming 0.29°C decade The land temperature change is double the ocean temperature change (Fig. 4, top) and 1.5 times larger than the global temperature change. mailchi.mp/caa/2025-glo...
results. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the proposed methods. A case study on global temperature change demonstrates their utility in practice. [8/8 of https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08332v1]
I don't want to alarm anyone, but I don't feel like enough people pay attention to graphs like this: #AGW #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange
March 2025 data for the C3S global temperature trend monitor is in. Feb 25 -> Sep 29 Mar 25 -> Jun 29 So, what is your guess when MM YY -> (same) MM YY +3 ❓ [please answer in the original thread below] & check historic projections yourself: apps.climate.copernicus.eu/global-tempe...
Global temperature change from 1850-2023. Watch till the end. There is no time to wait. #ActOnClimate #climate #energy #phaseoutfossilfuels #go100re
Alsup asks for answers - 11 MAR 2018 www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar... #climatechange #science
Climate deniers blew this, bringing research to prove it! They did lie by cutting off 1/2 the graph. Key findings - Rate of CO2 & global temperature change intimately linked. Too fast a change leads to mass extinctions. And ours is the worst ever! www.theclimatebrink.com/p/climate-sk...
This is what is happening. Data of global temperature change since 1850. Accelerating glacier loss since 1950. From the State of the Global Climate 2024 report just published. wmo.int/publication-...
It’s official: 2024 was the hottest year on record — both globally and for the US The US experienced 27 billion-dollar weather and climate disasters Studies found climate change contributed to the deaths of thousand and the displacement of millions during extreme weather events last year
The Atlantic published this article in 2017 containing input from Princeton Scientist Michael Oppenheimer that we had lost the chance to avoid 2 degrees of mean global temperature change. www.theatlantic.com/science/arch...
It can also be used to diagnose sources of biases in existing simplified WBGT approximations. We apply this framework also to sWBGT to show the underlying similarities and differences in how these related measures respond to global temperature change.
It’s part of the same MAGA-magical thinking as: “If we don’t track Covid, bird flu, global temperature change, etc., etc., it doesn’t exist.
No one alive will experience a better climate than today. But young people will experience a much more dangerous and chaotic world in the future, and the extent to which that happens will depend on our choices today. Trump doesn't care because he's old and a sociopath. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/s...
No one alive will experience a better climate than we have today. But young people will experience a much more dangerous and chaotic world in the future, and the extent to which that happens will depend on our choices today. Trump and many of his enablers […] [Original post on mastodon.world]
what kinda global temperature change are we talking about from a 100m impact
RT @pmagn: @PCarterClimate "We conclude that global warming of more than ≈1°C, relative to 2000, will constitute “dangerous” climate change…
@PCarterClimate "We conclude that global warming of more than ≈1°C, relative to 2000, will constitute “dangerous” climate change as judged from likely effects on sea level and Extermination
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
"Dear Mr. Kimoto, Thank you for pointing this out! Of all the hundreds of thousands of hours spent by scientists over the last half Century examining forcings involved in global temperature change, only YOU have thought to consider upper troposphere! Are you a descendent of Galileo by any chance?"
Now that all groups have released their 2024 global temperature data, here is a comparison of their timeseries and their 2024 values
felt appropriate to share here as well. feels less appropriate to add that we are definitely cooked
Any time the planet has done a 2C+ global temperature change, anything bigger than a rat went extinct. With run-away heating releasing methane in the atmosphere at insane rates from the Great White North and others... we have no worries about stopping climate change, we won't be there to stop it.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @BaxterWilliams_ The end of 2024 should be interesting for assessing Hansen et al. 1988. https://t.co/o1yKPBphGJ [http…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @BaxterWilliams_ The end of 2024 should be interesting for assessing Hansen et al. 1988. https://t.co/o1yKPBphGJ [http…
@9luckycrater09 @snowtree1931 @Oh_Come_On_Pls @ChrisMartzWX @kc10usaf @RogerCoppock As if you honestly care about evidence.
Jesus Christ, I'm sorry inds
"earths axis is off". No. The obliquity & precession of the planets rotation only affects the timing & intensity of the planets seasons. The GLOBAL temperature is unchanged. Orbital changes cause a global temperature change. Current orbit is that of cooling. (Milankovitch cycles).
A fantastic new CUP Elements volume on Climate Science from Wendy Parker--one of the best philosophers of climate science there is! Free to download through December.
@BaxterWilliams_ The end of 2024 should be interesting for assessing Hansen et al. 1988. https://t.co/o1yKPBphGJ [https://t.co/yEMvvodtZo] - figure 1.9: https://t.co/MyLtm3wzcg - figure 3: https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K [https://t.co/8Fmo6weAiv] https://t.co/Wwe1b7IeHW https://t.co/zaQIY3NwSl https://t.co/LSBm5JNcZ0
Yes, climate changes. Ice ages and all that. It is not supposed to change by a global average of +3°C in the space of 200 years. The cycles of global temperature change that we have record of are WAY, WAY longer than that. We are in the same cycle as the last global ice age some 12-16000 years ago.
The land warms about twice as fast as the ocean, but once you rescale for that basic difference, the patterns have usually been quite similar. But not during the early 20th century, when the ocean measurements were much cooler than land observations would expect. 4/
According to the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) Scientific Advisory Panel, reducing methane emissions associated with human activity by 50% over the next 30 years would mitigate against global temperature change by 0.2°C
The context of the last 2000 years and the rapid recent human-caused warming of our planet, mainly due to burning fossil fuels
Warming stripes running out of red Scientists added a new shade to a graphical representation of global temperature change to keep up with our warming world This should be an urgent wake up call www.bbc.com/future/artic... #COP29 #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis #Climate
A famous climate graphic is running out of red Scientists added a new shade to a graphical representation of global temperature change to keep up with our warming world If this isn't a key indicator of how bad the #ClimateEmergency is, I don't know what is www.bbc.com/future/artic... #COP29
Just to emphasise this. That chart again, with ALT-txt
Cumulative emissions of CO2 and future non-CO2 radiative forcing determine the probability of limiting warming to 1.5°C Figure 1. a) Observed global temperature change and modeled responses to stylized anthropogenic emission and forcing pathways 8/
#CO2.190 global temperature change 100 years after a one year pulse of present-day (2014) emissions? After 10 years short-lived components dominate (CH₄, SO₂, NOx, & also CO₂), but after 100 years it is all about CO₂. Mitigate both! Fig TS20 ipcc.ch/report/ar6/w... www.facebook.com/permalink.ph...
"The direct indicators of our failure to act [on climate change] are the rising Keeling curve and the average global temperature change that is rapidly approaching the first Paris Agreement target of 1.5°C" climatecrisisclub.org/blog/f/the-p...
Or that the average temperature going up 1-2% would mean hurricanes and tornadoes would get 1-2% stronger and the bad things, if they happened, would happen equally gradually. I’ve always noticed a disconnect there, just in understanding what average global temperature change means.
I think it's a positive shift, since it names it as a crisis rather than something that sounds vaguely problematic or even pleasant. Plus, the climate crises are a lot more widespread than global temperature change alone.
@DawnTJ90 @kissingtruth @Stashiv82 @rahmstorf I wish you'd provide a proper link: https://t.co/TFsFzIxx4F
@FreeInduna @_ClimateCraze Not really, given that we just had a super El Nino. Which is known to have the potential of lifting atmospheric surface temperatures up to 0.2C. https://t.co/GGVbPE4547
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
The sentence is somehow even worse in context! I know the authors of the only research being cited to support these claims personally and this is an outrageous misrepresentation of their work.
With respect to @hausfath.bsky.social @glenpeters.bsky.social and others, the problem with the article is not the temperature number they end up at, but the fundamental failure in trying to slam down a single, predetermined destiny onto the table, rather than presenting this as the result of choices
Grew up in colder times & places & heard stories of harder winters from family born in 1880s. 2nd hand farm in Vermont in family 1810-1986. My dad wired the house in 1941.
Surge protection Pondering the limitations (once again) of purely statistical techniques for understanding global temperature change. diagrammonkey.wordpress.com/2024/03/15/s...
Truth. #thailand @edhawkins.bsky.social
When is an Arctic bias not an Arctic bias? Wondering whether a warm bias in the Arctic in ERA5 affects our estimates of global temperature change. diagrammonkey.wordpress.com/2024/03/04/w...
Tweet of the climate 2023 NB: Not all lines reach 2023 yet.
Physical predictions out to year 2100, such as global temperature change, are useful for mitigation decisions because they explicitly depend on scenario assumptions. But if we try to predict societal changes in 2100 the exogenous assumptions become endogenous and get buried deep within such studies.
Here are El Niño overlays using images from Wikipedia. The first shows the Zeke Hausfather chart under occurrences in red. Second is the more scientific overlay (RCraig09) but it stops before 2023. If very strong, the next El Niño will probably push us permanently over the 1.5 C threshold.
James Hansen "disastrous BAU [Business As Usual], which could yield sea level rise of several meters per century with eventual rise of tens of meters, enough to transform global coastlines." West Side Highway is 3 m (10 ft) above sea level! @god_wrestle https://t.co/VzpmgUxkVM https://t.co/DXLTcBV84a
Sterk beeld van een versnellende opwarming. Al een paar maanden op onbekend terrein. Hopelijk is dit ‘uit de bocht vliegen’ tijdelijk. Via @edhawkins Global temperature change (1850-2023) Updated to include October 2023, showing 5 record warm months in a row. - ed-hawkins.github.io/climate-visu...
Ed Hawkins (Professor of Climate Science + Creator of Warming Stripes): Global temperature change (1850-2023) Updated to include October 2023, showing 5 record warm months in a row. Click on the link: ed-hawkins.github.io/climate-visu...
their data says that climate change has basically no impact on megafauna population. they don't comment on whether that's plausible (each of the spikes in the bottom graph represents a global temperature change of 4-6°C) https://t.co/E5jzpNVIDV https://t.co/x6c2YsvUDA
Pretty similar with the actual data for October.
New paper by Hansen: "Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields Charney (fast-feedback) equilibrium climate sensitivity 1.2 ± 0.3°C (2σ) per W/m2, which is 4.8°C ± 1.2°C for doubled CO2." academic.oup.com/oocc/article...
Much awaited James Hansen paper is out. If correct, theoretical 2X CO2 yields warming on the very high end of model estimates: “Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields equilibrium climate sensitivity of 4.8°C ± 1.2°C” academic.oup.com/oocc/article...
#Hansen82.2 Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields Charney (fast-feedback) equilibrium climate sensitivity 1.2 ± 0.3°C (2σ) per W/m2, which is 4.8°C ± 1.2°C for doubled CO2. #Global_Boiling academic.oup.com/oocc/article... twitter.com/bratananium/...
"Temperature switchboard" visualization of the global temperature change by country. Years 1900, 1950, 2000 and 2022. Something is clearly happening and it is fast
The danger of climate tipping points is real. Every tenth of a degree warming increases their likelihood, but any thresholds are awfully hard to pin down quantitatively. Global average temperature & AMOC from comprehensive GCMs show steady, not abrupt, changes even for high emission scenarios (figs)
4/ "These high temperatures are occurring despite the fact that the current El Nino may not even qualify as a “super” El Nino, comparable to those of 1997-98 and 2015-16. [...] Antarctica will become a more important contributor to global temperature change."
Interesting discussion in James Hansen’s newsletter on the Southern Hemisphere polar amplification: “The recent decline of sea ice area may be an indication that, averaged over weather, Antarctica will become a more important contributor to global temperature change.” mailchi.mp/caa/el-nino-...
Drop something blue from your gallery
Impressive visualization of global temperature change 1880-2022. Click through to watch video. https://live.staticflickr.com/video/52630940920/f580e47822/1080p.mp4?s=eyJpIjo1MjYzMDk0MDkyMCwiZSI6MTY5MjYwMTQ5OCwicyI6IjU1NzE1MTQzYTQxYjc3ZDMyMWJmNDg2NDg1NjMzNzhmY2Y3MmE0MTMiLCJ2IjoxfQ
You realise "climate change is inevitable" is absurd when you reword it as "fossil fuels are inevitable" or "Exxon is inevitable" or "Rishi Sunak is inevitable" It's a threat built of causes which we can identify and fight. Fatalism is pro-fossil. Be pro-fighting, instead ✊
More #buzzkill #sorrynotsorry
Good news: climate policies implemented since the 2015 Paris Agreement have reduced projected global temperature change by at least 1C so far. Bad news: it’s still not enough to avoid widespread dangerous impacts; and as this summer shows, we’ve been systematically underestimating the extremes.
@TonyClimate Historical data prove their point. https://t.co/S2hIRr940W
@Simonbuchtmann1 @AKundendienst @RA_MarkusHaintz @welt @AufstandLastGen @ulfposh @Tim_Roehn @a_nnaschneider Zur Temperatur: https://t.co/6xQ3NsWpq6 Den Ölverbrauch findest du selber, der letzte Teil ist Chemie. Das macht die explizite Messung menschlichen co2s obsolet. Aber ich werde dich eh nicht überzeugen.
A poignant figure from the #IPCC 6th Assessment report, just released today. Global temperature change from the perspective of my generation, my parent's generation, and my daughters. We need to shift from incremental to transformational change #ClimateReport
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
We’re warming at about a rate of 0.2C a decade * In Europe, that rate is 0.5C ** Earth is currently at 1.1C of warming. ** Current global policies result in about 2.1-2.9°C *** *https://t.co/e4VK0H9lJV **https://t.co/XRpnqeL4mW ***https://t.co/xQs21MY6zM https://t.co/JvfXcqojcl
Global temperature change | PNAS https://t.co/5dacwfTRfT
@CapTweed @Arcadiu15174978 @rtenews The Medieval warm period was not a global phenomenon and the little ice age corresponds with a major volcanic eruption which lowered solar radiation. Otherwise you have no explanation to the current rapid rise in temps globally over the past few decades! https://t.co/GvnzSJdnV0
@Gary_Morga @IrishTimes I'm not bothered to look any further. If you want some actual peer reviewed studies. Link below. Have a good weekend
@JeffNor50595241 @aNorthernGarden @TravellingAgro @CharlieJGardner https://t.co/GvnzSJdnV0
@doom37455413 @richykirsh @JKelleyK @AndrewLazarus4 @ZeetubesII @JimeeLiberty @mcfunny @PhillyPharmaBoy @JonathanHannah @reacharoundu @AspAlaAsnAsnTyr @nuhope2022 @SkepticalMutant @ogilville1 @Pouldeau61 @KellyGoodmanPhD @RadioColor @MaureenStroud @Jaytee116James @IdunsDaughter @RickeyH64219156 @provaxtexan @Monstercoyliar @TonyBaduy @barryjohnreid21 @tomsirolimus @ShockTraumaRN @doritmi @Cherylmm21 @scottstocker4 @kevinault @jtmayes3 @AngryFleas @newstranslate13 @WendyOrent @Nockit1 @pawley_robert @ConsequentialBr @krebiozen @jarbot15 @JimBeam102 @Thskicksarefire @swedishchf @Alex_on_A14 @ShadowDroid616 @TheDrJon @Adrian7745 @statsguyuk @CurfewX @JDCBurnhil More peer-reviewed science which disagrees with you: https://t.co/aEENMf21ls Got any more Twitter graphs?
@CDMarshall7 @xiehongwei1984 @shakibesque @JonHallin @TomGreg05368229 @TheRealNALee @ScottDuncanWX Not what the science says https://t.co/GvnzSJcQ5s
@NiusMarco @MartinS91309243 @EricVIALA7 @hugoclement (Et la source pour les 0,2 °C/décennie : https://t.co/pUpnnTTNsd)
@Mattzwolinski sneaky, but also normal -i-f- -y-o-u-'-v-e- -g-o-t- -a-n- -a-g-e-n-d-a-, sorry, if you want to highlight an issue. https://t.co/o1pqM3WJM7 https://t.co/LXhvzdeZoX
@michael_trumper @cloppyhorse @BethZitzow @axios https://t.co/HJIzveuxES
@RealSheepish @The_John_R @Jerrylwolf @MarshaBlackburn How about a peer-reviewed paper from scientists that also has been cited 2490 times. https://t.co/4qAVnwdaTz
@SentroAllery @Willard1951 @krebiozen @FillmoreWhite @SkepticalMutant @reacharoundu @doom37455413 @JamesLynchGTC @JimeeLiberty @JonathanHannah @andylumm @anxiety_korma @mpc_xetts @LifeAfterWEF @Amber84280581 @Mr_Magoo5 @AndrewLazarus4 @TonyBaduy @MsTrixter @CaeJak @djchicus @WalterTAllen @ghoppe @Dominos20076133 @carlsmythe @AlbertRodz5 @FoolanderWorld @chimera414 @FvckYourFear @fadgesniffer @richykirsh @Jaytee116James @nuhope2022 @ShockTraumaRN @Alex_on_A14 @paramaniac9 @Theonew16516042 @expose_the_dog @mcfunny @lazlowoodbine42 @malo_j @dann58638436 @WilliamMarsWard @NewSouthPhoto @volpiranyas @Frosty69B @raouldukeerik @kevinault @AlBowers1 @PremierImproves https://t.co/pJdrMErnQF
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
RT @pmagn: Global temperature change 1C dangerous 2006 350ppm James Hansen, Makiko Sato, Reto Ruedy, Ken Lo, David https://t.co/BFVsbvVygf
RT @larbi_fred: 7/366 Global surface temperature has increased ~0.2°C per decade in the past 30 years. https://t.co/odEoyrnLmD #ClimateChan…
RT @larbi_fred: 7/366 Global surface temperature has increased ~0.2°C per decade in the past 30 years. https://t.co/odEoyrnLmD #ClimateChan…
7/366 Global surface temperature has increased ~0.2°C per decade in the past 30 years. https://t.co/odEoyrnLmD #ClimateChange #ClimateFacts https://t.co/O68r7Dc3Kr https://t.co/GmmOKJ1NFl
Global temperature change attributable to external factors, confirms new study - @UniofOxford http://bit.ly/2X1LJFd
Really like this climate #dataviz: Global temperature change as polka dots http://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2017/polka-dot-patterns/ via @ClimateLabBook @ed_hawkins
https://claudiocassardo.wordpress.com/2016/05/20/global-temperature-change-month-by-month/ http://fb.me/6k9efdWpN
Past Century's Global Temperature Change Is Fastest On Record http://n.pr/YQwJ6v
V
JS
I
G
PE
JZ
S
JH
RC
C
A
JA
AS
JB
US
KH
SI
IS
AF
BL
CH
A
J
B
F
SR
C
RH
VJ
GC
N
G
PB
BM
HW
JD
SK
M
S
A
RL
Y
JZ
RA
IG
CT
DK
春
RE
RI
CR
O
C
RS
LA
FS
JB
RR
ES
AW
B
HM
OP
DS
CB
SP
TS
A
E
MG
D
CC
CW
IC
AS
F
DB
DH
S
A
SF
DÓ
F
V
I
IO
GG
B
PR
SQ
GA
FL