Synopsis of Social media discussions

The comments primarily focus on procedural aspects, such as modeling surfaces and slabs, with phrases like 'routine' and 'beginner-friendly,' indicating a functional but limited interest. The tone reveals casual curiosity rather than in-depth discussion or implications of the study itself, leading to moderate interest but minimal engagement or perceived impact.

A
Agreement
Low agreement

The discussions show some skepticism or indifference regarding the relevance or quality of the tutorial content.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

There is moderate interest, mainly from individuals familiar with computational modeling, but general enthusiasm seems limited.

E
Engagement
Neutral engagement

Most posts briefly mention modeling practice without deep analysis or critical engagement with the research findings.

I
Impact
Neutral impact

The conversations do not seem to influence broader scientific debates or reflect significant impact from the publication.

Social Mentions

YouTube

2 Videos

Bluesky

2 Posts

Twitter

6 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

2,100

Total Likes

76

Extended Reach

5,813

Social Features

10

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Modeling Copper Cu (110) Surface with BURAI for DFT Calculations

Modeling Copper Cu (110) Surface with BURAI for DFT Calculations

This tutorial walks through creating a Copper 110 surface in BURAI, including downloading CIF files, modeling the surface, and converting input files for various DFT codes. It highlights key steps for surface structure analysis.

December 27, 2024

1,152 views


Modeling Copper (100) Surface with BURAI: A Step-by-Step Guide

Modeling Copper (100) Surface with BURAI: A Step-by-Step Guide

This detailed tutorial guides you through building a Copper FCC 100 surface model with four layers using BURAI. It covers downloading CIF files, importing into BURAI, and creating surface slabs for adsorption studies.

December 16, 2024

948 views


  • Jose Carlos
    @Jcarlos_Ra89 (Twitter)

    RT @ManasSharma07: New tutorial, who dis? Watch or go broke https://t.co/nv1VviHjfI
    view full post

    December 27, 2024

    3

  • Kutand Alkım Bayer
    @kutandalkim (Twitter)

    RT @ManasSharma07: New tutorial, who dis? Watch or go broke https://t.co/nv1VviHjfI
    view full post

    December 27, 2024

    3

  • ..................
    @willloook (Twitter)

    RT @ManasSharma07: New tutorial, who dis? Watch or go broke https://t.co/nv1VviHjfI
    view full post

    December 27, 2024

    3

  • Manas Sharma
    @physwhiz.bsky.social (Bluesky)

    New tutorial, who dis? Watch or go broke youtu.be/fn4uqFsD3Zs
    view full post

    December 27, 2024

    2

    1

  • Manas Sharma, PhD
    @ManasSharma07 (Twitter)

    New tutorial, who dis? Watch or go broke https://t.co/nv1VviHjfI
    view full post

    December 27, 2024

    17

    3

  • Nuttachai Jutong
    @NuttachaiJT (Twitter)

    RT @ManasSharma07: Modeling slabs and surfaces is something that one does routinely as a computational material scientist. This video offer…
    view full post

    December 17, 2024

    1

  • Manas Sharma
    @physwhiz.bsky.social (Bluesky)

    Modeling slabs and surfaces is something that one does routinely as a computational material scientist. This video offers a beginner-friendly method to make it easier #CompChem #CompChemSky
    view full post

    December 16, 2024

    5

  • Manas Sharma, PhD
    @ManasSharma07 (Twitter)

    Modeling slabs and surfaces is something that one does routinely as a computational material scientist. This video offers a beginner-friendly method to make it easier: https://t.co/S8i3P8J97F
    view full post

    December 16, 2024

    17

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • The study explores the chemisorption of different atoms (H, N, S, O, C) on copper surfaces using density functional theory, revealing varying adsorption energy orders based on the surface type (Cu(111), Cu(110), Cu(100)).
  • The preferred adsorption sites vary: a 3-fold hollow site for Cu(111) and a 4-fold hollow site for Cu(100), while Cu(110) shows differing preferences depending on the specific atom.
  • Results indicate that surface coverage affects the adsorption energy significantly but does not notably change the preferred sites, except for hydrogen and oxygen on Cu(110).