Algumas leituras que recomendo sobre - https://t.co/IcFATQHJyV https://t.co/A12daea1sW https://t.co/niZzNaimGi https://t.co/OjSSgiuPVd
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Oct 2020 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
News74 articles
-
X / Twitter13 posts
-
Blogs6 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect a strong interest in the psychological mechanisms of anthropomorphism, as evidenced by references to empirical works and specific theory components. The tone varies from casual mentions to academic suggestions, indicating a balanced engagement with the publication’s ideas and their potential implications in AI and social behavior.
Most discussions acknowledge the relevance of Epley et al.'s theory, with some explicitly recommending or referencing the research, indicating general agreement on its importance.
The posts show high curiosity about the subject, especially with references to related concepts like AI and agency attribution, and recommendations for further reading.
Some posts delve into specific aspects of the theory, mentioning related studies and empirical work, demonstrating moderate engagement.
There's recognition of the work's significance in fields like AI and social psychology, but concrete claims of impact remain limited, reflecting moderate perceived influence.
Abstract in brief
- The article explains anthropomorphism as the tendency to attribute human-like qualities, motivations, or emotions to nonhuman agents, which is common but varies depending on certain psychological factors.
- The three key determinants influencing when people anthropomorphize are the accessibility of human-related knowledge, the motivation to understand and influence agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social connection (sociality motivation).
- The theory helps understand why anthropomorphism is variable across individuals and contexts, predicts how factors like knowledge, motivation, and social needs affect it, and discusses applications in robotics, human-computer interaction, and the related process of dehumanization.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyAI isn't close to becoming sentient—the real danger lies in how easily we're prone to anthropomorphize it @ConversationEDU https://t.co/FhkyREBhc3 https://t.co/brvBv4UzG6
@criticalneuro Nick Epley has a whole line of research on anthropomorphization. This would be a place to start: https://t.co/BHfUL3IprJ
On seeing human. https://t.co/CjVwe2OqNa https://t.co/Q5cX6S6DFu
@criticalneuro GAH. I'd just google scholar "On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism." there's a pdf version linked!
@jeffguhin Adam Waytz' work on anthropomorphism might be helpful. Here's one review paper out of many review & empirical papers: https://t.co/iG5kqkuQdr. I can also suggest some papers about agency attributions to God, just wasn't sure if God was too close to a human/animal.
All mentions
Understanding Anthropomorphism: Psychological Factors and Applications
This video explains anthropomorphism as the tendency to attribute human qualities to nonhuman agents. It explores key psychological factors like knowledge accessibility, effectance motivation, and sociality motivation…
Understanding Anthropomorphism in Artificial Systems and Human Psychology
This episode explores why and how we attribute human traits to artificial systems like AI and robots, examining the psychological and cultural factors behind anthropomorphism and its implications in technology and…
Issu de Epley, N., Waytz, A., et Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886
Today I look at "On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism". A psychology paper from 2007. https://t.co/eATUOQvDBo
RT @borbo_effect: Algumas leituras que recomendo sobre - https://t.co/IcFATQHJyV https://t.co/A12daea1sW https://t.co/niZzNaimGi https://t…
Algumas leituras que recomendo sobre - https://t.co/IcFATQHJyV https://t.co/A12daea1sW https://t.co/niZzNaimGi https://t.co/OjSSgiuPVd
RT @TechXplore_com: AI isn't close to becoming sentient—the real danger lies in how easily we're prone to anthropomorphize it @Conversation…
RT @TechXplore_com: AI isn't close to becoming sentient—the real danger lies in how easily we're prone to anthropomorphize it @Conversation…
RT @TechXplore_com: AI isn't close to becoming sentient—the real danger lies in how easily we're prone to anthropomorphize it @Conversation…
AI isn't close to becoming sentient—the real danger lies in how easily we're prone to anthropomorphize it @ConversationEDU https://t.co/FhkyREBhc3 https://t.co/brvBv4UzG6
@jeffguhin Adam Waytz' work on anthropomorphism might be helpful. Here's one review paper out of many review & empirical papers: https://t.co/iG5kqkuQdr. I can also suggest some papers about agency attributions to God, just wasn't sure if God was too close to a human/animal.
@criticalneuro GAH. I'd just google scholar "On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism." there's a pdf version linked!
@criticalneuro Nick Epley has a whole line of research on anthropomorphization. This would be a place to start: https://t.co/BHfUL3IprJ
On seeing human. https://t.co/CjVwe2OqNa https://t.co/Q5cX6S6DFu
@YaQueeens 5. On seeing human: A Three-factor theory of anthropomorphism (Epley, et al, 2007) 6. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism (Epley, et al, 2008)
On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism https://t.co/PUUZaRfFzs
EB
T
SK
WY
MC
DP
SM
KN
N
A
PT
PK
PF