@cegadede Aproveitando a polêmica da quiropraxia: https://t.co/ot5mFNvGIP Resumo (poucos dados, mas que levam a crer que a quiropraxia não funciona melhor do que tratamentos convencionais ou até que placebo, com o "bônus" de poder causar sérios riscos à saúde)
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter90 posts
-
News20 articles
-
Blogs11 articles
-
Bluesky7 posts
-
Facebook4 posts
-
Reddit4 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions are characterized by a critical tone, with many posters citing scientific studies or reviews like Edzard Ernst’s article, which emphasize the lack of scientific support for chiropractic practices. Words such as 'pseudoscience,' 'charlatanism,' and phrases like 'not based on solid science' reflect both firm disagreement and a strong desire to inform and warn others about potential risks and the scientific invalidity of chiropractic concepts.
The majority of discussions strongly oppose chiropractic practices, calling them pseudoscience and citing lack of scientific evidence.
Participants show high interest, referencing scientific articles, studies, and sharing detailed critiques of chiropractic concepts.
There is deep engagement as posters analyze the scientific basis, safety concerns, and provide examples like research articles and official reviews.
The collective tone suggests a significant impact in shaping negative perceptions and informing the public about the scientific discrediting of chiropractic methods.
Abstract in brief
- Chiropractic, founded by DD Palmer as a drug-free healing art, involves concepts like subluxation and spinal manipulation, but these are not supported by solid scientific evidence.
- The profession is divided between traditionalists who strictly follow its original mystical principles and more modern practitioners open to change, leading to internal conflicts.
- While chiropractic is mainly used to treat back and neck pain, evidence for its effectiveness beyond these issues is limited, and its safety and cost-effectiveness are not convincingly proven, with potential risks involved in spinal manipulation.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@nornadottir The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. https://t.co/wxYt9LhNLo
@lewis0701__ @lukregner @Baileymoon15 https://t.co/wQ7tCKpFWP There are countless studies, feel free to look them up.
This is not science and can hurt people. "The core concepts of chiropractic spinal manipulation are not based on sound science." https://t.co/4N19jhhNnF "High-velocity neck manipulation has rarely been known to damage, causing a stroke." https://t.co/9Hrsfz1naC https://t.co/r1vnbKMbJ4
Ja, Gott hab ihn selig. Lt. @edzard.bsky.social und anderen Forschenden ist das Konzept der Chiropraktik nicht wissenschaftlich fundiert. Der Therapeutische Wert kann nicht zweifelsfrei nachgewiesen werden. Unten ein frei zugänglicher Review Artikel: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18280103/
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
All mentions
Risks and Benefits of Chiropractic Spinal Treatment
Manual treatment of the spine often causes benign adverse events, which are common in both adults and children, but serious adverse events are rare. The risks of serious issues like strokes are very low, with individual…
Examining the Scientific Validity of Chiropractic Practices
Chiropractic, founded by DD Palmer as a drug-free healing art, involves concepts like subluxation and spinal manipulation that lack strong scientific support. This video critically evaluates the profession's origins…
@zoerosebryant Zoe please go to a physio and not a chiropractor bc they're pseudo-science!! They'll kill you, girl!! https://t.co/DKCxAh5qGk
#ERC Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation - ScienceDirect https://t.co/ABat36uQJA
@catgirlpissing chiropractic its all peer reviewed physical therapy would benefit you more https://t.co/tFUqMKX9bl
Pseudoscience. They believe completely unrelated illnesses can be treated with spine or foot manipulation. It is astonishing that this grift still exists today. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18280103/
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
@raybachi @cegadede Não lembro o primeiro, mas o segundo relato do rapaz da Nova Zelândia foi desse aqui: https://t.co/lm69QeY44T
@watsahoola @iSkinSheep @The_Traveler333 @kirawontmiss Like these? https://t.co/3QUekfdPpC https://t.co/u41Cye2Xpn
@kirawontmiss I'm all set, thanks. "The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt." https://t.co/MdvBCgbnEb
@babi @yasancap Sou espiritualista mas a gente não pode NUNCA virar as costas para a ciência. https://t.co/pkwLD5dXGL
@Nellynha_wwx @giusaldini Nelly tem um artigo que se chama "Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation", publicado pelo renomado pesquisador Edzard Ernst, é uma análise crítica da quiropraxia baseada em evidências científicas. Inclusive essa é a conclusão dele, aí você tira suas próprias conclusões sobre
@vitorcruzz1 @Jurassi83468097 @caiocgomes Basta abrir o PubMed e encontrar isso: "Chiropractic is rooted in mystical concepts" Charlatanismo é foda. https://t.co/bQIuWqkGzd
Core 'beliefs' of chiros "..subluxation and spinal manipulation..not based on sound science... With possible exception of back pain, chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been shown to be effective for any medical condition." pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18280103/
RT @AthopeMarie: This is not science and can hurt people. "The core concepts of chiropractic spinal manipulation are not based on sound s…
RT @AthopeMarie: This is not science and can hurt people. "The core concepts of chiropractic spinal manipulation are not based on sound s…
This is not science and can hurt people. "The core concepts of chiropractic spinal manipulation are not based on sound science." https://t.co/4N19jhhNnF "High-velocity neck manipulation has rarely been known to damage, causing a stroke." https://t.co/9Hrsfz1naC https://t.co/r1vnbKMbJ4
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@LiamSchubel @AndyKimNJ @RobertKennedyJr @NicoleShanahan @ScottPresler Can you comprehend this, 'doctor'? https://t.co/AD4f323z0q
@HeyNurseKat OMG-A Chiropractor?? Pseudoscience https://t.co/I7qM68T5aY "Chiropractic is rooted in mystical concepts...The core concepts of chiropractic, subluxation and spinal manipulation, are not based on sound science." Never allow neck manipulation- look up vertebral artery dissection
@lowlifts https://t.co/3F0IooHpIz
@TrishulVadi @fredrick_d31586 @Mr_Axel_Gear @LNielsenDK @NoLieWithBTC Actually https://t.co/8tXwevhmsA https://t.co/o6DfUSD5FP
@gcmarhx Démosle agua a la sedienta química Laurita. https://t.co/JkczUajv4l
@CNNBrasil A quiropraxia não tem evidências científicas sólidas de eficácia. A profissão não tem nem regulamentação. Procure um fisioterapeuta https://t.co/zJw3XIKgDR
@perlchen0_0 @lu_eder @stein_til Dagegen aufgrund der weltweiten Studienlage, die der Chiropraktik die Unwirksamkeit attestiert. https://t.co/4vovsuh8F1
O que a ciência diz sobre QUIROPRAXIA https://t.co/qWFKwRpSY7 via @YouTube
The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. https://t.co/ChnM8TQbJx https://t.co/C5ZpIBoKgE
@Bak65292Maryann @TaraBull808 Another: REVIEW ARTICLEVolume 35, Issue 5P544-562May 2008Open Access Download Full Issue Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation Edzard Ernst, MD, PhD, FRCP, FRCPEd edzard.ernst@pms.ac.uk Affiliations & Notes
@Justice0g @PTP_Lesko @HmmNiceee @BigMeeish @crazyclips_ So the best thing your chiropractor did for you was give you natural supps and teach you about a healthy lifestyle? It’s literally a pseudoscience https://t.co/wB6I4HAJMc
@DrBenTapper1 @ChildrensHD
@stkenned @aspiringpeasant A counterpoint is that I haven’t seen any scientific evidence demonstrating the benefit of chiropractic care. https://t.co/vusMWgkaxn
@apeirozenith @KadrinaOfficial @katietiedrich https://t.co/YxKzjuIysd
RT @Leo96814233: @Maiarabarrozo @rosana Parece que rola o mesmo com quiropraxia, tudo curso online. Olha o perigo! https://t.co/xEVo7OFzhK
@Maiarabarrozo @rosana Parece que rola o mesmo com quiropraxia, tudo curso online. Olha o perigo! https://t.co/xEVo7OFzhK
@lewis0701__ @lukregner @Baileymoon15 https://t.co/wQ7tCKpFWP There are countless studies, feel free to look them up.
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1RdA
@lu_mtrip Aqui flor, pra complementar: https://t.co/295Mp3ek3O
@w_laufer @H3LD_ @backtosantafe @ionarameirasz @profgontijo Não existem evidências que comprovem que a prática é científica. https://t.co/UQ5DUTjQ1V Além disso, embora seja um tema de estudo crescente, ainda não há estudos concretos que legitimem a prática. https://t.co/hLx9kuToe8
Gostei desse vídeo da @_NV1C sobre quiropraxia https://t.co/DXuEBr5Ord
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
"O que a ciência diz sobre quiropraxia" Por @_NV1C https://t.co/R6INZQRntb
@cegadede Aproveitando a polêmica da quiropraxia: https://t.co/ot5mFNvGIP Resumo (poucos dados, mas que levam a crer que a quiropraxia não funciona melhor do que tratamentos convencionais ou até que placebo, com o "bônus" de poder causar sérios riscos à saúde)
eu tô bem triste, não nego https://t.co/5zBRkzCzjn
O que a ciência diz sobre QUIROPRAXIA https://t.co/1gQLkcU3i2 via @YouTube
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
@sir_vert @butlerofdogs https://t.co/roAWW6i0HI
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
@HeyNurseKat "Chiropractic: a critical evaluation - PubMed" https://t.co/lKB2YZRKgz
this is an excerpt from an academic source https://t.co/XWD4sZhuZg https://t.co/XAUeVsFCP0
Ja, Gott hab ihn selig. Lt. @edzard.bsky.social und anderen Forschenden ist das Konzept der Chiropraktik nicht wissenschaftlich fundiert. Der Therapeutische Wert kann nicht zweifelsfrei nachgewiesen werden. Unten ein frei zugänglicher Review Artikel: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18280103/
@fost67 @kedemferre @DocPepper_FR https://t.co/skLUBJ8hKK
@trancerex @DrYametai 論文は結構あることをご存じありませんか? https://t.co/BKhm0zOjq5 https://t.co/e4LaevqqdH
Hier übrigens ein Beleg dafür, dass Chiropraktik eine gefährliche Pseudowissenschaft ist: https://t.co/tJ9XkMx5So
@kachoriaursabji @_glnarayanan @masthminching You can say the same about a random tweet. "The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt." https://t.co/R9oyQdpNZJ
@JennMoralesP @metodogolo No hay ninguna prueba de que la quiropráctica tenga buenos resultados. https://t.co/zw5MlA4CA1
@gloriaantonia20 @metodogolo @espagnum Aca te dejo artículos que dicen que no hay suficiente evidencia https://t.co/MBVnrNaEoa https://t.co/PcwVpvMGwx https://t.co/zw5MlA4CA1
@patepalito @qbeeert Como te explico que no hay estudios sistemáticos de la eficiencia de la Quiropraxia, esta al mismo nivel que la Homeopatía. https://t.co/66TrqpiLAP
@clodormido @Gustavousak https://t.co/66TrqpidLh
@nu_skewl @prints_ali @laura_rola @BadMedicalTakes - patients, on purpose, in what chiropractics can do for you https://t.co/k39UuD2J60
@nornadottir The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. https://t.co/wxYt9LhNLo
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N5hJtn
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N5hJtn
@Violet49_2021 @embasic @neilorpen https://t.co/l3E3N5hJtn
Remember that chiropractic is quackery. https://t.co/0de7iwxkLm
@ErmertMarkus Z.b. "With the possible exception of back pain, chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been shown to be effective for any medical condition." https://t.co/7DQnZUyCKa
@pseudo310 Not trying to harsh your vibe, but "Chiropractors' belief in the “innate,” subluxation, or spinal manipulation is not rational. Chiropractic practice raises numerous concerns. The effectiveness, safety, and cost of spinal manipulation are uncertain." https://t.co/cdxcnbhWCs
@notsamNJ @ResultFilms @RogerSullivanNO @BlueTeamSherpa @AP Did I miss the reference to chiropractic in the article? I don't think anyone is saying there is no such thing as musculoskeletal issues But here you go... https://t.co/T7x91WzMb0
@_FelipeBranco @folha Em português: https://t.co/3F5XxA605y Em inglês: https://t.co/0uPO2jA3g0
RT @TeessideSitP: et @EdzardErnst Chiropractic: a critical evaluation #chiropractic #chiropractor #pseudoscience https://t.co/DfhVrMH2QX
et @EdzardErnst Chiropractic: a critical evaluation #chiropractic #chiropractor #pseudoscience https://t.co/DfhVrMH2QX https://t.co/qHDqYCoroa
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvSJHZs
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/PFJVvT1jo2
The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. https://t.co/5W9EPAhkIm
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Artículos sobre efectos adversos de la quiropráctica, su historia, y la legitimidad de su entrenamiento de profesionales. https://t.co/A6MQkhCuY7 https://t.co/nyeQ9JPYuN https://t.co/A0QHFNKP2G https://t.co/pWMBZanYP2
@TrishulVadi @drflanders @ryarmst @realitybased111 @HealthWatch123 @wmacphail @pbenedetti @CaulfieldTim @drcadesky @drgigiosler @theresaboyle @sharon_kirkey @picardonhealth @Kidsdoc1Rick @KatieNicholson @kt_pedersen Like this for instance "With the possible exception of back pain, chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been shown to be effective for any medical condition. " https://t.co/zjdnKRVqMR
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
Chiropractic: A Critical Evaluation https://t.co/l3E3N508BP
@Kurz_Gesagt I have 2 topics suggestions: explanation of cosmic background radiation and chiropractic (a critical evaluation like your homeopathic video)
@mikaelgrev Åh, jag har aldrig använt en kiropraktor, bara delat korridor med en student. Tydligen ska det finnas vissa begränsade typer av ryggskott där det fungerar hyfsat. Ernst E (May 2008). "Chiropractic: a critical evaluation". Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 35 (5): 544–62
RT @EdzardErnst: Chiropractic: a critical evaluation. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/Ax00B41g4i
Chiropractic: a critical evaluation. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/Ax00B41g4i
RS
S
DA
EN
A
S
Y
DM
FI
G
O
F
D
K
MW
AM
DR
P
MM
Z
զ
MP
JT
OA
CA
HM
B
GN
A
P
SB
K
P
NC
L
PB
DD
DF
B
LT
TS
R
MR
ÓP
BA
JE
GL
?
GA
CE
MK
VG
KG
J
MÅ
F