December 2006 PMID 18500969

Effects of methoxyisoflavone, ecdysterone, and sulfo-polysaccharide supplementation on training adaptations in resistance-trained males.

Colin D Wilborn, Lemuel W Taylor, Bill I Campbell, Chad Kerksick, Chris J Rasmussen, Michael Greenwood, Richard B Kreider

Download social card

Mentions

33
Peak: 1 in Apr 2021
across 4 sources since Apr 2021

Extended reach

675,599
potential audience

Total likes

12,763

Video views

651,770

Mentions per month

Apr 2021 – Jun 2023

Where it's discussed

  • News23 articles
  • YouTube4 videos
  • Facebook4 posts
  • X / Twitter2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reflect a consensus that the studied supplements do not offer meaningful benefits for muscle gains, with comments like 'no different between the intervention & placebo,' and skepticism about claims of significant gains, which demonstrates a cautious and evidence-based tone. The choice of brief, straightforward language indicates a focus on dismissing unproven supplement claims based on recent research findings.

AgreementStrong agreement

The discussion agrees with the study's findings that supplements like ecdysterone show no significant benefits, as shown by statements dismissing their efficacy.

InterestModerate interest

Interest is moderate; there's curiosity about related studies and real-world implications, but limited deep analysis.

EngagementNeutral engagement

While some users reference specific research and share personal opinions, overall engagement remains surface-level with minimal detailed discussion.

ImpactModerate impact

Given the consensus that these supplements are ineffective, the discussion does not seem to suggest a high impact on practice or further research.

Abstract in brief

  • The study investigated whether supplementation with methoxyisoflavone, 20-hydroxyecdystone, or sulfopolysaccharide could enhance strength, muscle mass, or hormonal markers in trained males during an 8-week resistance training program.
  • Results showed no significant differences between the supplement groups and placebo in terms of muscle gains, body composition, or markers of anabolic and catabolic hormonal activity.
  • Overall, the findings suggest that these supplements do not provide additional benefits for muscle or strength development in already trained males.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Drew Baye High Intensity Training
@BayeDrew · X

Ecdysterone supplements don't appear to be any better than placebo for muscle gains. Don't waste your money. https://t.co/n3mWtwo0jB

Apr 21, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 12,055 followers View post →
Michael Joseph
@Nutradvance · X

@Frankanthony_ Though not specifically turkesterone, I saw this one and some lit reviews & animal studies. I am not sure it qualifies the massive gains and fat loss bit though. There was also an 8-week RCT with no different between the intervention & placebo https://t.co/HGGqRNTOno

Jun 10, 2023 · 11,773 followers View post →

All mentions

Michael Joseph
@Nutradvance · X

@Frankanthony_ Though not specifically turkesterone, I saw this one and some lit reviews & animal studies. I am not sure it qualifies the massive gains and fat loss bit though. There was also an 8-week RCT with no different between the intervention & placebo https://t.co/HGGqRNTOno

Jun 10, 2023 · 11,773 followers View post →
Drew Baye High Intensity Training
@BayeDrew · X

Ecdysterone supplements don't appear to be any better than placebo for muscle gains. Don't waste your money. https://t.co/n3mWtwo0jB

Apr 21, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 12,055 followers View post →