Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect an engagement with the scientific distinctions in the paper, such as the critique of the term 'pleasure' in defining addiction and the importance of precise definitions, exemplified by comments on how the public uses 'addiction' loosely versus scientific criteria, illustrating a balanced blend of curiosity and skepticism that influences social perceptions of the research.
Most discussions seem to align with the idea that the publication clarifies or supports current scientific understandings of addiction, especially emphasizing the difference between scientific definitions and public perceptions.
The overall interest appears neutral; some social discussions show curiosity or skepticism, but there isn't overwhelming enthusiasm or disinterest.
Posts reference specific concepts like 'pleasure' and 'definition,' indicating some level of detailed engagement, though some comments are more dismissive or superficial.
The conversations hint at the paper influencing how people think about 'addiction,' especially in distinguishing scientific criteria from everyday language, suggesting a moderate impact.
@sbrown64 @FoodFirst_Ty @g_spas @healthcoachkait @KenDBerryMD 1. https://t.co/NkhYS0fW3T 2. https://t.co/Ndg3MGqbOD 3. https://t.co/OzNOQWLWRM 4. https://t.co/8Khjozpg0V 5. https://t.co/QkP77SSPtj 6. https://t.co/Sh89CT2Izt https://t.co/eP4Cg0O1qa
۲: اون همون “دوست داشتن” بود. ولی مغزت کم‌کم یاد گرفت نشونه‌های پاداش را بیشتر از خودِ محتوا بخواد. کشیدن صفحه باعث ترشح دوپامین می‌شه، حتی اگه پستا خسته‌کننده باشن. منبع: https://t.co/nt0SjBdvN8
@MwaqMfydh Yes, the public uses the term "addiction" loosely. Of course, science has a strict definition. Most scientists use this paper to define it https://t.co/cvzx5Y92OD
@Liquidacid23 @TheoryPhd @PurifierAzrael That is definitely false. The most commonly-cited paper defining addictions doesn't even mention a "pleasure" criterion, which would be bizarre and does not exist. https://t.co/cvzx5Y92OD
This video explores the paradox of happiness, motivation, and how comfort may influence ambition. It discusses the relationship between happiness and productivity, the neurobiology of motivation, and the delicate…
Let's start with a hard truth wrapped in a soft blanket Yes food addiction is real and if you're struggling with it you're not broken lazy or weak. This video covers the research, neurobiological factors, and five…
۲: اون همون “دوست داشتن” بود. ولی مغزت کم‌کم یاد گرفت نشونه‌های پاداش را بیشتر از خودِ محتوا بخواد. کشیدن صفحه باعث ترشح دوپامین می‌شه، حتی اگه پستا خسته‌کننده باشن. منبع: https://t.co/nt0SjBdvN8
@MwaqMfydh Yes, the public uses the term "addiction" loosely. Of course, science has a strict definition. Most scientists use this paper to define it https://t.co/cvzx5Y92OD
@Liquidacid23 @TheoryPhd @PurifierAzrael That is definitely false. The most commonly-cited paper defining addictions doesn't even mention a "pleasure" criterion, which would be bizarre and does not exist. https://t.co/cvzx5Y92OD
@sbrown64 @FoodFirst_Ty @g_spas @healthcoachkait @KenDBerryMD 1. https://t.co/NkhYS0fW3T 2. https://t.co/Ndg3MGqbOD 3. https://t.co/OzNOQWLWRM 4. https://t.co/8Khjozpg0V 5. https://t.co/QkP77SSPtj 6. https://t.co/Sh89CT2Izt https://t.co/eP4Cg0O1qa
TM
غآ
NP