Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The collective discussions express positive recognition of the research's emphasis on rapid, adaptive judgments based on facial cues, as seen in comments about the evolutionary basis and references to specific foundational studies, which reflect a supportive tone and thoughtful engagement with the material.
Most discussions acknowledge and support the core ideas of the publication, highlighting the importance of the two main traits, trustworthiness and dominance, in face evaluation,” like references to the 2D model and its foundational basis.
The posts show high interest in understanding how facial cues influence social judgments, with mentions of evolutionary perspectives and implications for political imagery.
While some posts briefly cite the research, others delve into methodological details or suggest applications, indicating moderate but not highly deep engagement.
The discussions suggest the research's potential implications for understanding social interactions and perceptions, though they stop short of claiming transformative effects.
@TobiasWidmann I don’t know how many pictures there are, but Alex Todorov collected images of politicians as part of his broader work on evaluating faces (see https://t.co/3Kbgd4VFme). Maybe this helps?
@FC_Cicadas ありがとうの引用。初頭効果は確かに扁桃体で急速に形成され、修正が難しいのは事実です。ただし、引用の論文は2008年のOosterhof & Todorov (PNAS 105(32), 11087-11092) が適切です。「10倍の情報」は一般論で、論文直結ではありません。詳細はこちら：https://t.co/ywtPO5jkAb
@grok から引用"「ファーストインプレッションは後から修正が難しい」 出典：Todorov, A., et al. (2009). The functional basis of face evaluation. PNAS, 106(31), 12902–12907. → 初頭効果は脳の扁桃体レベルで即座に形成され、後から覆すには10倍以上の情報が必要。"
Evolution selected for rapid judgments, not necessarily accurate ones. From facial cues, alone, we assess strangers on their trustworthiness (good/bad intentions) and dominance (physical strength). We've adapted to overgeneralization for inferring harm. https://t.co/4Z3F92geyy
Appearances can be deceiving, but people instinctively form rapid judgments based on facial cues. This video explores how first impressions influence social outcomes and how psychology research helps us understand the…
This video explains the concept of Theory of Mind, a neural-based skill to interpret others' mental states. It covers traditional and emerging research methods, highlighting how interacting socially enhances our…
@FC_Cicadas ありがとうの引用。初頭効果は確かに扁桃体で急速に形成され、修正が難しいのは事実です。ただし、引用の論文は2008年のOosterhof & Todorov (PNAS 105(32), 11087-11092) が適切です。「10倍の情報」は一般論で、論文直結ではありません。詳細はこちら：https://t.co/ywtPO5jkAb
@grok から引用"「ファーストインプレッションは後から修正が難しい」 出典：Todorov, A., et al. (2009). The functional basis of face evaluation. PNAS, 106(31), 12902–12907. → 初頭効果は脳の扁桃体レベルで即座に形成され、後から覆すには10倍以上の情報が必要。"
@TobiasWidmann I don’t know how many pictures there are, but Alex Todorov collected images of politicians as part of his broader work on evaluating faces (see https://t.co/3Kbgd4VFme). Maybe this helps?
Evolution selected for rapid judgments, not necessarily accurate ones. From facial cues, alone, we assess strangers on their trustworthiness (good/bad intentions) and dominance (physical strength). We've adapted to overgeneralization for inferring harm. https://t.co/4Z3F92geyy
... PNAS August 12, 2008, vol. 105, no. 32, 11087–11092. Doi: 10.1073pnas.0805664105. Langlois et al. Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic ...
... (32), 11087-11092 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805664105. Share This Article. Post. Share. Share. Share. Mail. Further Reading. Psychology & Psychiatry.
JR
G
CC
N