Synopsis of Social media discussions
The discussions include support for the idea that nonverbal cues can indicate social class, as shown in posts mentioning 'social cues' and 'thin-slicing.' Conversely, some comments, like acknowledging ongoing work despite institutional decisions, suggest skepticism about the immediate impact, all conveyed with respectful tones and subtle interest in social research.
Agreement
Neither agree nor disagreeDiscussions show mixed reactions, with some support and some skepticism toward the article's claims.
Interest
Moderate level of interestPeople are generally somewhat interested, especially in how nonverbal cues relate to social class, but not deeply invested.
Engagement
Moderate level of engagementThere is moderate engagement, as some posts analyze concepts like social cues and their significance, but others are more superficial.
Impact
Moderate level of impactThe overall influence of these discussions appears modest, signaling awareness but not widespread change or debate.
Social Mentions
YouTube
3 Videos
3 Posts
Blogs
8 Articles
News
47 Articles
Metrics
Video Views
96,963
Total Likes
4,969
Extended Reach
110,515
Social Features
61
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Posts referencing the article
Examining Bias in Addressing Socioeconomic Inequality
Why isn’t inequality being addressed despite it being clear and visible? This video analyzes the interview with Gary Stevenson on biases that influence perceptions of socioeconomic issues, emphasizing the need for redistributive policies to support those affected.
Understanding Inequality and Bias in Socioeconomic Dynamics
Why isn't inequality being addressed despite clear evidence? In this video, Barry Ferns unpacks the biases that lead to the neglect of socioeconomic disparities and explores how social class shapes perceptions and behaviors, affecting our responses to inequality.
Addressing Bias and Inequality in Socioeconomic Systems
Despite clear evidence of inequality, it remains unchallenged. This video unpacks the biases and systemic barriers that keep inequalities invisible and ignored, highlighting insights from socio-economic research and interviews on systemic bias.
-
「社会的に地位の高い人は社会的な場面で不道徳になりやすい」 #心理学 #不道徳 #社会的地位 Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: a thin-slicing approach. Psychological science, 20(1), 99–106. https://t.co/bBmoVaO0ur
view full postMay 16, 2022
-
Bora Meraj
@borameraj (Twitter)@mwkraus There is more: 4) Social class and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of public versus private contexts & this one 5) Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach! Despite these institutions' decisions, your work will continue to make a difference!! Thank you !!
view full postFebruary 16, 2022
1
-
ケイ
@mikaitabi (Twitter)【お金持ちの見抜き方】 お金持ちは他の人と比べて「非エンゲージメント行動」が多い。 非エンゲージメント行動:他人との対話に関係ない行動(スマホを触ったり、落書きしたり、服をさわってみたりなど) 他人への依存の低下(頼る必要がない)ことからこのような行為か? https://t.co/MzTUpTN2dr
view full postJune 21, 2020
3
Abstract Synopsis
- The study explores how nonverbal behaviors in brief interactions can signal a person's socioeconomic status (SES), with higher SES individuals showing more disengagement cues like doodling and fewer engagement cues such as head nods.
- Observers viewing 60-second video clips could reliably estimate participants' SES based on these nonverbal cues, which correlated with actual measures like family income and maternal education.
- The findings suggest that nonverbal behaviors serve as systematic signs of SES and may influence social interactions, highlighting how SES can be "thinsliced" or inferred quickly from brief social exchanges.]
AK
@1qaz5tgb3edc (Twitter)