@GeorgeDarton @microscopicture I encourage you to watch this pair of videos. The content is a little bit chemistry heavy but the upshot is we know considerably more than ‘almost nothing’ https://t.co/wdLcPZjCpP
Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter116 posts
-
Facebook20 posts
-
News10 articles
-
Blogs6 articles
-
YouTube5 videos
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The collective discussions reveal a mostly skeptical attitude, with many posts explicitly criticizing scientists like James Tour and dismissing scientific explanations, often using dismissive language like 'charlatans' or calling arguments 'nonsense.' Occasional mentions of scientific theories are met with derision, and responses rely heavily on attacks rather than constructive engagement, reflecting low impact and engagement levels.
Most discussions express skepticism or disagreement with the article's conclusions, especially criticizing specific scientists and theories.
Participants show moderate engagement, with some expressing passive curiosity but many dismissive or dismissing without deep curiosity.
The responses tend to be dismissive or superficial, often attacking opposing figures or rejecting the arguments without detailed analysis.
The overall tone indicates minimal influence of the publication on the broader discussions, as many users dismiss or undermine it.
Abstract in brief
- The genetic code is nearly universal, with a nonrandom arrangement of codons, and its origin is explained by several theories: the stereochemical theory (codon assignments based on amino acid affinities), coevolution theory (code structure evolved with amino acid biosynthesis), and error minimization theory (selection to reduce mutation effects).
- These theories can coexist and align with the frozen accident hypothesis, suggesting the code's structure was fixed due to a common ancestor, and changes were limited by the negative effects of reassignment.
- Mathematical analysis indicates that while the standard code is robust to errors, it could evolve from a random code through a few codon reassignments, hinting at a complex evolution influenced by both accidental and selective processes.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@BineaToday @bex_fur @lDragonheartl @ScientiaPercept @TropicOfChaos @D1scoJerrys @_truthswordsa @edgy_knife @StillDizzy2 @TessFromWessex @JHerbatov @REPENTorrHELL @SecularSmurf @TertiusIV @DiphyCue @DarkCowboyGod @BeachHouse2049 @RebelATliance @PatricktheB @A_Damned_smith @KittyGrumble @MilesMosley666 @megafant1 @Wolfpak561 @Simple_Shaman @impeachqueen @ClarkKentSuped @AndrewRChapman @peregrinus_AK @pray2pesci @proundpapaof3 @willsworldview @IrisB42744268 @lintpop @michael43081938 @QuantumHawk666 @badgervindaloo @RossGilroy @magicaltime123 @Felix_Cat7 @lelkopf22 @GospelOBenjamin @Ihonestlydont19 @DeanoMartino1 @ShmerberParadox @SammyG1965 @caliga3456 @SkepticSplinter (First two minutes includes three scientists **that Tour cites** explaining that Tour is clueless) https://t.co/twJiBhWnbU
@WilliamMcgibney @paulogia0 @StephenCMeyer Did you seriously just cite James freaking Tour?
I'm not sure how arrival bias relates to the numbers of codons. But quite a lot has been written about the evolution of the genetic code. You might find possible answers there. A good place to start is this review by Koonin, et al. 12/12 https://t.co/qrz1v6iU3g
@AiG https://t.co/2EVD1X5Tc5
@Lintpop @Wilbo_Bagginsis @Melanie33720945 @SecularSmurf @_truthswordsa @AprilLigeia @megafant1 @AmyrAli16 @xxschlitzmaltxx @liamdennehy @rkdoctr @orna_verum @WastedAerospace @RTheatheist @illmakelamb @OnkelFester @MucusMucous @th1rt3en_TM @MindfulDamage @pussyfreewhtboy @hubie0 @umfpt @omnimomo @DeanoMartino1 @Sicut_Lupus @timmbosliceeee @spikeinthemidge @kester_lowers @ei9iw @IngridIngwah @DarkCowboyGod @dirk_fasshauer @TessFromWessex @mirandaisrisen @BrianNazarenus @HeathenWombat @Clayster1010 @Sidney1st @THHuxley1 @RavenLove69 @knitman57 @Cat_In_A_Box @remofjacob @WarrenSm2 @CrispyCurry @MaidelK LOLZ https://t.co/7OVFpcuMcJ https://t.co/oTf0XhUhWm https://t.co/vPpeQz02o8 #creationistFAIL @daveexplains #creationism #creationist
All mentions
Examining James Tour's Misunderstanding of Origin of Life Research
This video addresses James Tour's critique of origin of life research, highlighting inaccuracies and his dismissal of significant studies on homochirality. It contrasts his views with established scientific theories on…
Origin of the Genetic Code: What we do and do not know
Formation of RNA Nucleobases in Early Earth Conditions
The study reevaluates Miller-Urey experiments, demonstrating that RNA nucleobases can form in a reducing atmosphere with ammonia and carbon monoxide, supporting the natural emergence of biologically important molecules…
Recoding genomes: The hip new trend in synthetic biology
The Secret to EVERYTHING! Pastor Carl Gallups Explains
U of I Researchers Uncover Origins of Genetic Code Linked to Primitive Protein Structures The mystery surrounding the origin and evolution of the genetic code has fascinated scientists for decades. A pioneering study conducted by researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign seeks to…
@aesius1 @JohndeVos762831 @NotEvolution1 Here as well https://t.co/mBvgzhw32Q
@TheBroosh @jinxca @freddrumpf61 @HingleMcCr64580 @Lilith_Atheist https://t.co/6MuOfYVxC1 https://t.co/9zzx0r8HjG
@darwintojesus Educate yourself twat: https://t.co/AkMnvtcAY1
@BasedEmbraced @darwintojesus Educate yourself cultist narcissist : https://t.co/AkMnvtcAY1
@EricsonAdv @onlychrispark Watch a quality video for a change. See James Tour being exposed as the religious dumbass he is. Unable to do proper science due to religion. You can count the "wrongs" yourself. https://t.co/Kuf0vuKqYo
@F65995gg @MstrKapln @Alex_Oloyede2 https://t.co/1qPpKeReeZ
RT @ArlinStoltzfus: I'm not sure how arrival bias relates to the numbers of codons. But quite a lot has been written about the evolution of…
I'm not sure how arrival bias relates to the numbers of codons. But quite a lot has been written about the evolution of the genetic code. You might find possible answers there. A good place to start is this review by Koonin, et al. 12/12 https://t.co/qrz1v6iU3g
@SDAFS56788141 @BidenIsMalware @YoungAtheist0 https://t.co/s9nsgJ6MSv https://t.co/nAXNS1JYOp
@NoName18336109 @BidenIsMalware @YoungAtheist0 https://t.co/BOx3E5hy07 https://t.co/J6FrllicGy
@Spamgristle1 @BidenIsMalware @YoungAtheist0 https://t.co/9v8LOfvlaq and https://t.co/KjS875jAKF explain the experiments to science denialists.
@ThomasPudgy3 @TimeOfSatan 1. Here’s a rundown: https://t.co/dspwA608Sx https://t.co/hJNog6ueSk 2. Nonsense. The experiments are made to mimic prebiotic environments and they’re let loose from there. The results are then recorded. No “creative intervention” would be required; you’re simply biased.
@Real_handle Not only that, but we don’t have a scientific theory about abiogenesis. We have a few hypotheses stuck in the water, but no theory. Here’s a scientific paper by scientists in the field to educate you further. https://t.co/ceUzqlKI3w
@AtheistPhoenix You need a science lesson? Here it is. I highlighted the conclusion for atheists’ benefit. https://t.co/ceUzqlKI3w https://t.co/KC8vLesi4V
@penguinteamsix That's a claim. Can you evidence it? Researchers working in the field haven't been able to evidence it for decades now, but maybe "you" can. https://t.co/ceUzqlLfT4
@AtheistPhoenix The guys are. And they have now clue how unintelligence could have done it. And not for lack of trying. https://t.co/ceUzqlLfT4
@Dracopyre321 @M1NDW4RD3N @YoungAtheist0 The digital genetic code is evidence for God. There is ZERO evidence of a naturalistic origin of the genetic code. Read this scientific article by scientists who have looked for one for decades, and have made very little progress. https://t.co/ceUzqlKI3w
@zavod50573461 @WitsitGetsIt @plantblazer @ModernDayDebate Here, have a hundred… https://t.co/U4A3gubkxZ
@SDAFS56788141 @ScienceQriosity @gerrypayne @BowTiedRanger Stop & start signals could be viewed as punctuation. https://t.co/pqj7kVuw6R Shortly after the genetic code of Escherichia coli was deciphered (1), it was recognized that this particular mapping of 64 codons to 20 amino acids and two punctuation marks (start and stop signals)...
@BillGiovannetti @DrFrankTurek https://t.co/gxxsvCtwgI https://t.co/4mPPJOrSXy https://t.co/aP0v21UM8p
@David32856757 @big_simp @S4R41_K44R @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/SBtGH0PlpH
@AtheistPhoenix It’s also the passion and job of these scientists, and they pretty much concede he’s correct. https://t.co/ceUzqlLfT4
@Zux0r @learningtheist Where did the genetic code from in your account of reality, moron? A code requires a coder, hyper-moron. Don't you know your own atheistic myth? https://t.co/ceUzqlLfT4
@DenLacr @TRej2011 Why are you linking to a video with James Tours? He isn't a biologist. https://t.co/Q2fBck7kEv
@BineaToday @bex_fur @lDragonheartl @ScientiaPercept @TropicOfChaos @D1scoJerrys @_truthswordsa @edgy_knife @StillDizzy2 @TessFromWessex @JHerbatov @REPENTorrHELL @SecularSmurf @TertiusIV @DiphyCue @DarkCowboyGod @BeachHouse2049 @RebelATliance @PatricktheB @A_Damned_smith @KittyGrumble @MilesMosley666 @megafant1 @Wolfpak561 @Simple_Shaman @impeachqueen @ClarkKentSuped @AndrewRChapman @peregrinus_AK @pray2pesci @proundpapaof3 @willsworldview @IrisB42744268 @lintpop @michael43081938 @QuantumHawk666 @badgervindaloo @RossGilroy @magicaltime123 @Felix_Cat7 @lelkopf22 @GospelOBenjamin @Ihonestlydont19 @DeanoMartino1 @ShmerberParadox @SammyG1965 @caliga3456 @SkepticSplinter (First two minutes includes three scientists **that Tour cites** explaining that Tour is clueless) https://t.co/twJiBhWnbU
@michael43081938 @StillDizzy2 @BineaToday @willsworldview @REPENTorrHELL @A_Damned_smith @RossGilroy @peregrinus_AK @TropicOfChaos @TertiusIV @AdorablePodcast @DeanoMartino1 @BeachHouse2049 @lDragonheartl @SecularSmurf @SilenceB4tStorm @godisdeadmeat @bex_fur @Simple_Shaman @TessFromWessex @RebelATliance @_truthswordsa @impeachqueen @MilesMosley666 @KittyGrumble @proundpapaof3 @Wolfpak561 @Ihonestlydont19 @ShmerberParadox @IrisB42744268 @DarkCowboyGod @D1scoJerrys @megafant1 @zypisfy @JHerbatov @PatricktheB @MephistoTabern1 @ClarkKentSuped @AndrewRChapman @pray2pesci @lintpop @QuantumHawk666 @badgervindaloo @magicaltime123 @Felix_Cat7 @lelkopf22 @GospelOBenjamin @ScientiaPercept @SammyG1965 @caliga3456 There are quite a few responses https://t.co/YG4odHBbAG
@truthbackedup @DaniJ94 @halalhomer_ https://t.co/Pz4qaEVpPR
@lintpop https://t.co/5bDPwE6Ivl He's really stupid.
Los vídeos a los que me refiero. Por lo que recuerdo, en algunos puntos se hacía repetitivo y bastante básico, pero de vez en cuando dejaba un dato interesante. En general, creo que valía la pena verlos. https://t.co/TMWjWj6zPo https://t.co/6Ae1SutK1L
@LazyPhilosophia @AStrasser116 Also, if you can stomach it. This is the videos where misrepresenting (by misquoting) claims came from: https://t.co/ndymv4DBAp (I got that from the into, I do not feel like watching it all)
@SpeedWatkins @ChristianIdeal2 With follow up (after responses from Discovery Institute and Tour): Part1: https://t.co/b0dkp8xPHX Part2: https://t.co/EDw6PDPKhL Part1: https://t.co/VvBD0czQU7 Part2: https://t.co/fMoUOwcGhY Part3: https://t.co/cMMPVUribF Part4: https://t.co/85KeyDukF1 https://t.co/L81pJ0oeud
@saucegodpo It's not simply Darwin's theory anymore. Modern molecular biology, genetics has confirmed that all living organisms do share a fundamental unity. With genome sequencing technology we can read our evolutionary ancestry in our DNA. https://t.co/ilhkplnYra https://t.co/Kq4OzZp492
@BabyJysus @KevinPutzier @iamAtheistGirl Neither does he. Just big words and it can't happen. https://t.co/sYDmzNNJ5s
@YesWeCa37213657 @TayloTodd @mmolyx_mark @misty4630 @DrFrankTurek https://t.co/rgIIJj47GI
@TayloTodd @YesWeCa37213657 @mmolyx_mark @misty4630 @DrFrankTurek https://t.co/rgIIJj47GI
@larry3williams @VaporPete @AiG 2/4 … Elucidating the Agenda of James Tour - A Defense of Abiogenesis https://t.co/onIJSlO86I Response to James Tour - 700 Papers and Still Clueless https://t.co/Y5b99lw24k https://t.co/iOPxvd8qDz …
@sjg639 @DanielJNickolas @billpurdy @RayComfort No they’re not. Wrong. Amino acids encourage homochirality in solutions even in small concentrations. Ribozymes exist. You are ignorant of origin of life research. Hence you spout nonsense. https://t.co/uDeM547to5
“In our opinion, despite extensive and, in many cases, elaborate attempts to model code optimization, ingenious theorizing along the lines of the coevolution theory, and considerable experimentation, very little definitive progress, has been made.” https://t.co/2Gez13szky
@TomLish @BorgerPieter Op welke aannames doel je? Er is een gigantische berg literatuur over. Wikipedia biedt een aardige inleiding: https://t.co/TxDsVjsLp4. Kritiek op de bekendste creationist op dit gebied (James Tour) vind je hier (zie ook deel 2): https://t.co/YNzcZeyZPY
@your_mom101000 @Dear_Xtians @wendelltalks You referenced this video, which has Cronin right here. https://t.co/QSrmZuuotz
@SDAFS56788141 @Dear_Xtians @wendelltalks James Tour is a moron. https://t.co/FqREdS2DJH https://t.co/uokFRvm4qi https://t.co/w2ruf6dzcS https://t.co/WGfJKzptyf https://t.co/9B2JUxZTyh His arguments are bunk, and his reasoning is bunk.
https://t.co/Uw0uaMJwRe
@JebbUk 9/12 … Response to James Tour - 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) 20210505 https://t.co/Y5b99lw24k Response to James Tour - 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 2 of 2) 20210507 https://t.co/iOPxvd8qDz
@SDAFS56788141 @StephenCMeyer James Tour? LOL https://t.co/b9bNsZoqpo
@MissingMarple @Wotans_Runen @CScharun Molekularbiologie ist ja an sich gut. Aber gerade auf diesem Gebiet gibt es einige eigenartige Gestalten, etwa James Tour, der die Evolution leugnet, oder jedenfalls abiogenese. https://t.co/mqBer6keQx
@YoSoyRobertMera @rip157 @DrFrankTurek https://t.co/b9bNsZoYeW
Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) https://t.co/owKNqYjn85 via @YouTube
@OrwellianMSM @progrummer @AllanRuhl @Trent_Horn @catholiccom @paulogia0 Oh and as for James Tour. Debunked ages ago. Guys clueless. https://t.co/G9X75yziKZ
The Secret to EVERYTHING! Pastor Carl Gallups Explains https://t.co/vTPDgZ4F2m via @YouTube But who writes the code! 24 minute Science debacle..
RT @ScientiaPercept: @Lintpop @Wilbo_Bagginsis @Melanie33720945 @SecularSmurf @_truthswordsa @AprilLigeia @megafant1 @AmyrAli16 @xxschlitzm…
@Lintpop @Wilbo_Bagginsis @Melanie33720945 @SecularSmurf @_truthswordsa @AprilLigeia @megafant1 @AmyrAli16 @xxschlitzmaltxx @liamdennehy @rkdoctr @orna_verum @WastedAerospace @RTheatheist @illmakelamb @OnkelFester @MucusMucous @th1rt3en_TM @MindfulDamage @pussyfreewhtboy @hubie0 @umfpt @omnimomo @DeanoMartino1 @Sicut_Lupus @timmbosliceeee @spikeinthemidge @kester_lowers @ei9iw @IngridIngwah @DarkCowboyGod @dirk_fasshauer @TessFromWessex @mirandaisrisen @BrianNazarenus @HeathenWombat @Clayster1010 @Sidney1st @THHuxley1 @RavenLove69 @knitman57 @Cat_In_A_Box @remofjacob @WarrenSm2 @CrispyCurry @MaidelK LOLZ https://t.co/7OVFpcuMcJ https://t.co/oTf0XhUhWm https://t.co/vPpeQz02o8 #creationistFAIL @daveexplains #creationism #creationist
@The1NPC @MindfulDamage @SammyG1965 @Swizznowt @AwayFromTheKeys @TakeThatEarth2 @fedupofwm @Jim1810 @dan_cameron99 @JohnBoo85608696 @JFL1966 @MauroDias13 @TakeThatDarwin @FBScienceSub @HistoricalNoOne @CubeSteve @Shottsghirl There are a couple that make an appearance here https://t.co/EQHEStGsn5
Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) https://t.co/YJHStmnjYE via @YouTube
RT @NHoomans: @Lintpop @ScientiaPercept @HeathenOpinions @TAFKAB2 @tj10001110101 @CubeSteve @Paleoguy073 @RJDownard @Pope_of_Atheism @BRijs…
@Lintpop @ScientiaPercept @HeathenOpinions @TAFKAB2 @tj10001110101 @CubeSteve @Paleoguy073 @RJDownard @Pope_of_Atheism @BRijswijk @gregowoc @turboman80 @TakeThatDarwin @1Quetzalcoatl1 @8GraySpaceBass_ @cannoli1000 @taygee @DrSly16 @manchestermelly @bobfish1973 @RainyThorsday @CallMeEOnly @PhilBrown62 @nobodyonit @Danthemanbot @AiG Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) https://t.co/c7xT6oWbf2 via @YouTube
@Lintpop @HeathenOpinions @TAFKAB2 @tj10001110101 @CubeSteve @Paleoguy073 @NHoomans @RJDownard @Pope_of_Atheism @BRijswijk @gregowoc @turboman80 @TakeThatDarwin @1Quetzalcoatl1 @8GraySpaceBass_ @cannoli1000 @taygee @DrSly16 @manchestermelly @bobfish1973 @RainyThorsday @CallMeEOnly @PhilBrown62 @nobodyonit @Danthemanbot @AiG LOLZ The #creationist fraud Tour and his refuted #creationism lie about genetic entropy? You MUST have something and someone better? https://t.co/Ao8gi1zHoj https://t.co/5Rkh1EXou0 #creationistFAIL
@TheHarv3st @NoNonsenseSci @kunkkaralhoTV @YoussefEljouha1 @fasc1nate James Tour is a chemist and an all out god lover .. why is he speaking on a topic that’s miles away from his area of expertise .. ? .. open your mind - watch this video instead: https://t.co/hE1lj95INO
@1pckt @megafant1 @Canna420Uk @ChrisHildabrant @willsworldview @OnlyaMoment3 @BloodRedEye1 @ax2n38 @RossGilroy @BrianNazarenus @DarkCowboyGod @StillDizzy2 @thorinajarooft @WondersNorbit @zypisfy @MucusMucous @A_Damned_smith @gregowoc @Flaffenbam @Wolfpak561 @wiguy45 @Sicut_Lupus @JH747474 @AwayFromTheKeys @OnkelFester @Guy_JustaGuy3 @itisjustmebabe @MindfulDamage @D1scoJerrys @Melanie33720945 @Raven4212 @pray2pesci @_DenizenX @AndrewRChapman @remofjacob @Ihonestlydont19 @EeeBeeEll @HaircutSpock @kevin_witchell @dirk_fasshauer @The_Real_BiM @PatricktheB @hubie0 @DementedHuman @Avic_Wins @orna_verum @Mikethewander1 @twisted_pies https://t.co/46Ale8XMyJ
@1pckt @DarkCowboyGod @megafant1 @Canna420Uk @ChrisHildabrant @willsworldview @OnlyaMoment3 @BloodRedEye1 @ax2n38 @RossGilroy @BrianNazarenus @StillDizzy2 @thorinajarooft @WondersNorbit @zypisfy @MucusMucous @A_Damned_smith @gregowoc @Flaffenbam @Wolfpak561 @wiguy45 @Sicut_Lupus @JH747474 @AwayFromTheKeys @OnkelFester @Guy_JustaGuy3 @itisjustmebabe @MindfulDamage @D1scoJerrys @Melanie33720945 @Raven4212 @pray2pesci @_DenizenX @AndrewRChapman @remofjacob @Ihonestlydont19 @EeeBeeEll @HaircutSpock @kevin_witchell @dirk_fasshauer @The_Real_BiM @PatricktheB @hubie0 @DementedHuman @Avic_Wins @orna_verum @Mikethewander1 @twisted_pies https://t.co/46Ale8XeJb
@1pckt @DarkCowboyGod @badgervindaloo @Canna420Uk @ChrisHildabrant @willsworldview @OnlyaMoment3 @BloodRedEye1 @ax2n38 @RossGilroy @BrianNazarenus @megafant1 @StillDizzy2 @thorinajarooft @WondersNorbit @zypisfy @MucusMucous @A_Damned_smith @gregowoc @Flaffenbam @Wolfpak561 @wiguy45 @Sicut_Lupus @JH747474 @AwayFromTheKeys @OnkelFester @Guy_JustaGuy3 @itisjustmebabe @MindfulDamage @D1scoJerrys @Melanie33720945 @Raven4212 @pray2pesci @_DenizenX @AndrewRChapman @remofjacob @Ihonestlydont19 @EeeBeeEll @HaircutSpock @kevin_witchell @dirk_fasshauer @The_Real_BiM @PatricktheB @hubie0 @DementedHuman @Avic_Wins @orna_verum @Mikethewander1 @twisted_pies https://t.co/46Ale8XeJb
@OscarsWild1 @emilio97493490 @borngeek @OzzmanOsgood let me make it easier for you, here is the first part -https://t.co/YOXGUQHi2n
@YoSoyRobertMera @SkullAndUxV I don’t even know what that phrase means. He’s an organic chemist, but he’s not an origin of life researcher. https://t.co/BIxa0OCqBO https://t.co/boPSG4hBRH
@justin__reality @EricinSC76 @GodlessLiz Wrong… Pt. 1: https://t.co/cS3UQtrkxJ Pt. 2: https://t.co/Jn8w6tT1uv
[0807.4749] Origin and evolution of the genetic code: The universal enigma https://t.co/wmt6GhOkcQ
@SDAFS56788141 @joe_stapelberg @gunsnrosesgirl3 I’ve watched this too and he just gets so much wrong. He isn’t an expert in this field. But here are other people who are and I would encourage you to watch this. https://t.co/nHtxXi51q7
@Foreign_Dude @willsworldview @Wolfpak561 @FredMacManus @Phoenix42505497 @IllinLaneCraig @LeyFenix @Snowleopards12 @triggerman1976 @BenefactrChurch @agupdatesswt @Cleisthenes5 @Ferjetrisa @ASurreyAtheist @oohglobbits5 @theosib2 @JoshuaVats @YorkshirePalaeo @PrinceOfAtheism @wiguy45 @adrianturner01 @barry25247206 @Thohi @remnantofisr53 @hauxton @malo_j @Rev11_5 @antallan @JohnKrahn2 @MeMysel41161908 @DangelAngello @halcyondon @Avic_Wins @Dar42 @ObnoxBE @Onychom @rainmc @SpiritKing11 @Alexmipego @RobertBrownie @RossGilroy @warm_woobie @Squawkatoo2 Lmao, ever wonder why all you guys quote the same DI pseudo morons? They are charlatans, they aren’t scientists. https://t.co/gHuhf8bH9I https://t.co/LzPHPhLtT8
@PortCityAtheist @SPoppe8 @AiG it's longer, but great overview ;) the issue is opposite. there are many ways how to get complex replicating molecules and noone can tell which one was it so far. https://t.co/n6OQ1neMtx
@marcovandijk71 Tour blijkt geen verstand van zaken te hebben, maar de meeste leken zien dat niet. Hier wordt dat netjes uitgelegd, inclusief wat echte experts erover zeggen (zie ook deel 2): https://t.co/GWZsPwnkx2
@iAhmadAbdullah @mohammed_y148 @2072_hatem جيمس تور هو عضو معهد discovery الانجيلي وهو عامل مثل اياد القنيبي نجم على اليوتيوب بخطاب موجه للجمهور الغير متخصص حصرا.. اذا كنت مهتما مثلي بهذا المجال التخصصي يمكنك مشاهدة النقاش العلمي الصرف حول الأمر.. https://t.co/kxe8oOenC9
@Prophecy_YEC @BionicDance @AiG I'll see your video and raise you 1 video https://t.co/Y5b99lwzTS https://t.co/iOPxvd8Yt7
@MinistriesMicah @waldenpod @RealAtheology Scientific link needed. Dave Farina debunks James Tour; https://t.co/Bao9NQLxjF
@patprendergast3 @ArchTheAtheist @RaisedWolf @DrFrankTurek Also here :) https://t.co/wMggk7LzG9
@DrJamesTour https://t.co/T0SOEOzqIC
@WilliamMcgibney @patprendergast3 @JonHammond1701 @DrFrankTurek No, but I’ll check it out. Have you seen Prof Dave debunk Dr Tour? https://t.co/XVKBz9ODeV
@mirloXXbob @fiveacredream @CueenQristina @Kimmylynn74 This is another guy that seems to be smart but actually stupid because he believes in this god nonsense. Don't be that guy. https://t.co/Hty2EU3GLZ
@jyothi17750159 Professor Dave has you covered. https://t.co/XVKBz9ODeV Tour should stick to nanotechnology instead of #LyingForJesus.
@daglover @SkepticSpamton @InfinitmVeritum @DrSly16 @BajanBrownCow @kim_because @malo_j @kennyg4now @HotelChuck @MDH_UAR @CubeSteve @Thedukeistheman @JerryMcPhers @Nominal31152751 @GregCampNC @PBDerbysAtheist @YoungJy3250827 @Atheist_Trooper "James Tour" LOL! https://t.co/twJiBhWV1s
I don’t understand much of what was talked about here but I am a critical thinker & tend to drift toward logic instead of bull “Hallelujah” It’s A Miracle, god made you appear before me out of thin air’ There is No Other Explanation! Response to James Tour https://t.co/hJC0cKTwze
@marcovandijk71 Experts zijn de mensen die er dagelijks onderzoek naar doen en erover publiceren in de vakliteratuur. Tour behoort daar niet toe. Je hoort er een paar experts aan het woord aan in deel 2 van deze kritiek: - deel 1: https://t.co/YNzcZeyZPY - deel 2: https://t.co/ysE0jLXdbj
@RuMar202 @philipmuller James Tour, who probably is the name most commonly brought up in relation to discussions like this, is throughly refuted/debunked in this video (1 of 2). https://t.co/qdHhwe8EDl
@marcovandijk71 De evolutietheorie gaat niet over singulariteiten en ook niet over het ontstaan van leven. De kritiek van Tour is niet erg overtuigend, zie https://t.co/YNzcZeyZPY en het daarop volgende deel.
Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) https://t.co/3VFsUlJpxl via @YouTube
@WilliamMcgibney @paulogia0 @StephenCMeyer Did you seriously just cite James freaking Tour?
@GeorgeDarton @microscopicture I encourage you to watch this pair of videos. The content is a little bit chemistry heavy but the upshot is we know considerably more than ‘almost nothing’ https://t.co/wdLcPZjCpP
Oh creationist. *shakes head* Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2) https://t.co/6MQrHT6hUH via @YouTube
@atheistic_1 @CubeSteve @JennaverseGod @qirenni @Hollenfeuer88 Citation needed to back your quote.
@CubeSteve @JennaverseGod @atheistic_1 @qirenni @Hollenfeuer88 You too lazy to check the description and the credentials on the guy??
@LLicitus @Aj2Parkes @McranterR @onnlucky @bonsaibean @AnneMarron @TomJose75245504 @RandalRauser LMAO That guy is a crackpot https://t.co/Gd8KPgaoGb
@ApoloJedi_ @AleMartnezR1 @feasibilian @iamungit Ah, Dr. James Tour. As one of my favourite YouTubers, @daveexplains, said: Dr. Tour - 700 papers and still clueless! https://t.co/AQzqlbjUZm
@AiG https://t.co/2EVD1X5Tc5
@J_F_man_x @chean2rey @vbttv @R6esports James Tour, really?? https://t.co/qdHhweqfuT
@TosinAwe1 @BCH1066 @DrFrankTurek 11/11 ... chemist can be so wrong about abiogenesis because of the Dunning-Kruger effect! You can find all sources in the description. https://t.co/Y5b99lw24k
@OrwellianMSM @united6059 @AfriKoids_Only @AliceKing69 @ContextBiblical @GanniTonya @murmalerm @mennonite_mama @PickleMrs @AwokeRoseArisen @melJsaysso @CarsomyrPlusSix @stemmler448 @maxrenke @Hellmark @vixmcintyre @SimpleArgonian @dhopkiins1053 @bazblackadder @ColleenHerold @GrandmaD62 @DeanCullinane @FiveThirtyEight https://t.co/8rMD31RO3b
@badgervindaloo @1pckt https://t.co/T87shX54Ep
"Response to James Tour: 700 Papers and Still Clueless (Part 1 of 2)" https://t.co/TQXQ3wxKhs
@Jesus_is_G_d @MansplainingAb1 @TheLivingKira @AdorablePodcast @discoveringdown @Aliphaire Oh I don’t know he’s good at what he does. But he knows bigger all about abiogenesis. https://t.co/8rMD31RO3b you see I’ll back up my claims.
RT @pray2pesci: @1pckt @badgervindaloo @CoercriSeareach @SonyaSeigel @horusrage @laughchem @_BENEDIBRAVA_ @TertiusIV @Alliste35661241 @glob…
@1pckt @badgervindaloo @CoercriSeareach @SonyaSeigel @horusrage @laughchem @_BENEDIBRAVA_ @TertiusIV @Alliste35661241 @globalist13903 @WondersNorbit @tk_the_kitsune @Wolfpak561 @Chortling_Man @SecularSandwich @JustinCPorter @StillDizzy2 @A_Damned_smith @OnkelFester @IMudlet @PraiseHisName50 @zypisfy @MDH_UAR @peter_telecom @Baphomet555666 @RealAnonDouche @ZKomala @RossGilroy @Cern_lXXl @EdwardMKennedy2 @TakeThatDarwin @LeannEAF @Simple_Shaman @BlueDragonsFang @SBuddie1877 @Superior2Logic @MsCredentials @zapher134 @kester_lowers @MucusMucous @GodflyThe @EricBonner31 @JLee2027 @Quin4Trump @Tiffany_Stuff @waragoodwarfare @willsworldview @tklforgiven @hauxton @KaasKeizer https://t.co/pPYln3hlRs
@1pckt @IMudlet @laughchem @TertiusIV @Alliste35661241 @globalist13903 @horusrage @WondersNorbit @_BENEDIBRAVA_ @tk_the_kitsune @Wolfpak561 @Chortling_Man @SecularSandwich @JustinCPorter @StillDizzy2 @A_Damned_smith @OnkelFester @PraiseHisName50 @zypisfy @MDH_UAR @peter_telecom @Baphomet555666 @RealAnonDouche @ZKomala @RossGilroy @Cern_lXXl @EdwardMKennedy2 @TakeThatDarwin @LeannEAF @Simple_Shaman @BlueDragonsFang @SBuddie1877 @Superior2Logic @badgervindaloo @MsCredentials @zapher134 @kester_lowers @MucusMucous @GodflyThe @EricBonner31 @JLee2027 @Quin4Trump @Tiffany_Stuff @waragoodwarfare @willsworldview @tklforgiven @hauxton @KaasKeizer @JohnKrahn2 @WmManry Here Pablo. Check out the analogy at 57:07. This is exactly how you attack this. You demand to be told exactly how abiogenesis occurred or else God. Yet many paths could be possible. This sums your tactic (and your hero Tour’s) as we
@creative_resort @Sgruper32 @SaadChaudhry @ar888 @Snowden My response is he doesn’t have purely scientific points, he has poisoned cherry picked points the he forces to meet his already chosen conclusion. He’s also been throughly debunked many times https://t.co/tR2p1nxbbw
@Channelexodus @JamesMo19320924 @manchestermelly @keigh_see @luccaskunk @orneryostrich1 @derekgilbert You started by posting a YouTube video with James Tour, a scientist with no background or credentials in any fields related to your claims. https://t.co/qdHhwe8EDl
@StatedClearly @TeemoDoScience On the various theories about the origin of the genetic code (a good synthesis/entry point to other refs) freely accessible: https://t.co/7Z52PXNxZe
@subboor18 As Salaam U Alaikum what do you think of this guy who Br.Ahmed had on his channel: https://t.co/yeLRY1LoeQ
@sygarte @VincentNyle Are u sure you want to use James Tour. He spreads misinformation. Try a honest interlocutor https://t.co/8rMD31RO3b
The follow up to Tour's response to the above video from @daveexplains - The entire series is *REALLY* worth a look, as Dave breaks down the fallacies of J.Tour, exposes his confirmation bias & motivated reasoning, & cites loads of research/experts. https://t.co/b0dkp8xPHX
RT @YorkshirePalaeo: @1pckt @pray2pesci @globalist13903 @LeannEAF @Simple_Shaman @tk_the_kitsune @Cern_lXXl @BlueDragonsFang @WondersNorbit…
@1pckt @pray2pesci @globalist13903 @LeannEAF @Simple_Shaman @tk_the_kitsune @Cern_lXXl @BlueDragonsFang @WondersNorbit @SBuddie1877 @horusrage @Superior2Logic @TertiusIV @badgervindaloo @MsCredentials @A_Damned_smith @SecularSandwich @zypisfy @zapher134 @Wolfpak561 @StillDizzy2 @RossGilroy @PraiseHisName50 @kester_lowers @MucusMucous @RealAnonDouche @GodflyThe @peter_telecom @EricBonner31 @JLee2027 @Quin4Trump @Tiffany_Stuff @waragoodwarfare @willsworldview @tklforgiven @hauxton @Chortling_Man @KaasKeizer @JohnKrahn2 @WmManry @SPortoghesi @TakeThatDarwin @Ramirezplayer @oohglobbits5 @Falchion14 @DelSur742 @Janetb172 @HeathenSawyer @CollinOctantis @tarquinrees Sure. Right here: https://t.co/9v5WV8ZM9H
@Antitheistnz Response to James Tour by @daveexplains: https://t.co/XVKBz9ODeV
RT @YorkshirePalaeo: @EricsonAdv @mawson_craig @Call_Me_Emo1 @HaggertyTaupier @LtUhura2017 @Friendof_Darwin @TakeThatDarwin @JakeMondale @R…
@EricsonAdv @mawson_craig @Call_Me_Emo1 @HaggertyTaupier @LtUhura2017 @Friendof_Darwin @TakeThatDarwin @JakeMondale @Rkreb1 @umfpt @fmacanadaguy @JustinCPorter @Nat1Newf @Ah_Science @tweettruth2me https://t.co/AwPMxunVfI https://t.co/HqZj2XDeFz https://t.co/48aR50YaLO https://t.co/sZgtAqNHTs https://t.co/ufofvLSLvI https://t.co/XDJjF1mb2X https://t.co/bxPPNMXfnM
Un très bon article de synthèse sur ce qu'on sait de l'origine du code génétique (ie la table de traduction entre triplet de nucléotides et leur acide aminé correspondant dans une protéine en construction) Pourquoi est il quasi universel et si optimisé ?https://t.co/5hzqOlUUs4
"..main concepts on the origin and evolution of the code are the stereochemical theory, according.. codon assignments are dictated by physicochemical affinity between amino acids and the cognate codons (anticodons); the coevolution theory, which posits.." https://t.co/W7rUWz27vJ
@fscinico @Dylon59556561 Nasty cherrypicking typical of weak thinkers Little progress does not mean no progress and does not provide evidence for your pitiful deity. Note that the whole paper is supportive of the evolution of the genetic code https://t.co/kFXCFN5snz
#Origin and #evolution of the #genetic #code: the #universal #enigma https://t.co/eUzk34Lp2e
@TakeThatGravity @spikeinthemidge @SplinterReality @hauxton @Canna420Uk @andyguy @crypt_oguru @umfpt @R0samond @1pckt @rkdoctr @2Cor10_4_6 @hugh_bothwell @NoScienceDenial @firefighter5511 @TakeThatStraw @Dcoronata @guy_JustaGuy @AprilLigeia @geraldpayne25 @Dwyertd @Van_Vagabond @randy_o1970 @ScientiaPercept @TJimjones @NuckChorris16 @carlsmythe @AGTCnews @JaTapps @GardenerN21 @wiguy45 @PainesReason @Shadowzerg @malo_j @TheWestonMike @jcvampuk @EBatterson @DB_Grimwalker @Mwforhr @rockytech @DaviesHyland @JulieAMcLean @Rmns58 @DoubleDoubleJon @CrispyCurry @TakeThatEpi @jools6691 @EvanLHarris2 @Enjoyastogie @Heathen57 The statement about 50 years was made by Koonin in a subsequent article. Koonin, E. V., & Novozhilov, A. S. (2009). Origin and evolution of the genetic code: The universal enigma. IUBMB Life, 61(2), spcone-spcone. doi:10.1002/iub.190
@SavageTomas @sommarTomten @AiG I see. According to you, these scientists at the end of their article are saying they have the "accidental" origin of the genetic code all figured out, and I "personally" cannot understand it, right? https://t.co/ljGGHX6Vxm https://t.co/1MLObGFFtz