Eur J Appl Physiol May 2009 PMID 19229554

Efficiency in cycling: a review.

Gertjan Ettema, Håvard Wuttudal Lorås

Mentions

2
Peak: 1 in Jun 2023
across 2 sources since Jun 2023

Extended reach

3,845
potential audience

Total likes

31

Video views

305

Mentions per month

Jun 2023 – Sep 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter1 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The group shows strong interest in the efficiency concepts discussed in the review, citing specific examples like the efficiency of professionals at different cadences and the relationship between power and energy expenditure. The tone is analytical and technical, reflecting a careful engagement with the research findings related to cycling performance and efficiency.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions align with the review, emphasizing efficiency at various cadences and the importance of relative intensity and power output.

InterestHigh interest

Posters show high interest, engaging with technical details and implications of efficiency in cycling performance.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments reflect a thoughtful analysis of concepts like submaximal thresholds and the efficiency of professionals, indicating moderate depth of engagement.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussions are somewhat influential, but primarily focused on academic and technical insights without clear evidence of broad societal change.

Abstract in brief

  • The review highlights that in cycling, energy expenditure increases linearly with work rate, and this relationship is consistent across different performance levels, with about 91% of the variance in energy use explained by work rate.
  • Gross efficiency, which measures how well energy is converted into useful work, is mostly influenced by work rate because higher work rates reduce the impact of baseline energy costs, explaining why elite athletes tend to be more efficient than beginners.
  • The review also notes that it's difficult to determine the best cycling cadence for energy efficiency since many factors related to cadence can influence energy expenditure, preventing a definitive conclusion.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jem Arnold
@jem_arnold · X

This explains ⬇️submaximal thresholds at ⬆️cadence, while Wpeak is no different at V̇O2max Also why professionals appear more efficient at ⬆️cadences: because at the same relative intensity they produce ⬆️power ⇒ ⬆️efficient at ⬆️cadence 8/ https://t.co/04GRFlNBWk https://t.co/H6HLrfPBDb

Jun 21, 2023 · 9 likes · 3,541 followers View post →

All mentions

Jem Arnold
@jem_arnold · X

This explains ⬇️submaximal thresholds at ⬆️cadence, while Wpeak is no different at V̇O2max Also why professionals appear more efficient at ⬆️cadences: because at the same relative intensity they produce ⬆️power ⇒ ⬆️efficient at ⬆️cadence 8/ https://t.co/04GRFlNBWk https://t.co/H6HLrfPBDb

Jun 21, 2023 · 9 likes · 3,541 followers View post →