August 2009 PMID 19615713

Shanidar 3 Neandertal rib puncture wound and paleolithic weaponry.

Steven E Churchill, Robert G Franciscus, Hilary A McKean-Peraza, Julie A Daniel, Brittany R Warren

Mentions

45
Peak: 1 in May 2021
across 5 sources since May 2021

Extended reach

2,538,960
potential audience

Total likes

38,187

Video views

2,534,171

Mentions per month

May 2021 – Jun 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News23 articles
  • Blogs14 articles
  • X / Twitter3 posts
  • YouTube3 videos
  • Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions highlight ongoing debates about Neandertal violence and extinction causes, with remarks like questioning the focus on genocide and mentioning species' conflicts. The tone suggests curiosity but lacks detailed analysis, indicating moderate interest and engagement without a strong consensus or impact.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

The discussions show some neutrality, with a slight openness to alternative interpretations like violence or genocide theories, rather than outright disagreement.

InterestModerate interest

Participants display moderate curiosity, especially about the implications of the Neandertal injury evidence and its relevance to broader debates.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments reflect active engagement, pondering on the evidence and historical interactions, though they are mostly surface-level rather than deeply analytical.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussions seem to have minimal immediate influence but touch on significant questions regarding human and Neandertal interactions.

Abstract in brief

  • The study examines a Neandertal rib wound from Shanidar 3 to determine if it was caused by a spear or projectile weapon by comparing experimental injury patterns on animal ribs with the fossil injury.
  • Experimental results suggest that the injury to Shanidar 3 was likely caused by a low-energy projectile rather than a high-energy thrusting spear, based on the lesion's characteristics such as the absence of multiple rib involvement and specific fracture patterns.
  • The findings imply that Neandertals might have used projectile weapons, which overlaps with the period when early modern humans appeared in western Asia, highlighting broader questions about technological development in Paleolithic times.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Bad Anthropology Takes (Real Parody)
@badanthropolog1 · X

It's funny they didn't even go for the Neandertal genocide theory, which at least has the benefit of maybe one piece of evidence supporting it. https://t.co/mnePgc7bb3

Apr 28, 2023 · 4 likes · 1 share · 1,675 followers View post →
Bad Anthropology Takes (Real Parody)
@badanthropolog1 · X

mass violence between species. Did Neanderthals and H. sapiens kill each other? Sure. But it wasn't responsible for the species' extinction. https://t.co/mnePgc7bb3

May 31, 2021 · 1,675 followers View post →

All mentions

Calixto Lopez
@NerdyCalixto · X

RT @badanthropolog1: It's funny they didn't even go for the Neandertal genocide theory, which at least has the benefit of maybe one piece o…

May 2, 2023 · 1 share · 1,437 followers View post →
Bad Anthropology Takes (Real Parody)
@badanthropolog1 · X

It's funny they didn't even go for the Neandertal genocide theory, which at least has the benefit of maybe one piece of evidence supporting it. https://t.co/mnePgc7bb3

Apr 28, 2023 · 4 likes · 1 share · 1,675 followers View post →
Bad Anthropology Takes (Real Parody)
@badanthropolog1 · X

mass violence between species. Did Neanderthals and H. sapiens kill each other? Sure. But it wasn't responsible for the species' extinction. https://t.co/mnePgc7bb3

May 31, 2021 · 1,675 followers View post →