Various discussions highlight the importance of clarifying the stages of scoping reviews, with some posters expressing eagerness to implement the recommended practices—phrases like 'looking forward to' and 'recommendations based on' indicate moderate enthusiasm. Additionally, reflections on lessons learned and methodological updates demonstrate engagement, while recognition of the article’s potential to improve research reliability suggests positive perceived impact on the field.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions acknowledge the value of the methodology improvements proposed in the publication, reflecting a general consensus of support.
InterestModerate interest
Participants show moderate interest, with some expressing eagerness to apply the recommendations and others simply noting the relevance.
EngagementModerate engagement
Comments range from brief mentions to more detailed reflections about the methodology and lessons learned, indicating a moderate level of engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The discussions suggest that the article's ideas could influence future research practices, although concrete examples are limited.
Abstract in brief
Scoping studies are a popular way to review health research evidence, and a 2005 framework by Arksey and O'Malley laid the foundation for conducting these studies.
The authors suggest ways to improve this framework by clarifying each stage, such as defining the purpose, selecting studies, analyzing data, and involving stakeholders, to ensure consistency and relevance.
Ongoing discussions and enhancements of scoping study methodology will help make these reviews more useful and reliable for healthcare research, policy, and practice.]
@jmmorang @Jupij79 @Enfermeraocasi1 @vicente_gea @Vitrubia @Jlgurquiza @jmmasencio @anaicobo @C_Sarabia_Cobo @jl_cobo @OcupaTEA Las más aseadas tiene un metodología muy definida que son los pasos de https://t.co/YzqGKC9oP9 actualizados posteriormente https://t.co/9J3SEDeQbB y además, sus extensión para criterios prisma https://t.co/dPjV1rl2W1. Esto es variable, pero actualmente es lo más habitual.
Aug 8, 2020 · 8 likes · 4 shares · 717 followersView post →
B
BMC
@BioMedCentral · X
In a Springer Nature Protocols & Methods Community post, the authors reflect on the conceptualization, writing and publication of their article 'Advancing the Methodology' 12 years ago, and share lessons from their experience. #AfterThePaper https://t.co/ixA9kRhEQ6
It was great fun to reminisce on lessons learned during the writing of this paper #scopingreview in a recent blog post with @KellyOBrien25: After the paper: Scoping studies: Advancing the Methodology https://t.co/ecYZCKZbdM
In a Springer Nature Protocols & Methods Community post, the authors reflect on the conceptualization, writing and publication of their article 'Advancing the Methodology' 12 years ago, and share lessons from their experience. #AfterThePaper https://t.co/ixA9kRhEQ6
This video gives an overview of the major differences between systematic and scoping reviews. Researchers should consider scoping reviews for identifying knowledge gaps and clarifying concepts, while systematic reviews…
After formulating your research question, you may need to conduct a review. This video explains the differences between systematic and scoping reviews based on expert guidance. Knowing which review type applies is…
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O'Brien, K.K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 5, 69 (2010). https://t.co/rNbzjT6JX1 https://t.co/tUYfdI2RF1
Dec 21, 2023 · 1 like · 5,001 followersView post →
そ
そうなの
@parahippocampuz · X
Levac et al. (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
This provides recommendations for each of the stages of Arksey & Malley's framework for further clarification and enhancement (2/4) https://t.co/NDWr4jLZ8I
In a Springer Nature Protocols & Methods Community post, the authors reflect on the conceptualization, writing and publication of their article 'Advancing the Methodology' 12 years ago, and share lessons from their experience. #AfterThePaper https://t.co/ixA9kRhEQ6
In a Springer Nature Protocols & Methods Community post, the authors reflect on the conceptualization, writing and publication of their article 'Advancing the Methodology' 12 years ago, and share lessons from their experience. #AfterThePaper https://t.co/ixA9kRhEQ6
It was great fun to reminisce on lessons learned during the writing of this paper #scopingreview in a recent blog post with @KellyOBrien25: After the paper: Scoping studies: Advancing the Methodology https://t.co/ecYZCKZbdM
Interesting paper on scoping reviews as a methodology, and recommendations based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework.
I’m looking forward to putting the recommendations into practice
Aug 8, 2020 · 4 shares · 4,905 followersView post →
CM
Cris Mendoza
@crismmh · X
@jmmorang @Jupij79 @Enfermeraocasi1 @vicente_gea @Vitrubia @Jlgurquiza @jmmasencio @anaicobo @C_Sarabia_Cobo @jl_cobo @OcupaTEA Las más aseadas tiene un metodología muy definida que son los pasos de https://t.co/YzqGKC9oP9 actualizados posteriormente https://t.co/9J3SEDeQbB y además, sus extensión para criterios prisma https://t.co/dPjV1rl2W1. Esto es variable, pero actualmente es lo más habitual.
Aug 8, 2020 · 8 likes · 4 shares · 717 followersView post →
JR
John Rooksby
@johnrooksby · X
@ElsdenChris @sigchi A couple of interesting methods papers: https://t.co/0EUWkd2lOd and https://t.co/ntLWidWFW2 - from IS and Health respectively
CM
B
DL
CA
JR
そ
DK
KB
D黄
SF
J
RT
JU