Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many participants express interest and agreement by referencing the core idea of Peto's paradox and its implications, with comments like 'refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between size and cancer risk,' indicating familiarity. The tone suggests curiosity rather than controversy, and the use of terms like 'evolution's prescription' points to recognition of the article's potential impact on cancer research.
Most discussions acknowledge the paradox, highlighting the intriguing aspect of evolution and cancer prevention, though some references to conflicting information suggest moderate agreement.
Participants show a modest level of interest, with some engaging in technical details and citations, but overall the discussions remain somewhat surface-level.
The exchanges include references to scientific concepts and articles, indicating a reasonable degree of engagement, though there is limited deep analysis or debate.
The conversations recognize the significance of natural cancer suppression mechanisms, implying a moderate perceived impact on understanding cancer prevention.
Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of developing cancer. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002 #cancer #genomics #cancerresearch #petoparadox https://t.co/pTLSpMa9IF
Nevermind lol, wikipedia article says "Within members of the same species, cancer risk and body size appear to be positively correlated, even once other risk factors are controlled for" (Caulin, Aleah; Maley, Carlo (April 2011). "Peto's Paradox: Evolution's Prescription for Cancer Prevention".)
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
Peto’s Paradox: Evolution’s Prescription for Cancer Prevention https://t.co/upueWfZVSv
How do healthy cells transform into cancerous ones? This video explores the remarkable phenomenon of why large animals like elephants experience cancer less frequently despite having more cells at risk. We delve into…
Peto's Paradox explains why large, long-lived animals like elephants and whales do not have higher cancer rates despite having more cells. Evolution has developed enhanced cancer suppression mechanisms in these animals…
Nevermind lol, wikipedia article says "Within members of the same species, cancer risk and body size appear to be positively correlated, even once other risk factors are controlled for" (Caulin, Aleah; Maley, Carlo (April 2011). "Peto's Paradox: Evolution's Prescription for Cancer Prevention".)
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
RT @H3nRasouli: Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of d…
Peto's paradox refers to the observation that there is no clear correlation between the size of an animal and its risk of developing cancer. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002 #cancer #genomics #cancerresearch #petoparadox https://t.co/pTLSpMa9IF
Peto’s Paradox: Evolution’s Prescription for Cancer Prevention https://t.co/upueWfZVSv
RH
IT
DP
SC
L
C