Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.

Richard D Riley, Julian P T Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks

February 2011 BMJ

Synopsis of Social media discussions

Throughout the discussions, participants highlight the significance of understanding random effects models, referencing detailed explanations from the paper and related works. The tone suggests a respect for the paper’s depth, with phrases like 'outlined in detail' and mentions of 'interpretation,' indicating engaged and substantive dialogue around the article's content.

A
Agreement
 Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the paper, especially regarding the interpretation of statistical models in meta-analyses.

I
Interest
 High level of interest

Posts show high enthusiasm and curiosity about the content, with references to detailed explanations and the significance of the topic.

E
Engagement
 Moderate level of engagement

Comments include references to specific methodological points and the authors’ papers, indicating moderate involvement beyond surface-level discussion.

I
Impact
 Moderate level of impact

The focus on understanding statistical nuances suggests the discourse could influence better practices or awareness in research interpretation.

Social Mentions

YouTube

2 Videos

Facebook

21 Posts

Twitter

40 Posts

News

11 Articles

Metrics

Video Views

252

Total Likes

200

Extended Reach

113,522

Social Features

74

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Asthma and COVID-19 Mortality: Analyzing Protective Factors and Evidence Quality

Asthma and COVID-19 Mortality: Analyzing Protective Factors and Evidence Quality

A systematic review suggests asthma is linked to reduced COVID-19 mortality risk. This video examines the evidence quality, heterogeneity, and the significance of confidence and prediction intervals in meta-analyses for clinical insights.

INTVL ⠀

January 16, 2022

228 views

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Dementia Risk Analyzing Meta-Analysis Findings

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Dementia Risk Analyzing Meta-Analysis Findings

Join us for this special birthday pod where we discuss a fascinating new meta-analysis on the association of PPIs and dementia. Learn about the study's results, methods, and the significance of prediction intervals in meta-analysis.

Dr. Journal Club

August 24, 2023

24 views

  • Mihai Dinu
    @mihaidinu88 (Twitter)

    You don't have to take my word for it
    view full post

    September 10, 2024

    4

  • Lorenzo Lolli
    @LorenzoLolli28 (Twitter)

    Among the different illogical points being raised, it was claimed that we adopted “
    view full post

    September 3, 2024

  • Hanin Farhana
    @haninfarhana (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    September 2, 2023

    39

  • Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva (Lucas Silva)
    @lucasojesilva12 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 16, 2023

    39

  • Ana Carolina Peçanha
    @AnaCarolPecanha (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 15, 2023

    39

  • Arthur James
    @ArthurJamesMD (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 15, 2023

    39

  • Ash Paul
    @pash22 (Twitter)

    Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/owRlc3fEse via @deeksj et al
    view full post

    August 15, 2023

    2

  • Yasharz
    @YasharZeighami (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Aghiles Hamroun
    @AghilesHamroun (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Erik Svensson
    @EvolOdonata (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Chomes
    @CHOMES102 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Marion Campbell
    @MarionKCampbell (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Yaseen Arabi
    @YaseenarabiYa (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Hector Meza Comparan, MD
    @HectorMezaMD (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Mathieu van der Jagt
    @mvanderjagt1 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Caique de Melo
    @caique_demelo (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • David de Andrade Nunes
    @daviddeanunes (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Chris Lo
    @chrislowh (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Gabriel Andrade-Ponce
    @Gatorco_AP (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Justin Losciale, PT, DPT
    @JayLos18 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Lekaashree Rambabu
    @Lekaa_Shree (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Matthew B. Jané
    @MatthewBJane (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Stephen Parry
    @statsysteve (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Almir Dibai Filho
    @almirdibai (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • 一只小飞象
    @drivefly5 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Prof. Nasser Alzerwi
    @NAlzerwi (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Tonya Ward
    @T_L_Ward (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Unitaria
    @uni_taria (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Andrew Yockey, PhD (He/Him)
    @YockeyAndrew (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Jill Jacobson
    @doctorjaj (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • John Boylan
    @jboylan (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Daniele Orso
    @Orso_dan (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Francisco C Ceballos
    @Ceballos_Gene (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Breadcrumbs
    @Breadcr17527025 (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Geetha Saarunya, PhD
    @DrSaarunya (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Richard Riley (R²)
    @Richard_D_Riley (Twitter)

    RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    39

  • Anders Granholm
    @andersgranholm (Twitter)

    #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This paper describes fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses, including the underlying assumptions and what they mean for the interpretation, .. 1/..
    view full post

    August 14, 2023

    172

    39

  • Dinesh Bhandari
    @Dineshh_BhD (Twitter)

    RT @Richard_D_Riley: This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo
    view full post

    January 30, 2022

    2

  • Pavlos Bobos
    @pavlosbob (Twitter)

    RT @Richard_D_Riley: This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo
    view full post

    January 28, 2022

    2

  • Richard Riley (R²)
    @Richard_D_Riley (Twitter)

    This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo
    view full post

    January 28, 2022

    7

    2

  • Statistička analiza - usluge

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    Facebook

  • Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 18. McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Synthesizing and Presenting Findings Using Other Methods. Cochrane ...
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    News

  • 1 S6 Table. Prediction intervals for risk of P. vivax parasitaemia ...

    Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549. Epub 2011/02/12. doi: 10.1136/bmj ...
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    News

  • Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 17. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission ...
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    News

  • A nutritional biomarker score of the Mediterranean diet and incident ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:964–967. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 48. White IR. Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J. 2009;9:40–56. doi: 10.1177 ...
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    News

  • A combination of plasma phospholipid fatty acids and its association ...

    doi: 10.1081/SAC-120023882. 28. Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.
    view full post

    December 12, 2025

    News

  • LANÇAMENTO DO LIVRO – DIREITO E SOCIEDADE (Volume 02) É ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    December 1, 2025

    Facebook

  • 【報名倒數】11/30 統合分析工作坊 醫療/ 營養/ 教育/ 體育/ 法律/ 商 ...

    Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J ...
    view full post

    November 16, 2025

    Facebook

  • Bujar Osmani prin në sondazhin e fundit për Çairin Pyetja e vetme ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    October 4, 2025

    Facebook

  • Falingué Keita

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    September 8, 2025

    Facebook

  • L'IA, un Pont entre les Échelons Locaux et les Préfectures : Impact et ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    May 29, 2025

    Facebook

  • “Les famílies pageses que vivien a la vall a l'edat mitjana estaven ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    May 13, 2025

    Facebook

  • [Hari Statistik Nasional (HSN) 2024] HSN yang diperingati setiap ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    September 25, 2024

    Facebook

  • Kreg O'Šenesi, poznati teniski analitičar i statističar, izmislio je novu ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    August 25, 2024

    Facebook

  • HEBAHAN PEMBUKAAN KAUNTER PADU Orang ramai yang ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    January 29, 2024

    Facebook

  • Jak se inovuje statistika? To rozebral v rozhovoru únorového vydání ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    March 20, 2023

    Facebook

  • Sur l'ensemble de l'année 2021 la croissance ressort à 3,1%. http ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    March 15, 2022

    Facebook

  • Deuxième session ordinaire du conseil national de la statistique 2021

    org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...
    view full post

    December 28, 2021

    Facebook

  • [ENQUÊTE] Enquête sur les conditions de vie des étudiants : une ...

    org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...
    view full post

    October 1, 2021

    Facebook

  • Menopausal hormone therapy and women's health: An umbrella ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 114. Wang T, Bradshaw PT, Moorman PG, Nyante SJ, Nichols HB, Shantakumar S, et al ...
    view full post

    August 2, 2021

    News

  • Intake of dietary fats and fatty acids and the incidence of type 2 ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 47. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al ...
    view full post

    December 2, 2020

    News

  • Health system interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes in low ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 25. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Meta-Analyst: software for meta ...
    view full post

    November 12, 2020

    News

  • COMUNICADO | El Comité de Operaciones de Emergencia ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    May 1, 2020

    Facebook

  • Bénin / Adoption de la SNDS-3 : Le pari de la cohérence Grâce à l ...

    Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4 ...
    view full post

    April 23, 2020

    Facebook

  • SEMINAIRE DE FORMATION EN GESTION DES RESSOURCES ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    April 7, 2020

    Facebook

  • CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 48. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting the extent ...
    view full post

    April 3, 2020

    News

  • CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a ...

    BMJ. 2011; 342: d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549 PMID: 21310794. 48. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting ...
    view full post

    April 3, 2020

    News

  • What are the limitations of meta-analyzing effect sizes in psychology ...

    Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4 ...
    view full post

    December 16, 2019

    Facebook

  • Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: A systematic review and ...

    BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 26. Chen L, Liu J, Kang Y, Liu J, Sufeng H. [Relationship between pre-pregnant body ...
    view full post

    December 10, 2019

    News

  • Saludos a todos, Espero que estén disfrutando el verano. En ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    July 29, 2019

    Facebook

  • En Côte d'Ivoire pour tous les chefs-lieux et départements, par ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    April 16, 2019

    Facebook

  • Le 12 octobre prochain, Jean-Luc Pissaloux (Professeur de droit à ...

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...
    view full post

    October 8, 2018

    Facebook

Abstract Synopsis

  • The text discusses the methods used to analyze and interpret random effects in meta-analyses, which are statistical techniques combining results from multiple studies to draw overall conclusions.
  • It explains how random effects models account for variability between studies, making the results more generalizable to different settings or populations.
  • Additionally, the text provides guidance on interpreting the results, including understanding what the estimated effects mean and how to assess the reliability and heterogeneity of the summarized findings.]