BMJ February 2011 PMID 21310794

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.

Richard D Riley, Julian P T Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks

Mentions

74
Peak: 35 in Aug 2023
across 4 sources since Oct 2018

Extended reach

113,522
potential audience

Total likes

200

Video views

252

Mentions per month

Oct 2018 – Dec 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter40 posts
  • Facebook21 posts
  • News11 articles
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Throughout the discussions, participants highlight the significance of understanding random effects models, referencing detailed explanations from the paper and related works. The tone suggests a respect for the paper’s depth, with phrases like 'outlined in detail' and mentions of 'interpretation,' indicating engaged and substantive dialogue around the article's content.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the paper, especially regarding the interpretation of statistical models in meta-analyses.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high enthusiasm and curiosity about the content, with references to detailed explanations and the significance of the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments include references to specific methodological points and the authors’ papers, indicating moderate involvement beyond surface-level discussion.

ImpactModerate impact

The focus on understanding statistical nuances suggests the discourse could influence better practices or awareness in research interpretation.

Abstract in brief

  • The text discusses the methods used to analyze and interpret random effects in meta-analyses, which are statistical techniques combining results from multiple studies to draw overall conclusions.
  • It explains how random effects models account for variability between studies, making the results more generalizable to different settings or populations.
  • Additionally, the text provides guidance on interpreting the results, including understanding what the estimated effects mean and how to assess the reliability and heterogeneity of the summarized findings.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Anders Granholm
@andersgranholm · X

#MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This paper describes fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses, including the underlying assumptions and what they mean for the interpretation, .. 1/..

Aug 14, 2023 · 172 likes · 39 shares · 1,198 followers View post →
Richard Riley (R²)
@Richard_D_Riley · X

This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo

Jan 28, 2022 · 7 likes · 2 shares · 12,952 followers View post →
Mihai Dinu
@mihaidinu88 · X

You don't have to take my word for it

Sep 10, 2024 · 4 likes · 1,024 followers View post →
Ash Paul
@pash22 · X

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/owRlc3fEse via @deeksj et al

Aug 15, 2023 · 2 likes · 32,294 followers View post →
Richard Riley (R²)
@Richard_D_Riley · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 12,952 followers View post →
Erik Svensson
@EvolOdonata · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 7,922 followers View post →

All mentions

Mihai Dinu
@mihaidinu88 · X

You don't have to take my word for it

Sep 10, 2024 · 4 likes · 1,024 followers View post →
Lorenzo Lolli
@LorenzoLolli28 · X

Among the different illogical points being raised, it was claimed that we adopted “

Sep 3, 2024 · 470 followers View post →
Hanin Farhana
@haninfarhana · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Sep 2, 2023 · 39 shares · 104 followers View post →
Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva (Lucas Silva)
@lucasojesilva12 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 16, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,084 followers View post →
Ana Carolina Peçanha
@AnaCarolPecanha · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 15, 2023 · 39 shares · 5,333 followers View post →
Arthur James
@ArthurJamesMD · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 15, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,296 followers View post →
Ash Paul
@pash22 · X

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/owRlc3fEse via @deeksj et al

Aug 15, 2023 · 2 likes · 32,294 followers View post →
Yasharz
@YasharZeighami · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 630 followers View post →
Aghiles Hamroun
@AghilesHamroun · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 722 followers View post →
Erik Svensson
@EvolOdonata · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 7,922 followers View post →
Chomes
@CHOMES102 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 328 followers View post →
Marion Campbell
@MarionKCampbell · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 4,946 followers View post →
Yaseen Arabi
@YaseenarabiYa · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 5,211 followers View post →
Hector Meza Comparan, MD
@HectorMezaMD · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 601 followers View post →
Mathieu van der Jagt
@mvanderjagt1 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 456 followers View post →
Caique de Melo
@caique_demelo · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 279 followers View post →
David de Andrade Nunes
@daviddeanunes · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,135 followers View post →
Chris Lo
@chrislowh · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 188 followers View post →
Gabriel Andrade-Ponce
@Gatorco_AP · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 543 followers View post →
Justin Losciale, PT, DPT
@JayLos18 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 674 followers View post →
Lekaashree Rambabu
@Lekaa_Shree · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 131 followers View post →
Matthew B. Jané
@MatthewBJane · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 7,337 followers View post →
Stephen Parry
@statsysteve · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 142 followers View post →
Almir Dibai Filho
@almirdibai · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 34 followers View post →
一只小飞象
@drivefly5 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 90 followers View post →
Prof. Nasser Alzerwi
@NAlzerwi · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,766 followers View post →
Tonya Ward
@T_L_Ward · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 283 followers View post →
Unitaria
@uni_taria · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,110 followers View post →
Andrew Yockey, PhD (He/Him)
@YockeyAndrew · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 1,207 followers View post →
Jill Jacobson
@doctorjaj · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 348 followers View post →
John Boylan
@jboylan · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 433 followers View post →
Daniele Orso
@Orso_dan · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 357 followers View post →
Francisco C Ceballos
@Ceballos_Gene · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 2,265 followers View post →
Breadcrumbs
@Breadcr17527025 · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 90 followers View post →
Geetha Saarunya, PhD
@DrSaarunya · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 575 followers View post →
Richard Riley (R²)
@Richard_D_Riley · X

RT @andersgranholm: #MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This…

Aug 14, 2023 · 39 shares · 12,952 followers View post →
Anders Granholm
@andersgranholm · X

#MethodMonday 33: Fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses https://t.co/E8KprmLF3l by @Richard_D_Riley et al This paper describes fixed effect vs random effects meta-analyses, including the underlying assumptions and what they mean for the interpretation, .. 1/..

Aug 14, 2023 · 172 likes · 39 shares · 1,198 followers View post →
Dinesh Bhandari
@Dineshh_BhD · X

RT @Richard_D_Riley: This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo

Jan 30, 2022 · 2 shares · 315 followers View post →
Pavlos Bobos
@pavlosbob · X

RT @Richard_D_Riley: This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo

Jan 28, 2022 · 2 shares · 1,461 followers View post →
Richard Riley (R²)
@Richard_D_Riley · X

This is outlined in detail in our BMJ paper 'Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses' https://t.co/mxVhF28Mdo

Jan 28, 2022 · 7 likes · 2 shares · 12,952 followers View post →
Statistička analiza - usluge
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...

Dec 12, 2025 View →
Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 18. McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Synthesizing and Presenting Findings Using Other Methods. Cochrane ...

Dec 12, 2025 View →
1 S6 Table. Prediction intervals for risk of P. vivax parasitaemia ...
News

Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549. Epub 2011/02/12. doi: 10.1136/bmj ...

Dec 12, 2025 View →
Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 17. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission ...

Dec 12, 2025 View →
A nutritional biomarker score of the Mediterranean diet and incident ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:964–967. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 48. White IR. Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J. 2009;9:40–56. doi: 10.1177 ...

Dec 12, 2025 View →
A combination of plasma phospholipid fatty acids and its association ...
News

doi: 10.1081/SAC-120023882. 28. Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.

Dec 12, 2025 View →
LANÇAMENTO DO LIVRO – DIREITO E SOCIEDADE (Volume 02) É ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Dec 1, 2025 View →
【報名倒數】11/30 統合分析工作坊 醫療/ 營養/ 教育/ 體育/ 法律/ 商 ...
Facebook

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J ...

Nov 16, 2025 View →
Bujar Osmani prin në sondazhin e fundit për Çairin Pyetja e vetme ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Oct 4, 2025 View →
Falingué Keita
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Sep 8, 2025 View →
L'IA, un Pont entre les Échelons Locaux et les Préfectures : Impact et ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

May 29, 2025 View →
“Les famílies pageses que vivien a la vall a l'edat mitjana estaven ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

May 13, 2025 View →
[Hari Statistik Nasional (HSN) 2024] HSN yang diperingati setiap ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Sep 25, 2024 View →
Kreg O'Šenesi, poznati teniski analitičar i statističar, izmislio je novu ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Aug 25, 2024 View →
HEBAHAN PEMBUKAAN KAUNTER PADU Orang ramai yang ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Jan 29, 2024 View →
Jak se inovuje statistika? To rozebral v rozhovoru únorového vydání ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Mar 20, 2023 View →
Sur l'ensemble de l'année 2021 la croissance ressort à 3,1%. http ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Mar 15, 2022 View →
Deuxième session ordinaire du conseil national de la statistique 2021
Facebook

org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...

Dec 28, 2021 View →
[ENQUÊTE] Enquête sur les conditions de vie des étudiants : une ...
Facebook

org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. (2016). Plea for ...

Oct 1, 2021 View →
Menopausal hormone therapy and women's health: An umbrella ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 114. Wang T, Bradshaw PT, Moorman PG, Nyante SJ, Nichols HB, Shantakumar S, et al ...

Aug 2, 2021 View →
Intake of dietary fats and fatty acids and the incidence of type 2 ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 47. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al ...

Dec 2, 2020 View →
Health system interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes in low ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 25. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Meta-Analyst: software for meta ...

Nov 12, 2020 View →
COMUNICADO | El Comité de Operaciones de Emergencia ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

May 1, 2020 View →
Bénin / Adoption de la SNDS-3 : Le pari de la cohérence Grâce à l ...
Facebook

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4 ...

Apr 23, 2020 View →
SEMINAIRE DE FORMATION EN GESTION DES RESSOURCES ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Apr 7, 2020 View →
CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 48. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting the extent ...

Apr 3, 2020 View →
CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a ...
News

BMJ. 2011; 342: d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549 PMID: 21310794. 48. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting ...

Apr 3, 2020 View →
What are the limitations of meta-analyzing effect sizes in psychology ...
Facebook

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4 ...

Dec 16, 2019 View →
Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: A systematic review and ...
News

BMJ. 2011;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549. pmid:21310794. 26. Chen L, Liu J, Kang Y, Liu J, Sufeng H. [Relationship between pre-pregnant body ...

Dec 10, 2019 View →
Saludos a todos, Espero que estén disfrutando el verano. En ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Jul 29, 2019 View →
En Côte d'Ivoire pour tous les chefs-lieux et départements, par ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Apr 16, 2019 View →
Le 12 octobre prochain, Jean-Luc Pissaloux (Professeur de droit à ...
Facebook

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, d549. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d549 4. IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., Rovers, M. M., & Goeman, J. J. ...

Oct 8, 2018 View →