Xでフロセミドの話になってたからDOSE試験(2011)紹介。フロセミドの持続静注と間欠投与で臨床症状改善や60日時点の予後に有意差なし。あと、高容量群の方がCrは高くなるけど、早めに臨床症状は改善するし60日時点での予後も関係なかったって内容でした。https://t.co/HZfHQdUDhM
Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Mar 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter75 posts
-
News17 articles
-
Blogs11 articles
-
Facebook6 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The overall discussion demonstrates strong engagement through references to the NEJM trial, with phrases like 'no significant difference' and 'infusion vs bolus,' illustrating nuanced debates about diuretic strategies and their clinical implications. The tone varies from informative to analytical, with many examples emphasizing the relevance of trial outcomes for treatment decisions.
Most posts agree that the study shows similar outcomes for different diuretic strategies, but some emphasize advantages of infusion in specific settings.
Discussions reveal high interest, with multiple mentions of trial results, implications for practice, and references to specific studies.
Posts are quite detailed, referencing trial data, sharing opinions on dosing methods, and debating clinical relevance, reflecting deep engagement.
While some recognize the trial's importance in shaping diuretic strategies, others see it as one of many pieces in a complex decision-making process, indicating moderate impact.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky心不全でのループ利尿薬 ✔︎閾値が上昇 ✔︎効果の減弱 https://t.co/UCCCzmcSib つまり十分な量を投与する必要あり 複数回投与か、持続で尿量をかせぐ ただし、DOSEでは単回・持続の差はなし https://t.co/QOBy8fQzbe ↓
Da igual usar bolos de furosemide que infusión continua en Insuficiencia cardiaca aguda https://t.co/Z4vYOoikrQ
@sargsyanz Is there evidence to support this? https://t.co/UM9gfR22xi
✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifKEg https://t.co/QjdfxraRgt
@brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to the comparison of bolus with continuous infusion, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups across a broad range of efficacy and safety end points. #NephJC https://t.co/MElAfLsimU
All mentions
ECLS Impact on Cardiogenic Shock: Key Study Insights by Prof. Thiele
Prof. Dr. Holger Thiele presents the central findings of his studies ECLSSHOCK and CAVAADHF at the European Society of Cardiology Congress. ECLSSHOCK explored whether ECLS improves outcomes in cardiogenic shock due to…
Empagliflozin: Impact on Cardiovascular Health in Diabetic Patients
Empagliflozin, a type 2 diabetes medication, reduces cardiovascular deaths and overall mortality in high-risk patients. This video explores the results of recent studies highlighting its effectiveness compared to…
Congestive Heart Failure Treatment in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
This video discusses the treatment of congestive heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease. It also addresses an erratum regarding blood pressure terminology at minute 08:33 of the Spanish version. For more…
RT @niklaus2009: Da igual usar bolos de furosemide que infusión continua en Insuficiencia cardiaca aguda https://t.co/Z4vYOoikrQ
RT @niklaus2009: Da igual usar bolos de furosemide que infusión continua en Insuficiencia cardiaca aguda https://t.co/Z4vYOoikrQ
Da igual usar bolos de furosemide que infusión continua en Insuficiencia cardiaca aguda https://t.co/Z4vYOoikrQ
#常陸田舎の総合内科 #とある日常
https://t.co/M7UhHfgltY フロセミドの持続投与って意味あるのか? ほとんどなさそう。
RT @ken_korai: 心不全でのループ利尿薬 ✔︎閾値が上昇 ✔︎効果の減弱 https://t.co/UCCCzmcSib つまり十分な量を投与する必要あり 複数回投与か、持続で尿量をかせぐ ただし、DOSEでは単回・持続の差はなし https://t.co/QOB…
RT @clinicasac:
RT @autumnleaveskid: Xでフロセミドの話になってたからDOSE試験(2011)紹介。フロセミドの持続静注と間欠投与で臨床症状改善や60日時点の予後に有意差なし。あと、高容量群の方がCrは高くなるけど、早めに臨床症状は改善するし60日時点での予後も関係なかった…
RT @autumnleaveskid: Xでフロセミドの話になってたからDOSE試験(2011)紹介。フロセミドの持続静注と間欠投与で臨床症状改善や60日時点の予後に有意差なし。あと、高容量群の方がCrは高くなるけど、早めに臨床症状は改善するし60日時点での予後も関係なかった…
Xでフロセミドの話になってたからDOSE試験(2011)紹介。フロセミドの持続静注と間欠投与で臨床症状改善や60日時点の予後に有意差なし。あと、高容量群の方がCrは高くなるけど、早めに臨床症状は改善するし60日時点での予後も関係なかったって内容でした。https://t.co/HZfHQdUDhM
@PrakashUpretiMD @RandyGoldbergMD @ReyentovichHFMD @SVRaoMD @JasonKatzMD Look at the renal outcomes here: https://t.co/OrVZgzrxab
@jackbardwell99 @DrDavidWarriner No difference overall. I prefer bolus dosing so the patient isn't encumbered by being attached to a drip all the time. https://t.co/bYFruq385C
DOSE trial https://t.co/T6A3RlyYGo
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifK…
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifK…
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifK…
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifK…
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifK…
✍️Bibliografias: ✨️Revisión: https://t.co/wSEQ80eSLU ✨️Artículos originales: https://t.co/lvY731FBhC https://t.co/OMxIuifKEg https://t.co/QjdfxraRgt
According to the #DOSE trial, which utilized furosemide for ADHF, only 15% of patients had no clinical congestion after 72 hours of treatment. https://t.co/XyiSMNepke #CritPRNjc
RT @ken_korai: 心不全でのループ利尿薬 ✔︎閾値が上昇 ✔︎効果の減弱 https://t.co/UCCCzmcSib つまり十分な量を投与する必要あり 複数回投与か、持続で尿量をかせぐ ただし、DOSEでは単回・持続の差はなし https://t.co/QOB…
RT @ken_korai: 心不全でのループ利尿薬 ✔︎閾値が上昇 ✔︎効果の減弱 https://t.co/UCCCzmcSib つまり十分な量を投与する必要あり 複数回投与か、持続で尿量をかせぐ ただし、DOSEでは単回・持続の差はなし https://t.co/QOB…
心不全でのループ利尿薬 ✔︎閾値が上昇 ✔︎効果の減弱 https://t.co/UCCCzmcSib つまり十分な量を投与する必要あり 複数回投与か、持続で尿量をかせぐ ただし、DOSEでは単回・持続の差はなし https://t.co/QOBy8fQzbe ↓
フロセミド単回投与 vs 持続投与 どちらも大きな差はない → DOSE trial ですね! NEJM (https://t.co/vfo4rFma61) アルブミンと利尿作用は関係ない?! CJASN →炎症性マーカーと関連があり、低アルブミンはサロゲートマーカーの可能性!!
RT @captainchloride: Only a minority of patients in the DOSE trial, which used high dose diuretics were free from congestion at 72 hours h…
Only a minority of patients in the DOSE trial, which used high dose diuretics were free from congestion at 72 hours https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1005419
Only a minority of patients in the DOSE trial, which used high dose diuretics were free from congestion at 72 hours https://t.co/Y7IJ1J8MY8 https://t.co/bsAzUbbK6w
RT @NU_IntMed: #Noon Conference: "Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure" from NEJM - Journal Club with Dr.…
#Noon Conference: "Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure" from NEJM - Journal Club with Dr. Lee and Content Expert Dr. Anand Srivastava
RT @javier20ch: Conclusiones: bolo o infusión da igual, dosis altas es mejor (>2.5), inicio temprano del tratamiento (<60 min) y UF como úl…
Conclusiones: bolo o infusión da igual, dosis altas es mejor (>2.5), inicio temprano del tratamiento (<60 min) y UF como última opción.
RT @CONAREC_ORG: Para leer completo este articulo puedes ingresar a la web por este enlace
Para leer completo este articulo puedes ingresar a la web por este enlace
Only 15% of AHF included in DOSE trial were decongested after 72 hours of high-dose loop diuretic (LD) therapy (3/9). https://t.co/qqJwutZWQD https://t.co/icaAg47tgC
8. DOSE trial showed similar outcomes with bolus vs infusion of furosemide, but remember that infusion gives the patient a longer period of the day in the adequate therapeutic window and don't be afraid to switch to infusion if bolus isn't working. https://t.co/6oy2kqijSQ
RT @priti899: @brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to…
RT @priti899: @brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to…
RT @priti899: @brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to…
RT @priti899: @brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to…
RT @priti899: @brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to…
@brian_rifkin @AlanYuNeph @NephJC @aarthi_dr @Ken_Nephrology @krithicism This trial from NEJM suggested that with respect to the comparison of bolus with continuous infusion, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups across a broad range of efficacy and safety end points. #NephJC https://t.co/MElAfLsimU
RT @JonathanDavisHF: @jniznick @FH_Verbrugge @DmitryAbramovMD Thanks for sharing! Would you mind sharing the reference? Other good ones: h…
@jniznick @FH_Verbrugge @DmitryAbramovMD Thanks for sharing! Would you mind sharing the reference? Other good ones: https://t.co/vx68763hWf https://t.co/WcgC8ASLPM https://t.co/yCrICLY4tt @DukeHFDoc & coming (!!): https://t.co/DGCLoIMkNk @SJGreene_md @robmentz
Estrategias diuréticas en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda descompensada. #FisioHumUCM https://t.co/8bvWJtTycd
“Estrategias diuréticas en pacientes con fallo cardíaco agudo”
RT @interna_12: Para acabar, os dejamos por aquí el enlace al artículo DOSE de @NEJM https://t.co/tGs4iAmjKq @Nefro12Octubre @SENefrologia…
RT @interna_12: Para acabar, os dejamos por aquí el enlace al artículo DOSE de @NEJM https://t.co/tGs4iAmjKq @Nefro12Octubre @SENefrologia…
RT @interna_12: Para acabar, os dejamos por aquí el enlace al artículo DOSE de @NEJM https://t.co/tGs4iAmjKq @Nefro12Octubre @SENefrologia…
RT @interna_12: Para acabar, os dejamos por aquí el enlace al artículo DOSE de @NEJM https://t.co/tGs4iAmjKq @Nefro12Octubre @SENefrologia…
Para acabar, os dejamos por aquí el enlace al artículo DOSE de @NEJM https://t.co/tGs4iAmjKq @Nefro12Octubre @SENefrologia @ResidentesSEMI #MedEd
#KingstonGasDocsJC Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure https://t.co/rANmCRSOUZ
@MikeRoseMDMPH And there is no difference in outcomes when it comes to bolus vs drip https://t.co/W4Kk3awqoD
@olivimet @doctoctocbot Un des principaux papiers sur le sujet : https://t.co/efFVRqC4nz Pour la supplémentation en fer, ça rejoint la question plus globale du bénéfice du fer dans l'insuffisance cardiaque, cf recos ESC entre autres.
@UnderNorazilla @MedecinDesAbers En voilà un : https://t.co/lO8BZGP65g
RT @MelbourneEPdoc: @sargsyanz Is there evidence to support this? https://t.co/UM9gfR22xi
@sargsyanz Is there evidence to support this? https://t.co/UM9gfR22xi
Trials a destacar -DOSE-AHF: bolo iv 2.5 veces la dosis oral acumulada por día/ambulatoria, mostró una tendencia no significativa hacia la mejoría de síntomas y de la diuresis.
RT @Ahmed742Iqbal: Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | NEJM @HEARTinMagnet @DrDavidWarriner http…
RT @Ahmed742Iqbal: Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | NEJM @HEARTinMagnet @DrDavidWarriner http…
RT @Ahmed742Iqbal: Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | NEJM @HEARTinMagnet @DrDavidWarriner http…
RT @Ahmed742Iqbal: Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | NEJM @HEARTinMagnet @DrDavidWarriner http…
Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | NEJM @HEARTinMagnet @DrDavidWarriner https://t.co/Ig1hxYs4Wp
@ansakhuja @scoca1 @hswapnil @PulmCrit @gchertow @taraichang @StanfordNeph Again, AKI was one of many outcomes we examined, and may be the least patient-centered. We certainly have prospective, even randomized, data showing that diuretics bump creatinine: https://t.co/O3ykt71m4v https://t.co/YA6aKL1lcB But the clinical relevance is far from established.
@medrants @kidney_boy @RossFarris1 This was before DOSE showed, as some predicted, that this reflects confounding by indication. Sicker pts get more diuretics. https://t.co/LZ0fwZUu0c
RT @medrants: #UncleBob a podcast week - all worth #5goodminutes - Today: #150 HFpEF with Dr Clyde Yancy MD https://t.co/OuusBoeAAJ @thecur…
RT @medrants: #UncleBob a podcast week - all worth #5goodminutes - Today: #150 HFpEF with Dr Clyde Yancy MD https://t.co/OuusBoeAAJ @thecur…
RT @medrants: #UncleBob a podcast week - all worth #5goodminutes - Today: #150 HFpEF with Dr Clyde Yancy MD https://t.co/OuusBoeAAJ @thecur…
RT @medrants: #UncleBob a podcast week - all worth #5goodminutes - Today: #150 HFpEF with Dr Clyde Yancy MD https://t.co/OuusBoeAAJ @thecur…
#UncleBob a podcast week - all worth #5goodminutes - Today: #150 HFpEF with Dr Clyde Yancy MD https://t.co/OuusBoeAAJ @thecurbsiders @NMHheartdoc @PaulNWilliamz interesting reference on diuretics - https://t.co/56LwxwSsxY Interpreting this study is a real challenge!
RT @hswapnil: @brentnreed @VelezNephHepato @RClaure_nefro @scoca1 Ah - you weren’t convinced with this? https://t.co/mIBenw8HCE In ICU set…
RT @edgarvlermamd: Diuretic strategies in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ADHF ca. 2011 from @NEJM #Nephpearls http://t.co/JgnnPKM0lB htt…
DOSE Trial: Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure - Visualmed https://t.co/r47F1xWaSr
@dora_ph 参考資料これかなぁと。 https://t.co/4Ew4aeVYLb 先行研究に「J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):376-82.[PMID: 8800113]」やら、「Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 1;115(5):360-6.[PMID: 21366472]」、コクランのCDSR(Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003178.)があったけども・・・と。
@brentnreed @VelezNephHepato @RClaure_nefro @scoca1 Ah - you weren’t convinced with this? https://t.co/mIBenw8HCE In ICU settings people do prefer continuous infusion for closer titration which is fine with me
お腎
高心
HM
GW
DF
DF
S
LM
茨柴
N
NP
S
CT
み
HK
PP
BK
HB
Y
WP
L
OC
RB
AP
G
KN
SN
NM
MU
NM
AG
FB
C
WM
DS
DW
AM
NC
N
MV
JM
FA
FB
JJ
RS
SN
PR
MO
K
SK
N
A
DB
GG
DW
PG
AI
IM
DE
RC
RG
M
TC
RM
AM
Hا
猫
KK
SS