Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
This group of discussions reveals a strong collective interest in how extraneous factors, such as judges' hunger, bias judicial outcomes, with many examples citing the original study and related critiques. The tone ranges from factual reporting to critical reflection, illustrating profound engagement with the research's societal and ethical impacts.
Most discussions support the main findings of the article, emphasizing how external factors like hunger influence judicial decisions.
The topic sparks high interest, as many posts reference studies and question the implications for justice and ethics.
Posts often discuss specific aspects of the research, share related studies, and critically analyze the findings, indicating deep engagement.
The discussions highlight the significant implications of the research for understanding judicial bias, decision-making processes, and potential reforms.
“Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa para comer. Si los jueces están hambrientos, son más duros” Danziger, Levav y Avanim-Pesso. Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions (2011).
El estudio es «Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions» de Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav y Liora Avnaim-Pesso de 2011. Lo pueden encontrar aquí, si tienen más curiosidad: https://t.co/GD6WcduAbI
https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Aside from accountability by the Chief of the court - a break with snack is essential to help with judicial decision fatigue. Study: https://t.co/NflgVJasDR https://t.co/ckxEUNjcnx
Buradaki bulgular, 2011'de yayınlanan bir başka çalışma ile temelden çelişiyor. İsrail'de, yemek arasından hemen önce hakimlerin şartlı tahliye başvurularının neredeyse hepsini reddettiği, yemek yedikten sonra ise kabul etmeye başladığı bulunmuştu. https://t.co/eKFCqz0frd https://t.co/tQBHgEycgR
9| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/9Fvxi5Oc6n Q2: https://t.co/jtSsShTs7n Q3: https://t.co/mRmtkpSDVX Q4: https://t.co/NmtEM9dpin Q5: https://t.co/9IjvAJamAJ
The Pomodoro Technique is a time management system that enhances focus and productivity by incorporating scheduled breaks, which help maintain constant vigilance and prevent goal habituation during studying or work…
Hi I am Adri Cortee I am a 4th year Biomedical Sciences PhD student at Vanderbilt University In this video I summarize some of the key points in the book When by Daniel H Pink I tell you how to figure out your…
参照論文： Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions." PNAS. https://t.co/xG3gUBW0BC こうした“行動が止まる理由”を毎日ひとつ紹介しています。 興味があればフォローをどうぞ。
参照論文： Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). https://t.co/xG3gUBW0BC こうした“判断の劣化”を理解すると、意思決定は今より確実に改善できる。
RT @Bonboryage: @psyDrHirai @x___encounter @daruinaka_ 裁判官が囚人の仮釈放を認める（囚人にとって有利な）判断をするかどうかがご飯休憩に依存するという話らしいです Extraneous Factors in Judicia…
@psyDrHirai @x___encounter @daruinaka_ 裁判官が囚人の仮釈放を認める（囚人にとって有利な）判断をするかどうかがご飯休憩に依存するという話らしいです Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions (2011) https://t.co/iarf6kk0D4
Are you hangry? In 2011, researchers at @TelAvivUni showed that judges’ hunger influenced sentencing. In 1,112 parole hearings, favorable rulings dropped from 65% to nearly 0 before meals, then rebounded after lunch. https://t.co/JICScyD15M https://t.co/tHwvTrBUmV
イスラエルの裁判官で昼休憩が判断に影響するかどうかを検証した先行研究があったりする https://t.co/ZpEn2CIdsg https://t.co/5u5kHhSlm8
8- حتى قراراتك اليومية تتأثر بشي بسيط مثل الجوع! “نظرية القاضي الجائع” تقول إن القضاة يصدرون أحكام أخف بعد الفطور! وين الإرادة الحرة هنا؟ [مصدر: Danziger et al., 2011, PNAS. https://t.co/BQcxjWRSct]
https://t.co/001jfP4J2g Human Factors in Litigation....forewarned is rescheduled
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
@unverantwortbar @jreichelt Ist evidenzbasiert. Die „gut gemachte Studie ist in PNAS veröffentlicht. Nach dem Mittagessen sind die Urteile milder. https://t.co/yKHX5UUu8n
Prisoners who appeared in the morning received parole about 70% of the time, while those who appeared late in the day were paroled less than 10% of the time. https://t.co/sTD6dXuSIE
fun fact: tem um estudo de 2011 que mostra que os magistrados eram mais favoráveis aos réus no início das sessões (logo após comer) e que isso quase zerava quando conforme a fome ia aumentando https://t.co/GloAFr34n5 https://t.co/1Dp4SY3qSY
That Reference: Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889–6892.
@PicturesFoIder Great tactic also backed up by evidence! A 2011 study titled "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions" showed judges are 65% more likely to grant parole after lunch, suggesting a full stomach leads to a more forgiving heart!
@Stortrappe A propos sprawiedliwosci roztrzygania przez sedzie przypomina sie ten artykul o wplywie przerwy na jedzenie https://t.co/mPfAyM4Cqz https://t.co/8L5IQaVXOV
RT @psychologynudge: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. #rechtspraak #rechters #depletion #justice #judges #Noise #Kahneman #Sibony…
@TheRookieCons You're right. The system is not entirely justice dependent. I read a research paper titled "Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions" The study found that the likelihood of a favourable ruling was significantly higher at the beginning of the workday or after a meal break.
@alexoxo_01 @erikmbaker I'd assume it does, our behavior is affected by, for example, our hormonal levels, and that's just one aspect of bodily influence. https://t.co/x6VBpsCovQ
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
A case against 24-hour shifts in medicine: https://t.co/BP5hsfTuPy
Also likely to happen in science funding..."We find that the percentage of favorable rulings drops gradually from ≈65% to nearly zero within each decision session and returns abruptly to ≈65% after a break" https://t.co/j1aRmKUGZe
@gasolinenvrtbr8 3 consecutive nights of full, quality sleep w/ good sleep hygiene? I requirement to do anything important. Bad enough humans are so frail… ever heard of decision fatigue & a study called “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions”.
یه مطالعه باحال اینجا انجام داده روی ۱۱۱۲ بررسی پرونده قضایی، توسط ۸ قاضی ، در یک دوره ۱۰ ماهه، و چیزی که باید قاضی ها قضاوت میکردند بررسی آزادی مشروط یا تغییر وضعیت حبس بوده! بعد مطالعه نشون داده اگر پرونده صبح باشه یا عصر و قاضی صبونه خورده باشه
RT @miiitomi: ほえーhttps://t.co/5kGfe1Rvbx
ほえーhttps://t.co/5kGfe1Rvbx
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @MGInvestigates: The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. Aft…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions | PNAS https://t.co/zWT9OrX9aR
#Justice in parole decisions is "what the judge ate for breakfast": Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/m3NbyA1LA9 https://t.co/1tZgOWscCn
@EasyRid04682094 Badania naukowe... " Okazało się, że prawdopodobieństwo zwolnienia było większe, jeśli sprawę rozpatrywano na samym początku dnia roboczego lub po przerwie obiadowej." https://t.co/WSbZFlIkIJ https://t.co/yVSGnGjyz1
@fentasyl https://t.co/nvzCAkh0yM https://t.co/EdBKbHfOag
RT @YoshiyukiNishi_: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けら…
Offhand, this is real: judges are more lenient right after they eat. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21482790/
https://t.co/3hBSPPuwEg https://t.co/U9f3WOnnPk
@Bornakang https://t.co/z2YhiEBNGm
RT @MGInvestigates: The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. Aft…
RT @MGInvestigates: The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. Aft…
RT @MGInvestigates: The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. Aft…
RT @MGInvestigates: The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. Aft…
The TikTok is a joke, but studies show the #1 factor to predict whether you get parole is how hungry the judge is. After breakfast 65-70% chance, before lunch 0%, after lunch 65%, ~10% before break, 65% after break. Severity of crime had little impact. https://t.co/Uf8QNAcllG https://t.co/ssHuMPyFuM https://t.co/vUKTUOOeOm
RT @paulieponzi: Danziger, Shai et al. “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U…
Danziger, Shai et al. “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America vol. 108,17 (2011): 6889-92. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018033108 https://t.co/615LQeBcQU https://t.co/bRYyzJv91X
@quant_arb and look at https://t.co/i0FU9wvRO0 to see other bias !
10/ Fuentes: Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Debate. Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889–6892. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018033108
11/ Críticas y sus respuestas: Weinshall-Margel, K., & Shapard, J. (2011). Overlooked factors in the analysis of parole decisions. Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Reply to Weinshall-Margel and Shapard: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions persist.
@Ofa9s صح هههههه هذي دراسة اندارت ع القضاة. لقوا ان القاضي لما يكون جيعان يحكم بعقوبة أشد من لما يكون واكل https://t.co/9RhlMYEWIc
Prisoners who appeared in the morning received parole about 70% of the time, while those who appeared late in the day were paroled less than 10% of the time. https://t.co/sTD6dXuSIE
@n3ll41 Gibt auf jeden Fall das ein oder andere Argument dafür ;) https://t.co/ipf9fC0rdZ
5/ What to make of this? Some have interpreted the study as contravening the Hungry Judge study by Danziger et al. (2011), which famously found that parole decisions become harsher the longer the time from the last meal, and conversely after eating. https://t.co/tcadgUfdWk
@ole_b_peters https://t.co/TohWMRjzP0 <-- i think you are talking about this one, right? I remember reading a critic saying that It was the ordering of the cases truly the dependant variable: maybe the hard cases were pushed to the end or something like that. 1/2
‘Justice is what the judge ate for breakfast’ Amazing study from 2011 examining the effects of #fatigue on judge rulings. Favourable rulings drop from ≈65% to ≈0% by the end of session. If you’re in court make sure your judge has had a break
RT @karunanundy: Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Asi…
RT @karunanundy: Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Asi…
RT @karunanundy: Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Asi…
RT @karunanundy: Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Asi…
RT @karunanundy: Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Asi…
Case in viral video was more borderline. Way too many cases where there's shouting from the bench with no provocation. Aside from accountability by the Chief of the court - a break with snack is essential to help with judicial decision fatigue. Study: https://t.co/NflgVJasDR https://t.co/ckxEUNjcnx
I swear I saw a paper responding to the "hungry judges" finding from Danzinger, Levav, and Avnaim-Pesso from 2011 https://t.co/fpZS1T5WNg Do any of you know where this was? The one I keep finding now is simulation based, and I didnt think that was it...
@alannagillis3 https://t.co/C5YrSN5pAK
@gonzalofraguas @hora25 @manueljabois Artículo científico: https://t.co/nFNDFoz86b
This study reminds me of another famous paper that looked at parole decisions by judges in Israel. That team found that the further the judges were from their last meal, the more likely they were to mete out harsher decisions. https://t.co/Cbm0EbdHdW https://t.co/0oT8ZJBXQ4
@kailintunen Tuomareiden tuomiot riippuvat tutkimusten mukaan niinkin banaalista asiasta kuin milloin söivät viimeksi. Tunteiden vietävissä siis. https://t.co/KwH6Bd8iZk https://t.co/ldpjlz6Fip
Buradaki bulgular, 2011'de yayınlanan bir başka çalışma ile temelden çelişiyor. İsrail'de, yemek arasından hemen önce hakimlerin şartlı tahliye başvurularının neredeyse hepsini reddettiği, yemek yedikten sonra ise kabul etmeye başladığı bulunmuştu. https://t.co/eKFCqz0frd https://t.co/tQBHgEycgR
המחקר המקורי: https://t.co/tIxrnYdhcp המחקר החדש: https://t.co/u8XdWHgkY0
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
RT @uttambabu: https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
https://t.co/xcxGlAG1r5
@mstambolis It might be ethical towards people but food can bias the results. https://t.co/1lMN45RYbu
5/ Don't take it personally. When you decide to fundraise a lot of people will pass. Many of these rejections are unrelated to you. To see this in another context note that a judge’s blood sugar is predictive of parole rates. https://t.co/czxvcK5GRa
@cjmandell Similar to the so-called "hungry judge" study that found Israeli parole judges were more likely to be lenient after meals than before: https://t.co/BReEqqo2Ea
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
@locuta @NPORadio1 Rechters zijn net mensen. https://t.co/Cactzh8QpY https://t.co/o9bwnsgFgP
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @Yoshiyuki_JtoB: 【裁判官は空腹だと厳しくなる？】 イスラエルの裁判官8人の1112件の仮釈放を調査したところ、裁判官は満腹だと寛大な判断を下す傾向にあり、空腹だと厳しい判断を下す傾向にあったそうです。裁判官も人間である以上、人体の無意識的な影響は避けられ…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
RT @christian1wolff: “Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa p…
“Se ha comprobado que es más probable que los jueces concedan la libertad al comienzo del día o después de una pausa para comer. Si los jueces están hambrientos, son más duros” Danziger, Levav y Avanim-Pesso. Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions (2011).
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions | PNAS I may be late to the party, but perhaps if you are about to make a key decision you should take a short break (probably but not definitely involving food) and read this paper first. https://t.co/HIznC3cdTV
How desk jobs alter your brain—and why they're so tiring @ConversationEDU https://t.co/uyuvBpBS2S https://t.co/FuWGmO6zEC
קישור למחקר מלמעלה: https://t.co/PSWbRrxcOp מקווה שקיבלתם ערך. כמו תמיד אשמח לשמוע מה אתם חושבים, אם אהבתם מוזמנים לשתף :)
@olsonplanner https://t.co/67wp9jbBnt https://t.co/m7xnMqNcfG
RT @agustineacuna: El estudio es «Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions» de Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav y Liora Avnaim-Pesso de 2011.…
RT @agustineacuna: El estudio es «Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions» de Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav y Liora Avnaim-Pesso de 2011.…
El estudio es «Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions» de Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav y Liora Avnaim-Pesso de 2011. Lo pueden encontrar aquí, si tienen más curiosidad: https://t.co/GD6WcduAbI
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. #rechtspraak #rechters #depletion #justice #judges #Noise #Kahneman #Sibony #Sunstein https://t.co/u4E3FBoV6z https://t.co/OFcm97jTVk
Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions. "We test the common caricature of realism that justice is "what the judge ate for breakfast" in sequential parole decisions made by experienced judges". https://t.co/2w65PxamXF
9| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/9Fvxi5Oc6n Q2: https://t.co/jtSsShTs7n Q3: https://t.co/mRmtkpSDVX Q4: https://t.co/NmtEM9dpin Q5: https://t.co/9IjvAJamAJ
RT @Elizabe43492064: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/fS3LBDJIBk
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/fS3LBDJIBk
@robkhenderson https://t.co/Grul4EpIjZ Extraneous factors in judicial decisions: https://t.co/eCVbVNbp1o
@kubazak Tak, samopoczucie sędziego wpływa niestety na wyrok. Wg bad. na Uniw. Ben Guriona i Columbia z 2011 r., opubl. przez prestiżowy PNAS, sędziowie rano odmawiali 35% wnioskom o warunk. zwolnienie, a przed obiadem w 85% (Danziger i in.) https://t.co/XILl6FSOmL https://t.co/wTqr6M5kfZ https://t.co/O5Ln9XXoor
@THIAGOSALOMAO https://t.co/iyBfzribPc
Voltou a circular uma notícia, baseada num artigo de 2011 na Revista da National Academy of Science - Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions (Fatores "Externos" na Decisão Judicial) -, dando conta que os juízes tendem a ser mais rigorosos em suas decisões quando estão com fome https://t.co/AQ0mXj1aNO
Fuente: Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892. https://t.co/uhAijEyUhr
@OdedRechavi Reminded me of this: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/gPc4KxKoxY NB not sure if this study held up to further scrutiny
@SimLabURI @cagrainger Ah, that would be Danzinger et al. (2011): https://t.co/CKyjjrGwW4 There's some back and forth about that paper (though full disclosure I haven't read these follow ups): https://t.co/sawRkC6kYU
イスラエルの司法における囚人の仮釈放率について、それを左右しているのは「裁判官が休憩から判断するまでに働いていた時間の長さ」だったという論文。おもしろい Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/rgasO515SG
The original Danziger et. al. 2011 hungry judge study (https://t.co/LMknGeqftS) ran into replication issues in 2011 itself (https://t.co/kgaDCj5GY7) and is again featured prominantly in the new book Noise, along with a few more similar studies
@rickhuckstep @enricomolinari @terence_mills What if the human judges rulings were poorly taken in first place? Plenty of evidence humans are biased by exterior factors too when judging! Eg https://t.co/Zj39skZiEK
RT @adricortee: In my latest YouTube video I talk about the #scientific #secrets behind #perfect #timing described in When by @DanielPink ,…
In my latest YouTube video I talk about the #scientific #secrets behind #perfect #timing described in When by @DanielPink , check it out! #biologicalclocks #chronobiology #phdlife #phdchatter #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter https://t.co/YpfOFIjC7H
Extraneous Factors in judicial Decisions 인생은 타이밍 그 타이밍은 정말 연관성 없는 요소에서 결정이 난다 고백의 결정을 받으려면 그 사람과 맛있는 식사 후에 하세요 그 타이밍이 성공할 확률이 높습니다. 제가 아는 팁입니다.
And another study @Behavior2020 mentioned from Levav: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions, https://t.co/6ksTMr2uNR https://t.co/dkzw88U0qn
@Buriedbhindbars Especially when something as trivial as whether a judicial decision is made before or after a judge has had their lunch break can significantly influence outcomes https://t.co/avDJ63UlIE
「食事休憩前の審議において判事が仮釈放を認める割合が少なくなる」という事実から，我々はちゃんと食事を取らないといけないということがわかります。メシ行ってきます。 >> Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/FxJxzT2X35
有名な研究？らしいけれど、知らなかった
Sapolsky is asked about the paper, “Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions”. “An extraordinary finding that should be one of the first steps in convincing everyone that the criminal justice system makes no sense whatsoever for a million reasons...” https://t.co/cJAJXSNohh
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions : we are what we eat
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions | PNAS https://t.co/J2vMZVLfXv
justice is “what the judge ate for breakfast”
Reason being this: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/VBrySgiaDW
RT @dropsoul: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions (LUNCH) "We find that the likelihood of a favorable ruling is greater at the very b…
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions (LUNCH) "We find that the likelihood of a favorable ruling is greater at the very beginning of the work day or after a food break than later in the sequence of cases. This pattern is readily evident..." https://t.co/v2u6gkJcT5 https://t.co/DG0p1RxRki
Therminplanung!
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions https://t.co/r8NMRCJHv2
RT @AWRix: As we're discussing AI bias & ethics, last
RT @AWRix: As we're discussing AI bias & ethics, last
Many bias & ethical issues are issues with the status quo, with power, with us & our motives. Our job: understand, mitigate & monitor risks like bias, to ensure product works. And put the right controls in place to fix Danziger's lunchtime jeopardy https://t.co/S2ykGjpxPg /3
As we're discussing AI bias & ethics, last
RT @j0xsz: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions; food break impact: http://t.co/DVfH4rhI1D | #important #TODO #bloodsugar http://t.co/n…
@ScottPWoods Yes - see S Danziger, J Levav, L Avnaim–Pesso, ‘Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions’ (2011) 108(17) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 6889–6892. i wrote a bit about this in my Judge v Robot article.
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions Shai Danziger, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnaim-Pesso PNAS April 26, 2011 108 (17) 6889-6892; Quiero recordarles que hay un estudio (aunque algunos lo consideran cuestionable) sobre esto a un nivel más delicado. https://t.co/WaVyjqKzP2
A #fome dos #juízes influencia #julgamentos? Extraneous factors in #judicial decisions https://t.co/630s8BtPKr
RT @SciencePresse: La science s’appuie sur des faits empiriques et sur leur interprétation: Parfois il y a dissension quant à l’interprétat…
RT @ProfCamposBueno: ¿hoy día de reflexión política? debería serlo... yo mientras le doy vueltas a esto... Extraneous factors in judicial d…
RT @ProfCamposBueno: ¿hoy día de reflexión política? debería serlo... yo mientras le doy vueltas a esto... Extraneous factors in judicial d…
RT @ProfCamposBueno: ¿hoy día de reflexión política? debería serlo... yo mientras le doy vueltas a esto... Extraneous factors in judicial d…
¿hoy día de reflexión política? debería serlo... yo mientras le doy vueltas a esto... Extraneous factors in judicial decisions the legal reasons explain the decisions of the judges? psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings https://t.co/3AnCDzRzja
La science s’appuie sur des faits empiriques et sur leur interprétation: Parfois il y a dissension quant à l’interprétation. #BrunoDubuc présente l'un de ces cas: «Extraneous factors in judicial decisions» https://t.co/OZsaXkcCeW #Cerveau #Danziger #Levav #Avnaim #Pesso https://t.co/cq1O2etaeZ
La #science s’appuie sur des faits empiriques et sur leur interprétation: Parfois il y a dissension quant à l’interprétation. #BrunoDubuc présente l'un de ces cas: «Extraneous factors in judicial decisions» https://t.co/OZsaXkcCeW #Cerveau #Danziger #Levav #Avnaim #Pesso https://t.co/RfXxAF6TnT
La science s’appuie sur des faits empiriques et sur leur interprétation: Parfois il y a dissension quant à l’interprétation. #BrunoDubuc présente l'un de ces cas: «Extraneous factors in judicial decisions» https://t.co/OZsaXkcCeW #Cerveau #Danziger #Levav #Avnaim #Pesso. https://t.co/b1lDXYyLMg
Después de tomarse un break o comer algo, las decisiones de los jueces cambian favorablemente. Si tienen tiempo, vean este interesante estudio : Extraneous factors in judicial decisions | https://t.co/imz3Gg7E9m
@cenkyigiter @LvntKker Adalete giden yol da ... "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions" https://t.co/YXZSKwqlBI
Literature meets science: "A good, contented, well-breakfasted juryman is a capital thing to get hold of." (Charles Dickens, The Pickwick Papers, 1836, Ch. 34) and Danziger et al. (2011, PNAS): "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions" https://t.co/1iTQv8tSCe …
RT @bmorling: That parole study discussed at #nitop? Some issues with the results and design: https://t.co/MyhoWMcr0P
RT @bmorling: That parole study discussed at #nitop? Some issues with the results and design: https://t.co/MyhoWMcr0P
That parole study discussed at #nitop? Some issues with the results and design: https://t.co/MyhoWMcr0P
CG
A
US
KN
SA
TS
し
T
ぼ
Dג
ソ
RR
S
L
KV
EW
Y
BF
L
AB
CG
T
上
TE
JR
ER
F
十
み
蓋
LM
T
殴
フ
もＡ
熊
ゲ
A
サ
KT
MN
K
BB
?
AS
م
GG
L
C
MK
MG
G
P
I
BA
MA
TW
CB
M
HC
SA
KP
RH
BR
SD
SS
ES
NC
UI
KT
DI
AD
B
N
PA
रश
शऋ
SD
GW
ZP
M
PP
む
磯ゆ
ア両
ヨデ
弁
R
う
兵
軽仮
い
ま
B
ふ自
そ独
I玲
A
NH
HS
九テ
N
Mま
俺
MV
EO
JR
JA
B
MV
MR
RG
GG
EG
JA
MA
CD
JM
B
P
JL
MG
AP
R
L
WC
DR
ED
LC
AB
MX
R
AM
M
SD
RS
D
EB
MY
JB
HM
FR
RE
DC
TW
Hデ
K
DC
비일
BC
J
T
の
C
L
AM
CB
CA
AP
IS
N
AR
YN
TS
W
WS
JR
SB
LG
ML
JB
S
MF
OE
AS
I
DB
BM