Phys Chem Chem Phys June 2011 PMID 21541371

In silico screening of metal-organic frameworks in separation applications.

Rajamani Krishna, Jasper M van Baten

Download social card

Mentions

4
Peak: 2 in Jan 2024
across 2 sources since Aug 2021

Extended reach

315
potential audience

Total likes

2

Video views

315

Mentions per month

Aug 2021 – Jan 2024

Where it's discussed

  • Bluesky2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reveal a generally positive outlook on the publication's contribution, with users mentioning its relevance to water harvesting and separation applications. Phrases like 'valuable insights,' 'technological potential,' and 'systematic evaluation' highlight the perceived impact, while mentions of 'simulation methods' and 'performance metrics' illustrate technical engagement.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions agree that the study offers valuable insights into MOF and ZIF applications, with some emphasizing its novelty and importance.

InterestModerate interest

The posts indicate a moderate level of curiosity, often referencing specific scientific applications like water harvesting and gas separation.

EngagementNeutral engagement

While some users delve into technical details such as simulation methods and performance metrics, others make brief comments, reflecting mixed depth of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

There is a recognition that the research has potential implications for environmental and industrial technologies, though this is not universally emphasized.

Abstract in brief

  • In silico screening of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) is crucial for their application in separating gas mixtures like CO2, CH4, H2, and hydrocarbons, using technologies such as pressure swing adsorption and membrane separation.
  • Due to the large number of synthesized MOFs and ZIFs, molecular simulations are used to systematically evaluate their performance based on metrics like adsorption selectivity and permeability, helping identify the best candidates for specific separation tasks.
  • The study highlights how these simulation methods compare the performance of novel MOFs and ZIFs against traditional zeolites, with experimental data validating the effectiveness of the screening approach.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
MOF Papers
@mofpapers.bsky.social · Bluesky

In Silico Screening of Metal–organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05868

Jan 2, 2024 View post →
MOF Papers
@mofpapers.bsky.social · Bluesky

In Silico Screening of Metal–organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05868

Jan 2, 2024 View post →

All mentions

MOF Papers
@mofpapers.bsky.social · Bluesky

In Silico Screening of Metal–organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05868

Jan 2, 2024 View post →
MOF Papers
@mofpapers.bsky.social · Bluesky

In Silico Screening of Metal–organic Frameworks for Water Harvesting http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05868

Jan 2, 2024 View post →