Stroke June 2011 PMID 21566236

Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy.

Karen Baker, Stefan J Cano, E Diane Playford

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 7 in Apr 2021

across 2 sources since Aug 2020

Extended reach

122,096

potential audience

Total likes

303

Video views

19,316

Mentions per month

Aug 2020 – Apr 2021

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter7 posts
YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions predominantly highlight the systematic process of evaluating measures like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and its practical application in clinical settings, using technical language and references to evaluation criteria, which indicate a strong interest and recognition of the publication's impact in advancing outcome measurement strategies.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most comments agree that the article offers valuable insights into outcome measurement tools, with some emphasizing the importance of systematic scale selection.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions show high interest, as users engage deeply with specific measurement methods like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the consultation process for scale selection.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments reflect some detailed analysis and sharing of methods, indicating moderate engagement rather than superficial reactions.

ImpactModerate impact

Participants perceive the publication as meaningful, especially regarding its systematic approach to scale evaluation, potentially influencing future stroke research methodology.

Abstract in brief

This article discusses a three-step approach to selecting the best outcome measurement scales for stroke rehabilitation studies, emphasizing the importance of reliability, validity, and responsiveness.
The authors used guidance documents, theoretical considerations, and a thorough literature review involving healthcare professionals to evaluate 45 different measures, ultimately identifying the most suitable scales to capture relevant outcomes.
Their process highlighted that no single measure perfectly covered all important domains, leading to the selection of three key scales initially, with two additional scales added later for better clinical content and study design fit, demonstrating a systematic way to choose the best tools for stroke research.

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Assessing Upper Limb Function in Stroke Rehabilitation Using ARAT

This video discusses a systematic approach to selecting outcome measurement scales for stroke rehabilitation, emphasizing reliability, validity, and responsiveness in tools like the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).

竹林崇 · Aug 27, 2020 11,870 views

Optimized Outcome Measurement in Stroke Rehabilitation Using Fugl-Meyer Assessment

This video discusses a systematic approach to selecting appropriate outcome measurement scales for stroke rehabilitation, highlighting reliability, validity, and responsiveness, with a focus on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment…

竹林崇 · Aug 19, 2020 7,446 views

ゆきだるま

@Yuki_Daruma_Sa · X

Apr 24, 2021 · 9 shares · 4 followers View post →

竹林崇@脳卒中リハの専門家, 作業療法士, PhD（医学）

@takshi_77 · X

Apr 24, 2021 · 9 shares · 50,558 followers View post →

竹内章子@認定作業療法士

@ukkari_megane · X

Apr 23, 2021 · 9 shares · 240 followers View post →

たにしん@はたらき方×健康＝幸せ

@tanishin_321 · X

Apr 23, 2021 · 9 shares · 465 followers View post →

ahgiedmeu-作業療法士13年目

@MONMONsrabc · X

Apr 23, 2021 · 9 shares · 92 followers View post →

いっちー

@nano1414213560 · X

Apr 23, 2021 · 9 shares · 738 followers View post →