Br J Nutr September 2011 PMID 21679480

Don't disregard the essential distinction between PUFA species.

Christopher E Ramsden, Joseph R Hibbeln, Sharon F Majchrzak-Hong, John M Davis

Download social card

Mentions

7
Peak: 4 in Mar 2023
across 2 sources since Mar 2023

Extended reach

51,791
potential audience

Total likes

811

Video views

11,969

Mentions per month

Mar 2023 – Oct 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter4 posts
  • YouTube3 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The posts demonstrate disagreement by accusing seed oil advocates of dishonesty, with phrases like 'no honest argument' and 'misrepresentation,' reflecting skepticism and a dismissive tone. The lack of detailed elaboration suggests limited engagement with the nuanced scientific distinctions discussed in the publication.

AgreementStrong disagreement

The posts strongly oppose the publication's emphasis, questioning the honesty of seed oil proponents and suggesting misrepresentation, indicating clear disagreement.

InterestNeutral interest

The discussions show some engagement but lack enthusiasm or detailed analysis, reflecting moderate interest.

EngagementLow engagement

Responses express skepticism and critique rather than in-depth conversation, hinting at shallow engagement.

ImpactLow impact

The posts seem dismissive of the importance of the discussion, implying minimal influence on broader understanding.

Abstract in brief

  • The text emphasizes the importance of recognizing the different types of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) rather than treating them as a single group.
  • It suggests that understanding specific PUFA species is crucial, as they may have distinct effects or roles in health and nutrition.
  • Ignoring this difference could lead to misunderstandings or misinformation about the benefits or functions of PUFAs.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Tucker Goodrich
@TuckerGoodrich · X

Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argument to be made for benefit...

Mar 14, 2023 · 21 likes · 3 shares · 28,304 followers View post →
Raphael Sirtoli
@raphaels7 · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 14, 2023 · 3 shares · 8,601 followers View post →
ZahcM
@ZahcM · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 14, 2023 · 3 shares · 1,915 followers View post →
Understand then QUESTION science
@AbAnand9 · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 19, 2023 · 3 shares · 979 followers View post →

All mentions

Understand then QUESTION science
@AbAnand9 · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 19, 2023 · 3 shares · 979 followers View post →
Raphael Sirtoli
@raphaels7 · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 14, 2023 · 3 shares · 8,601 followers View post →
ZahcM
@ZahcM · X

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argu…

Mar 14, 2023 · 3 shares · 1,915 followers View post →
Tucker Goodrich
@TuckerGoodrich · X

Why can't seed oil proponents make an honest argument, without misrepresentation? Maybe because there's no honest argument to be made for benefit...

Mar 14, 2023 · 21 likes · 3 shares · 28,304 followers View post →