Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone demonstrates high interest through references to scientific studies like Hammer (2011) and Durvasula & Sankararaman (2020), with commenters debating the extent of archaic DNA in modern Africans, suggesting both curiosity and recognition of the research's impact on understanding human evolution.
Most discussions support the idea that ancient gene flow occurred in Africa, citing studies like Hammer (2011) and Durvasula & Sankararaman (2020).
Numerous comments reference detailed research and studies, showing high curiosity and engagement with the scientific findings.
Posts include examples of citing specific studies, debating interpretations, and questioning evidence, indicating active participation.
Discussions highlight how these findings challenge previous misconceptions about African human history, suggesting moderate significant influence.
Hold the phone. This is an exaggeration, surely? Studies like Hammer (2011) https://t.co/I5opeFyQmj And Lachance (2012) https://t.co/20dXQefPrA both do confirm archaic admixture in Africa, but it’s a minor fraction, similar to Neanderthal contributions elsewhere. Calling it https://t.co/Pm75hXD0ou
@mandelasmind @Occupymylife5 @ItIsHoeMath @tadgh_dc Multiple peer-reviewed studies have proven this fact. Robert Sephr has only referenced those studies, he was not part of those research teams. https://t.co/x85HviezLm
@arigra888 @UltraPatriot44 @Crazyy_Videos Yes, Lakisha. We believe the truth. You're the heir of Homo Erectus or another closely related hominid species. https://t.co/IBsBVbRuZU
@exponential28 @RealChrisLangan @elonmusk Thats the one Here are some links [1] https://t.co/gvCQszGvCg [2] https://t.co/UYGxqnWP0s [3] https://t.co/mwnYFnHoYo [4] https://t.co/Fj4sHA9b3M [5] https://t.co/crVqs7RXH0 [6] https://t.co/9gqvRIRfTt [7] https://t.co/GWhEW1C7io] https://t.co/rYq5yWJj1J] https://t.co/QASAnZbOoy
@hhhhhhbbhhbbbb @nianello6 @Narmer_X @kaido5556 @jamessh00293570 @m_fma @MrMisr1 @ManciSiya @MelaninExtracts @Void_pilled @AskPerplexity @iyamyesyouareno @Belrock01 @Vic18246223 @Treday_90 @T_A_Activist @ProudlyHotep @IRLEgyptologis7 @Tonycmyk @Jerome_bagz @irregularcurve @alfa3141592653 @WellnessCheck12 @PedosYt @BlackPa10086717 @ka64502876 @grok @aigov_agent @juandia07842974 @Benny6696029227 @qyld1234 @grounded_in @kaido544 @graytown68100 @KingEzana77 @KushnerAvi @Fv07wX9IdQEjEwU @Woosey7945 @U740_2 @Tasdghj1 @kemetnubiakamp @AdherbalduRif @Mikey234 @JBCrpted @U780_2 @kaido So you’re debating a topic you barely grasp? Got it. SSA carry archaic DNA like everyone else, the difference being a ghost lineage not yet physically found. Now go ahead and show me a study proving SSA have none
@AfroAthem @NephilimRevenge @scrowder It is limited to those of Sub-Saharn African descent. https://t.co/ajLr6SqydQ https://t.co/BM94ksJCjx
This video delves into the complexities of quantum computing techniques. It explores the foundational principles and recent advancements, illustrating how these technologies are set to transform various fields…
This video explores a significant finding of a Denisovan mandible from Pleistocene Taiwan, expanding the understanding of Denisovan distribution in ancient Asia. The mandible, dating between 10,000 to 190,000 years ago…
@1PTHANG @B1TuckerCarlson @AmiriKing https://t.co/G9wGdTMmUE here is another example
@iam2CoolShawty @ChudTheBuilder DAS YOU MAAA BRUDDAH!!! Dassss your ancestor!!! See what has happen WuZ. Some worthless non human hominid GRAPED (yall love graping shit) a female Neanderthal a long time ago and it gave birth TO YOU!!! My lil negro! https://t.co/gK4dpZAHD0 https://t.co/Gc1rHLTJyI
@realeyez0 @bAnthonYsr Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa (2011) by Michael F. Hammer et al. Link. Sample size: ~16 Mandenka (West Africa), ~16 Biaka (Central Africa), 9 San (Southern Africa). Key finding: Contemporary African populations contain ~2% genetic material from an archaic
@Mizzkey79 @realeyez0 @bAnthonYsr Studies on Archaic Hominin Admixture Shared Between West Africans and African Americans • Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa (2011) by Michael F. Hammer et al. Link. Sample size: ~16 Mandenka (West Africa), ~16 Biaka (Central Africa), 9 San (Southern Africa). Key
@McThiccens_ @necros111 @HumbleFlow Durvasula & Sankararaman 2020 – Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations. Science Advances • Hammer et al. 2011 – Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. PNAS
Hasta no hace mucho se creía que los africanos subsaharianos eran sapiens puros al contrario que el resto de habitantes del planeta, pero por primera vez en una investigación genética de 2011, "Hammer, M. F. et al. Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. PNAS, 108(37)"
@AfroAthem @NephilimRevenge @scrowder It is limited to those of Sub-Saharn African descent. https://t.co/ajLr6SqydQ https://t.co/BM94ksJCjx
@mandelasmind @Occupymylife5 @ItIsHoeMath @tadgh_dc Multiple peer-reviewed studies have proven this fact. Robert Sephr has only referenced those studies, he was not part of those research teams. https://t.co/x85HviezLm
@PerkinWerbecque @Kingbingo_ @Sargon_of_Akkad So There is the Multiregional Hypothesis, suggesting that there were multiple species that evolved separately with heavy mixing. Sub-Saharan Africans have almost no Neanderthal DNA and the reverse is true for archaic African hominins DNA. https://t.co/i9vDh9dVwa
@hhhhhhbbhhbbbb @nianello6 @Narmer_X @kaido5556 @jamessh00293570 @m_fma @MrMisr1 @ManciSiya @MelaninExtracts @Void_pilled @AskPerplexity @iyamyesyouareno @Belrock01 @Vic18246223 @Treday_90 @T_A_Activist @ProudlyHotep @IRLEgyptologis7 @Tonycmyk @Jerome_bagz @irregularcurve @alfa3141592653 @WellnessCheck12 @PedosYt @BlackPa10086717 @ka64502876 @grok @aigov_agent @juandia07842974 @Benny6696029227 @qyld1234 @grounded_in @kaido544 @graytown68100 @KingEzana77 @KushnerAvi @Fv07wX9IdQEjEwU @Woosey7945 @U740_2 @Tasdghj1 @kemetnubiakamp @AdherbalduRif @Mikey234 @JBCrpted @U780_2 @kaido So you’re debating a topic you barely grasp? Got it. SSA carry archaic DNA like everyone else, the difference being a ghost lineage not yet physically found. Now go ahead and show me a study proving SSA have none
El 2011, es va analitzar l'ADN de tres grups africans (pigmeus biaka, san i mandinka) i es va demostrar que provenia d'una espècie ara extinta que es va separar del llinatge humà modern fa més de 700.000 anys. https://t.co/KRfJY4Su7O
@T_Rizzeal @GlitchRoberts @iamyesyouareno https://t.co/8HrrQ9mbOe https://t.co/cag4s5dEJw https://t.co/GFt3SBoHOq
@SurlyThomasMore @purpplondon @DunderMifflnity @PretentiousT10 @shane7777ssss @OttisRot I had used my character max and had to make cuts where I could. You're lucky it ended with a period. MF Hammer Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 15123–15128 (2011). Science Mag vol. 6 no. 7 2020 https://t.co/WKMxjP9zMg
@NathanS31397389 @Est_gaming8 @Kenedhloger Hammer et al. (2011) - Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. Durvasula & Sankararaman (2020) - Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations.
@LaurynBahen @elonmusk Spencer J. Quinn: Race Realism Vindicated: Archaic Human DNA Found in Black Africans https://t.co/tQ8Zyed0W8 Michael Hammer, Dr. Jeff Wall: Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa https://t.co/Nan5jDdVPq Erik Trinkhaus, Milford Wolpoff: Multiregional Evolution Model -MEM
@VPdrinker @PPC4Liberty So heres why I think you might all be wrong… Too much of our research comes from zogafilliated medical research centers. Here’s what some Russian geneticists found: https://t.co/SQnR0BAHQK https://t.co/zhlhcqOkj0 https://t.co/EQt8yzn1Fz https://t.co/ZVEnM7UHOY https://t.co/vuyPOafs7n
RT @ubiquitousnewt: Hold the phone. This is an exaggeration, surely? Studies like Hammer (2011) https://t.co/I5opeFyQmj And Lachance (…
@exponential28 @RealChrisLangan @elonmusk Thats the one Here are some links [1] https://t.co/gvCQszGvCg [2] https://t.co/UYGxqnWP0s [3] https://t.co/mwnYFnHoYo [4] https://t.co/Fj4sHA9b3M [5] https://t.co/crVqs7RXH0 [6] https://t.co/9gqvRIRfTt [7] https://t.co/GWhEW1C7io] https://t.co/rYq5yWJj1J] https://t.co/QASAnZbOoy
@LandonCrismon @The_NS_Question @Neo_Uberweiss @dailylives87 @NextWaveAmerica You were better off not knowing because it isn't correct. https://t.co/NA4OzJilw1 TLDR they haven't identified the archaic DNA in Africans and likely never will
Hold the phone. This is an exaggeration, surely? Studies like Hammer (2011) https://t.co/I5opeFyQmj And Lachance (2012) https://t.co/20dXQefPrA both do confirm archaic admixture in Africa, but it’s a minor fraction, similar to Neanderthal contributions elsewhere. Calling it https://t.co/Pm75hXD0ou
@k9_reaper https://t.co/hHpLLJmvcE
@Demuremoony @MGoonery0331 Blood kin to H. Erectus https://t.co/UP1DA1Dhxo https://t.co/K2x9WLGVcZ
@matigary Actually no https://t.co/DsUrVV2aVl
@PeacockClu38175 https://t.co/MCCDfcHb4Y
@SneedFeed1235 @InsaneCope Lol, Ive seen that before. Here is the actual study that it's miss-quoting. It's funny how easy it is to get you all to repost factually inaccurate information because racist lies make you feel good. https://t.co/aSNNZSc1iC
@southpawmikhail @Renialate @Moneyma89071669 @ejejjuk @Orwellsghost28 than there are between Asians and whites. Sub-Saharans are a different subspecies. https://t.co/cOywbN9yFL
@MountKenyan You are an idiot. It lists the study at the bottom. If that’s not good enough here is another one. It’s easy to look up but you won’t cause it goes against your agenda. https://t.co/aGKyYI7Yv4≈700%20kya. https://t.co/SzyM7hizad
@ssj3emyia @BIPOCracism No. You got it backwards. Your screenshots, that you failed to cite, come from a 2011 paper, “Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa” (Hammer, Werner, et al.). “Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations” is from 2020.
@arjunviswanaths @iamyesyouareno https://t.co/pHdn3peqEs
@TheMalaiLana @theblackjack02 The racist mythologist always black me. The study is about hominid introgression in DNA of extinct hominids. Has nothing to with brain development. The study emphasizes African human phenotypes have the most diverse human genome/originality. https://t.co/o40DjRtWpD
@Crazyy_Videos The heirs of Erectus never cease to act in their predictably violent, inhuman ways. https://t.co/IBsBVbRuZU
@arigra888 @UltraPatriot44 @Crazyy_Videos Yes, Lakisha. We believe the truth. You're the heir of Homo Erectus or another closely related hominid species. https://t.co/IBsBVbRuZU
@mustbehuey @EbonySupremacy @bugimane @Blackmillions_ @CNN Yep. https://t.co/TZRVLPVY1I
@jai_chism @MarRiott_Marley @petty_murphy43 https://t.co/YwryLA6mq7
@Jamila8790 @YuuriCanzu @kentaromichinom All Sub Saharan Africans, lol. 23&Me doesn't account for deep ancestry matrix populations. You are almost a quarter erectus, which is closer to chimps compared to all human groups, due to this archaic hominid species. We have known this for a while. https://t.co/IBsBVbRuZU https://t.co/enpI9D52bi
Khoesan and Pygmy beware
@RhinoMemphis @WatchCapt https://t.co/arjbbgsbAN Source for claims.
RT @Phillip05166897: @AllenJRobinson @Xongkuro The hammer study and Tishkoff studies found small traces of admixture comparable in both TMR…
Interesting article https://t.co/boACKUt5nl
@Crash_Burn0215 @eviljinious1 @AsianDawn4 Certainly not sub-Saharan black. Sub-Saharans are intermixed with an unknown hominid that is not present in the rest of humanity. This is one of the bigger blows against the out of Africa theory. https://t.co/3XWVPYaiFp
@regularJay22 @nianello6 @Berry_gojii @JenniferALeoni @Phillip05166897 @Shiftant @FrankDeScushin sub saharan africans are admixed with archaic hominids. likely homo erectus. nothing wrong with that though. erectus invented the boat and was the first living being to learn how to control fire. https://t.co/VaSCUQXf3Q
@AllenJRobinson @Xongkuro The hammer study and Tishkoff studies found small traces of admixture comparable in both TMRCA and amounts to Neanderthals. https://t.co/FpdtyHNEoY https://t.co/YXugsLCmGx https://t.co/IElqiBvH7r
@PorchProgram @DomaiForeman @SerenaJB3 Africans are mostly Eurasians within the last 40kya as shown by genetics and the fossil record. https://t.co/3gB4YUTrtN africans have less than 2% Homo naledi/Australopithecus (archaic dna)
@Skoputsaren @dekman @Asklanda Nej, afrikaner blandade sig med en okänd arkaisk människoras efter det att våra förfäder lämnade Europa. En som skiljde sig från homo sapiens med mer än 4 miljoner år. https://t.co/FFzlGfvcB8
@BabeTruth2 @realdill731 @SerenaJB3 I too can post links Is the Out of Africa Theory Out? https://t.co/AdZ0LLjsEE Archaic Hominin Introgression in Africa Contributes to Functional Salivary MUC7 Genetic Variation https://t.co/NtTGnyzXhC Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa https://t.co/bs0UTH7cur
#300のmemo 本日のななめよみ。2011年なので少し古い論文。ghost archaic introgressionに否定的な論文の理解ためにghost archaic introgressionに関する論文を漁ってるところ。introgressionがあったであろう単一遺伝子座について議論し始めたりするあたりが時代を感じる…。 https://t.co/0lcZCnGMbQ
https://t.co/AJ9oAiTpsI https://t.co/2E7InVjS7d
@NOflexZONE191 Another 2011 report… here’s the results but doesn’t change anything I posted… https://t.co/AJ9oAiTpsI https://t.co/LU5DoUMLdd
@anarcho_app OOAT YOU ARE PSEUDO https://t.co/oTOU2o7VOl
@AsherAharonov כנראה שפחות טבח (אם כי גם), אלא merge באמצעות פרו ורבו. נראה שהמינים השונים שחיו במקביל (בתקופות שונות) היה compatible מבחינת רבייה. הניאנדרטל בכלל היה קרוב, אך כנראה שגם סאפיינס וארקטוס. ככל ונהנדס, ונרצה לקבע קסטות, יש למנוע. https://t.co/ijkkgV9AT6 https://t.co/qgWqrMa2gX
@Ericcpalmer @empireenjoyer10 @napoleon21st https://t.co/RqZmhNMJqq https://t.co/ziQVZg9kGg https://t.co/Fr0ggLuY8u
@empireenjoyer10 https://t.co/zTwNPQWEuv
@Nimble_iii @Ghostof_Atticus Africans are up to 20% homo erectus. Not entropy, they're mixed with a different subspecies https://t.co/EI6M9vF7mf
@lee2335731341 @negropessimist @Purebloodorigin The term "ghost population" means they cannot determine what type of homo sapien it was but there's enough unique DNA that it is distinguishable from other human DNA. Africa was full of early hominids. It's throughout Africa: https://t.co/0VWs9zr6J7
@AquaPaadre Those populations have a very archaic homo admixture in them even older than Neanderthal and denisovans maybe that’s why. https://t.co/eqLkbJBpiX
Las poblaciones africanas contemporáneas poseen genes de poblaciones arcaicas extintas, genes que las poblaciones euroasiáticas no poseen. Los euroasiáticos poseen en parte genes neandertal, la África subsahariana no. https://t.co/PDTMrhKagB
Research Article: Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa. https://t.co/dHNJDFuHMx HT: @Champion_Puffa #Hominids
@CubaMendez2 @CloudyChef @Autarchitecture @Iamabigail517 @RGC_Comics Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa https://t.co/VVUXjECZ9k https://t.co/Yxez4FWFku
Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa https://t.co/mtmmvjGe4R
S
C
DV
EA
KR
S
D
AM
M
WI
M
I
EE
V
KI
SD
T
M
E
G
CN
PP
M
AC
AG
ZT
HN
M
KB
ER
F
A
ᚺᚺ
AF
PA
TS
EO
JN
JD
K
CT
C
Я
N
Lι
V川
SP
F
K
SS
C
SD
H
RB