This collection highlights a strong collective interest in scientific consensus about the roles of environment and genetics in intelligence, exemplified by citations of key studies like Nisbett et al. (2012). The tone is analytical and respectful, with some posts challenging pseudoscientific notions and emphasizing the importance of broad, evidence-based discussions, which contribute to high engagement and perceived impact.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions support the article's emphasis on environmental influences over genetics and acknowledge the scientific consensus presented.
InterestHigh interest
Posts demonstrate high engagement with detailed citations and debate, indicating strong curiosity about nuanced research findings.
EngagementHigh engagement
Many participants reference specific studies, critique methodologies, and discuss implications, showing deep involvement.
ImpactHigh impact
The dialogues reflect an awareness of research significance, with references to policy and social implications of intelligence research.
Abstract in brief
The text discusses recent discoveries in intelligence research, such as the variability in heritability of IQ across social classes, the limited identification of specific genetic factors, and the distinct biological and behavioral differences between crystallized and fluid intelligence.
It highlights the significant impact of environment on IQ, showing that adoption and early childhood interventions can improve IQ scores and later life outcomes, with continued gains observed in developed and developing countries.
Additionally, it explores theoretical issues like the connection between working memory and intelligence, the causes of sex differences, the reduction in IQ gaps between racial groups, and the influence of factors like self-regulation and stress on cognitive abilities.]
Agreed.
In case this surprises you (because everyone and their grandma insists that IQ is a real psychological measure): Did you know that a kid adopted from a working-class home to a middle-class one makes an immediate jump in their IQ of 12 to 18 points?
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22233090/
@BrynnTannehill Which test version has this magical property? What does he think an IQ test is actually measuring?
This is naked eugenics.
If an IQ test measures raw intelligence then why can one increase their score with practice?
He must have missed this.
https://t.co/VHm1wYsLNx
Jun 21, 2021 · 8 likes · 2 shares · 1,000 followersView post →
A
Acaru
@t_acaru · X
Zeka üzerine kesinlikle okunması gerekenler:
https://t.co/XPIg46jevJ
https://t.co/Q5vl6B2B2X https://t.co/LJzylIr1ej
May 27, 2024 · 7 likes · 1 share · 17,364 followersView post →
DD
Denis Daly
@DenisDaly · X
Blue ticks seem to be dead against education, especially university ed. Now who is surprised.
Oh, we have solid evidence that reasoning improves with university.
Fascists always fear education.
Nisbett et al. 2012 . https://t.co/9ZamBVXRi0 https://t.co/Mj2jbKszci
Dec 8, 2023 · 6 likes · 1 share · 5,114 followersView post →
T
tesoureiros
@tesoureiros · X
@izzynobre 2 minutos de Google
https://t.co/pBOkdsZ6Mg
Jun 6, 2020 · 3 likes · 231,964 followersView post →
O
Obi
@obi_lewis · X
@AbrahamJ7B Eso es completamente falso, la distancia entre ambos grupos ha disminuido en 0,33 desviaciones estándar en los últimos años. https://t.co/hjERyhBHcY
Tampoco esperaba mucho viendo tu perfil de twitter pero bueno.
This video discusses recent discoveries in intelligence research, highlighting environmental impacts on IQ, genetic factors, and differences between crystallized and fluid intelligence. It emphasizes the importance of…
This video discusses recent discoveries in intelligence research, highlighting environmental impacts on IQ, genetic factors, and differences between crystallized and fluid intelligence. It explores how interventions can…
@its_The_Dr She said the word dumb down. According to research called: “Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments” by the American Psychological Association (APA). Average American ~100 vs. average Somali 68. You’re welcome.
@Florian4Gamers @jakubwiech Damn bro is salty and blocked.
https://t.co/NXbfCHAq2b
Duyme, M., Dumaret, A., & Tomkiewicz, S. (1999). How can we boost IQs of “dull children”? A late adoption study.
OECD PISA data (Programme for International Student Assessment)
Repeated cycles 2003–2018.
@Janeseesit @DonHouston85824 @andrewilliamsus https://t.co/ulS5baWU2j for sub saharan iq
https://t.co/CaWwaCR9lx for socioeconomic claims
https://t.co/m57lq4DJ8H for full iq chart by race and extra coverage on socioeconomic influence
@Xilenox1 @3301TLADSM @NESS_F2007 @grok @Exa2108 Oh, por favor, acepte esta humilde ofrende como muestra de mi arrepentimiento.
Por favor, me arrepiento de haber sido llamado invalido y de haber sido llamado retrasado.
Siento mucho arrepentimiento por las cosas que me dijeron.
https://t.co/fQRolrtGBN
https://t.co/ie3TxVEUZd
+ https://t.co/tzAb7O52Yn
@MagaMantis @much_lose @restoreorderusa Nisbett, R.E. et al. (2012). Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159.
Flynn, J.R. (1987). Massive IQ Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2),171–191.
@ergrilmuit @celestialbe1ng More Sources:
Nisbett et al. (2012)
https://t.co/PbZpnIUUra
Devlin et al. (1997)
https://t.co/VcMLrHanuK Polderman et al. (2015)
https://t.co/QhZId7Iuut
Neisser et al. (1996)
https://t.co/lxQqKfmNsI
@Gammato_ @RazemJmperium (b) Almost no genetic polymorphisms have been discovered that are consistently associated with variation in IQ in the normal range.
https://t.co/zyQh7BU1Bg 1500 cytowań, komprehensywne przedstawienie konsensusu, pseudonauka BTFO
@workercommie Also see https://t.co/W2kI66KuSZ with p. 843 on hypothesis explaining positive manifold via "beneficial relationships between cognitive processes", not unitary causal factor, and the "ecosystem metaphor" they give there. Cited on p. 151 of Nisbett et al at https://t.co/hRh3Jya6Mp
@twiron @RareNotion @jonatanpallesen I cited another detailed review a few tweets further down. The nature of intelligence is way more complex than you Nazi morons can understand. Try:
Nisbett, R. E., et al.. (2012). Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. American psychologist, 67(2), 130.
Oct 11, 2025 · 1 like · 31,864 followersView post →
AC
Apenas um cara
@FernandoItal · X
@FugitiveTree @f4b10rms Fontes: Nisbett et al. (2012), Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments, American Psychologist
Tucker-Drob & Bates (2016), Nature Human Behaviour
Plomin & Deary (2015), Genes and Intelligence, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
@JBerkeleyClarke @PannonianMantis Glad you asked. APA “Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns” (1996) Richard Nisbett et al. (2007) Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments Ken Richardson (2002) – What IQ Tests Test Stephen J. Gould – The Mismeasure of Man
.
@Dororoo_ @Lo8524574750331 @TDriver90 Nisbett et al. (2012), “Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments”, American Psychologist "Almost all observed group differences are due to environment."
6/X
@HonoraryZoomr https://t.co/mhkLWCQUCn
Stop spreading misinformation, IQ and its correlation with “race” have been proven to have more to do with environment/circumstance than hard genetic limits. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
@STCNewsfeed @whstancil It is literally the consensus view of the field and what nearly every modern study has shown and scientist believes but you're only reading online racists instead of the scientists lol. Here's a review of studies: https://t.co/EMS2g9RFNa
@trainrobber4eva @db0255 @ElijahSchaffer You’re completely incorrect. The IQ gap between yts and blks has shrunk by .33 SD in recent years, which is 5 points. If this were solely genetic and not heavily influenced by external factors, why would the gap shrink?
https://t.co/mhkLWCRsrV
@EvanDrake333 Actual evidence to debunk the mess you shared. Please take the time to review and understand. Please also fact check outputs shared from any AI .. especially, Grok.
Nisbett, R. E. et al. (2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments." American Psychologist,
@TimJosling @ikristoph @esrtweet @elonmusk @ikristoph @esrtweet @elonmusk Here are the citations for the studies:
1. Nisbett, R. E., et al. (2012). Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. DOI: 10.1037/a0026699
2. Haworth, C. M. A., et al. (2009). A twin study of the
@John42991250 @NoticingthingsJ @SimonButler83 @MattL_90 So argument from ignorance and now ignoring individual moral agency.
+ none of that science is evidence for your claim.
https://t.co/HhnvfUHMpo
https://t.co/mvMjKY057n
https://t.co/Djxwj6n35d
https://t.co/2KDvG5mcl8
@Franck1530707 @SaladeTomate18 @DjemaounSamy @BrunoRetailleau Oui, il existe une preuve du contraire. Toutes les études sérieuses montrent que les variations de QI entre groupes sont majoritairement liées à l’environnement, pas à la génétique. Aucun gène n’explique des écarts raciaux d’intelligence.
https://t.co/7FgEsL32bl
@Franck1530707 @SaladeTomate18 @DjemaounSamy @BrunoRetailleau 3.
Le consensus scientifique est clair :
– Le QI dépend de multiples facteurs (éducation, nutrition, environnement)
– Aucune preuve que les différences seraient génétiques entre groupes dits "raciaux"
https://t.co/F9A9YmaO5U
@ZherkaApologist @Vendetta_0511 @Mr_Lambbb @interesting_aIl Anthropologists REJECT race science. And MENDEL, the father of genetics, didn’t study IQ. .33 SD is the RESIDUAL gap AFTER CONTROLLING FOR systemic inequities. Overwhelming consensus is that the gap is caused by environment not dna
https://t.co/lgh0aTaudd
https://t.co/mhkLWCRsrV
@UnknowGarbage @PotetreSamcell @LesVents88 @NZS_OOC Here are some studies arguing against the existence of race and IQ differences being tied to ethnicity
- https://t.co/fOzoO8bJoX
- https://t.co/dIzeStZ6p8
- https://t.co/UAhjHSNsOm
- https://t.co/yVSgf5kAoA
- https://t.co/r87w3jsrCu
- https://t.co/R8atQiQ6UZ
@EtBenePendentes @D_Martinezv @Umacaquino_ @Harnolld__ Y, bueno, que esa conclusión te la has inventado.
https://t.co/h5MMZvNYBd https://t.co/r9R0McOenN
This post is peak pseudoscience with a side of colonizer smugness. IQ doesn’t measure innate intelligence, it tracks exposure to resources, education, nutrition & bias. Ranking continents by it isn’t science. It’s colonial thinking dressed up as data.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22233090/?ut...
@GolColar @potipoua @bouliboulibouli qlq papiers bien review et importants en la matière: https://t.co/RbjhFn7lyp sur l’effet Flynn ; https://t.co/LhbDUcAQek sur l’inconstance statistique d’un forte part génétique ; https://t.co/H5kIyAlOeu sur la nature des concepts mesurés ; https://t.co/abFLWZH8iI sur la (R)
@CJBrEngLeo @sennasccp82 @Como_Tanka Estudos empíricos, como os revisados por Nisbett et al. (2012), concluem que nenhuma métrica atual captura toda a inteligência. O QI e outras ferramentas medem facetas específicas, mas a inteligência humana é dinâmica e multifacetada.
https://t.co/Ewg4nqNsK2
@Jacob606 @80epazote @xspotsdamark You lost me a bit there in the end, talking about 'intrinsic spiritual value' and whatnot.
Imma just link some articles that discusses heritability.
https://t.co/UAhjHSNsOm
This articles also dives into stats and dissects the general intelligence claim;
https://t.co/mPzPya5WBX
@thehurtplan @VincentJCurtis1 @MomsPostingLs This is one study for example
"Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments" von Richard E. Nisbett et al. (2012)
@YamatoBanido 1. Viés cultural e limitações de testes de QI
Nisbett et al. (2012) – Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments
Revisão ampla mostrando que QI é altamente influenciado por ambiente, cultura, educação e SES. Herdabilidade ≠ imutabilidade.
https://t.co/yDsn2YT5zw
@yz1707 @M8_ARTOK @Mugiwara9414 @NCinquo51577 @CerfiaFR DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.104
DOI: 10.1037/a0026699
DOI: 10.1038/nature15393
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000500
Chat GPT m’aide uniquement pour les formulations de phrases, les sources, ça vient de docteurs
@charlieminero @tnmplt @TraductorTeAma @GordoDan_ Tenés razón, es refeciado en articulos que refutan la hipotesis ampliamente
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). "Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments." American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159.
@kareta_twts Jesteś w kompletnym błędzie, bo to nie musi być kwestia „rasy” samej w sobie, tylko właśnie zmiennych środowiskowych.
https://t.co/Qc40xEtwlK
@IsWgmagic @efox303 @RacismIsNotHate @AnthonyCumia Yeah, you are super desperate. You went from Taking nuanced scientists that disagree with you to Philip Rushton. That study of Rushton was debunked with recent data:
https://t.co/PKkbbcdtCk (abstract)
https://t.co/Z5P8br4qHv (full paper;They talk about race and brain size) 1/?
@IsWgmagic @RacismIsNotHate @AnthonyCumia these studies have found no meaningful correlation between cognitive abilities and the proportion of African or European ancestry.
https://t.co/vdf4G1HqbU
https://t.co/PKkbbcdtCk
3/?
@Cristi0176 @RFboris Uite, eu m-am documentat mai adanc si nu e asa:
Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry.
Nisbett, R. E., et al. (2012). Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist
@cherub_92 @omarbajaber @Aslan_Bey_1 Take a look at these studies, you so-called “race scientist.”
Richard E. Nisbett et al. (2012) - "Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments"
James Flynn (2007) - "What is Intelligence? Beyond the Flynn Effect"
Stephen Jay Gould (1996) - "The Mismeasure of Man"
@TheusauGabriel @neekoBugs @rubstrange Um artigo publicado no Annual Review of Psychology ('Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments') fala como o QI continua sendo uma ferramenta valida em conjunto com outras avaliaçoes. Satisfeito?
@0xDreamWeaver @real_Bluecat @ajtourville Pseudoscientific claims that have been widely debunked
1. IQ is not purely heritable - Nisbett, R. E., et al. (2012). Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. https://t.co/IS1ZHdYv5U
@MauroMelo752 @goenjiisakamoto @resist_lusitana Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments - é dito que existe uma diferença de QI entre brancos e negros, que supostamente têm diminuído nos últimos anos. Não consegui ver dados no pubmed. E fala que o ambiente tem um peso no QI,como é evidente e já está esclarecido
@Ricardoffaraujo @goenjiisakamoto @resist_lusitana - Nisbett, R. E. et al. - "Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments;
- James Flynn - Flynn Effect (1987);
- Estudo de Hunt e Sternberg - "The Role of Intelligence in Modern Society" (2006);
- Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. - "The Effects of Poverty on Children"
@ByteOctet @renoi_sombr @sshd_config @Nicolas_Sunrise @Zoltan_47 @lereveildatlas Oui source discréditée depuis dans Nisbett, R. E. et al. (2012) - "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments." , Coyle, T. R. (2013) - "Intelligence and culture: The need for a new synthesis." Intelligence Flynn, J. R. (2007) - What is Intelligence?
@yacineMTB From "Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments" (Nisbett et al., 2012): "Intelligence test scores are correlated with many important social outcomes—education, occupation, income, crime, health, and longevity."
Agreed.
In case this surprises you (because everyone and their grandma insists that IQ is a real psychological measure): Did you know that a kid adopted from a working-class home to a middle-class one makes an immediate jump in their IQ of 12 to 18 points?
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22233090/
@condeumbau89024 @Tocharus @B0STERIZAR 3. Inheritability within *individuals*. Evidence across groups and race show much less genetic correlation. https://t.co/4eCUTEjJBF
4. Notice how *I* am the only one linking any data or papers.
@bbkhb332498 @SashaGusevPosts @krichard1212 @JedMSP On intelligence: Richard E. Nisbett, Joshua Aronson, Clancy Blair, William Dickens, James Flynn, Diane F. Halpern, Eric Turkheimer (2012). Intelligence. New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130-159 https://t.co/bWBKrBcJbB
@profbeckyallen Mijn bron: Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Early schooling and educational inequality: socioeconomic disparities in children's learning. In Clark, J. (Ed.) (1996). James S. Coleman (p. 63-80). London: The Falmer Press.
Ook: Nisbett ao. 2012 https://t.co/bWBKrBcbm3
@eddyerkelens Het gat tussen die 80% (tweelingonderzoek) en 5% (h onderzoek menselijk genoom) heet 'the missing heritability problem'. Zie de paragraag 'The search for genes for IQ' in: New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130-159 https://t.co/Pvb9EEZkA3 2/n
RT @DenisDaly: Blue ticks seem to be dead against education, especially university ed. Now who is surprised.
Oh, we have solid evidence…
Dec 8, 2023 · 1 share · 7,506 followersView post →
DD
Denis Daly
@DenisDaly · X
Blue ticks seem to be dead against education, especially university ed. Now who is surprised.
Oh, we have solid evidence that reasoning improves with university.
Fascists always fear education.
Nisbett et al. 2012 . https://t.co/9ZamBVXRi0 https://t.co/Mj2jbKszci
Dec 8, 2023 · 6 likes · 1 share · 5,114 followersView post →
DD
Denis Daly
@DenisDaly · X
@Murphybear64 @DouglasKMurray @Telegraph nope. I advise organisations on who to hire. The research is very clear. Universities improve reasoning. Now, see if u can look up and read the research cited here.
Nisbett et al 2012
https://t.co/9ZamBVXRi0
@BronNano26197 @BKnightwell @TrollinNYC @codesfast @uMarhobane Those causes are circumstantial (socioeconomic status, availability of learning materials, etc). See:
"Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments." by Nisbett et al, or
"IQ and Human Intelligence" by Mackintosh.
Or find me 1 gene linked to population-level IQ diffs.
and also:
"The importance of the environment for IQ is established by the 12-point to 18-point increase in IQ when children are adopted from working-class to middle-class homes.
https://t.co/X01yyUsrOT
@witchfinder_ @Vincent_FVD En als je je hier eens "inhoudelijk" op in wil lezen kan je altijd een keer de citaten volgen van de desbetreffende wiki-pagina:
https://t.co/nP3YpJYKEb.
Waaronder, deze:
https://t.co/rMBOboo8xD
https://t.co/9likCzLujh
https://t.co/oJnnNAL1L6
@QuetzalThoughts It's not ~5 IQ points. The generally accepted range for the gap is 10-15 IQ points.
The paper below argues that the BW gap narrowed by ~5 points from its historical value of ~15 points.
https://t.co/4qNefwAIqG
@Droptawgs @YungEuropean @florida_man100 @UsingLyft @whstancil You mean you YouTube video is right?
Also... notice how all you do is share opinions from other racists that are not scientists and dismiss hundreds of actual studies proving you wrong?
Lol
https://t.co/DV2T6FxUbD https://t.co/BKmlSxqniY
@Droptawgs @YungEuropean @florida_man100 @UsingLyft @whstancil Irony is dead...
You're the one sharing YouTube videos instead of studies.
Loser
https://t.co/DV2T6FxUbD
@BostonTea84 @dorota_spyrka @KONFEDERACJA_ Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., ... & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130-159.
@FoodistG @Romeropilled @fredgiblet @jackchang1812 @PopulismUpdates @abughazalehkat @mrjeffu The article I provided is far less biased, written by actual researchers, and actually adheres to scientific consensus, but if you want direct links to journal articles, here:
https://t.co/Xm5VhYEqFD
https://t.co/pU7xDMnv2T
https://t.co/5oGpLGfndZ
@cremieuxrecueil @monitoringbias What about this study, that concludes "Almost no genetic polymorphisms have been discovered that are consistently associated with variation in IQ in the normal range."
https://t.co/t2fwruvNng
May 28, 2023 · 1 like · 1,723 followersView post →
O
Obi
@obi_lewis · X
@AbrahamJ7B Eso es completamente falso, la distancia entre ambos grupos ha disminuido en 0,33 desviaciones estándar en los últimos años. https://t.co/hjERyhBHcY
Tampoco esperaba mucho viendo tu perfil de twitter pero bueno.
@whybutwait @w02alro1 @ingridcarlqvist @svenskakyrkan Jag länkade bokstavligen till hela artikeln på Scihub. Den har över tusen källhänvisningar. Här, länkar den igen: https://t.co/Dpk9J7V0Oi
@whybutwait @w02alro1 @ingridcarlqvist @svenskakyrkan Här är t.ex. en metastudie med över 1000 källhänvisningar från 2012 som beskriver hur mycket nonsens de ärftliga teorierna innehåller: https://t.co/Dpk9J7V0Oi
@adilyaya1 @1karus_ @disidente30 @Ah_Science @SeptembersRain @BryanMace5 You keep bringing Darwin for some reason, he is not the Theory.
Females performed better on verbal abilities while males performed better on visuospatial abilities.
None of these findings, suggest an advantage for either sex in GENERAL intelligence.
https://t.co/UnccBiOc26
@vincentgrit Ook bekend als Mattheus-effect. Een serieuze uitwerking is gegeven door Dickens & Flynn, op zoek naar mogelijke verklaringen voor het 'Flynn-effect' (zie verwijzingen in https://t.co/bWBKrBcbm3 ).
Een leesgierig kind krijgt een voorsprong die vervolgens steeds groter wordt.
@CharlesNegy @lastpositivist https://t.co/Y9z4MZCMDw
"Almost no genetic polymorphisms have been discovered that are consistently associated with variation in IQ in the normal range. "
You're welcome
@lukashenko445 @Lukashenko199 @unprodigal_sun @AnComNezuko @unsweettease @aden207 In mean IQ was studied for instance. And diffrences in IQ are explained much better by enviroment effects then by biological diffrences.
Besides that what methods of thought do you even mean? They cant be biological due to too similar genes between races
https://t.co/oWfLxnGSOE
@PLoobuyck Literature: Nisbett, Aronson, Blair, Dickens, Flynn, Halpern, Turkheimer (2012). Intelligence. New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American Psychologist, volume 67, 130-159
https://t.co/bWBKrBcbm3
zie p. 138 van de sectie 'Education and Other Environmental Interventions'
@JoeRand21877011 @StepsTwin @attanooo @PeachNoo624 @BaathistMeido Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E.
(2012, January 2). Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments. American
Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0026699
@Kinchkun @Simulacron2 @quarkswdr Schau dir doch die angegebenen Quellen an.
https://t.co/k2meoAxEyN
https://t.co/GWKjjVWliK
https://t.co/UfAnfJMLSy
Hat nichts mit "Klassen" zu tun.
@JonathanMTweet @WiringTheBrain There's also this: Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012a). "Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments". American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159.
Mar 30, 2022 · 1 like · 3,486 followersView post →
LR
(((Liz Ditz))). Mask up, y'all. Viruses are real.
@lizditz · X
RT @electrikmonk: @BrynnTannehill Which test version has this magical property? What does he think an IQ test is actually measuring?
This…
Jun 22, 2021 · 2 shares · 10,464 followersView post →
J
JCallas
@ghostofhypotia · X
RT @electrikmonk: @BrynnTannehill Which test version has this magical property? What does he think an IQ test is actually measuring?
This…
Jun 21, 2021 · 2 shares · 1,800 followersView post →
EM
e_monk
@electrikmonk · X
@BrynnTannehill Which test version has this magical property? What does he think an IQ test is actually measuring?
This is naked eugenics.
If an IQ test measures raw intelligence then why can one increase their score with practice?
He must have missed this.
https://t.co/VHm1wYsLNx
Jun 21, 2021 · 8 likes · 2 shares · 1,000 followersView post →
EP
Ecce Posmo
@EccePosmo · X
@Wilsonsalguero5 @Heathen1400 @darkthanos Vaya afirmación, en APA niega esa correlación tuya sin sonrojarse "although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that between-group differences in average IQ have a genetic basis." https://t.co/htpZTdhev8
@thoseyearsback @Sodaina__ @NeoCyberPosadas Because IQ holds to measure a generalized intelligence. That is literally the point of the test. If it doesn't do that, maybe it's just measuring how good a kid is at being motivated in school. After all, parental encouragement is also a predictor of IQ https://t.co/RPpBQyAQqT
@UKempenaer @rblommestijn Dat eerste punt geeft ik je gelijk. Onwaarschijnlijk, maar ik geef je gelijk.
Literatuuronderzoek is niet zomaar gedaan. Dat kost tijd. Je kan beginnen met Nisbett et al. Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments.
@izzynobre 2 minutos de Google
https://t.co/pBOkdsZ6Mg
Jun 6, 2020 · 3 likes · 231,964 followersView post →
BW
Ben Wilbrink
@benwilbrink · X
@gvan_esch @horesienswijge @KatinkaSlump @Onderwijsraad @nu Yep. Zie Richard E. Nisbett, Joshua Aronson, Clancy Blair, William Dickens, James Flynn, Diane Halpern & Eric Turkheimer (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist. https://t.co/3P3OItwJTS zoek op "summer"
@Pinkerite1 @rasmansa @AndyMLinn @EPoe187 I think this review paper which finds support for 100% environmental causes for the B/W IQ gap is a good start, it reviews the studies on heritability, showing that it is variable.
https://t.co/gciALTAIIC
@StevenGeurts Ik weet niet wie je hier aanspreekt, maar over oneerlijke negatieve effecten van zomervacanties, zoek op ‘summer’ in Nisbett, Aronson, Blair, Dickens, Flynn, Halpern & Turkheimer (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. AmPsychol https://t.co/3P3OItwJTS
@malpaso @charlesmurray @ent3c @kph3k @LorenaABarba Testing the validity of ‘The Bell Curve’ (TBC) is not that difficult. Six strong claims ‘beyond significant technical dispute’ on pp 22-23. See, for example, Richard E. Nisbett and others, 2012: ‘Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments’ https://t.co/3P3OItwJTS
@JohnJohnington @_captainscience @DrRobertOConnor @sophswhynot @UCC @Repealist_ @ilainabananas @drg1985 @Change ...I think you'll find it's a little more complicated than that
"(a) Heritability of IQ varies significantly by social class."
https://t.co/H4FDUFRshM
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699. Ini sumber untuk Slide 5 yang menyatakan kecerdasan lahir dari interaksi kompleks antara DNA dan pengalaman hidup. 6 ...
Cognitive Assessment Course | PDF | Wechsler Adult Intelligence ...
News
10.1037/a0026699. *Sattler, J. (1988). Assessment of children. Ch.2 (Useful statistics and. concepts of measurement). Class: Begin practicing WAIS-III ...
Coyle2021 The Future of Intelligence | PDF | Sat | Intelligence Quotient
News
nomological network could be modeled after the Cattell-Horn-Carroll org/10.1037/0033-2909.121. ... https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699. Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., ...
Binet Kamat | PDF | Intelligence Quotient | Intelligence
News
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699. Rajkumar, A. P., Yovan, S., Raveendran, A. L., & Russell, P. S. S. (2008). Can only. intelligent children do mind reading ...
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699. Nsamenang, A.B., & Dawes, A. (1998). Developmental psychology as political psychology in sub-Saharan Africa: The challenges ...
Breastfeeding during infancy and neurocognitive function in ...
News
doi: 10.1037/a0026699. PubMed PMID: WOS:000300538200005. pmid:22233090. 28. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ. Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and ...
EM
A
DD
T
O
K
I
U
LR
X
K
M
S
TK
J
JM
RS
AC
M
KP
S
J
S
G
DM
G
TW
HP
X
J
M
П
M
S
D
LW
PS
F
LC
NP
J
MS
A
A
CI
P
OB
RA
MM
K
M
AS
LP
BW
TK
BW
MO
ZS
A
L
F
LI
NB
C
B
I
M
CP
Zپ
FC
A
UJ
K
CE
MP
LR
J
EP
L
C
J
VM