Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many posts consider the validation of the Wisloff formula over older models like 220 - age, using phrases such as 'more validated' and 'thousands tested,' which indicate active engagement with the research findings. The tone reflects a mix of curiosity and practical interest as users discuss how these formulas affect fitness assessments and age-related accuracy, demonstrating moderate engagement and perceived impact.
Most discussions support the validity of the new age-predicted formulas and acknowledge the limitations of traditional methods like 220 - age.
Participants show curiosity about more accurate formulas and their implications for different age groups.
Comments reference specific formulas and studies, indicating moderate depth in analyzing the research and its applications.
The conversations suggest the research could influence how fitness professionals and healthcare providers estimate HRmax, indicating a moderate impact.
@B_Holmer Wisloff formula from 2013 is actually more validated than the 2001 formula. Thousands of people tested in the lab. Obviously none of the formulas will work for everyone, as they are derived from large samples. https://t.co/SNyDPC5Ca5
@c4conditioning Nes et al 2012 https://t.co/JFupKGwpOy
RT @bianco_____: @B_Holmer Wisloff formula from 2013 is actually more validated than the 2001 formula. Thousands of people tested in the la…
Age‐predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects: The HUNT Fitness Study https://t.co/G5P7UHuLes via @instapaper
This video discusses how maximum heart rate declines with age, with little influence from gender, body composition, or activity level. It compares prediction formulas to actual measurements, showing age as a key factor…
The study found that Maximum Heart Rate declines significantly with age, with prediction formulas tending to underestimate HRmax in individuals over 30. Age alone is a practical predictor, with small influences from…
The review aims to gather evidence supporting the validity, ecological usefulness, and factors influencing the Session RPE method for monitoring training load, based on studies from 2001 to 2016. The Session RPE method…
RT @bianco_____: @B_Holmer Wisloff formula from 2013 is actually more validated than the 2001 formula. Thousands of people tested in the la…
@B_Holmer Wisloff formula from 2013 is actually more validated than the 2001 formula. Thousands of people tested in the lab. Obviously none of the formulas will work for everyone, as they are derived from large samples. https://t.co/SNyDPC5Ca5
If you are NOT 25 years old, then the maximum heart rate (HRmax) formula of `220 - age` is not accurate. This paper[1] suggests the following formula instead: `211 - 0.64 * age`. A 40yo should have an estimated HRmax of 185.4bpm instead of 180bpm! [1] https://t.co/lFFpXifjRe https://t.co/w0EEBjdlhj
@c4conditioning Nes et al 2012 https://t.co/JFupKGwpOy
Age‐predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects: The HUNT Fitness Study https://t.co/G5P7UHuLes via @instapaper
B
JP
CL
JI
A