PubHawk
Front Hum Neurosci October 2012 PMID 22403535

Sensory augmentation for the blind.

Silke M Kärcher, Sandra Fenzlaff, Daniela Hartmann, Saskia K Nagel, Peter König

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

14
Peak: 4 in Oct 2020
across 6 sources since Mar 2012

Extended reach

27,869
potential audience

Total likes

76

Video views

10,674

Mentions per month

Mar 2012 – Nov 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter4 posts
  • Bluesky2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts
  • News2 articles
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions show a strong interest in the research, with posts referencing technical concepts like weak and subcognitive integration and mentioning specific devices such as feelSpace naviGürtels, which reflect a curiosity about practical applications and theoretical foundations. The tone is analytical and supportive, emphasizing the potential for sensory augmentation to significantly improve spatial navigation and confidence for blind individuals.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posts acknowledge the scientific value and potential benefits of sensory augmentation devices, reflecting a level of support and optimism.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions convey high curiosity, especially around concepts like weak and subcognitive integration, and specific devices like feelSpace naviGürtels, showing active engagement with the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts include references to experimental studies and crowdfunding efforts, indicating a thoughtful and engaged dialogue rather than superficial reactions.

ImpactModerate impact

The mention of enhancing navigation skills and emotional effects suggests the discussions see this research as having a meaningful influence on improving independence for the blind.

Abstract in brief

  • Sensory augmentation devices, like a vibrotactile belt signaling magnetic north, can improve navigation skills for blind individuals by providing additional environmental cues that are integrated into their behavior and decisions.
  • Training with these devices enhances both immediate performance in tasks such as pointing and longer-term abilities like maintaining direction over distances and taking shortcuts, ultimately increasing confidence and security in unfamiliar environments.
  • The study suggests that sensory augmentation not only boosts navigational accuracy but also has positive emotional effects, making blind individuals feel more secure and courageous when exploring new or complex settings.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
PsyArXiv-bot
@PsyArXivBot · X

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://t.co/J9rgQcPP77

Oct 20, 2020 · 7,247 followers View post →
Eric Oyen
@n7zzt · X

RT @seeingwithsound: Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmen…

Oct 21, 2020 · 1 share · 6,173 followers View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound · X

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://t.co/tIATs0Qyhm

Oct 21, 2020 · 1 share · 3,732 followers View post →
Claudia
@Claudia99729499 · X

feelSpace naviGürtel Crowdfunding (deutsch) https://t.co/jR6A60dkZI via @YouTube

Mar 25, 2020 · 40 followers View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound.bsky.social · Bluesky

Sensory augmentation for the blind http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00037/full sensory substitution

Mar 1, 2012 View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound.bsky.social · Bluesky

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://psyarxiv.com/jgx6q/

Oct 21, 2020 View post →

All mentions

Eric Oyen
@n7zzt · X

RT @seeingwithsound: Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmen…

Oct 21, 2020 · 1 share · 6,173 followers View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound.bsky.social · Bluesky

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://psyarxiv.com/jgx6q/

Oct 21, 2020 View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound · X

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://t.co/tIATs0Qyhm

Oct 21, 2020 · 1 share · 3,732 followers View post →
PsyArXiv-bot
@PsyArXivBot · X

Evaluating the concepts of weak and subcognitive integration - an experimental study using vibrotactile sensory augmentation for the blind https://t.co/J9rgQcPP77

Oct 20, 2020 · 7,247 followers View post →
Claudia
@Claudia99729499 · X

feelSpace naviGürtel Crowdfunding (deutsch) https://t.co/jR6A60dkZI via @YouTube

Mar 25, 2020 · 40 followers View post →
The vOICe vision BCI
@seeingwithsound.bsky.social · Bluesky

Sensory augmentation for the blind http://www.frontiersin.org/human_neuroscience/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00037/full sensory substitution

Mar 1, 2012 View post →