Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group demonstrates a thoughtful engagement with the article, exemplified by comments about the molecular clock, fossil record, and debates over the timing of divergence events, with some users emphasizing the relevance of new genetic methods and others questioning their implications or the robustness of current fossil evidence.
Most discussions support the idea that our understanding of divergence times is shifting based on new molecular data, though some remain skeptical or seek additional sources.
The discussions show a moderate level of curiosity, especially around the implications of earlier divergence times and methodological adjustments.
Participants reference specific studies, debate revision of estimates, and discuss fossil evidence, indicating thoughtful engagement.
The conversation suggests this research influences how scholars and enthusiasts think about human origins, potentially affecting future studies and interpretations.
@B9F3G4 At the point we start looking at great ape single nucleotide mutation rates, it is useful to consider rates per year instead of per generation, because their generations are shorter than human generations. https://t.co/Ap9JikvMdR
@tomshark @Ah_Science @TolleLege21 @TakeThatDarwin @JustRickard @mountainman827 @HunterAA6 @XLColdJ Not dirt+magic Peer-review 10, creationism zero https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
@leroyb756 Another example of science being unconcerned with your ignorance. Peer-reviewed science 5, Leroy's dirt+magic myth 5. https://t.co/KhfnDXZCK6
@WrldOfPaleoAnth I think revisions to the molecular clock estimates as well as more ppl taking Sahelanthropus more seriously as a hominin have shifted it back. Though I usually say 7-8mya (eg see below) and would be curious about a source for an earlier estimate. https://t.co/iy0MnVAxjf
@RoblovesJC Peer-reviewed Scientific Truth 3, Dirt + Magic Kung Fu Minister 0. https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
@natenotabot1234 @SeptembersRain @ZachsMind @theclipperslim @ChappyLeo @dan_cameron99 @ScienceQriosity @redharehorse @blowave @Imagicka @KirksCousin1 @JustinCPorter @_CROPES_ @TakeThatDarwin @Paleoguy073 @RobertK22245756 @EnithTea @outtasync @Craig84671918 @Anit10432231 @BenP112233 @curtisdaddylove @dougpasnak @rantyskeptic @EDGEinthewild @ODanaos @TBesserwisser @Sapphirology @dj_halling @WoopsWoah @GreekVikingX @Dwyertd @MoPal63461 @CursedDavyJones @LisaSimpsonLib @Smilodon85 @DiPolarPilot @Ah_Science @NatGeo https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
In this video, we discuss the claim that Adam was the first Homo sapiens. We explore archaeological and genetic evidence for human evolution, tracing the origin of Homo sapiens back to Africa. Join us as we analyze…
Les chimpanzés, nos plus proches cousins biologiques, offrent un aperçu de l'évolution humaine. Cette vidéo compare leur comportement avec celui des humains et examine les différences et similitudes. Abonnez-vous pour…
@AntoninDramski @Kamaglory97 @Imaginary_Flame Le "Missing Link" désigne le dernier ancêtre commun (DAC) des humains et chimpanzés, dont aucun fossile n’a été clairement identifié. Les études d’horloge moléculaire placent littéralement
Generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution. https://t.co/v3M9IPFb8N
@RoblovesJC Peer-reviewed Scientific Truth 3, Dirt + Magic Kung Fu Minister 0. https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
@leroyb756 Another example of science being unconcerned with your ignorance. Peer-reviewed science 5, Leroy's dirt+magic myth 5. https://t.co/KhfnDXZCK6
@WrldOfPaleoAnth I think revisions to the molecular clock estimates as well as more ppl taking Sahelanthropus more seriously as a hominin have shifted it back. Though I usually say 7-8mya (eg see below) and would be curious about a source for an earlier estimate. https://t.co/iy0MnVAxjf
@tomshark @Ah_Science @TolleLege21 @TakeThatDarwin @JustRickard @mountainman827 @HunterAA6 @XLColdJ Not dirt+magic Peer-review 10, creationism zero https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
@natenotabot1234 @SeptembersRain @ZachsMind @theclipperslim @ChappyLeo @dan_cameron99 @ScienceQriosity @redharehorse @blowave @Imagicka @KirksCousin1 @JustinCPorter @_CROPES_ @TakeThatDarwin @Paleoguy073 @RobertK22245756 @EnithTea @outtasync @Craig84671918 @Anit10432231 @BenP112233 @curtisdaddylove @dougpasnak @rantyskeptic @EDGEinthewild @ODanaos @TBesserwisser @Sapphirology @dj_halling @WoopsWoah @GreekVikingX @Dwyertd @MoPal63461 @CursedDavyJones @LisaSimpsonLib @Smilodon85 @DiPolarPilot @Ah_Science @NatGeo https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
@proundpapaof3 @Bigteethyouhave @TeaseUsDiced @Chuckychuckles1 @VinceGottalotta @tip_ct @tsmee66 @PhysicistTx @cannoli1000 @ShellyRKirchoff @ThereseOSulliv2 @rosegar17673310 @Godslightangel7 @TreatHunterDog @dqschmitt15 @lostandlovinit @LukeSo20 @KsLiberal @dirk_fasshauer @1961mcruzer @Natural_Femme @JimBowersclimb @SoulNature9 @yourmomswatchin @Lietdansnewlegs @__TeekeeMon @Missy8008135 @KimberlyMcKeeve @JulieMu36442360 @8BrianVogel4 @AgainMothra @Wanderinglord @fwe1991 @Synyster63 @_CapitalOffense @DigiVorr @Littlwritergir1 @RoyLovesAmerica @CarmenB84085948 @RoyQHobbs @Vickie627 @Nrthms1 @ghost_of_tick @WoodcutterBrian @Resistenzanow @slim90866101 @42Gnome @Flattielover @DigiMalice @itisjustmebabe 6/ https://t.co/v07oxalo5V
Generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution. https://t.co/v3M9IPFIYl
@B9F3G4 At the point we start looking at great ape single nucleotide mutation rates, it is useful to consider rates per year instead of per generation, because their generations are shorter than human generations. https://t.co/Ap9JikvMdR
JH
TH
RM
H
FR