Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Posts reveal a mixture of concern and skepticism regarding food dyes, with several users pointing out that dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5 are banned in other countries due to health risks. For instance, comments like 'These are what a majority of Americans want banned' and 'Many of these dyes are proven carcinogens' demonstrate the prevalent alarm over synthetic dyes. The tone shifts between urgency and sarcasm, highlighting a serious underlying worry contrasted with dismissive remarks about those who disregard the risks.
Many discussions express concern over food dyes, with participants generally supporting the publication's findings.
A high level of curiosity is evident, as many participants seek additional information and studies related to food dyes.
Discussions vary in depth, with some posts analyzing specifics of the studies while others exhibit a casual tone.
There is a strong belief among participants that the publication's findings will significantly influence attitudes towards food dye regulations.
レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能性がある。 https://t.co/tm3bKpv3Ul https://t.co/aET6vvnFtK https://t.co/Rz3gyoETKk
"The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
@jimmyfswanson https://t.co/OfH2o5dLqI I believe removing liability is a good first step as other have mentioned
@AdderallLovesMe @rapttxrrK @papi_r5 @Iuhwalk https://t.co/DNqdNCTRZg is one and https://t.co/7PdDbIedKv is the other. Two quick lookups but there are many other studies you can find as well if you need more than these two sources.
@JunkScience "There is no credible evidence that food dyes are harmful." Fact check:
@SoonerDEW @JunkScience Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed "Red 3 causes cancer in animals, and there is evidence that several other dyes also are carcinogenic. Three dyes (Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6) have been found to be contaminated with benzidine or other carcinogens." Idiotic hysterics you say?
Doritos for the Super Bowl? This video explores the disparity in food ingredient regulations, asking why the EU has only 24 ingredients compared to 39 in the U.S. Delve into the safety concerns regarding food dyes and…
Synthetic dyes like Red 40, Yellow 5, and 6 have raised safety concerns due to potential adverse health effects. This video explores their risks, including carcinogenic contamination and hypersensitivity reactions…
This video analyzes Trix, Cheerios, Magic Spoon, and Three Wishes cereals, highlighting concerns over synthetic dyes like Red 40 and their links to health issues, including DNA damage and attention problems in children…
Beef tallow or not, there are 73 ingredients in a Shake Shack Shackburger. Safety concerns arise from the use of artificial food dyes such as Red 40 and Yellow 5, linked to health risks. Understanding these ingredients…
Explore the potential health risks associated with common food additives and dyes. MSG has been linked to negative health effects in certain doses, while food dyes, including Red 40 and Yellow 5, raise significant…
This video examines the health implications of synthetic food dyes, particularly Red 40. Just because a product has protein and colorful branding doesn't mean it's healthy. Studies show that Red 40 is linked to DNA…
@AdderallLovesMe @rapttxrrK @papi_r5 @Iuhwalk https://t.co/DNqdNCTRZg is one and https://t.co/7PdDbIedKv is the other. Two quick lookups but there are many other studies you can find as well if you need more than these two sources.
@SquidbillyCPO1 @NoContextHumans PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE keep eating food coloring, please. The more people such as yourself who do, the better off the world will be IMO. https://t.co/eGemY7BYaY
@SquidbillyCPO1 @yvette_harms @NoContextHumans https://t.co/8nthJjS16f
@electronluke @SpencerKlavan No worries. https://t.co/kS7K9jfGny
@jwestonharvey @ShamashAran Canada and Europe banned many of them for a reason. Some worse than others. Why take the risk for something superficial? https://t.co/GdJwMCCoRj
No mention of the fact that these dyes are linked to cancer and behavior problems: https://t.co/7Q6afFgXEW
@LoveLipids @jakescottMD Most of them have been banned in Europe for years. You could google it but i guess you were afraid you would find it? Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/L2xu1Xf8n6
@RedLionReps @DrNeilStone Yes, and it's not even close https://t.co/339FkFTSHz
@sharkerteeth @catgirlprostate https://t.co/PcEkvQDHaf
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@WomenAreFedUp By all means take as much time as you need to read this. zero evidence?
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@Chrystalos @marykirst @DrNeilStone you can't possibly be arguing red 40 is better than beetroot and carrot extract, can you???
RT @PatriotVerity: That's a bad thing. Studies show synthetic dyes damage DNA and can increase the risk of cancer among other things. http…
RT @PatriotVerity: That's a bad thing. Studies show synthetic dyes damage DNA and can increase the risk of cancer among other things. http…
That's a bad thing. Studies show synthetic dyes damage DNA and can increase the risk of cancer among other things. https://t.co/WBMIS3Xtkd https://t.co/9dbz5fvuR8 https://t.co/fZJeEHngo2 https://t.co/ku0ohDoj0O
@WallStreetMav That's a bad thing. Studies show synthetic dyes damage DNA and can increase the risk of cancer among other things. https://t.co/yicJrziMAL https://t.co/gllV5csQJ3 https://t.co/lqs1lYYk7t
@TomFitton Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/pX82F5rE4M
@tthrush14 @aelfred_D @HardPass4 https://t.co/iuQyhpzSYe
Artificial dyes are no Bueno. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
How is this not a good thing? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@okumabear2 @schlibbs @_keikoKitty_ https://t.co/QcOZSChMfA https://t.co/egCdPK6pEj
Yep completely cosmetic pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@KangintheNorth @_JakeKnowsBall_ @GramanhFolcwald This is the only one that matters really https://t.co/cqVT2TGFgX https://t.co/2t0OaKJE5w Give a little review of those and tell me why we would ever want them in our food You’re arguing for man made chemicals in our food rn
@simonmaechling @bakrantz LD50 alone isn’t enough to determine safety of a product. You are just looking at the tip of the iceberg. https://t.co/6QdmtNXxOg https://t.co/OH8NEP4iiJ https://t.co/75b8mRSBPn Natural alternatives exist and have been used for decades in Europe, and have often beneficial
@AidanShaffer @LosAlamosNatLab Crayon colors shouldn't be in DRINKS
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@simonmaechling https://t.co/LWOD2N1lJS Conclusions: This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying degrees. Red 3 causes cancer in animals, and there is evidence that several other dyes also are carcinogenic. Three dyes (Red 40, Yellow 5, and
@SoonerDEW @JunkScience Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed "Red 3 causes cancer in animals, and there is evidence that several other dyes also are carcinogenic. Three dyes (Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6) have been found to be contaminated with benzidine or other carcinogens." Idiotic hysterics you say?
@J_Coriolanus @bradkelly https://t.co/ccCAy2YYRf https://t.co/g8MqCR3SBT https://t.co/nGurfx0bPz https://t.co/S7nSbhcuFz https://t.co/XFbnno3Iqz https://t.co/0n2lT6L5et Here you go retard
RT @StevenNekhaila: @jimmyfswanson https://t.co/OfH2o5dLqI I believe removing liability is a good first step as other have mentioned
@bakrantz @simonmaechling https://t.co/fUJBWIzKju
RT @PatriotVerity: @hunter_peeples @AP4Liberty https://t.co/6HitqSlchT https://t.co/gllV5csQJ3 https://t.co/aHhnXzvgl2
@hunter_peeples @AP4Liberty https://t.co/6HitqSlchT https://t.co/gllV5csQJ3 https://t.co/aHhnXzvgl2
@jimmyfswanson https://t.co/OfH2o5dLqI I believe removing liability is a good first step as other have mentioned
@simonmaechling You know exactly what they mean, dumbass https://t.co/5h52Ndyg6Q
@whacksnack @insomni_man @NotSwagy @JohnLayland1 @PolitPaige @EricLDaugh https://t.co/5h52NdxIhi
@JohnLayland1 @PolitPaige @EricLDaugh https://t.co/5h52NdxIhi Dyes that were banned 35 years ago in cosmetics are still for some reason still legal for use in food.
Another chemist here - https://t.co/UDmZi4kKwA These are what a majority of Americans want banned. Get politics out of our field and just do what’s right for humanity for once. Half this stuff is banned everywhere except in the US. https://t.co/sC1rfWbrlY
@AP4Liberty How do you call yourself a journalist? Are you splitting hairs by using the word “acutely” as if to compare the danger to chronic damage done over years/a lifetime? If so, that’s super duper low IQ. https://t.co/STMrL09tat
@VigilantFox For those who think there was nothing wrong with the food dyes, and they were safe, you might want to read this... https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
@GuntherEagleman https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
Fuentes: https://t.co/Xd3zScSXUn https://t.co/qkdgFilfvE https://t.co/Hh8H9VxghB https://t.co/gEQQtCg9AF https://t.co/odmx9qPwxu https://t.co/PbgKSnESI9
Sources: https://t.co/Xd3zScSXUn https://t.co/qkdgFilfvE https://t.co/Hh8H9VxghB https://t.co/gEQQtCg9AF https://t.co/odmx9qPwxu https://t.co/PbgKSnESI9
@Shane00 Thoughts? https://t.co/xcAmthY3C0 https://t.co/ETCo5tRQbq https://t.co/0f1yvYNTuQ
@5ivecent @Dan_Zmann @unusual_whales Surely https://t.co/Pwht8qsLBH The FDA https://t.co/YuqhNvLoTH Doesn't https://t.co/wGYyFi2mxd Lie to us https://t.co/Stbq2yXzUt
@BlueLiberal3 @DerrickEvans4WV https://t.co/g37S633eiD
@MackLatimerTX https://t.co/GQLCeZEb55 Again please read the link. Answer my questions.
@MackLatimerTX https://t.co/GQLCeZEb55 however, regardless you stated we can't ban it regardless. Because it isn't Conservative. Which isn't true Conservatism has banned things before.
The dye comment wasn't addressing that part, and I don't think any other health agencies have linked the dyes to autism, just the elevated risk of cancers. No, the government shouldn't eradicate anyone. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
@KHLittle603 @rand_longevity https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
@guptaso2 @SondagarChetan @unusual_whales @RobertKennedyJr Specifically . . . https://t.co/gITRgeZU5F
@DiplodocusThe @unusual_whales There certainly are studies done showing the harmful effects of artificial dyes https://t.co/UbfD8Dkk5x
@Totinhiiio @unusual_whales Look at the science, they are dangerous, and big food lobby has pushed to keep it legal. https://t.co/iH5HppLepD
This should’ve been done a long time ago. Many of these dyes are proven carcinogens which shouldn’t be a surprise considering they’re made from petroleum and/or coal tar… https://t.co/412T4KqO6m https://t.co/n3sF0sB7I5
@remarks This should’ve been done a long time ago. Many of these dyes are proven carcinogens which shouldn’t be a surprise considering they’re made from petroleum and/or coal tar… https://t.co/412T4KqO6m
@MattGriscom @SawyerMerritt They're banned in a number of other countries. There's good science behind those bans too. Here's one from 2012. https://t.co/jH8qOrQPYc
@MtOlivePickles Can we remove Yellow 5, please? https://t.co/7o9tGgx77g
@MtOlivePickles Time to remove Yellow 5. https://t.co/7o9tGgx77g
@LauriLinnea @kashbadami @Holden_Culotta @SecKennedy @wvgovernor Really "Horror movie fiend"? Definitely a scientist!! https://t.co/HljzfQvN3j https://t.co/HerrmMBskI
RT @KarenBearss: @schwabbie28 @Holden_Culotta This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of va…
@schwabbie28 @Holden_Culotta This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying degrees. https://t.co/8jAr6Q35u3
• Background: Food dyes, synthesized originally from coal tar and now petroleum, have long been controversial because of safety concerns. • Conclusions: This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying degrees. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
Toxicology of food dyes • Background: Food dyes, synthesized originally from coal tar and now petroleum, have long been controversial because of safety concerns. • Conclusions: This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying
@grok @thewscat @greg16676935420 Not quite @grok: https://t.co/asvGinGEUU
@thehealthb0t For those who think food dyes are totally safe and nothing to worry about, might want to read this... https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
RT @BigGuy794: @iluminatibot For those who might wonder, what's the big deal about food dyes... https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
@iluminatibot For those who might wonder, what's the big deal about food dyes... https://t.co/FJPx0IEGPO
First ones to prioritize https://t.co/wga2Kbhijr
A review by Kobylewski & Jacobson raises concerns about the safety of food dyes like Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6. These dyes are linked to cancer, DNA damage, hormonal imbalances, and testicular dysfunction. Read The Study: https://t.co/dqq09fMr64 https://t.co/N2XvhA8SZJ
@davidharsanyi @Psquirrel00 Are you sure? https://t.co/6hHjfXunYM
@Martina https://t.co/P62K8FYH32 It’s not about the food. It’s the ingredients that are in our food that is carcinogenic. Ingredients that in banned in other countries due to health side effects.
@timoteo0167 @JunkScience @kayleighmcenany @ainsleyearhardt @OutnumberedFNC They do. https://t.co/U58QRtkVqt
Canada is an outlier on abortion and MAIDS. And now increasingly with what's safe in our food supply. Europe, Australia, New Zealand and now the U.S. all banned red dye but Canada says 'no evidence'. Is this true? https://t.co/jlJM9EKzb1 https://t.co/ZFtQVNGrIv
@SenWarren He also talked about removing toxic substances from the food supply … Biden made the FDA remove last minute only one food dye (Red 3) out of many. Again one step behind. https://t.co/YKW93tJ1ON.
@JunkScience You sure? This took me less than 5 minutes to find, there were plenty more studies suggesting otherwise. https://t.co/bali2ITNSn
@JunkScience There have been murmurings .... Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/y4DuovPpFX
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
@tinsleybach @JunkScience https://t.co/O4ECvPV2E4
@tinsleybach @JunkScience Oh, look! Another! In a two second search… “I’ll take ‘Things Moms have known for years’, Alex.” https://t.co/O4ECvPV2E4
@JunkScience "There is no credible evidence that food dyes are harmful." Fact check:
@JunkScience What about this ? https://t.co/e6auyCGTG5
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @IlindelatorreMD: Toxicología de los colorantes alimentarios https://t.co/yETtZaGVae
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
Toxicología de los colorantes alimentarios https://t.co/yETtZaGVae
RT @AaronOtsuka: 発癌性のあるものを少量だから安全という消費者担当相。 自分の子供に発癌性あるもの食べさせて平気な性格かな？ https://t.co/48uLp2EPWt https://t.co/9Ho8QElbNv
@WeTheCanceled Good question. Apparently, a petition was sent to the FDA 2 years ago. Other countries have known about the safety concerns for many years. They provided the evidence a long time ago. We have other food dyes that need to be banned https://t.co/iPnSNZ06P5
Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/lsea1h0h6U
@ChefGruel Need to get rid of all of them Toxicology of food dyes Sarah Kobylewski, Michael F Jacobson Affiliations PMID: 23026007 DOI: 10.1179/1077352512Z.00000000034 Abstract Background: Food dyes, synthesized originally from coal tar
Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/pgSvve2E88 sometimes people love regulatory authorities sometimes they call you sheep for loving regulatory authorities
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
@DanDGriffis @_Raising_Kane_ Here's a peer reviewed scientific study by the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. https://t.co/VcegKfft6k
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
RT @AaronOtsuka: レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能…
レッド４０やイエロー５のような人工食品着色料、食品を魅力的に見せる。しかし過敏性や代謝障害に関連しています。これらの着色料は、酸化ストレス、炎症を促進し、さらには特定の癌のリスクを高めることが示されている。ＦＤＡは新政権の元でこれを禁止する可能性がある。 https://t.co/tm3bKpv3Ul https://t.co/aET6vvnFtK https://t.co/Rz3gyoETKk
@UsaBayern @Sasquatcher2 @park_jammin @chrisdmowrey Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/gR6ubtGdAj
RT @BillyBostickson: @atuntable @quay_dr Re: "Nor artificial dyes toxic, in the literature", see: 1. Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co…
@atuntable @quay_dr Re: "Nor artificial dyes toxic, in the literature", see: 1. Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/oB7urgNNRT 2. Azo dyes & human health https://t.co/5ZaMXaiPsj 3. Carcinogenicity & toxicity of food dyes https://t.co/0QMRLjYnrW
@_MRN31 @noahthefrankk @CDumberlan84526 @RevakGoneRogue @RealDoctorMike doi: 10.1179/1077352512Z.00000000034. here is the study number.... and here is a link to an article that puts everything together with hyperlinks so you can see where the data come from. https://t.co/BYW01cwSKa
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/ pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... www.childrensmercy.org/contentasset... health.clevelandclinic.org/red-dye-40
RT @TheRootCauseCo: "The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
Why the fuck are they putting this shit in our foods!!! Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/ZAeTOEyJ8Y
Sources: Toxicology of Food Dyes: https://t.co/mKoSW9AZDn Rep. Luna Press Release: https://t.co/GPOl4L7v6O
@travelingenes @X Congrats on your release! Good work! Don’t forget food dyes ban in other countries but used here. https://t.co/XTwFNfNQl2
Toxicology of food dyes - PubMed https://t.co/PLEKsVK8qn
Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/2eAYugFJDe
@PooleFitness For sweeteners (predominately aspartame) https://t.co/oqR5kmgXXk https://t.co/DtvvdnErQ0 Both obviously show low risk for cancer but still means there’s a possibility Flavour/ colourings https://t.co/NC0FqJbeA8 (older one but still accurate)
Toxicology of food dyes: International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health: Vol 18, No 3 https://t.co/lIHMbwPUF0
@ElRon1n https://t.co/BSl1byAOYC
Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/PJ0xITgqvE #genotoxicity #fooddye #fooddyes #poison #benzidine #toxicology #nutritional #nutrition #dye #dyes #carcinogens #cancer #colorings #microbiology #microbiological #biology #science #scientists #physics
@IntractableLion The dyes upset me so. I know people who get migraines from approved dyes. My dog was dying mysteriously until one vet thought to ask if we used a particularly dyed but particularly affordable food. And of course.... https://t.co/NbAkHhUGb6
@TheNegroPatriot People need to get back to basics and learn to cook. https://t.co/S6fPNQlqZT
@robertlufkinmd "Three dyes (Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6) have been found to be contaminated with benzidine or other carcinogens. At least four dyes (Blue 1, Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6) cause hypersensitivity reactions." #foodsafety #Cancers #health #healthy https://t.co/xzg88Nd09Y
@real_lord_miles That one isnt very accurate, it correlates with some risks but to my knowledge its undetermined for sure how unhealthy they are Although i think the link to hyperactivity is pretty confirmed https://t.co/nj9TlXST9j
RT @TheRootCauseCo: "The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
RT @TheRootCauseCo: "The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
RT @TheRootCauseCo: "The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
RT @TheRootCauseCo: "The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
"The dye is thought to be linked to allergies, migraine, and mental disorders in children." https://t.co/DS4qw5KNPc
Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/SdDQOKlmo5
Kobylewski S, Jacobson MF. Toxicology of food dyes. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jul-Sep;18(3):220-46. doi: 10.1179/1077352512Z.00000000034. PMID: 23026007.
Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 may contain #contaminants that are known #cancer-causing substances. #Toxicology of food #dyes is harmful not only to #human animals too. #COVID19 #wednesdaythought #vaccination https://t.co/d65fuXwQuP
RT @theflowernurse: FDA Approved though "This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying…
FDA Approved though "This review finds that all of the nine currently US-approved dyes raise health concerns of varying degrees. Red 3 causes cancer in animals, and there is evidence that several other dyes also are carcinogenic." Toxicology of food dyes https://t.co/siomlvhZGz
Toxicology of food dyes. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/2Y4GglEBMB