Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Throughout the collection of discussions, participants emphasize that mRNA vaccine technology has been under development since at least 1989, citing specific sources like the 2012 review paper and historical trials, which demonstrate their deep engagement and support the idea that the technology is well-established over decades. The tone is often technical and fact-oriented, highlighting the extensive research timeline to counter claims of novelty or untested status.
Most discussions acknowledge that mRNA vaccine technology has been researched since 1989, emphasizing its long development history, indicating strong agreement on the baseline facts.
The discussions show high engagement and curiosity, with many posts referencing scientific papers, historical development, and detailed biological mechanisms.
Many users cite specific studies, historical dates, and technical details, demonstrating deep involvement and understanding of the topic.
While some posts suggest the knowledge could influence public opinion or policy, the overall focus remains on establishing the scientific legitimacy and long-term research behind mRNA vaccines, indicating moderate but meaningful impact.
3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fellow human beings." Unfortunately, I think I can guarantee that that is not going to happen.
2021 年 1 月 19 日にアクセス。https://t.co/45zZDoer4M… . 4 Schlake T、Thess A、Fotin-Mleczek M、Kallen K. mRNA ワクチン技術の開発。RNA 生物。 2012;9(11):1319-1330。 doi:10.4161/rna.22269 5 Kloc M、Uosef A、Kubiak JZ、Ghobrial RM。
@varingian @mcfunny @timtron2020 @docstardust @1ohreally @peoplenotrobot1 @Top_Muppetries @bitcoinbookshop @AcademicShards @empireloyalists @cooljamm55 @Tony__Heller @TonyBaduy @LiamKav @chickaboy @carlsmythe @villagerssn @TakethatCt @tenebra99 @crabb_vicki @provaxtexan @ZaynJaffer @DCGreenZone1 @policing_uk @stevenmosher @_mamadeb @Kathmarval @vaxxinesRpoison @PPALtd @ncdave4life @doritmi @AGTCnews @EstesPga @MathewMoisture @richykirsh @SkepticalMutant @FillmoreWhite @DomIsa6 @RailFareWatch @llambchops @AJL037 @GeoffSchuler @RedSatoshi4 @AndrewLazarus4 @THC1001 @luigi_warren @realPitBullDog @Mchael21592783M @krebiozen @murdersquirrel Yeah, 30 years ago. Three decades of research behind the mRNA vaccine isn't good enough for you? Need 10 more years? Or you thought mRNA was brand new technology, did you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@EmilyMcgowin @meganranney No cell lines are needed for mRNA vaccines see DOI: 10.4161/rna.22269 Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies for details
@M_T_Franz Nur ein Beispiel: https://t.co/YqXZdiwpDM Aber ich nehme an das wissen Sie ohnehin... https://t.co/tSdXTPtv8M
@mab_sp125 @lflima4 @LaroccaRA @mellziland @RachelNigro3 Inclusive @mab_sp125 @romulismo: https://t.co/ce40r2ZsZc Fig. 1B
Tienes dudas en ponerte la vacuna contra el COVID-19? This video explores essential information about the different types of vaccines, debunks common myths, and discusses important factors like immunity and variants…
A new mRNA vaccine shows promising results to help end COVID-19. mRNA vaccines trigger a balanced immune response, activating both cellular and humoral immunity without interacting with DNA, offering a flexible and safe…
@alex4peneast As an oncologist you will know there are virologists who also have linked the Covid vaccine with cancer. Virologists are actively involved in both understanding viral connections to cancer and developing mRNA vaccine technologies.
@CynFarmGirl @Bluebird1333 @JamesTate121 https://t.co/eMVSoy2NlI https://t.co/S5yaSO0qwe It's a vaccine type.
@Scary7Dr @ncdave4life I am no expert but noticed that the Schlake et al 2012 review of Developing mRNA vaccine technology cites Malone et al. 1989 References:%20Developing%20mRNA-vaccine%20technologies https://t.co/DuykgKv2Po https://t.co/4LJTUHH2dO
@NeverV82625 @CarlSmytheCells @ncdave4life @Lorenzo7127 @jojo_rn123 @higgsri @ZachPayneMusic @DopplerEffect93 @richykirsh @davideyoungmd @Scary7Dr @cappsie @WaitingForPerot @crabb_vicki @mass_rising @drloveariyana @NurseMicheleRN @ChrisJohnsonMD @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @BlairHealt68622 @djt10 @PatrickSquirrel @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools @TorySnyc @dirk_fasshauer @RonMortimer3 @lasikeyecenter1 @Hanky1844607 @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @EugeneBu Tell us Mr I. Ball Jr, how new do you think it is and what sources do you use and trust to find out? Make a direct and clear statement so we can assess your opinion. Otherwise all you are saying here is ‘I know better than you.” Free 2012 lit review h
@Micheleth12 @NicHulscher Here is the development of mRNA for vaccines over the decades using review articles: 2000s: https://t.co/Bh8zF7OFtb 2010s: https://t.co/Zv5PGtBe8O 2020s: https://t.co/INZtLU8fct
@D_Boyer69 @DrNeilStone 2012. Schlake, T., Thess, A., Fotin-Mleczek, M. & Kallen, K. J. Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies. RNA Biol. 9, 1319–1330
https://t.co/k8qqjmDAzG
@NWgasman @LORD_RYKARD_ @jsm2334 Still vaccines https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/VAmmyxbCQf
@patfrank830 @RARohde I'm not interested in your unsourced screenshots, you deceptive fraud. You've already been caught lying. https://t.co/he8FORHrKz https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/HCqQYET7WP
15/C Since this apparently still needs to be explained to some folks... https://t.co/RTG4At8aC4 https://t.co/ODL2lbf0D2 https://t.co/i8XXlVlrBb https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/yXFQgNTWfc https://t.co/6MG2zCV5yl
@ChrisAS350AS355 @marcuschown You do realise that scientific journals have print copies with multiple articles bound together in a volume? That meets your definition of book. Specifically this article was published in volume 9 pages 1319-1339 (of 1527 pages). https://t.co/5Z1l7A0rOJ
@KinseyKat1 @Pouldeau61 @tvpparking @ShaneAKAProp @nualanichols @koen0611 @RGusnowski @AnnLove4All @HDBreakout17 @DomesticLiberty @TakethatCt @RotundC @crabb_vicki @TheHammerT800 @Quabsork @desktopcarl @mcfunny @bamalonia @ckellywpg @sduncanhealth @cappsie @Alex_on_A14 @TakeThatClouds @GhostOfChaplin @TonyBaduy @axoplasmicgap @WendyOrent @PickEmLegend @djt10 @AndyJLumley @doritmi @HossmanOfficial @darin_squared @runhack @carlstarus13 @TheFrankmanMN @1_TMF_ @davideyoungmd @taurusg333 @raoulduke49 @DaveBla81093404 @krebiozen @MsTrixter @Hurriquake @MONTMAN9500 @StuWizzle @Golfergirl2018 @dann58638436 Not so novel. From 2012 https://t.co/GiNsGQEg2j
@helpdeskert @marcovonk3108 Als je met 'nooit bedoelt' zegt 'er werd in 2012 al uitgebreid over gepubliceerd' dan heb je volkomen gelijk https://t.co/0mQ9CW29PA
@M35245 こちら有名な論文ですので是非読んで、科学的、論理的に問題がある箇所があれば教えてください。 https://t.co/hLEYpvzVBv
@meczennik @Rafa67712394 @Tomasz74073193 @kura_domowa_z https://t.co/liCow173If Tutaj wspomniany artykuł, jakbyś chciał zobaczyć.
@Navigator504 @USBornNRaised @POTUS by the wY...Just to prove how stupid you are about the definition thing. this article is from 2012...8 years before the Covid vax https://t.co/3dCslTMrjZ
@jayne_kniphofia @CoCanna @Hypothesis "About two decades after the first successful administration of mRNA in vivo, mRNA-based vaccines promise to become" Hope springs eternal. /s Article was from 2012. https://t.co/xfZFWopSBP
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies.. published in Nov. 1, 2012..... mRNA vaccines combine desirable immunological properties with an outstanding safety profile and the unmet flexibility of genetic vaccines. #SharingIsCaring #mRNA https://t.co/H8RsUDUHDG
@VonMaunder @SteveOdell71 @cellestial1 Man you should probably contact the authors! (2012) “Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies” https://t.co/D5cdkQxczl
@DarylLicTecOAA @CCJ_NB @HopiNg66966500 @DrJBhattacharya @drsimonegold @DrAseemMalhotra @ZelenkoZev @DrJamesOlsson @DrAnaMihalcea @DrOz @P_McCulloughMD @shanejett @RWMaloneMD How bout a verifiable scientific paper from qell before covid was a thing? https://t.co/um5lTkWcrp
@DrSujav @Debunk_the_Funk @Johnincarlisle @PolitiFact Ebov/zeka/hiv/rsv. Decades worth of trials..its embarrassing that a 'Dr' is not aware of the science. https://t.co/XRaN85tf7L
@MPloughboy @unaxeptableVs @JonathanSarfat1 @gwhitics1 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump They are vaccines + were called such before the pandemic. No amount of deception from you changes that. https://t.co/YUg0IA54QL https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/qAhwVRUumS
@unaxeptableVs @MPloughboy @JonathanSarfat1 @gwhitics1 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump None of your disingenuous evasions changes the fact that these are vaccines, were called such before the pandemic, and thus it's a lie to claim the definition of 'vaccine' was changed during the pandemic to claim they were vaccines. Deal with it.
@unaxeptableVs @JonathanSarfat1 @MPloughboy @gwhitics1 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump It might ruin credibility with you, but you're not my target audience; my target audience is *honest* people who won't want deny reality in order to maintain deceitful positions. They're vaccines + were called such before the pandemic. Deal with it. https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/Z1ShH1BkMs
@unaxeptableVs @MPloughboy @JonathanSarfat1 @gwhitics1 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump You're just making stuff up in bad faith, as usual. Experts called mRNA vaccines 'vaccines' before, during, and after the pandemic. It's not my fault y'all lack the integrity to admit that reality. https://t.co/zOzPRpM83W https://t.co/CUiH1SKfxM https://t.co/osuSlzG88q
@MasherMito @leo_lloros @Mentor1Universa @DanielEcidi https://t.co/d9fFjDv1fQ https://t.co/sqVnWJo6os
@TheUnrig @dimgrr @NickiVerweij @JanusKlaasssen @PaulvanHoek2021 @HaHaGentherapie @KimKimetje @jpaternotte @JuisteAntwoord Kan jij dan ook uitleggen waarom mRNA-vaccins in 2012 al gewoon mRNA-vaccins werden genoemd? https://t.co/IM3y8SlFzm https://t.co/ZPWNpc2ujL
@leucinedreams "The half-life of the mRNA is short and remains in human tissues for just a few days" https://t.co/s8kexxkQhy
@Homes907 @GrtCdnNeckbeard @lporiginalg About 30 seconds of searching pulled up an interesting article about the creation of mRNA vaccines. Schlake, T., Thess, A., Fotin-Mleczek, M., & Kallen, K.-J. (2012). Developing mrna-vaccine technologies. RNA Biology, 9(11), 1319–1330. https://t.co/mnivaWKwV9
"Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies - PMC" https://t.co/WYf38C7Wt4
@11thJeff From the article you posted done in May 5th 2021 "The half-life of the mRNA is short and remains in human tissues for just a few days citation 19" citation 19 was from an article in 10/12/2012, that's right 2012. https://t.co/BqBiEomaxV It's gets worse next tweet
@11thJeff From the article you posted done in May 5th 2021 "The half-life of the mRNA is short and remains in human tissues for just a few days citation 19" citation 19 was from an article in 10/12/2012, that's right 2012. https://t.co/zRAEg3lg6g It's gets worse next tweet
@NahBabeeNah @Avengin55592123 https://t.co/BrmCcpv00J Oddly, McCullough's name doesn't appear to be attached to the paper. https://t.co/hdu4OdWjwf
@Lenadaddy @AUMattis @Finanz_Spass @MitAktien Danke, die Abkürzung war mir nicht geläufig. Aber auch modRNA ist nur maximal einige Tage im Körper stabil und zerfällt in harmlose Einzelteile. https://t.co/vrUsnEBCJX
@stkirsch 9 days you fool https://t.co/KJj7qXeaDT https://t.co/3FWryuxP1x
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/r1qUu0btXn
@Service2power1 @KiwiBassMonkey @itsJeffTiedrich The mRNA vaccine as well as the DNA vaccine has been developed for years. Here is an article from 2012: https://t.co/jHomY93UP5
@PeterSweden7 JFC you keep spreading lies and misinformation. Here is an article from 2012 talking about mRNA vaccines. The technology has been around *way* before COVID. You are the cause of death of many Americans with all your misinformation. https://t.co/jHomY93UP5
@FennJoshua https://t.co/LDm67ilJYM https://t.co/Zx7mJjTNOa https://t.co/twkEsvD7gv https://t.co/uyTomljAMg
RT @dogehodl2021: @IamBrookJackson And this is from 2012. Interesting though that the CureVac vaccine was not working as expected ...
RT @dogehodl2021: @IamBrookJackson And this is from 2012. Interesting though that the CureVac vaccine was not working as expected ...
@IamBrookJackson And this is from 2012. Interesting though that the CureVac vaccine was not working as expected ...
@TagTonic @MarkWendrich @vanranstmarc 2015? Zelfs dit artikel komt al uit 2012: https://t.co/8MaTI0ogBI
@eliott006 @JulienPain cet article de 2012: "About two decades after the first successful administration of mRNA in vivo, mRNA-based vaccines promise to become a game-changing vaccine technology platform for therapeutic as well as prophylactic applications." https://t.co/AC6kDTjSeo /
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
RT @EdV1694: 3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fello…
3/ Byram Bridle pleads in his article for "those developing mRNA vaccine technologies ... to give consideration to their fellow human beings." Unfortunately, I think I can guarantee that that is not going to happen.
@_CrypTony_ Hij is niet de enige die eraan en meewerkt: https://t.co/8MaTI07dzI https://t.co/pRmd3lSeuN https://t.co/J53a3KxxY2 Allemaal onderzoekers die ook aan mRNA vaccines werken.
@SolScientist @Rob_Roos @TuckerCarlson And another one: https://t.co/VJxfaYBTbp https://t.co/xmLPheLimL
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies worth the read @SenateGOP @SenateDems @potus @fda @cdc @who 2012 https://t.co/lYZSkk2KUw
@Comfortcove @stephenfgordon https://t.co/tciEg1Phgh This is what a proper scientific peer reviewed paper looks like.
@dinomisiklar @erdembayramps @resiapretorius @DrAlperYl yanlış değil. hucredeki sure ile plasmadaki sure farkli, ayrica mRNA'yi olcme sekli ile de farkli. Bakiniz 2012 senesinden figure1: https://t.co/4dOjYpHtbp Bakiniz 2007 senesinden figure 1d https://t.co/5MSfPj4pap
@Bert57677915 @aveldjesgraaf @janintheusa2 @RosemarieVerbr1 @HenriSouth @Jeron_in_Spain @changenedrlnd @Judit_Betulia @TisjeboyRay @GarageRemus @alles_komtgoed @HTillaert @ShallWeCallMe @HaHaGentherapie @njmidm @SkankhuntA2 @JP41560290 @ThomasInLeiden @BennieLekkur @ColinBoos @Trusttheplan20 @Doc_Box @Food4ears @ErikCumps @KlaasvanDijk5 @Sarasota2011 @jorgje @PostvanFenna @Dieren_Doc @BorgerPieter @VaxxDoc @DokterBertho @DocDoorsnee @Marc_Veld CRISPCAS is hier helemaal niet bijbetrokken, heeft hier niets mee te maken. mRNA dat is waar het omdraait. Misschien dit artikel eens goed doorlezen: https://t.co/gMjwlUvftJ En dan mij vertellen waar CRIPCAS genoemd wordt.
@Bert57677915 @aveldjesgraaf @janintheusa2 @RosemarieVerbr1 @HenriSouth @Jeron_in_Spain @changenedrlnd @Judit_Betulia @TisjeboyRay @GarageRemus @alles_komtgoed @HTillaert @ShallWeCallMe @HaHaGentherapie @njmidm @SkankhuntA2 @JP41560290 @ThomasInLeiden @BennieLekkur @ColinBoos @Trusttheplan20 @Doc_Box @Food4ears @ErikCumps @KlaasvanDijk5 @Sarasota2011 @jorgje @PostvanFenna @Dieren_Doc @BorgerPieter @VaxxDoc @DokterBertho @DocDoorsnee @Marc_Veld Hier een artikel daarover: https://t.co/gMjwlUvftJ
@LT4WOM @AngeShare @Sharky_vs_Evil @RafaelNadal So, if I understand your opinion, these COVID vaccines have been in the works since the 1990s. Could you explain your claim that there wasn't a clinical trial? https://t.co/pwtsdl4nq1
@factode305 @WeRone777 @SpyVsSpy20 @tracyjayney64 @NickT4000 @ATInsider @whykeepitup @SandyConnell5 @VoiceOf81716176 @BreezerGalway @SwaledaleMutton @IainMulady @mr_raiderMD @CovidLarry @Iron_Mechanic @OTURISK @AshTFE @KPCResearch @EastYorksTony @bitcheswitches5 @GreatRegretCA @RagToo @Truth_in_Number @g_ballew @SwordtheChemist @philippapotts @radke_4 @stephan19573 @nevercunninplan @marcush87747500 @judysimpson222 @Nemeses667 @PrezJoeyB @AntonyGoodman5 @SirGorden @Sharky_vs_Evil @WaitingForPerot @Angelaisawake @Angelanashville @Lizzy_Lang7 @1Geofferson82 @badboyntx @tigresseleanor @JujuliaGrace @Natasha_KC1 @KrochetxKorner @jimbonail @Captain_EyebaII @QMUL Dman "Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies" pub: 12 Oct 2012 "mRNA as a therapeutic was first promoted in 1989 ... Only a couple of years later, mRNA was advocated as a vaccine platform" https://t.co/52kTcFeVzs
@DebateOnFacts @Michael65971864 @ClareCraigPath And nothing came of them in 2011. You are clearly ignorant of the whole complexity of the science, especially of adjuvanticity. Neither safe nor effective. Promising if properly tested in the future. GMOs suffered the same fate. https://t.co/BpukejANWk
Vakzin-mRNA Massenproduktion Ich frage mich schon, ob es bei den Kontrollbehörden genügend unbestechliche Experten gibt, die diese komplexen Synthese-, Reinigungs- und Kontrollschritte überprüfen können. Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/kJECRazTJZ https://t.co/yqg3j9d3Kf
@therrienv @BastsBest @KevinBr34468154 Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/3TIi118dU1
@Ciara_IRL @Songbird5432 I did investigate a clown though. His name is Robert #Malone. Seems like he has quite a following these days. Looking at the article, Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies, with Malone providing some distraction https://t.co/qJwUzfcEtI
Looking at the article, Developing #mRNA-vaccine technologies, with #Malone providing some distraction #GETTR https://t.co/cdOzD0ugUI
@disclosetv I recommend this video for these protestors when they get back home. Looking at the article, Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies, with Malone providing some distraction https://t.co/qJwUzfuNHQ
#GETTR Looking at the article, Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies, with Malone providing some distraction #Malone #mRNA #Vaccines https://t.co/yNcccNKY40
I was so hoping she could listen to this. Looking at the article, Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies, with Malone providing some distraction https://t.co/qJwUzfuNHQ
Looking at the article, Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies, with Malone providing some distraction https://t.co/qJwUzfuNHQ
Again, here's the link. Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/7O60Qpk5ZB
@WomanoftheApoc2 It is better to be able to review and critique each article on its merits instead of spreading your net too widely. Focus on review articles 1st that provide background & context then read & critique the primary research & clinically based articles https://t.co/w2sRImWh5e
@irving_sappho @eigenbros @nntaleb Why because his lazy fat ass is too dumb to look at cited journals? https://t.co/FSAOSyP1vv
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies #Malone single-handedly did this. All on his own. No collaboration, no assistance. He did it all in one day. He can also walk on water. https://t.co/7O60QpB91B
@realuncledenden @ZaynJaffer @OlafFub4Prez @tvheidihatch @rdsimpson @byuthad @KUTV2News https://t.co/b8At3oWJ1j "In addition, mRNA is an intrinsically safe vector as it is a minimal and only transient carrier of information that does not interact with the genome."
RT @The_Eloise: @yoshkapundrick @schwoer1 @Covid19Crusher You mean this reference to the half-life i quoted? "...the efficacy of an mRNA va…
@yoshkapundrick @schwoer1 @Covid19Crusher You mean this reference to the half-life i quoted? "...the efficacy of an mRNA vaccine will rise as protein expression is increased and prolonged." https://t.co/VpoEUorcwL
RT @SKDitta: @RWMaloneMD Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies Excellent reference for all. https://t.co/7O60QpB91B
RT @SKDitta: @RWMaloneMD Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies Excellent reference for all. https://t.co/7O60QpB91B
@RWMaloneMD Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies Excellent reference for all. https://t.co/7O60QpB91B
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/7O60QpB91B
@uzakyolcu81 @mehmetceyhan23 @RTErdogan Üstadım aşı bulaşmayı anca daha önce bir çok hastalığı eredike ettiğimiz gibi yüksek oranda aşılama ile sonlandırabilir. Aşı karşıtlığı devam ettikçe virüs daha çok mutasyona uğramaya devam eder. Ve bu salgın asla bitmez. Ha güvenirlik için: https://t.co/yH4vi6Z2AV
@InfoInterest See e.g. the section "Adjuvanted mRNA-based vaccines" in https://t.co/Lx2SQXJ9De
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies written in 2012 mRNA #vaccines were not developed quickly. The research and work took decades. https://t.co/FAfArUScbm
@sugarpantz @BrandyZadrozny Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies This article is from 2012 Article information RNA Biol. 2012 Nov 1; 9(11): 1319-1330. Thomas Schlake,* Andreas Thess, Mariola Fotin-Mleczek, and Karl-Josef Kallen https://t.co/OplDwb0Bxd
@eaglesoft1980 @Nacho78611615 @McKaylaRoseJ 10 more years? Why do we need 10 more years? mRNA vaccines have been around since 1989, and studies have been going on since 1990. Why do you think we wouldn't have found DNA damage in the last 30 years? We need 10 more? https://t.co/nrEMuS9Ov6
RT @l91_jxbx: @varingian @mcfunny @timtron2020 @docstardust @1ohreally @peoplenotrobot1 @Top_Muppetries @bitcoinbookshop @AcademicShards @e…
@varingian @mcfunny @timtron2020 @docstardust @1ohreally @peoplenotrobot1 @Top_Muppetries @bitcoinbookshop @AcademicShards @empireloyalists @cooljamm55 @Tony__Heller @TonyBaduy @LiamKav @chickaboy @carlsmythe @villagerssn @TakethatCt @tenebra99 @crabb_vicki @provaxtexan @ZaynJaffer @DCGreenZone1 @policing_uk @stevenmosher @_mamadeb @Kathmarval @vaxxinesRpoison @PPALtd @ncdave4life @doritmi @AGTCnews @EstesPga @MathewMoisture @richykirsh @SkepticalMutant @FillmoreWhite @DomIsa6 @RailFareWatch @llambchops @AJL037 @GeoffSchuler @RedSatoshi4 @AndrewLazarus4 @THC1001 @luigi_warren @realPitBullDog @Mchael21592783M @krebiozen @murdersquirrel Yeah, 30 years ago. Three decades of research behind the mRNA vaccine isn't good enough for you? Need 10 more years? Or you thought mRNA was brand new technology, did you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@timtron2020 @docstardust @mcfunny @1ohreally @peoplenotrobot1 @Top_Muppetries @bitcoinbookshop @AcademicShards @empireloyalists @cooljamm55 @Tony__Heller @TonyBaduy @LiamKav @chickaboy @carlsmythe @villagerssn @TakethatCt @tenebra99 @crabb_vicki @provaxtexan @ZaynJaffer @DCGreenZone1 @policing_uk @stevenmosher @_mamadeb @Kathmarval @vaxxinesRpoison @PPALtd @ncdave4life @doritmi @AGTCnews @EstesPga @MathewMoisture @richykirsh @SkepticalMutant @FillmoreWhite @DomIsa6 @RailFareWatch @llambchops @AJL037 @GeoffSchuler @RedSatoshi4 @AndrewLazarus4 @THC1001 @luigi_warren @realPitBullDog @Mchael21592783M @krebiozen @murdersquirrel @SeriousSkeptic Yellow fever? Hepatitis vaccine? So now we're going back even further, into the 1940's. Yes, we've learned nothing in 80 years. You have literal dog shit for brains. 30 years of research on the mRNA vaccine. 3 decades in the making. We have the dat
@timtron2020 @docstardust @mcfunny @1ohreally @peoplenotrobot1 @Top_Muppetries @bitcoinbookshop @AcademicShards @empireloyalists @cooljamm55 @Tony__Heller @TonyBaduy @LiamKav @chickaboy @carlsmythe @villagerssn @TakethatCt @tenebra99 @crabb_vicki @provaxtexan @ZaynJaffer @DCGreenZone1 @policing_uk @stevenmosher @_mamadeb @Kathmarval @vaxxinesRpoison @PPALtd @ncdave4life @doritmi @AGTCnews @EstesPga @MathewMoisture @richykirsh @SkepticalMutant @FillmoreWhite @DomIsa6 @RailFareWatch @llambchops @AJL037 @GeoffSchuler @RedSatoshi4 @AndrewLazarus4 @THC1001 @luigi_warren @realPitBullDog @Mchael21592783M @krebiozen @murdersquirrel @SeriousSkeptic In fact, we have 30 years of data on mRNA vaccines. We know exactly how they work. Three decades of research behind the current COVID vaccine isn't good enough for you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@twenty1kaay @_Floodlight And perhaps, if you are a nurse and work in the medical field, you should probably know that the first mRNA vaccine was developed all the way back in 1989. And his been tested for over 30 years now. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/UsWxQROpnR
@hollyjayewiley @LifeNewsHQ @EmeraldRobinson Here is my source https://t.co/ltG1c0tDJG Just as a reminder
@twinelm @Johnnywas25 @LifeNewsHQ The mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines were not developed using fetal cells. https://t.co/ltG1c0tDJG
@notmymandate @Chiaz2Frank @News_8 This article about MRNA is from 2012, I'm sure you'll block me after these facts Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies Article information RNA Biol. 2012 Nov 1; 9(11): 1319-1330. Thomas Schlake,* Andreas Thess, Mariola Fotin-Mleczek, and Karl-Josef Kallen https://t.co/OplDwb0Bxd
@anzaloneroberto @giuseppe9401 @deer55 @Cartabellotta Però sono bravo anch'io a prendere mezzo screen e dire "leggi troll" ...diciamo che tu non sei un troll, sei direttamente le caverne oscure. https://t.co/RzjPFa77KD P.S., come dicevo, studiati e confermati come metodi da anni.
@bathwin @Dr_Ellie This is a fairly definitive article on mRNA vaccine tech, when it was written in 2012, and also references in vivo success of 90's. It's a long read & full of molecular biology jargon, but if you can wade through it there is some interesting content in it. https://t.co/h1FSLAC3Bc
@CempireMvf @heavy_sunshine @Exhausted_dad @briannatravers @theheraldsun @JosephBiggane Can you please post me YOUR source to support your claim that the vaccine was untested? You're aware that the mRNA vaccine has been being studied since 1990 - correct? 30 years isn't good enough for you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@mab_sp125 @lflima4 @LaroccaRA @mellziland @RachelNigro3 Inclusive @mab_sp125 @romulismo: https://t.co/ce40r2ZsZc Fig. 1B
@SANDRAFREYB Le "vaccin" à ARNm n'est prétendument pas une thérapie génique; étrangement le brevet CureVac sur sa propre technologie ARNm de synthèse parle de "vaccin génétique"... Alexander Samuel (#Quiiiiiii) sait sans doute mieux que les fabricants ce qu'il en est...https://t.co/vw4FWiNJlH
https://t.co/9xSbcK61Pn
@WillowDawnOneal @CaulfieldTim @NewYorker Wow, you are literally so fucking stupid. Which vaccine in the history or vaccines has ever produced a side effect with a lag of 5 to 10 years? None? It's not a brand new vaccine type. Been around since 1990, mate. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@ZealousOrtho @The_Common_Toad @PageauJonathan mRNA isn't new, bud. The mRNA vaccine was developed in 1990 and has been in continuous study since then. What long term effects do you think we wouldn't know about after 30 years of testing? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@Fradbius @jordimartifont_ @gerardbat Per començar, hem de considerar que en el desenvolupament de vaccins d'ARNm hom ha fet un esforç per maximitzar la biodisponibilitat d'aquestes molècules. https://t.co/K9qZDcdFAe
@notokmaybeok @lisasim87792211 @BSecqs69 @jasonrantz Ah. So then your original argument is meaningless. Got it. By the way, the mRNA vaccine was developed in 1990 and has been in continuous study since. Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@chipdippler @THC4U2C @Mjisthegoat1996 @GovInslee I mean, this is one of those "think for yourself" moments you appear to brag about all over Twitter. RNA immunity was discovered in 1961. The first vaccine was developed in 1990. It's been in continuous study since then. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/JG4zhQl1rQ
@2thousan9Mmix @Jonesannaleanne @AMakuyana @bbnojutsu https://t.co/HwApxw82EC
@healthfirst500 @Bodyhealer1 There is long term data. The mRNA vaccine was developed in 1990. It is three decades old. Three decades of research. On use in cancer and other viruses. Zika had a mRNA vaccine, which clinical trials ended simply because the outbreak ended. Stop lying. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@Oakenaxe1 @quantum_prophet @blackvaultcom Never said they've been used widespread for over a decade. I said tech is established (see Schlake, Thomas, et al. "Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies." [2012] for 9yr old summary) and safe (based on current phase 3 trials & over a billion ppl who've now had an mRNA vaccine).
@afriedduck @R1peb @SouhanStrib https://t.co/wrfH7dKGLX. A history of mRNA vaccines.
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies - PubMed 2012 For those who think the #Covidvaccine was developed too quickly, here is an article discussing the development of mRNA vaccines from 2012. The vaccine technology has been developed over decades. https://t.co/neDUssfdMG
@ydeigin There are a lot of points that have been brought up in the room by vaccine hesitant folks that are patently false. The first time mRNA was used in an animal cell was in 1989, source: https://t.co/fBYqmnyVpa
@GolovineSolange @idrissaberkane un élément de réponse : https://t.co/n7XGOvnUqN https://t.co/Sir3Xe0c68
@ElodieJauneau Sur l'histoire des vaccins à ARNm tout particulièrement, puisque je vois qu'il y a un certain nombre de réponses allant dans le même sens, je peux conseiller la lecture de https://t.co/CazgjbBr5b ou bien https://t.co/pvUzlhp6ns
@avconnection_7 @Mariebe10098426 @KennethWPratt @PoliticsPollss The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? You don't think that after three decades, we'd know anything about long term effects? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@JaySaxton_11 @IdkTreJ @WineLoverSF @MissPotamia @Reuters Imagine shitting your pants over a vaccine that has been in development since 1989. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@milesgrimes @TNBAKaminski16U @EmeraldRobinson The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research. Human trials have been ongoing for two decades. Not new. Educate yourself. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@Kimberl12163549 @honestquestio10 Long term research? mRNA vaccines have been in research since 1990! Lady! Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? There are PLENTY of clinical trials on safety. PLENTY. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@Kimberl12163549 @honestquestio10 The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research..... https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@UKCryptoKing247 @mcfunny @rikdigital @GrumpyOldDoc @thereal_truther @RWMaloneMD @19criticalcare @BIRDGroupUK @WHO @cdc @medpagetoday What medical experiment, my man? RNA immunity was discovered in 1961 by Dr. Marvin Fishman, and has been in clinical trials since 1990... they aren't new vaccines??? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@enugal_alain @sudouest Les vaccins développés pour le covid s'appuient donc sur presque 20ans d'étude des coronavirus. Les vaccins à ARNm sont expérimentés depuis au moins 2012 Il y a du recul sur tout ça https://t.co/FltXsXgwEE
@KimNath57983093 @thereal_truther @RWMaloneMD The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Two decades of human trial.... You don't think that after three decades, we'd know anything about long term effects of mRNA and delivery mechanism???? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@lajeunefille716 @nigelrudd @Fenku14 @Ciolfilicious1 @GBNEWS The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Human clinical trials have been going on for two decades. Mrna is not new. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@CRT20202 @BobP05608794 @ScotRoss @tamrobinson1966 The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? You don't think that after three decades, we'd know anything about long term effects? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@tonidasilva18 @onewryeye @CraigKellyMP The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@MeMikeD1 @snappycinder @santiagomayer_ The first mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Simple mRNA injection studies in mice began in 1990. Three decades of research isn't good enough for you? You don't think that after three decades, we'd know anything about long term effects? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@arcministerjams @RatchetNurse1 mRNA vaccines were developed in 1989. Mouse trials began in 1990. Human trials have been going on for almost two decades. Coronavirus research, specifically is 10 years old. That's not good enough for you? Three decades of mRNA research? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@MikeLon12273807 @Mooses_kitten @krassenstein @realDonaldTrump The mRNA vaccine was developed in 1989. Mice trials began in 1990. Three decades of research. Nearly two decades on human patients with cancer. Coronavirus research - a decade. That is "untested" to you? Three decades isn't good enough? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@vicprisonstate @leannetonkes @VictorianCHO The study of simple mRNA injections in mice began in 1990. There is over a decade of research on mRNA vaccines on humans, too, it's not new. It's only new to infectious disease. But up until now, it has been widely used cancer therapeutics. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@Twitbrain1 @honestquestio10 @GaliforniaSocal @austere_wyatt It has no previous human trials? Isn't that... isn't that what the clinical trials were for? The mRNA vaccine was invented in 1989. Mice studies began in 1990. Three decades, with a decade of human trials. That's not good enough for you? https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@nigelrudd @Fenku14 @Ciolfilicious1 @GBNEWS Don't listen to him. The mRNA vaccine is not experimental. It's just a buzz phrase they use because it's still in end phase clinical trial. The mRNA vaccine was invented in 1989. It's not new. https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@ManOfGo20510250 @JonathonMomsen @missrobinson Just going to also go ahead and throw this out there, too: the mRNA vaccine was actually developed in 1989. And began clinical study in 1990. Not sure we need "couple more years" to find out what we probably learned at some point in the last three decades https://t.co/nrEMuSrpmE
@CLE2327 @CardiacjasJas @NVruggink @ravens4dummies @Bease11 Three decades**. First emerged in 1989, and simple injections of mRNA in mice in study for use in therapeutics and vaccines since 1990.
@moos_tbe @harryhol @Samiseenkat1 En wat leesvoer uit 2012: https://t.co/2Vvn4REfAS
RT @kBF4MCyfZ61m5TI: 2021 年 1 月 19 日にアクセス。https://t.co/45zZDoer4M… . 4 Schlake T、Thess A、Fotin-Mleczek M、Kallen K. mRNA ワクチン技術の開発。RNA 生物。 2…
RT @kBF4MCyfZ61m5TI: 2021 年 1 月 19 日にアクセス。https://t.co/45zZDoer4M… . 4 Schlake T、Thess A、Fotin-Mleczek M、Kallen K. mRNA ワクチン技術の開発。RNA 生物。 2…
RT @kBF4MCyfZ61m5TI: 2021 年 1 月 19 日にアクセス。https://t.co/45zZDoer4M… . 4 Schlake T、Thess A、Fotin-Mleczek M、Kallen K. mRNA ワクチン技術の開発。RNA 生物。 2…
2021 年 1 月 19 日にアクセス。https://t.co/45zZDoer4M… . 4 Schlake T、Thess A、Fotin-Mleczek M、Kallen K. mRNA ワクチン技術の開発。RNA 生物。 2012;9(11):1319-1330。 doi:10.4161/rna.22269 5 Kloc M、Uosef A、Kubiak JZ、Ghobrial RM。
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/WowtKTdn0c
@timmo74 @beakerpower @ADnl Ongetest? Artikel uit 2012: https://t.co/wc4YkkkNkx
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/Ev1R9wz0Nr published in 2012
https://t.co/PAmGyYTil4
@ExodusLaughing @GYamey @MackayIM https://t.co/LbJu7u423C
@AlexBerenson @barnes_law Been researching. . Always be cautious but don't freak out! https://t.co/DvDUlPDCRl
@RoseARosey @adinuf1 @RogerCo07997264 @nadhimzahawi @StevePeers @HouseofCommons @Conservatives @UKLabour Sure. Some research websites: https://t.co/YOkpvgbAyQ. Good for mRNA definition and how it works. https://t.co/7U2s9vlYTl 2012 research paper on the vaccine technology.
@Jesselaurence @davewalshucc @TimHowe73500437 @constanzag77 https://t.co/bANqyIoLiC https://t.co/ImauRZaoqf https://t.co/HuiEl3ZRJ4 https://t.co/8tiybXDlkG I can also provide you a pdf of a cellualr biology book, but it's university level, quite heavy
@mikjames @PhRMA You want real science? How about evidence that mRNA vaccine research has been going on for years... Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/pqkXAYJf5C
@EmilyMcgowin @meganranney No cell lines are needed for mRNA vaccines see DOI: 10.4161/rna.22269 Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies for details
#science https://t.co/DXokkXMy4X
RT @lidl_j: @M_T_Franz Nur ein Beispiel: https://t.co/YqXZdiwpDM Aber ich nehme an das wissen Sie ohnehin... https://t.co/tSdXTPtv8M
@M_T_Franz Nur ein Beispiel: https://t.co/YqXZdiwpDM Aber ich nehme an das wissen Sie ohnehin... https://t.co/tSdXTPtv8M
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/TUt4O8SfrJ
#SchlakeThessEtAl-1. "RNA #Biology, Vol. 9, Issue 11, 1319–1330 (Nov. 2012) Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies Thomas Schlake Andreas Thess Mariola Fotin-Mleczek Karl-Josef Kallen #CureVac GmbH; Tübingen, #Germany M.t. 'Entwicklung von #mRNA-Impfstoff-Technologien'
@ElmarD31765059 @Julia130487 @SHomburg @Karl_Lauterbach Und da Sie anscheinend noch nie mit RNA gearbeitet haben, wissen Sie auch nicht wie schnell diese abgebaut wird bzw. was deren biologische Halbwertszeit ist. https://t.co/CcjhU6UdAc
Developing mRNA-vaccine technologies https://t.co/RjLGBXNoaX
RV
まコ
I
SB
DB
BB
AT
PP
F
CS
W
AS
R
D
EH
M
KD
K
VV
H
I
C
M
DM
TF
F
L
GC
WM
S
DO
S
WS
Z
AK
K
V
MK
AP
L
AW
E
TT
A
O
AA
FU
E
K
M
F
I
ST
M
GK
SM
WS
KT
S
PM
AN
S
VV
S
C
UK
TC
V
DR
SS
L
AQ
DN
BD
HA
D
FL
B
JB
KK
ST
S
J
JM
EC
よ
け度
M
K
D
SM
N
NH
TD
KV
OM
M
EM
MU
C
LI
D
GK