June 2013 PMID 23665393

An fMRI study on sunk cost effect.

Jianmin Zeng, Qinglin Zhang, Changming Chen, Rongjun Yu, Qiyong Gong

Mentions

7
Peak: 1 in May 2014
across 4 sources since May 2014

Extended reach

18,366
potential audience

Total likes

121

Video views

17,372

Mentions per month

May 2014 – Jul 2025

Where it's discussed

  • YouTube2 videos
  • News2 articles
  • Blogs2 articles
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Several discussions highlight the article’s exploration of the sunk cost fallacy, with mentions of how it applies to beliefs and decision processes, such as ‘chasing good money after bad’ or applying the concept to personal choices, which shows a moderate level of interest and engagement centered around everyday relevance.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the relevance of the sunk cost fallacy beyond financial decisions, indicating general agreement with the article’s broader implications.

InterestModerate interest

Posts demonstrate moderate curiosity, referencing how the fallacy applies to beliefs and decision-making, which suggests some interest but not deep engagement.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments make brief connections between the research and everyday thinking or beliefs, reflecting a surface-level engagement rather than in-depth analysis.

ImpactNeutral impact

While some recognize the importance of understanding these neural mechanisms, overall discussions suggest limited perceived immediate impact beyond academic discussion.

Abstract in brief

  • This fMRI study investigated the neural basis of the sunk cost effect, a common decision bias, by examining brain activity in healthy subjects engaged in decision-making tasks that involved varying levels of sunk and incremental costs.
  • The findings showed that higher sunk costs increased activity in lateral frontal and parietal cortices, regions involved in risk-taking, while lower incremental costs activated areas like the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex, which are linked to reward processing.
  • The study concluded that different brain regions respond to sunk costs and incremental costs without overlap, supporting the certainty effect explanation over self-justification or diminishing sensitivity for the sunk cost bias.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Former Comrade Mullet
@awakened_mullet · X

@johnpavlovitz There's also the 'sunk cost' fallacy, originally formulated to describe chasing good $ after bad, but works just as well for beliefs. https://t.co/TmwBWonTgl

Apr 28, 2020 · 995 followers View post →

All mentions

Former Comrade Mullet
@awakened_mullet · X

@johnpavlovitz There's also the 'sunk cost' fallacy, originally formulated to describe chasing good $ after bad, but works just as well for beliefs. https://t.co/TmwBWonTgl

Apr 28, 2020 · 995 followers View post →