Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The collective discussions reflect a generally cautious stance toward polarized training, citing evidence that it offers minimal benefit for recreational runners and emphasizing the importance of individual factors like genetics and training load. The tone varies from analytical to dismissive, with several posts referencing the study’s findings to question the value of increased training intensity and distribution, contributing to a balanced but skeptical perception of the research's implications.
Most discussions agree that polarized training offers limited or no additional benefit for recreational runners, as seen in comments emphasizing the 'ZERO benefit' and referencing the study's findings.
Posts demonstrate high interest by referencing specific studies, training strategies, and implications for recreational athletes, indicating active engagement with the topic.
Discussion participants analyze methods, speculate on individual factors, and question training effectiveness, showing moderate depth in their engagement with the research.
The discussions could influence training approaches for recreational runners by challenging assumptions about increased intensity, though the overall impact remains moderate as many comments reflect opinions rather than groundbreaking insights.
Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time above VT1 for runners training ~4 hours per week. Harder is not "worth more". https://t.co/R98kGeNEW6
2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvement 10km setelah 10 minggu:
@maleke_r Good question sir! How long is going to depend on a variety of individual factors. Genetics, athletic background, training load, etc. I advocate for 3 months dedicated to base training. This might not get you to your goal but you should see significant https://t.co/ZbQxB3M2p8
This is an older study (2012) that tested either a polarized or a between-thresholds training intervention on recreational runners. [I've seen the original polarized training work, but don't recall seeing this study]: https://t.co/ahBwDEodCG (1 of 3) #210107
@TeamWurtele An interesting paper here around that very question.. https://t.co/zSJnDlirqk
@chimpchops27 @SimpliFaster He averaged 21hrs per week in the last year. Could a 10hr per week athlete expect a VO2max of 70 with the same distribution? No. Is a more intense training distribution better for a low volume athlete? No. https://t.co/a1527Td1KG
This video explores a study comparing aerobic training methods to assess their effects on maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) and heart stroke volume. The findings highlight that high-intensity interval training leads to…
This video explores the benefits of polarized training on endurance variables, including a comparison with threshold and high-intensity methods, and discusses its effect on improving cardiorespiratory fitness in various…
@ARStager Polarized training (lots of slow and a little fast) https://t.co/jP5L96FfRr
@altini_marco What I made was: long run (~2h), intervals(< 1h) and two time fartlek(~1). Worked but for me (without control body), but evidence points in a differiert direction. https://t.co/ulH9122J5C
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @runliftrunlift: @maleke_r Good question sir! How long is going to depend on a variety of individual factors. Genetics, athletic backgro…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
@pierrepaquette_ https://t.co/71GIO9rFhF
RT @runliftrunlift: @maleke_r Good question sir! How long is going to depend on a variety of individual factors. Genetics, athletic backgro…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @runliftrunlift: @maleke_r Good question sir! How long is going to depend on a variety of individual factors. Genetics, athletic backgro…
@maleke_r Good question sir! How long is going to depend on a variety of individual factors. Genetics, athletic background, training load, etc. I advocate for 3 months dedicated to base training. This might not get you to your goal but you should see significant https://t.co/ZbQxB3M2p8
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
A 2014
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
RT @k_munir84: 2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvem…
2 kaedah latihan dilakukan oleh pelari rekreasi: ➡️Polarized (~77% Easy) ➡️Non-polarized (~46% Easy) Perbandingan improvement 10km setelah 10 minggu:
@CyclingCoeliac @AlpineCols Not quite. https://t.co/UAsuoL7rZL « ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time above VT1 for runners training ~4 hours per week. » Harder is not "worth more".
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
https://t.co/xQvcBYySof It seems it does
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
RT @Alan_Couzens: Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time abov…
Every time limited runner should read this paper... https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8 ZERO benefit to spending 30% more time above VT1 for runners training ~4 hours per week. Harder is not "worth more". https://t.co/R98kGeNEW6
@triluarca @Kakecg Hay un par de estudios sobre este tema: https://t.co/3hUluFnI2k https://t.co/ZajAKUE6Yj
@TeamWurtele An interesting paper here around that very question.. https://t.co/zSJnDlirqk
@triluarca El nivel de rendimiento no es una variable que necesariamiente deba influir en la selección de distribuciones de intensidad de entrenamiento (DIT). Como ejemplo de ello está este artículo científico de @iker_munoz_ et al. Sí influye en el volumen. https://t.co/ZajAKUE6Yj
https://t.co/80krjzXiYW
This is an older study (2012) that tested either a polarized or a between-thresholds training intervention on recreational runners. [I've seen the original polarized training work, but don't recall seeing this study]: https://t.co/ahBwDEodCG (1 of 3) #210107
@aaronbmd @jamesbu63376536 @Briandbegley @conormcgloin @maximumcharacte @doctorinigo I honestly wouldn't change the intensity. In this study they trained only slightly more (3.5-4hrs/wk) and there was zero benefit from adding intensity to the program. Also, at that volume, I think you're training more for general health. https://t.co/N5zPkhVpi8
@maximumcharacte @doctorinigo Always a good one to come back to when the qu of increasing the intensity to "make up for" missing volume comes up.... https://t.co/N5zPkhDOqA
@KerryMcGawley there is some research that suggests that amateur/recreational athletes would also benefit from a polarised training model, including; https://t.co/ql4hNxTxAY https://t.co/xQ4NpaL64t https://t.co/Hn1B7xHH3s
@alisdavidson @TMR_Coaching @UKRunChat @361europe Most of the evidence for polarised (80/20) training is in well-trained endurance runners eg https://t.co/UzDtzobChd There is some evidence showing it might be the best approach in recreational runners too https://t.co/dzvmEDNvxw https://t.co/kedjXlc2z9
Polarizar los entrenamientos en corredores populares conduce a mejoras en el rendimiento. Does polarized training improve performance in recreational runners? - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/xln6jOvCxO
@chimpchops27 @SimpliFaster He averaged 21hrs per week in the last year. Could a 10hr per week athlete expect a VO2max of 70 with the same distribution? No. Is a more intense training distribution better for a low volume athlete? No. https://t.co/a1527Td1KG
AC
M
DA
DR
AR
TM
DC
M
VG
TD
TS
M
CT
BM
KH
K
U
AZ
K
RC
عا
Z
م
AR
T
IK
FW
GG
KR
DA
K
BE
S
RV
P
FC
JB
M
AA
AJ
BC
RB
H