Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions demonstrate a strong interest in both the psychological aspects and practical consequences of misestimating large numbers, exemplified by mentions of research studies, algorithms, and real-world observations. The tone often combines curiosity with analytical insights, emphasizing the significance of these findings in areas like crowd estimation, science communication, and decision-making.
Most discussions acknowledge that humans are poor at estimating large numbers, aligning with the article’s findings and established psychological research.
Many posts show high interest, referencing studies, advanced algorithms, and practical implications, indicating fascination with the topic's relevance.
Posts range from sharing personal experiences to discussing technical methods, reflecting moderate depth of engagement with some technical details and examples.
The discussions highlight the importance of understanding how humans perceive large numbers, which can influence policy, science communication, and education—implying a noticeable impact.
One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to feel meaningless over time while smaller ones just hit... much much harder... But why? I did some psych research. Let's dig in. ▶https://t.co/9ww5rzTp46 https://t.co/KXHosKRmB5
Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be half way between the two... how well understood is the concept of a trillion?... some science: https://t.co/DyO6Px8rm1
I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to menthol vapes to make the PH case a menthol cig ban. This matters, of course, because FDA has not authorized a single one. Perrone again avoids it.
"Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficult to understand." https://t.co/X7m2nx6PMQ
This is why most humans are not good with estimating large numbers Especially when exponential growth, or decay, are involved. A brilliant physical example… https://t.co/Ne9TjWeNj9
My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
The study examines how adult Americans estimate and evaluate very large numbers, revealing that many tend to place these numbers on a number line as if the words thousand, million, billion are part of a uniformly spaced…
This video explores the perception of large numbers and offers strategies for presenting them clearly. It highlights how adults estimate large numbers and the impact on decision-making, emphasizing the importance of…
@GermanicFren grok is also retarded especially when estimating large numbers
@Lydonj5 The human brain is notoriously bad at estimating large numbers of anything. That's why you have to use calculations of what is actually physically possible. Stephen thought 20 roads of his protest would be the entire UK population.
Out for a walk and was at the right place at the right time. Just witnessed easily over a thousand (I’m not good at estimating large numbers of birds.) chimney swifts joining together for the night. So cool. #birds #birding #AnnArbor
@TonyHomewood @SausageSpice @realninawysocka @TRobinsonNewEra Humans are very bad at estimating large numbers by eye, which is why police use mathematical models and specialised drones to count crowd sizes, rather than watching a twenty second clip taken from hundreds of meters away
@TrueBritVoice @floboflo Humans are notoriously bad at estimating large numbers from just glancing at a situation. You need to do the calculations (or get an AI to do it for you, asking it to count numbers in the actual video in the thread & asking it to explain the steps in its reasoning.)
@BackTo70179 @JimCognito2016 The maths says otherwise. How many do you think it was? Do you have. Any actual proof (other than, “it looks like more”- it’s well established that humans aren’t good at estimating large numbers)
@ToonDazza Yes, if that's 0.75km long and 20m wide it would be around 50k people given 3 people per metre square. Humans are very bad at estimating large numbers/quantities/volunes beyond a certain point.
@Sutton1Mr Wee scientific fact for you pal: Humans are notoriously AWFUL at estimating large numbers. It's due to something called "Nonlinear Perception of Quantities", for large groups humans perceive numbers logarithmically. That means the difference between 10 and 20 feels much bigger...
@RealCFrampton People are generally really poor at estimating large numbers.
Also I mean people are just terrible at estimating large numbers. I mean could you tell the difference between 100,000 and 200,000 people?
@peterrhague It’s really difficult estimating large numbers of people, particularly when you have as low an IQ as most Reform supporters.
@WharfRat7690 @Jon_Williamso @TRobinsonNewEra I saw the footage. Crowd seems in line with some of the larger no kings rallies, like Philly, which had around 100,000 attendees… Humans are really bad at estimating large numbers (anything over a few hundred.) You need to use math to solve (crowd density * crowd area)
Walkthrough Wednesday: AMDM classes work through a PBL task analyzing numerical data by estimating large numbers in a crowd while AP World History was working in teams to explore and present on world religions. Awesome engagement and collaboration! @ia_kent @FultonCoSchools https://t.co/Zdel5lu92f
Holy shit. I can't believe this is true, but apparently there's, like, research? https://t.co/TS30RS0i6i Landy, D., Silbert, N. & Goldin, A. (2013). Estimating large numbers. Cognitive Science, 37(5) 775-799. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12028 https://t.co/NZR50A30I7
People are notoriously bad at estimating large numbers.
For the ShoutOut today I wanted to highlight @DarylTalksGames, especially a video from about 10 months ago on the Puny Paradox: https://t.co/jFhM9FoYuC Just his whole video catalogue really. He is an amazing video essayist who brings psychology into many of his video discussions.
@FDBMenK @ChallengeCorner @MarioBrothBlog you immediately got me thinking of this video https://t.co/OyOwxABpyc, a video which has single handedly rewired my brain in how i see numbers in video games now
@MattZeitlin extremely true; part of why so many americans with “have $500k net worth soonish” on their to do list thought railing against “millionaires and billionaires” was about them. never evolved to count this high and maintain an intuitive grasp on things. https://t.co/WQRbWBvcem https://t.co/5xhPuvxPOL
https://t.co/nzyMkDxdM9
@yaxu Does it make you good at estimating large numbers, e.g. how many sweeties on a plate?
Not only just ignorance, but humans overall are really terrible at understanding or estimating large numbers and percentages.
Humans tap out on high numbers very quickly. There was a protest march in NZ recently and the estimate of the number of people is anywhere from 15 thousand to 85 thousand. This is being presented as evidence of malfeasance, but it’s mostly just people being very bad at estimating large numbers.
Humans have never been good at estimating large numbers.
Tem um vídeo bem interessante sobre isso na vdd!! youtu.be/wnwM-t8sLVM?...
@ThatSamWinkler @DarylTalksGames just did a video about this. Highly recommend. https://t.co/kJpKwjLg0W
@SpaceCakeCSGO @Benjamaing @Skandal_NOII Je vous pose ça ici, si jamais vous avez envie d’essayer de comprendre ce qui est dit précédemment et que vous avez besoin d’une étude pour le justifier https://t.co/GGqmcBNiAO
RT @bencebicayicek: İlk sağlık barı 1984 yılında The Black Onyx RPG oyunundaymış. #önemlibilgiler He bu arada iyi bir youtube videosu izlem…
İlk sağlık barı 1984 yılında The Black Onyx RPG oyunundaymış. #önemlibilgiler He bu arada iyi bir youtube videosu izlemek isteyenlere: https://t.co/OhrzO9bEcJ
Big numbers never really felt good anyways. Hitting 9999 in Final Fantasy was cool, the first time you did it, but now it just feels meh. https://t.co/0lirO3SKiu
RT @alexgroundwater: This is why most humans are not good with estimating large numbers Especially when exponential growth, or decay, are i…
This is why most humans are not good with estimating large numbers Especially when exponential growth, or decay, are involved. A brilliant physical example… https://t.co/Ne9TjWeNj9
@pipkinpippa I have a small clipper channel (see below) but I’ve been editing videos for years for my band. I’m a huge stickler for spelling, grammar, and text/font legibility.
RT @Scorsheep: thi is the video <3 https://t.co/MA0HjeAtxh it's evyr interesting <3<3
thi is the video <3 https://t.co/MA0HjeAtxh it's evyr interesting <3<3
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
Good video. Its something Ive noticed as well. When you hit for 75 in Baldurs Gate it feels likr a bigger deal than when I hit a boss in Diablo for 50,000,000 damage and their health bar barely moves lol https://t.co/umujYDaGA1
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
Buen video. Los números en los videojuegos son siempre un tema interesante en varios niveles. https://t.co/tSUvByF79O
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
@LysanderBoomer Sometimes if I round up a variable, I’ll round down the next. I think of estimating large numbers like this is the equivalent to cooking vs. baking. Cooking is fluid, and baking is more precise like chemistry.
@csmfiction Including re reads we're looking somewhere in the ballpark of 55,500. I'm terrible at estimating large numbers.
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @DarylTalksGames: One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to fee…
RT @GreatCrapestry: Agree -large numbers are difficult to understand https://t.co/fs6IKBBAuy 1 in 50000, 1 in 250000, 1 in 500000..all com…
One of the strangest things I've experienced in my many years of playing RPGs is how larger damage values begin to feel meaningless over time while smaller ones just hit... much much harder... But why? I did some psych research. Let's dig in. ▶https://t.co/9ww5rzTp46 https://t.co/KXHosKRmB5
Agree -large numbers are difficult to understand https://t.co/fs6IKBBAuy 1 in 50000, 1 in 250000, 1 in 500000..all come under the same umbrella risk category for ADRs. They could have said 'very rare' and covered themselves but that misses the point - it was all risk, no gain. https://t.co/DHOAtqfSAy https://t.co/MaV4Ii1Lqv
Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count By making use of randomness, a team has created a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data. https://t.co/T6fZjux6jp
@bocephusfuss @BaddCompani AI count confirms humans aren’t very good at estimating large numbers over 5000
RT @avyfain: "Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count [...] a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct ob…
"Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count [...] a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data." I remember having my mind blown learning abt Hyperloglog / DataSketches. This is much more elegant. https://t.co/rdw6c7puUW
By making use of randomness, a team has created a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data. https://t.co/bBJW8ulGA3 via @QuantaMagazine
Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count: "By making use of randomness, a team has created a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data." via @QuantaMagazine https://t.co/WUCmyIXt6x https://t.co/yYRtGFqWNw
Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count - By making use of randomness, a team has created a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data. https://t.co/Y2sMAxrVrx
By making use of randomness, a team has created a simple algorithm for estimating large numbers of distinct objects in a stream of data https://t.co/khkn5ys3aU @QuantaMagazine #algorithms #computerscience https://t.co/F76AN28jYf
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
RT @GregTHR: I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to…
I informed Perrone more than once of FDA's reliance on a paper estimating large numbers of menthol smokers would transition to menthol vapes to make the PH case a menthol cig ban. This matters, of course, because FDA has not authorized a single one. Perrone again avoids it.
...5:32.."...For instance I was reading some paper on the way people are estimating large numbers and it turns out, that half of Americans, if asked to place 1 million between 1 thousand and 1 billion...We will put it halfway between..."..: https://t.co/RdeHtGdrsx
@GoodwinMJ People are generally not very good at estimating large numbers.
@WellsHFoster its definitely a half truth, like we have trouble visually estimating large numbers in general but at the same time what else were u gonna do at that time? u could get fit and get fed for free, die, and go the heaven u believed in and maybe have gay sex along the way if u wanted
@FactualPhilemon @TheOmniLiberal Fair enough. So your claim now would be that all these bodies aren't actually from the al-Ahli hospital blast and they've transported them from elsewhere to fool the press? You realise there are non-Palestinian eye-witnesses confirming deaths & estimating large numbers? https://t.co/3Xv0PUTubl
@TheOmniLiberal No exact numbers confirmed but we have MSF doctors & Anglican church members estimating large numbers. According to Richard Sewell most of those killed were outside & there were ~1000 displaced people sheltering in the courtyard at the time https://t.co/3J5mnOZ0U7
Check out those context notes. This is why I just tell people I'm not good at estimating large numbers like this and call it a day. https://t.co/8eVv2DNljP
One of my favorite online interactions I've had was in the comments under a video about estimating large numbers, including the number of seconds in a year. I commented something like "well you could just multiply 525,600 by 60, easy." And someone responded in earnest- https://t.co/IuAdHoAGyu
@FOX26Houston Estimating large numbers can be hard, but here’s a helpful way to do it: Count the number of fish in a square foot area (or better, a square yard), then multiply by how many square feet/yards of fish. You’ll find there are probably close to a hundred in a single square yard.
Also fascinating that one of the studies cited in the piece (where people estimated that a million was halfway between a thousand and a billion for reference https://t.co/Z1dRWjNR2z) indicates that humans conceive of big numbers logarithmically as a way to cope with such scale
@alex_renard13 @EdwardVersaii That number honesty feels more accurate from a boots-on-the-ground perspective. Research shows that people are notoriously bad at estimating large numbers. This is likely even more true when you are invested in those numbers
@aniket_sule @DrDavidLandy @IndiaAsksWhy @Haritara @avanishutsav @SciComm_India @WhatsScienceIN @IScicommunity @Anusha_R_ @cete_tiss @foldscopeindia @sciencenxtdoor In number line estimation task, this information is enough. By 'two points not enough' do u mean- one also needs to know where 'zero' is? Sharing d link to Landy's paper- https://t.co/OzbQrrsVt0 https://t.co/YFZPtHBycG
Just passed a field with so many cows so widely distributed that it looked like a primary-school exercise in estimating large numbers.
Це не моя особиста думка, досить багато на цю тему було досліджень, ось одне з них https://t.co/3doJpLpfuk https://t.co/up3FnSKHhO
Even with enacting with boxes my #mathisfun challenge turned out a bit tough for my 2nd graders but was fun; we moved on to estimating large numbers. #mtbos #iteachmath https://t.co/fNReRvr3P2
@queenwartooth (Its always more than people think - humans are terrible at estimating large numbers... it's just not something most of us have practice with.)
@maxfawcett Humans really are bad at estimating large numbers
Estimating large numbers using benchmark numbers- who wants to but this $120,000 car? #ocsbmath #JERPride https://t.co/ULRcxJ47m8
Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficult to understand. https://t.co/YjxqFRvEYy
@objsucks Always good to try and challenge people's perspective on these things - a good third of us put 1 million half way between 1 thousand and 1 billion https://t.co/n3RMNnXfzE
David Landy, Noah Silbert and Aleah Goldin (2013) show experimentally that respondents estimate large numbers relying heavily on the structure of their number word systems. Estimating large numbers. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12028 #ReckoningWith
RT @PeoplesParty_US: "Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficu…
RT @PeoplesParty_US: "Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficu…
RT @PeoplesParty_US: "Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficu…
RT @PeoplesParty_US: "Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficu…
"Despite their importance in public discourse, numbers in the range of 1 million to 1 trillion are notoriously difficult to understand." https://t.co/X7m2nx6PMQ
Ss were excited to check out car prices in our #ocsbMathUP activity on estimating large numbers. They were
@uk_virgo2020 @FarDarcy @Gyropitus @jonnymarshall3 @mdlachlan Humans are notoriously bad at estimating large numbers. This picture is from this afternoon. The red box contains exactly 100 heads. You're welcome to download it and count them yourself. Replicate that red box over the whole crowd. If I was feeling generous, there's 2,000 tops. https://t.co/LgYnigF9KO
RT @misaacstein: My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
RT @misaacstein: My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
RT @misaacstein: My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
RT @misaacstein: My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
My Achilles heal is estimating large numbers, but there are a ton of people here https://t.co/AzjbU3iROh
RT @ManometCenter: Have you ever wanted to join a #CitizenScience volunteer monitoring program, but been overwhelmed at the thought of esti…
RT @ManometCenter: Have you ever wanted to join a #CitizenScience volunteer monitoring program, but been overwhelmed at the thought of esti…
RT @ManometCenter: Have you ever wanted to join a #CitizenScience volunteer monitoring program, but been overwhelmed at the thought of esti…
Have you ever wanted to join a #CitizenScience volunteer monitoring program, but been overwhelmed at the thought of estimating large numbers of birds? Join Manomet's @Monica_Iglecia today for this interactive #webinar! https://t.co/i6yGZtJSfT
@AlexBerenson I once heard in some Astronomy show where distances in space communicated, that human beings are horrible in estimating large numbers/quantities. This "crisis" makes that painfully clear.
RT @PratherLab: @IrisVanRooij there's some different but related work on lack of understanding of big numbers and their relative magnitudes…
RT @PratherLab: @IrisVanRooij there's some different but related work on lack of understanding of big numbers and their relative magnitudes…
@IrisVanRooij there's some different but related work on lack of understanding of big numbers and their relative magnitudes. https://t.co/LDXMuqyin0
I love a good demonstration of scale. When I was working with citizen science volunteers, one thing I learned was how uncomfortable people are estimating large numbers. We have a hard time wrapping our brains around them. https://t.co/Req3RGlNaQ
Estimating large numbers then grouping by 10's to find the total. @StStephenOCSB https://t.co/2e32jtxZ9J
Two or three web searches and five minutes with a spreadsheet, and suddenly, strangely, as if it had been thought about prior to being added to the manifesto, it turns out the maths is fine. People *suck* at estimating large numbers. You have to do the work. https://t.co/0bARnLlLPA https://t.co/n9l1pBByXl
RT @PratherLab: There's some research on people's understanding of large numbers (billion, trillion, etc). Plot twist, people are not goo…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @PratherLab: There's some research on people's understanding of large numbers (billion, trillion, etc). Plot twist, people are not goo…
RT @PratherLab: There's some research on people's understanding of large numbers (billion, trillion, etc). Plot twist, people are not goo…
RT @PratherLab: There's some research on people's understanding of large numbers (billion, trillion, etc). Plot twist, people are not goo…
There's some research on people's understanding of large numbers (billion, trillion, etc). Plot twist, people are not good at estimating how big these numbers are relative to each other. https://t.co/LDXMuqyin0 https://t.co/PsNWGkNHYG
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
RT @faisalislam: Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be h…
Over a third of people in this experiment think that if you put a thousand and a billion on a line... a million would be half way between the two... how well understood is the concept of a trillion?... some science: https://t.co/DyO6Px8rm1
All of us have a difficult time understanding the large numbers being discussed in the news right now. (See: https://t.co/0A9Ds7sLeU for some science about that.) Here's a helpful graphic for income amount comparison: https://t.co/wTHLjQfj1F
@MarkSmi58604302 @mrwtch An expert in estimating large numbers, I see. I guess your field of vision must spread across London in one glance?
@barner_ucsd @samuelmehr @chazfirestone @spiantado @JoshHMcDermott Totally. I was just sayin that there's no reason to assume we have only one heuristic for estimating large numbers.
We’re learning to group pennies in an array as a strategy for estimating large numbers @rosevilleslp19 @LauraBa48751309 @gecdsbpro @ClaraHowitt #GECDSBslp2019 https://t.co/g231eaA4qK
Grade 6...Estimating large numbers... #HandsOnLearning #MathIsFun https://t.co/anOaBBqahP
Today is the last day of Math Week, and phew! What a week! Our 8th graders have been hard at work solving complex problems—correcting traffic jams, collecting data & estimating large numbers. These are just a few of our project-based learning techniques that foster innovation
FI
GC
TP
AG
MS
SN
D
NO
MS
F
YG
B
CC
M
CS
FA
BM
C
KZ
ND
V
CM
TR
TC
NB
T
TN
AF
OA
R
RN
RM
SM
SU
S
JM
A
AM
C
A
Z
P
MR
LC
PK
RD
MB
S
W
HE
GP
CS
AL
TL
E
JO
то
DB
TE
W
TN
RS
PM
V
AR
S
L
ML
ST
L
MC
LM
TL
P
DQ
MP
MS
IM
E
IR
R
RW
MM
CY
CH
I
SC
LA
CG
LF
NB
FR
DM
M
SA
GF
M
MW
MW
EV
HT
TS
B
DP
P
NA
D
TI
AS
?
LE
R
D
EM
M
SA
N
BR
TL
SM
AC
NL
RM
AD
ML
DR
A
MB
JG
IS
LN