@VPrasadMDMPH @NEJM https://t.co/fFhPxPZgDO
Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Dec 2019 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
News104 articles
-
Facebook9 posts
-
Blogs6 articles
-
X / Twitter5 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions emphasize the relevance of the study's findings, such as references to mortality benefits and screening decisions, exemplified by posts questioning if the research justifies colorectal cancer screening. The tone is cautious yet acknowledge the significance of the findings, suggesting moderate engagement and interest but not deep scrutiny.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the study in supporting colonoscopy as a preventive measure, highlighting its benefits.
Participants show moderate interest, focusing on practical implications like mortality benefits and screening justification.
Comments are generally brief and question-oriented, with limited in-depth analysis or detailed critique.
The discussions seem to recognize the study's potential influence on screening practices but do not convey a paradigm shift.
Abstract in brief
- The study found that both colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy significantly reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer and dying from it, with colonoscopy offering a stronger protective effect, especially against proximal colon cancer.
- Negative colonoscopy results are associated with a lower incidence of proximal colon cancer and reduced mortality from colorectal cancer, particularly when the procedure occurs more than 5 years before diagnosis.
- Cancers diagnosed within 5 years after colonoscopy tend to have more aggressive molecular features, like the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability, indicating that some cancers may develop rapidly despite screening.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky検査を受けた患者のrisk18%⬇️
@jungleland @EvanHallMD @fredhutch @SeattleCCA Great question @jungleland! The most important outcome is mortality benefit. Many studies have demonstrated this in colon cancer screening, these are just a few: https://t.co/jBbXBGB5sd; https://t.co/FbXoBC9s1G; https://t.co/TUQKtLicdT
@sahajrathi @AustinChiangMD @drkeithsiau @stevenbollipo @DeMadaria @drabbyphilips @RashidLui Tell me if this study is enough to justify screening for colorectal cancer https://t.co/CaC46GbrjC)%20for%20distal%20colorectal%20cancers.
All mentions
How Screening Prevents Colorectal Cancer Before It Starts
Early Signs of Colon Cancer and Screening Strategies for Prevention
This video covers the top 8 early signs of colon cancer and the importance of early detection. It discusses recent research on how lifestyle, screening options, and timely colonoscopy can reduce cancer risk and improve…
RT @keisuke4713: 検査を受けた患者のrisk18%⬇️
検査を受けた患者のrisk18%⬇️
@sahajrathi @AustinChiangMD @drkeithsiau @stevenbollipo @DeMadaria @drabbyphilips @RashidLui Tell me if this study is enough to justify screening for colorectal cancer https://t.co/CaC46GbrjC)%20for%20distal%20colorectal%20cancers.
@VPrasadMDMPH @NEJM https://t.co/fFhPxPZgDO
@jungleland @EvanHallMD @fredhutch @SeattleCCA Great question @jungleland! The most important outcome is mortality benefit. Many studies have demonstrated this in colon cancer screening, these are just a few: https://t.co/jBbXBGB5sd; https://t.co/FbXoBC9s1G; https://t.co/TUQKtLicdT
R雷
T
RM
DM
や