PubHawk
N Engl J Med October 2013 PMID 24088091

A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.

Jon F R Barrett, Mary E Hannah, Eileen K Hutton, Andrew R Willan, Alexander C Allen, B Anthony Armson, Amiram Gafni, K S Joseph, Dalah Mason, Arne Ohlsson, Susan Ross, J Johanna Sanchez, Elizabeth V Asztalos

Download social card

Mentions

130
Peak: 7 in Sep 2019
across 5 sources since Nov 2013

Extended reach

11,845,507
potential audience

Total likes

53,606

Video views

11,805,509

Mentions per month

Nov 2013 – Oct 2021

Where it's discussed

  • Facebook63 posts
  • News41 articles
  • X / Twitter22 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Several discussions support the idea that vaginal delivery is as safe as cesarean sections for twins, with posts referencing the NEJM study and quoting researchers like Dr. Barrett, demonstrating strong agreement. The tone is informative and enthusiastic, especially when tagging OB-GYN professionals or sharing educational videos, which reflects high interest and engagement in understanding the research's significance.

AgreementStrong agreement

Many posts express support for the study's findings, emphasizing the safety of vaginal delivery for twins and highlighting its implications.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions show high engagement with the topic, referencing specific studies, experts, and videos, indicating strong curiosity and relevance.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts involve a mix of sharing information, reactions to videos, and tagging others, displaying moderate to deep interaction with the subject.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest the findings could influence perceptions and possibly clinical practices related to twin births, indicating some impact.

Abstract in brief

  • This study compared planned cesarean section with planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancies between 32 and 39 weeks of gestation, focusing on whether the type of delivery affected the risk of serious neonatal outcomes.
  • Women were randomly assigned to each group, with elective deliveries scheduled between 37 and 39 weeks, and the main goal was to see if there was a difference in fetal or neonatal death or serious health problems.
  • The results showed no significant difference in adverse outcomes between the two groups, indicating that planned cesarean did not significantly reduce or increase risks compared to planned vaginal delivery in this specific gestational window.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
ギネコロ
@gynecolo_obgyn · X

MD双胎、帝王切開と経膣分娩で児の予後に差無し。 twin birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk)のサブ解析。 施設間の資源の差があるので難しいですね。 元論文は25カ国106施設の物凄いstudyですが、麻酔科医到着に1時間かかります！みたいなところは無さそう… https://t.co/8cgiJ9xn4f

Jun 25, 2020 · 25 likes · 3 shares · 3,140 followers View post →
ギネコロ
@gynecolo_obgyn · X

Twin Birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk) 2013年にNEJMから報告された、DD/MD twinでの帝王切開(CS)の優位性を確かめる試験。25カ国(日本はなし)106施設が参加し、32週から38週の1398人が選択的CS、1406人が経膣分娩(VB)に割付。主要評価項目は児の合併症、新生児死亡。両群で差はなし。 https://t.co/DQf1mhzvlB

Jun 26, 2020 · 15 likes · 3 shares · 3,140 followers View post →
Ayako Shibata@ウィメンズヘルス本発売中
@ayako700 · X

【双胎妊娠の分娩方法】　2013年の論文ですが、帝王切開術1400ｖvs 経腟分娩 1400人でRCTして、ってすごすぎますね。。。 双胎の場合、経腟分娩にトライして成功する率は43.8％ https://t.co/ThH5obVvgi https://t.co/61S0JGKmfx

Jan 3, 2021 · 14 likes · 2 shares · 12,683 followers View post →
Dr. Sperling MFM
@MFMSperling · X

A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy | NEJM https://t.co/vRT2etDgGe this is a must know study. @dryosefb

Jun 11, 2019 · 3 likes · 1 share · 4,088 followers View post →
☘️Jen✨
@WorcesterGrl82 · X

OMG YOU GUYS HAVE TO WATCH THIS THIS LASY REACT TO THIS VIDEO OF @EthanDolan AND @GraysonDolan https://t.co/K7wIeWXZfK

Jul 23, 2020 · 1 like · 1,057 followers View post →
New Life Prenatal Classes
@newlifeprenatal · X

#Multiples #prenatalclasses #scarborough #doula #goodtoknow #Twin #Pregnancy with the world's expert! Dr Jon Barrett (#Toronto). Twin #birth study NEJM article can be found here: https://t.co/OpH7LZTPCV https://t.co/y93cyrfuFI

Mar 10, 2019 · 1 like · 305 followers View post →

All mentions

agapedoulasllc
@agapedoulasllc · X

New study found that women should be given the opportunity to birth vaginally because it is just as safe in women with no pre-existing conditions. https://t.co/QBhEdHfbZT #twinbirthing #doulasareessential #doulasinjacksonville #christiandoulas #vaginalbirth #breachbirth

Oct 27, 2021 · 3 followers View post →
御手洗アキラ
@a_r_c_wksy · X

RT @ayako700: 【双胎妊娠の分娩方法】　2013年の論文ですが、帝王切開術1400ｖvs 経腟分娩 1400人でRCTして、ってすごすぎますね。。。 双胎の場合、経腟分娩にトライして成功する率は43.8％ https://t.co/ThH5obVvgi http…

Jan 3, 2021 · 2 shares · 4,629 followers View post →
Yoshiro Hadano, MD, PhD, MPH, MCTM, DTMH
@hatayoshiyoshi · X

RT @ayako700: 【双胎妊娠の分娩方法】　2013年の論文ですが、帝王切開術1400ｖvs 経腟分娩 1400人でRCTして、ってすごすぎますね。。。 双胎の場合、経腟分娩にトライして成功する率は43.8％ https://t.co/ThH5obVvgi http…

Jan 3, 2021 · 2 shares · 661 followers View post →
Ayako Shibata@ウィメンズヘルス本発売中
@ayako700 · X

【双胎妊娠の分娩方法】　2013年の論文ですが、帝王切開術1400ｖvs 経腟分娩 1400人でRCTして、ってすごすぎますね。。。 双胎の場合、経腟分娩にトライして成功する率は43.8％ https://t.co/ThH5obVvgi https://t.co/61S0JGKmfx

Jan 3, 2021 · 14 likes · 2 shares · 12,683 followers View post →
☘️Jen✨
@WorcesterGrl82 · X

https://t.co/K7wIeWXZfK

Jul 23, 2020 · 1,057 followers View post →
☘️Jen✨
@WorcesterGrl82 · X

OMG YOU GUYS HAVE TO WATCH THIS THIS LASY REACT TO THIS VIDEO OF @EthanDolan AND @GraysonDolan https://t.co/K7wIeWXZfK

Jul 23, 2020 · 1 like · 1,057 followers View post →
ゅʓ ₹˝ ね
@yurugyne · X

RT @gynecolo_obgyn: Twin Birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk) 2013年にNEJMから報告された、DD/MD twinでの帝王切開(CS)の優位性を確かめる試験。25カ国(日本はなし)106施設が参加し、32週から3…

Jun 26, 2020 · 3 shares · 2,469 followers View post →
にわ鶏子
@TikiTikiChicken · X

RT @gynecolo_obgyn: Twin Birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk) 2013年にNEJMから報告された、DD/MD twinでの帝王切開(CS)の優位性を確かめる試験。25カ国(日本はなし)106施設が参加し、32週から3…

Jun 26, 2020 · 3 shares · 363 followers View post →
ギネコロ
@gynecolo_obgyn · X

Twin Birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk) 2013年にNEJMから報告された、DD/MD twinでの帝王切開(CS)の優位性を確かめる試験。25カ国(日本はなし)106施設が参加し、32週から38週の1398人が選択的CS、1406人が経膣分娩(VB)に割付。主要評価項目は児の合併症、新生児死亡。両群で差はなし。 https://t.co/DQf1mhzvlB

Jun 26, 2020 · 15 likes · 3 shares · 3,140 followers View post →
にわ鶏子
@TikiTikiChicken · X

RT @gynecolo_obgyn: MD双胎、帝王切開と経膣分娩で児の予後に差無し。 twin birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk)のサブ解析。 施設間の資源の差があるので難しいですね。 元論文は25カ国106施設の物凄いstudyですが…

Jun 25, 2020 · 3 shares · 363 followers View post →
ギネコロ
@gynecolo_obgyn · X

MD双胎、帝王切開と経膣分娩で児の予後に差無し。 twin birth study(https://t.co/hmS2uFM0Nk)のサブ解析。 施設間の資源の差があるので難しいですね。 元論文は25カ国106施設の物凄いstudyですが、麻酔科医到着に1時間かかります！みたいなところは無さそう… https://t.co/8cgiJ9xn4f

Jun 25, 2020 · 25 likes · 3 shares · 3,140 followers View post →
Birth Congress
@Birth_Congress · X

Does planned #CesareanSection results in a lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in #Twin Pregnancy? This was investigated by J.F.R. Barrett, M.E. Hannah, E.K. Hutton, et al through a randomized trial https://t.co/Frl4hv1QCE

May 21, 2020 · 146 followers View post →
GraysContagiousLaughter (Cierra Riley)
@GraysContagious · X

This video by MamaDoctorJones is how I discovered the Dolan twins and I will be forever grateful to her for that. Love you, Dr. Jones. #MamaDoctorJones #TheDolanTwins ObGyn Reacts to Womb Simulator | Dolan Twins https://t.co/VgJzivW4qr via @YouTube

Mar 14, 2020 · 870 followers View post →
Books+Makeup=Heaven
@chrislech88 · X

@emilynoel83 Hi Emily! I just watched your Q&A and wanted to tell you about Mama Doctor Jones, an OBGYN Labor and delivery Doctor who has a YouTube channel. Smart & funny. Lots of comments from men about how much they learn about reproductive health.

Sep 30, 2019 · 10 followers View post →
jenna
@ILICITWALLS94 · X

she tried so hard to keep a straight ace https://t.co/6yodW55tsf

Sep 19, 2019 · 411 followers View post →
mykayla wilson
@mmw21 · X

So I know the womb simulator was a while back, but this lady is hilarious and if you want more answers about when you were in the womb she has it in comedic way @EthanDolan @GraysonDolan https://t.co/H02fe17ShJ

Sep 17, 2019 · 141 followers View post →
Sassy_Soda
@Sassy_Soda · X

I love this woman. Her vids are great and she's funny https://t.co/CkH0x4bLEo

Sep 17, 2019 · 626 followers View post →
Cass♡
@msadamsxoxo · X

@EthanDolan @GraysonDolan Another obgyn doctor with a YouTube channel reacted to y'alls video. It's pretty funny https://t.co/7FuTZ1otKG

Sep 16, 2019 · 548 followers View post →
Michelle Ross
@easilcat · X

@EthanDolan @GraysonDolan You MUST watch this Ob/Gyn @MamaDoctorJones watch & react to your womb simulator video. She was impressed... https://t.co/Bokv3fjfkJ

Sep 16, 2019 · 1 like · 209 followers View post →
Dr. Sue Gross
@DrSueGross · X

RT @MFMSperling: A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy | NEJM https://t.co/vRT2etDgGe this is a mus…

Jun 12, 2019 · 1 share · 3,034 followers View post →
Dr. Sperling MFM
@MFMSperling · X

A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy | NEJM https://t.co/vRT2etDgGe this is a must know study. @dryosefb

Jun 11, 2019 · 3 likes · 1 share · 4,088 followers View post →
New Life Prenatal Classes
@newlifeprenatal · X

#Multiples #prenatalclasses #scarborough #doula #goodtoknow #Twin #Pregnancy with the world's expert! Dr Jon Barrett (#Toronto). Twin #birth study NEJM article can be found here: https://t.co/OpH7LZTPCV https://t.co/y93cyrfuFI

Mar 10, 2019 · 1 like · 305 followers View post →