Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The conversations reveal a skepticism towards the way scientific articles are titled, with comments like 'Why do journals write titles like this?' and suggestions for more engaging titles, reflecting a superficial engagement with the actual research but expressing a desire for better communication and broader understanding.
Most posts are dismissive and skeptical about the relevance of the publication's title, rather than commenting on its actual content.
There is a moderate interest in the topic, as shown by curiosity about alternative titles and the purpose of the study, but not in the detailed findings.
The discussion shows low engagement with scientific details, focusing instead on critique of presentation and curiosity about study relevance.
The posts do not indicate that the publication has substantial influence; they mainly reflect a superficial reaction to the title and perceived accessibility.
https://t.co/uBrFwsQafB Why do journals write titles like this? There are Dozens of alternative titles that would cause people to actually read this study. @nick_krontiris @The_Nutrivore
Dr. Natalie Crawford discusses the impact of lubricants on fertility, how to time intercourse with ovulation, and which lubricants are safest for conception, including PreSeed, canola, and baby oils that do not impair…
https://t.co/uBrFwsQafB Why do journals write titles like this? There are Dozens of alternative titles that would cause people to actually read this study. @nick_krontiris @The_Nutrivore
B