Cochrane Database Syst Rev March 2014 PMID 24610050

Endometriosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Julie Brown, Cindy Farquhar

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 6 in Mar 2022

across 5 sources since Mar 2019

Extended reach

105,381

potential audience

Total likes

139

Video views

9,378

Mentions per month

Mar 2019 – Dec 2023

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter13 posts
News10 articles
Facebook5 posts
YouTube2 videos
Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Overall, the discussions demonstrate moderate support and interest, referencing the summary of 17 high-quality reviews and highlighting key topics such as pain relief and fertility, using phrases like 'summarizes the evidence' and 'reporting outcomes'. The tone is informative and respectful, with examples like mentions of 'pain outcomes' and 'significance of research', which contribute to an understanding that while the publication is regarded as valuable, it has yet to instigate deep engagement or widespread impact.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value of summarizing evidence from Cochrane reviews, indicating general agreement on its importance.

InterestModerate interest

The mentions of pain and fertility outcomes and specifics about endometriosis treatments suggest moderate interest, though comments lack deep enthusiasm.

EngagementNeutral engagement

Comments mainly consist of retweets and summarizations without detailed critique or personal reflection, reflecting a moderate level of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The repeated emphasis on evidence summaries and the connection to awareness campaigns imply some influence but limited immediate change or action.

Abstract in brief

This overview summarizes 17 high-quality Cochrane reviews on treatments for pain and fertility issues in women with endometriosis, highlighting that evidence quality varies from very low to moderate due to study limitations.
The reviews mainly focus on pain relief methods like GnRH analogues, which show some benefit, but the evidence is not strong enough to make definitive conclusions.
Also, the overall evidence points out challenges such as study bias and inconsistent results, indicating a need for better research to determine the most effective treatments.

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Management Options for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Explained

Dr. med. Ivo Faehnle - Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe · Jan 21, 2023 5,841 views

Assessing the Effectiveness of Gestrinone for Endometriosis Treatment

Gestrinone, a synthetic steroid hormone, has been used to treat endometriosis. This video reviews its efficacy and discusses concerns about its widespread use and the need for more robust research to determine optimal…

Dr. Mateus - Endocrinologista · Dec 11, 2023 3,537 views