Sci Eng Ethics June 2015 PMID 25027859

Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis.

Alexander Hevelke, Julian Nida-Rümelin

Mentions

9
Peak: 1 in Nov 2016
across 3 sources since Nov 2016

Extended reach

12,287
potential audience

Total likes

1

Video views

242

Mentions per month

Nov 2016 – Feb 2024

Where it's discussed

  • News6 articles
  • YouTube2 videos
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The posts highlight the relevance of the publication to broader debates about AI responsibility, with phrases like 'most analogous thing to AI/ML and use in warfare' and references to ethical issues that imply deep interest and concern. The tone indicates a recognition of the article's significance in shaping legal and moral considerations for emerging technological challenges.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the ethical considerations raised by the publication, with some supporting the notion that responsibility should be clearly defined.

InterestHigh interest

The posts display high curiosity about the implications of autonomous vehicle liability, especially in relation to AI and warfare, indicating strong engagement with the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments delve into the legality, morality, and potential regulatory frameworks, showing a moderate level of deep engagement and critical thinking.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions have the potential to influence perspectives on AI ethics and legal responsibility in emerging technologies, reflecting a meaningful impact.

Abstract in brief

  • The article explores who should be held responsible for accidents involving autonomous vehicles, considering legal and moral questions, including how liability should be assigned to manufacturers or users.
  • The discussion questions whether regulations should encourage the development of self-driving cars by shaping tort law, despite potential risks to human life, and examines the moral legitimacy of holding users liable when they might not have the chance to intervene in accidents.
  • The paper also considers a third approach where users of autonomous vehicles have no responsibility for accidents, focusing on whether this system is morally acceptable, with only one proposed method deemed ethically feasible.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Puff, a lightsaber Airman ⚔️
@KeraRolsen · X

@dhartaggie88 I'm focusing hard here, "Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis" because it the most analogous thing to AI/ML and use in warfare https ://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5

Jun 19, 2022 · 11,986 followers View post →

All mentions

Puff, a lightsaber Airman ⚔️
@KeraRolsen · X

@dhartaggie88 I'm focusing hard here, "Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis" because it the most analogous thing to AI/ML and use in warfare https ://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5

Jun 19, 2022 · 11,986 followers View post →
Regulating Emerging Robotic Technologies in Europe: Robotics ...
News

Permanent ID: Digital Object Identifier:10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5; PubMed ID:25027859; PubMed Central ID:PMC4430591; Microsoft Academic Graph Identifier: ...

Dec 26, 2025 View →
2016 Book AutonomousDriving | PDF | Autonomous Car | Autonomy
News

doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 23. IEEE: IEEE code of ethics. http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html (2014). Accessed 8 July 2014 24 ...

Dec 26, 2025 View →
Encyclopedia of The Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy by ...
News

... s11948-014-9565-5 leichter Sprache über die Einstellungsmö- Hilgendorf E ... 10.1007/s13347-017-0284-0 192 Autonomous Vehicles: Crashes. Martínez-Díaz M ...

Dec 26, 2025 View →
自動駕駛車輛的倫理、法律與社會影響. 導論| by 楊學智 @筆記 ...
News

doi:10.1007/s11948–014–9565–5; Matthias, A. (2020). The ethics of autonomous vehicles. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. AVCrashes.net ...

Feb 27, 2024 View →
Applied AI Ethics Reading & Resource List | by Jessica Rose Morley ...
News

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5. Hew, P. C. (2014). Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies. Ethics ...

Jun 29, 2019 View →
Are you ready for autonomous vehicles? | by Daniel Bohan ...
News

... 10.1007/s11948–014–9565–5. Merrill, Barbara. “Disabled Americans Deserve the Benefits of Self-Driving Cars.” TheHill, 19 Sept. 2018, thehill ...

Mar 24, 2019 View →