Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions show consistent support for the scientific consensus on human-induced global warming, with many posts referencing surveys displaying over 97% agreement among climate scientists, using words like 'scientific consensus,' 'majority of scientists agree,' and emphasizing the importance of understanding these findings to combat misinformation, which reflects high engagement and impact.
Most discussions strongly support the scientific consensus that human activities are responsible for global warming, highlighting high agreement and endorsement of the findings.
The discussions demonstrate high interest, as many posts cite specific surveys and scientific studies, emphasizing the importance and relevance of the topic.
Postings include detailed references to scientific surveys and debates, showing in-depth engagement with the research and its implications.
The widespread reinforcement of the consensus and references to authoritative studies suggest these discussions are intended to influence perceptions and inform public understanding significantly.
In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the observed warming, and only 17% agreed with the IPCC position that they caused >100% of the warming. https://t.co/7zbbCMdMpE https://t.co/uIjcKH8Lvw
People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 years of warming and propaganda, there is no significant trend in the responses. These % are likely true for scientists too. Figure 2 in: https://t.co/Rk8QatpPA6 https://t.co/ZLLE4VaOoa
Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ https://t.co/Ng9J2Uagkf
@GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@ona_temu_winna @andrei_poznan @jakubwiech @djankowski10 @lkwarzecha A >1800 klimatologów wystarczy? Czy znajdziesz jakąś inną wymówkę? https://t.co/rGFd3CMquv
@johnfocook Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
This video is the first in a series discussing common beliefs about climate change. We will explore scientific consensus and key studies that inform our understanding of human-caused global warming. Join us as we delve…
In this video, I respond to The Red Elephant's claims against climate change. With extensive evidence supporting the reality of global warming, the analysis reveals fallacious reasoning in his approach. Explore the…
This video explores the complexities of modern climate science, highlighting temperature changes over the last 24,000 years. It uncovers the driving mechanisms behind temperature variability, including the roles of ice…
This video explores how online culture influences climate change perceptions and decision-making, emphasizing the importance of personality and message content in shaping opinions.
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
@JVinos_Climate Here is an actual summary of the paper: Scientists who study climate change mostly agree that humans are the main cause of global warming since the mid-20th century. Those who disagree get more media attention. https://t.co/tveHAcPPZu
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
RT @JVinos_Climate: People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 yea…
People's opinions on the cause of global warming are unaffected by global warming. https://t.co/Yz39QgIfkK After 20 years of warming and propaganda, there is no significant trend in the responses. These % are likely true for scientists too. Figure 2 in: https://t.co/Rk8QatpPA6 https://t.co/ZLLE4VaOoa
@JKraschl @LSteinwandter Waren tatsächlich mal 90%, wenigstens 2014: https://t.co/GiOtlDW71e "90% of respondents with more than 10 climate-related peer-reviewed publications (about half of all respondents), explicitly agreed with anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) being the dominant driver of recent
@gargantuandwarf @JimBlack48 @ellelledeell @ChrisMartzWX https://t.co/xwjIpF8Cxe How many reviews one would need to send you for you single anonymous screenshot not explicating its method - or your homophobic memes which obviously support your scientific credibility?
@gargantuandwarf @ellelledeell @ChrisMartzWX Why do we need to send papers after papers to conspiracy guys while they never send some backing their weird argument? So FUCKING exhausting and how dumb are you not to be able to look at them! https://t.co/Rq6hPKxaL1 https://t.co/n5IaKOc4o0 https://t.co/xwjIpF8Cxe
@quasirob @_ClimateCraze @LucTrioen @FrederikSchenk @FGleed73314 When properly counted, the skeptics of mostly human-induced climate change are about a third, and only 17% agree with the IPCC. https://t.co/7zbbCMdMpE But this was never a question of counting hands. It never is in science. https://t.co/WnUtOc5zZJ
RT @Canalcienciaym: Falso: https://t.co/db4d7mPKH1 Apenas un 17% de los científicos climáticos apoyan la teoría del cambio climático antr…
Falso: https://t.co/db4d7mPKH1 Apenas un 17% de los científicos climáticos apoyan la teoría del cambio climático antropogénico https://t.co/kAJUf3vPDk https://t.co/oGCXdl83hI
UN TERCIO DE LOS CIENTÍFICOS CLIMÁTICOS NO SE CREE EL DOGMA CLIMÁTICO. https://t.co/MeSBgVi9MH
@velardedaoiz2 El consenso https://t.co/ZL4LTuYgmS
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @drddupuy: L’absence de consensus étudiée en 2014. Celui qui a l’outrecuidance de qualifier son contradicteur de
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
L’absence de consensus étudiée en 2014. Celui qui a l’outrecuidance de qualifier son contradicteur de
L’absence de consensus étudiée en 2014. Celui qui a l’outrecuidance de qualifier son contradicteur de
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
RT @JVinos_Climate: In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the…
In an open, peer-reviewed survey of 1,868 climate scientists, only 2/3 agreed that GHGs are responsible for >50% of the observed warming, and only 17% agreed with the IPCC position that they caused >100% of the warming. https://t.co/7zbbCMdMpE https://t.co/uIjcKH8Lvw
@Visitor51171015 @ejwwest @jemmm85517813 @kissingtruth @kevhof52 @Marcusgibson @Robert76907841 @xynyxs @25_cycle @TWTThisIsNow @CyfraithEcocide @GeraldKutney @MarcEHJones @DaleGribble_666 @AutumnMandrake @TMGFlorida @PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @priscian @MusicFrom90 @Proemed45 @Konrad_Chapman @Rebecca74083947 @NdabaningiMoyo @patfrank830 @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @Anvndarnamn5 @COrepKdeGraaf @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @Willard1951 @LxxResearcher @bitterwaterblue @AndrewDressler @BrknMan @JrmeBrwnCt @KiwiEV Asinine reasoning on your part. From @BVerheggen, co-author on multiple peer-reviewed studies showing the consensus: https://t.co/Zd4wpNaXtO https://t.co/rXYKh6vghB https://t.co/U0F3tuVFk0 https://t.co/X4cZakEr5v https://t.co/nTXLpcovJx
@federicoca61562 @echarareir @LANACION El corto período de tiempo es el cambio drástico. Siempre sucedieron eras de hielo, pero en períodos que abarcaban millones de años, no 100. La evidencia es abismal. https://t.co/Tq6AqKF9uG https://t.co/mrErLMZx58 https://t.co/zV1JFW4CIo
In 2012, roughly one-third of climate scientists were not "very concerned" If you only read the original publication, you wouldn't realize the opinions of scientists who study climate were so divided https://t.co/nwGu1ciZGE https://t.co/Tq98kb0iut
@SeppHinter4512 @fragebaer444 @joerg_spengler @WWF_Deutschland https://t.co/EW2ZfiqMte https://t.co/E2maMk2bzk https://t.co/LEtzSbtYse https://t.co/tzuR2G3Ye9 https://t.co/ViXl2rXp8O
@fvck1sl4m @Narkophobia @JacquesPinchard @SergeZaka https://t.co/2kc3izy3DC
@twit4thot @Race2Extinct so the knowledge?? Why focus on Cook 2013? https://t.co/inrZzJrnTC https://t.co/aDfFaoyPKB https://t.co/0xtifr8muG https://t.co/cxYJmXJ1LZ https://t.co/agnLCXWX2s https://t.co/Hu0BVKHOp4 https://t.co/rnGEueL6Qy https://t.co/aCfspPhRJi https://t.co/GnpVKUgCCg
@kevinnbass You'll probably like my paper on “Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming” by Verheggen et al. See the examples of what they included as "consensus" on human-caused climate change. I loved the paper on palladium... https://t.co/QtUmMzt4Zb
@FChecker76 @johnbeal77 @decymahon @jimmy_dore @WarwasC 4/ https://t.co/WVQvZ60dh6 This was 2014, and since then the science has become much more detailed and convincing, so I would expect that % has increased
@waldenmonk @DFliesstext @RichterHedwig Und wie gesagt, keine Theorie. Durch alle Modelle bewiesen die zur Verfügung stehen. Überwältigender weltweiter Konsens seit Jahrzehnten https://t.co/eCMreZ7XGa https://t.co/75GBYBx6Os https://t.co/s2BK4nmsmY https://t.co/LEtzSbtqCG https://t.co/DCfD5deQcy https://t.co/EW2ZfiqeDG
@PeterEvans1138 @Veritatem2021 I got some peer-reviewed sources instead of your tabloids. https://t.co/fhbfbYxQ8L https://t.co/4Wha6IvErH https://t.co/dDnffq86yh https://t.co/jU6EDc1RLh https://t.co/BnPi9q2Bok
@chrizqq @PeterMenke7 @HubertAiwanger https://t.co/uZZrA0N5Mv
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change https://t.co/t9meGcXD81 https://t.co/QSPoe2jKaT https://t.co/S1SRwynTH4 https://t.co/KHyPTPoGlE https://t.co/dr3LKhmb2Y https://t.co/Z7Q3ySTW4G
@redned59 @s14722839 @whostig @PhartStorm @call_me_tomasso @iluminatibot Thank you for the links, lots to read there and so far only scratched the surface but somehow I landed on (my first pick, not cherry picking) a survey that indicates of over 8k solicited only 29% responded so their 97% is of the 29%, not by any means all. https://t.co/09qZ1l9raq
@FChecker76 @AGW_is_bad @Mike_N_Prescott @JamesFranklinMt @Dardedar @Wolf_Tech @Anvndarnamn5 @ErnieStortz2 @JimBowersclimb @ejwwest @TWTThisIsNow @JamesZimr @alaskaN6658 @jimdtweet @pjselby01 @BrknMan @25_cycle @What_Doubelieve @climate_fact @Doc_Valerie @jpad319 @Bostons80113133 @DanCady @Ceist8 @kevpluck @realDonaldTrump @RepMTG @desertphile @NBPTROCKS @TheDisproof @MADmagazine @GOP Already explained why your nonsense is as asinine as Tol's. From @BVerheggen, co-author on multiple peer-reviewed studies showing the consensus: https://t.co/Zd4wpNaXtO https://t.co/rXYKh6vghB https://t.co/U0F3tuVFk0 https://t.co/X4cZakEr5v https://t.co/r29Pr1DufB
@FChecker76 @GodelieveTT @BernieSanders
@Andrnunez2 @Kloridrix @TatianaVentose Commence à lire autre chose que Twitter André, ça te fera pas de mal, il y a consensus. Va lire et ramène moi la preuve qu'il n'y en a pas : https://t.co/TVvI8o0DtZ https://t.co/1bQniU7LBP https://t.co/upk7b8PEp7 https://t.co/MnkbCxIJMn https://t.co/2NwduMza5S
@aveldjesgraaf @carlito9911 @RTLnieuws 1/ Found it: https://t.co/ewGmiYmjaK Uit dit onderzoek zou blijken dat 66% van de klimaatwetenschappers geloven dat de mens verantwoordelijk is voor meer dan 50% van global warming sinds 1950. Maar later bleken die "klimaatwetenschappers" deels te bestaan uit psychologen...
@FChecker76 @TheDisproof @ChrisBBacon3 @andrewp109 @Michael_D_Crow @SamuelQPrescott @aSinister @carlblom_robert @cjtjgeol @LarryTu05180091 @6lennybravo @fishyfish67 @Barbarajdurkin @Barrtecforever @MedBennett @TypicalDeviant @RuleByLogic @Tark4Real @Narvuntien @TonyGFunderburk @MKahn84 @DawnTJ90 @d_e_mol @_Ratzz_ @CCross1776 @IngersolRobert @NoHiJinx @RijpeW @GeoConservative @no2wind @gimmeabreak8 @Bossmustangfan @Climatehope2 @markosib @PoliticalToonz @MikeDel21893959 @RexHavoc8 @FehringerMartin @kbo1978 @RustyAway @SlagOffTwits @yestiseye @hardtimehardta1 @markcojuangco @TheRealStranded @MaxFichtner @TrevorDKidd1 @messengitis @jonsaxon67 @jsj11113 Did you bother checking all the other consensus sources and questionnaires? https://t.co/lc9cC2XVM7
@FChecker76 @ChrisBBacon3 @andrewp109 @Michael_D_Crow @SamuelQPrescott @aSinister @carlblom_robert @cjtjgeol @TheDisproof @LarryTu05180091 @6lennybravo @fishyfish67 @Barbarajdurkin @Barrtecforever @MedBennett @TypicalDeviant @RuleByLogic @Tark4Real @Narvuntien @TonyGFunderburk @MKahn84 @DawnTJ90 @d_e_mol @_Ratzz_ @CCross1776 @IngersolRobert @NoHiJinx @RijpeW @GeoConservative @no2wind @gimmeabreak8 @Bossmustangfan @Climatehope2 @markosib @PoliticalToonz @MikeDel21893959 @RexHavoc8 @FehringerMartin @kbo1978 @RustyAway @SlagOffTwits @yestiseye @hardtimehardta1 @markcojuangco @TheRealStranded @MaxFichtner @TrevorDKidd1 @messengitis @jonsaxon67 @jsj11113 And you are just getting antsy because an actual scientist is pointing out your misconceptions about science. Like climate survey questions. https://t.co/lc9cC2XVM7
@gadams999 @abineemmanuel4 @CNN The 97% consensus is a lie. That’s Dr. Mann, hid the information . If one of the responders said there was a 1% chance of man-made global warming. He counted it in the 97% consensus.
@DubiBoat @wilescape @polipolio @GlennCarr6 @DenisDaly @MedBennett @DawnTJ90 @d_e_mol @Tony__Heller @GoodCollie @marshgre @mentalmal1 @Canadianworker2 @HalBrow68884227 @WayneAllanH @rsqk9s @Rob46401650 @TheDisproof @TransparentMed1 @Jagster20548365 @RobMeekel @All_Day_SCIfi @Mainetain21 @jasonpaisley @StormSignalSA @MikeDel21893959 @rln_nelson @IanDJbrown2 @Barbarajdurkin @Knah22 @DLMtd2 @UCBearcat90 @RoyPentland @RijpeW @BridgetHolmstro @hadleyjohn @AffitThro @GeraldKutney @Cole44749821 @SapientHetero @hfjohnsen @0Sundance @nooil4pacifists @dodgydingo1 @cjtjgeol @QuixotesDonkey @alan_poirier @PACleanwater @no2wind @Lightswide Okay, let's go to the actual paper then. https://t.co/02sbKWLxgB As you can see Mr Mckitrick is misrepresenting the survey and removing the detail it has, when you consider things such as expertise of the survey respondants.
@hausfath @AndrewDessler @umairfan @readfearn Still, the AR5 attribution statement was a big improvement over that in AR4 because it focused on the net human contribution rather than only greenhouse gases. The AR4 statement was prone to being misinterpreted, even by scientists themselves: https://t.co/ilskEOm8XO https://t.co/e4bUKTmALH
@WanderSci @GrahamKirk17 @GeraldKutney @DougBebb @migilmor @MichaelEMann @DanCady And another https://t.co/QYObpWlcEi And another https://t.co/2GvOcpZCQu There are lots more. The results are hardly ambiguous.
@mefistofelleess @JacekLanuszny @jakubwiech Nie umiesz po polsku czytać? To manipulant Warzecha powołał się na to badanie. @jakubwiech powołał się na inne. Ponad 1800 naukowców zajmujących się klimatem Ci wystarcza? ⬇️ https://t.co/uqQuRTqjqt
@EwaZajaczkowska @jakubwiech @lkwarzecha Warzecha jako rasowy manipulator powołuje się tylko na wygodne dla niego treści. Ilu klimatologów, bądź naukowców zajmujących się tym obszarem nauki musi literalnie potwierdzić AGO, żeby Warzechę przekonać? ⬇️ https://t.co/ymT7KE7KF0
@ona_temu_winna @andrei_poznan @jakubwiech @djankowski10 @lkwarzecha A >1800 klimatologów wystarczy? Czy znajdziesz jakąś inną wymówkę? https://t.co/rGFd3CMquv
RT @klimaatVeranda: @PieterZijlstra2 @bobbrand_nl @LeraarWillem @bertveeningen @BVerheggen Ook voor veel klimaatwetenschappers blijkt dat e…
RT @klimaatVeranda: @PieterZijlstra2 @bobbrand_nl @LeraarWillem @bertveeningen @BVerheggen Ook voor veel klimaatwetenschappers blijkt dat e…
@PieterZijlstra2 @bobbrand_nl @LeraarWillem @bertveeningen @BVerheggen Ook voor veel klimaatwetenschappers blijkt dat een lastig dingetje, zie bijv de resultaten van onze survey https://t.co/TSDWpFOwJ3 en de (mis)interpretatie van bijv Judith Curry https://t.co/nh53lywFPh en https://t.co/PWvXJm1Zf1 -BV
@whitakerX @SebGorka That humans do not contribute to climate change is a laughable idea at any serious academic/scientific institution worldwide. If you do not believe me, see for yourself: https://t.co/gRCtZa3EY0 https://t.co/SQaI2GkNdv https://t.co/9T6mekHqz0
@SemiIsland @UnitedNationsRU Извиняюсь за неточность, не ученых, а научных работ. На эту тему существует научный консенсус, поэтому даже спорить с вами не буду, спорьте со всем научным сообществом. 1. https://t.co/DbAAlp70e0 2. https://t.co/33WJxVLe0z 3. https://t.co/GwlaGDppM2 4. https://t.co/SxmjRXDAmE https://t.co/KdIVu4R1im
@lazyjones7 @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@DrDMurray1 @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@JamesLinnell1 @AlexEpstein @WBrettWilson Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@Christophellie5 @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@nsromaine @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@tfer68 @AlexEpstein @Spin_Assassin Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@TrollskiTheBot @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@Vieux_Rhone @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@catandman @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@searchfeast @AlexEpstein Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@PigbirdJetFan @despicarello @AlexEpstein @RachelBock9 Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@RachelleMerle @AlexEpstein @JacobTBrunton Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@DanCady @GretaThunberg Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @johnfocook @NaomiOreskes Thank you for the excellent video.
Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming https://t.co/p7JEPsRyCj
@johnfocook @NaomiOreskes Thank you for the excellent video.
@Potn20 https://t.co/E7X0zMGUkL https://t.co/VvaHDH5g6r https://t.co/tgmftyZEv2 https://t.co/HBMP835kXd Ideias e vontades não contradizem ciência...
RT @BVerheggen: This includes results of our climate science survey: "Respondents who characterized human influence on climate as insignifi…
@Tom_Rellour @Leftfield9 @tveitdal Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@PlainPoppycock @TravellingAgro @hayrenos12 @LNGeconomist @tveitdal Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ https://t.co/6yLZQ6KE7L
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
@GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@DanAllan_2 @Soronya @Michael63746953 @Dar42 @tan123 @GretaThunberg @PreemSverige Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @HanbyAndrew @DanCady @adamdoner2 @svegress @EJ39206913 @GeraldKutney @WBrettWilson @gmbutts @JustinTrudeau @GretaThun…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @HanbyAndrew @DanCady @adamdoner2 @svegress @EJ39206913 @GeraldKutney @WBrettWilson @gmbutts @JustinTrudeau @GretaThun…
@Minorcynic @GretaThunberg @patrickharvie 2/2 Multiple independent studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @allaboutheben @turkeynator_85 @chrisalecanada @CDNEnergyCentre @ShellenbergerMD Scientific consensus is: https://t.co…
@allaboutheben @turkeynator_85 @chrisalecanada @CDNEnergyCentre @ShellenbergerMD Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@HbAlpaca @waldowns @SaltyPete1 @johnmwking @AdamBandt Asserting that Cook's work is denialist nonsense and I've already supplied four different surveys. Here they are again. Wm Anderegg https://t.co/hql5BaPjPR JS Carlton https://t.co/qpkEdhiVMG Neil Stenhouse https://t.co/LeNBaLJyRm Bart Verheggen https://t.co/kAYYiywP2M
@HbAlpaca @waldowns @SaltyPete1 @johnmwking @AdamBandt You're talking bullshit. Here are some of the surveys: Wm Anderegg https://t.co/hql5BaPjPR JS Carlton https://t.co/qpkEdhiVMG Neil Stenhouse https://t.co/LeNBaLJyRm Bart Verheggen https://t.co/kAYYiywP2M Show me scientific counter-indications.
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @cathmckenna 3/3 Scientific consensus: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84O…
@cathmckenna 3/3 Scientific consensus: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @IncredibleClim1: @johnfocook @IceDoctorD @tedcruz @johnfocook forgets to tell about his other study that found only 37% of scientists a…
@johnfocook @IceDoctorD @tedcruz @johnfocook forgets to tell about his other study that found only 37% of scientists agree that climate change is man-made. https://t.co/7iW0aTYVIi https://t.co/oCZd62ePIU
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
@johnfocook Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https:…
Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ https://t.co/Ng9J2Uagkf
@GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@Netpropheting @deedeesmiles4u @Baysie4 @GeraldKutney @dwallacewells @MichaelEMann @ClimateHuman Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@Netpropheting @deedeesmiles4u @Baysie4 @GeraldKutney @dwallacewells @MichaelEMann @ClimateHuman 2/2 Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb MMCC agreement studies: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@LandonCraigie Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@NotSweetDeeSez @Jimmy93130448 @GretaThunberg Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/f5RDjM6KuS Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/XMhmW4uXpw 97% https://t.co/QaoKWieume 97% https://t.co/RtU6iGJfXu 97% https://t.co/O1xePtYWNw 97% https://t.co/TuKW49WPXz 93% https://t.co/3VRIPhvPdP 91% https://t.co/cdX1B4PJkw
@BreitbartNews Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 16, 8963-8971 Publication Date:July 22, 2014 https://t.co/ZGkrbxARPw Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @Sven37903409 @Jimmy93130448 @GretaThunberg Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreemen…
@Sven37903409 @Jimmy93130448 @GretaThunberg Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@bloo40 @BrunoTheBridge @BrexitisGoodWTO @TeeteringAngel @StueyPhooey @IanGianni @MarinereSteve @Charlie_45uk @lisamariahoenig @dw2essex @brianbloop @ThatAndreCamara @Ciolfilicious1 @viv_cooper @SGTVance @paulsimpson3113 @sunick51 @Davidmetroland @ImSantini @JohnRya13591294 @JohnJac52201234 @MattGeeSymonds @Smithdsd11 @thegrimbarian @Macid3000 @VeuveK @RayJack97465601 @3112Mel @ra_gg12 @ConnorACotton @CharithRuckmal @Ray42827150 @Jag11814459 @mindedmusically @twvasi @geor97 @Chris_not_a_bot @StrongbowsPub @Graeme444 @The_Leaver @f505eb72b9cd493 @CharlieHicks90 @Sir_Tommy_ @JonattonY @El_Chele85 @ecmagenda @Kitchy2016 @AnimousUK @BrexitGone @JTillx This survey of 1868 climate scientists shows that 90% of the most active climate researchers are convinced of anthropogenic global warming. https://t.co/Sb2TrVkYU3
@SolashPaul Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84OA 97% https://t.co/UV97p20wDZ 97% https://t.co/usz3FL5si8 97% https://t.co/rCCH9txqh2 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Ugur8 93% https://t.co/834RIZoKOU 91% https://t.co/SDe58c0ZCJ
@Civildebate2017 2/3 Scientific consensus: https://t.co/o1CzBx2JVD Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGTQtX2 97% https://t.co/UV97p1IVMr 97% https://t.co/usz3FLn3GI 97% https://t.co/rCCH9tP1FC 97% https://t.co/JKSX2Uy5PI 93% https://t.co/834RIZGmdu 91% https://t.co/SDe58ciB1j
@larskohler https://t.co/8ZFkITEpOt
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
RT @ScienceNotDogma: @GeraldKutney Scientific consensus is: https://t.co/o1CzBxkkNb Studies on MMCC agreement: 100% https://t.co/FZNAGU84…
Almost all climate experts agree that greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming. https://t.co/V9lxArrjZv #ClimateStrike #Science #Politics #AusPol https://t.co/JonM9phIhU
@TamaraHensley16 @jc_bic4rd @GretaThunberg https://t.co/naSYKmfCsj actual link to said FAQ.
http://bit.ly/2VTrPMl-stenhouse 91% https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es501998e
Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming - Verheggen, 2014 (Opiniões de cientistas sobre a atribuição do aquecimento global) https://t.co/GNEtjdq1wx
@jeangilhaus @Onychom @RJDownard @GasmaNZ @Freewillburnin @PhoenixTruths @IngridIngwah @RTW_Tweets @deepinsights19 @Nahdya777 @lesgantssexuels @StandBackUp2 @rupejonner2 @Baxter51557003 @PObdura @hackingx2 @A__Stout @intelligent50 @rorylane @derbybbb @Glad2bAtheist @YICYAC @1pckt @JK43108 @KaeAndersen @Devil4President @TheGod_Particle @C_82l @The_Real_BiM @GrayHouse77 @tighe15 @yrysbryd @PleasureOfDoubt @Jandrewgotsguns @grumpy_dai @zythophiliac @Grimasaur @AllistairGraham @Falchion14 @Mogleeone @FearTheSphere_ @Scotty_2017 @pbfrsox @alllibertynews @jpcqg @AwayFromTheKeys @brainouty @KyleCol61968866 @luzeternapr @S_A_Malcolm Scientists' views about attribution of global warming https://t.co/iZ82gaBfPV
JV
ꜱᴅ
N
S
BJ
LF
G
II
B
MC
JW
FT
P
MM
RC
伊
KA
F
M
F
VS
CM
CG
BW
AP
J
MD
LB
SA
SG
KP
C
Cﻥ
J
S
DT
ER
CR
IH
D
D
PS
R
RR
LN
HB
DT
RC
OY
IS
DM
R
TD
PU
AR
CJ
M
DD
DD
BK
VH
E
D
JL
DL
CM
DP
D
A
JR
OM
TO
AS
GD
PS
C
J
W
JD
TD
TK
D
PC
JM
N
JB
F
N
BV
BD
B
BB
BV
K
SC
LS
Xレ
CE
ZF
PN
DD
JC
D
JD
CB
RS
DK
BB
GE
IC
E
NA
NF
CS
JS
O
NO
K
RH
MM
F
D
AA