A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops.

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

L’étude : https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

SW

Skeptics in the Pub Wien

@ViennaSitP · X

@peter_simone Das widerspricht der wissenschaftlichen Evidenzlage: https://t.co/dpkqEgfjf7 Metastudie zum Anbau von gv-Pflanzen: Weniger Pflanzenschutzmittel, mehr Erträge. Die Vorteile sind in Entwicklungsländern sogar deutlich größer als in Industrieländern.

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@nthierry @fmbreon Les OGM, notamment les OGM Bt, permettent de réduire les phytosanitaires.

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

@ConfPaysanne @ECVC1 Source https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

YB

Yann Duroc est sur BlueSky

@DurocYann · X

Que je suis las … mais las qu’on en soit encore à affirmer des choses pareilles alors que 1- la réalité est plus complexe et nuancée cf meta analyse ici https://t.co/g2bUIPPKLq 2- continuer à présenter « les ogm » comme un ensemble uniforme critiquable avec 1 seule approche https://t.co/0e6IEEBZHy

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

Hier die Quellen und Belege für meine Behauptungen:

AA

Ad Astra

@SpaceScienceGod · X

“GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%.” https://t.co/SDvT96VDQc https://t.co/LA9Bw5sXfQ

VG

Val Giddings

@prometheusgreen · X

@KiloFxTrot the data show otherwise https://t.co/ieCR1WwtKK & https://t.co/6DljsNYWbe https://t.co/mC4ZAq1e6M

VG

Val Giddings

@prometheusgreen · X

@elleonwheels @GEHonesty my sources are peer reviewed & confirmed by experience. yours make money sowing unfounded fears. neither data nor experience support their claims. https://t.co/xJ2vl0ogs4 & https://t.co/o7LQPHM4L9 & https://t.co/ieCR1WwtKK

VC

Voodoo Child

@OEzebilo · X

@ActivistJerry @chude__ NAFDAC does assess GMO safety: https://t.co/kNUShqYh8K ✅ WHO: No proven harm from GMOs https://t.co/85YyYPy8Ku

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@rvandrieu @barriere_dr @atlantico_fr Bcp d'études montrent que les OGM sont favorables à la biodiversité : https://t.co/CtTNBtMpeg https://t.co/uYfurzZVt3 https://t.co/wvnOA0hzdp https://t.co/r575oI37p0 https://t.co/DmjkhPwgpO Tout ça n'est qu'un prétexte. Le but est d'interdire les OGM pour ce qu'ils représentent

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@mandubian @barriere_dr @atlantico_fr Bcp d'études montrent que les OGM sont favorables à la biodiversité : https://t.co/CtTNBtMpeg https://t.co/uYfurzZVt3 https://t.co/wvnOA0hzdp https://t.co/r575oI37p0 https://t.co/DmjkhPwgpO Tout ça n'est qu'un prétexte. Le but est d'interdire les OGM pour ce qu'ils représentent

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@NoehWahn Les OGM sont favorables à la biodiversité : https://t.co/CtTNBtMpeg https://t.co/uYfurzZVt3 https://t.co/wvnOA0hzdp https://t.co/r575oI37p0 https://t.co/DmjkhPwgpO Etc... Et pourtant les OGM sont toujours interdits.

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@NunoLui81735612 Toujours pas... https://t.co/csC7JESXMn https://t.co/A7xVWUDSPx

DC

David Cornish

@barnoolut · X

@BlairHealt68622 @kevinfolta @ianfmusgrave @SkepticJonGuy @ChildrensHD @USRightToKnow @ChiaraGiannare1 Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLOS ONE, 9(11), e111629

LC

Ludovica Ignatia Di Cianni

@DiIgnatia · X

RT @simonmaechling: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/OhTzKZhXKQ

JK

Jackie Kensler

@mz55qrf · X

RT @simonmaechling: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/OhTzKZhXKQ

CJ

Chaos Captain Jonathan

@mysticpolijon · X

RT @simonmaechling: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/OhTzKZhXKQ

SM

Simon Maechling

@simonmaechling · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/OhTzKZhXKQ

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@L__J__M @DIMENSION_YT @Knoppix5 @marinetondelier Si on regarde la science (l'objet du premier tweet), les OGM c'est au global -37% de phytosanitaires selon cette meta-analyse : https://t.co/csC7JESXMn On parle ici à la surface. Si on raisonne à la quantité produite, c'est bien plus... https://t.co/CJQ4txznKZ

JV

Jean-LuK, derrière le site "Éclectiquement vôtre"

@jlukphoto · X

@mauduitf @MacLesggy @ConfPaysanne @uniGoettingen Ce n'est pas tel ou tel, c'est une « méta-analyse » ! Le voici, bonne lecture. https://t.co/Qmr4jq1KXa

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

@ConfPaysanne @ECVC1 Source https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

JD

Jan Deschoolmeester

@JDSchoolmeester · X

@JeremieVaneeckh @BertjanOlivier @BVHecke Meta-analyses wijzen nochtans uit dat boeren er meer aan verdienen en dan vooral kleinschalige boeren in het arme Zuiden. Dat met meer opbrengst en minder pesticiden. Economisch houdt het dus perfect steek om te pleiten voor ggo's. https://t.co/YPjXvU9ZZD https://t.co/jNycNFSfNl

R

RuralEnt81

@RuralEnt81 · X

@TerryDaynard @FCCagriculture ChatGPT analysis of: Klümper and Qaim’s 2014 meta-analysis published in PLOS ONE, titled A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. https://t.co/bydfEGrLtT

This was a meta-analysis of the impacts of touch with some surprising and unsurprising outcomes:

RD

Robert Wager #donotdonatetoGreenpeace

@RobertWager1 · X

@rexdelay Almost 30 years of commercial use and what have we found. Reduced chemical inputs, increased yields and increased income 9particularly for developing world farmers. https://t.co/QuLsB5pL6D

IF

I'm not your friend

@No_your_friend · X

@mariodeleow Qué pasó mi cientifico del bienestar? Vas a subir UN SÓLO ARTICULO QUE AFIRME TUS DICHOS? https://t.co/F6zgffATHl

MC

Michel Ceuppens

@Michel_Ceuppens · X

RT @JDSchoolmeester: @StukkenL @Pdbruyne Bij jaren aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek zijn er nooit gevaren voor mens of milieu gevonden. Ook s…

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@JoelGREA @Cobra_FX_ @MacLesggy @emma_ducros @sebastien_abis @astropierre @GrainHedger @RemDumDum @JouveauM @laranquette https://t.co/csC7JESXMn

JD

Jan Deschoolmeester

@JDSchoolmeester · X

@StukkenL @Pdbruyne Bij jaren aan wetenschappelijk onderzoek zijn er nooit gevaren voor mens of milieu gevonden. Ook stellen metastudies dat er door ggo's minder pesticiden gebruikt worden, met meer opbrengst en meer winst, vnl voor arme boeren. /2 https://t.co/MMZ2KeIc86

F

Filiecs

@Filiecs2 · X

@jasonaramburu @AgBioWorld @dr_andrealove Yet the best way to *reduce* applied pesticide use is with genetic modification, which RFK Jr. is also against: https://t.co/0Qh0bEWuap Until we come to accept GMOs, safe(er) pesticides like Glyphosate-based ones are better than "organic" pesticides. https://t.co/BnPOUbZUgX

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@JoanElizShields This is organic activist propaganda. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Always pleased to refute activist propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

AP

Andrea C. Love, PhD

@dr_andrealove · X

@McCarthy_JT https://t.co/p7SVqXOfFk You’re good at cherry picking.

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@TimothyAWise @Afsafrica @BIBA_Kenya @NnimmoB @newhumanitarian This is 100% activist propaganda. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Always pleased to provide facts that refute the lies spread by this activist. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @TerryDaynard "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Always pleased to refute the lies posted by this anti-vax troll. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@spacefish2 @Riaan256 @Mari922221193 @TimothyWSchwab He's wrong. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." This is what anonymous troll are opposed to. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@Jay1Pat @IATP Thank you for the personal attack and for publicly confirming you're opposed to farmers being more profitable. GM crops increase farmer profits by 68%. Always pleased to provide facts that refute anonymous troll lies. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

@Haute43 Yep https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq https://t.co/T1C8xAG0nd

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

@MartinHaeusling Fake News! Seit Jahren ist bekannt, dass #Gentechnik unter dem Strich zu einer erheblichen Reduktion des Einsatzes von Pflanzenschutzmitteln geführt hat. Und übrigens produziert der Mais genau das Insektenvertilgungsmittel, das Bio-Bauern versprühen! https://t.co/aGgweIXa3d

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @derekrcarlson "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22% & increased farmer profits by 68%." It's great when evidence soundly refutes anonymous troll lies. This troll opposes farm profit & higher food production. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@jimmyfalco77 @SciSustAg Pesticide use has decreased by 37% following the adoption of GM crops. It's always important to have facts. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

MB

Matthias Berninger

@berninger71 · X

@moodindi @theNASciences Also have a look at this study: https://t.co/sbQfCkefrq

IF

I'm not your friend

@No_your_friend · X

@pauletta_sofia Ningún estudio hasta hoy a determinado un riesgo del consumo de maíz transgénico por humanos. Ninguno. https://t.co/F6zgffAlRN

HH

Hashtag Hugemoji

@hashtaghugemoji · X

RT @ZigaMalek: Sedaj pa k empiriji. Študije so pokazale, da GSO znižajo porabo pesticidov za 37%, povečajo hektarske donose za 22% in poveč…

ŽM

Žiga Malek

@ZigaMalek · X

Sedaj pa k empiriji. Študije so pokazale, da GSO znižajo porabo pesticidov za 37%, povečajo hektarske donose za 22% in povečajo dohodke kmetov za 68%. https://t.co/okJGNujNUS

DB

Dyamond Brokenberry

@VegasDegen2_xrp · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @stopthespraybc @greenfork This is a deliberate lie. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%,…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @greenfork This is a deliberate lie. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Farmers benefit immensely from GM crops. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@Kr1s_m3th4 @MathieuMf @MacLesggy Donc vous devrez être résolument pour les OGM puisque la réduction des phytosanitaires, c'est déjà la réalité : https://t.co/csC7JESXMn https://t.co/EnWrLPsRQK

TP

Thomas Potuschak

@potuschak · X

@oliverSorg @Axel_Bojanowski @ulfposh Nein, Bauern der Dritten Welt profitieren von modernem Saatgut. Siehe zB: https://t.co/T57fm8W56A

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to all 3 of these benefits from GM crop production. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@thehealthb0t This is 100% propaganda. A robust assessment of 15 years of evidence quantifies that GM crops increase yields by an average of 22%. Always pleased to refute propaganda with evidence. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

GM

Guy Montag

@sclehdorn · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @chuckbenbrook @SCMPNews Without evidence of mistakes, this is just more activist propaganda. The facts are that GM crop…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@chuckbenbrook @SCMPNews Without evidence of mistakes, this is just more activist propaganda. The facts are that GM crops reduce chemical use and increase farm profitability. Why are you calling these mistakes? https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@OlivierFAUVEL1 @AgnesRunacher @EmmanuelMacron @GabrielAttal @gouvernementFR @MFesneau @Agri_Gouv @TerresDeProgres Pourquoi mentir ? Les OGM, c'est -37% de phytosanitaires en moyenne. https://t.co/csC7JESXMn Et on ne parle pas de tous les projets qui ont fini dans le placard à cause de l'opposition aux OGM. Comme cette pomme de terre résistante au mildiou : https://t.co/F7e06VZmkJ https://t.co/vR5SSqo7Dc

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." "37% less", is very easy to understand. Glad to refute your lies and propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc This is a lie. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Always pleased to refute anonymous troll propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @AgBioWorld This is more propaganda from this anti-vax account. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Always pleased to refute troll propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

PT

Plant thief

@Goblinpobre · X

@Adriano97865061 @Alienadosapiens @monarkbanido Obviamente encerrou o contrato, péssimo marketing uma história dessas, igual GMO, completamente inofensivo mas quantas empresas trocaram de milho só pelo marketing. https://t.co/s2dhKoIUnK

JD

Jan Deschoolmeester

@JDSchoolmeester · X

De metastudie kan je hier zelf nalezen. Probeer er eens op te letten dat tegenstanders hun eigen beweringen nooit staven met wetenschappelijke studies maar enkel met eigen gefabriceerde rapporten. https://t.co/MMZ2KeIc86

SN

Soulèvement Néolibéral

@SlvmtYIMBY · X

@MarcMilanini Les HT ↗️ la consommation de pesticides, les BT la font ↘️. En moyenne, dans le monde l'adoption des OGM HT et BT fait ↘️ la consommation de pesticides (malgré l'effet des HT. Des ↗️ peuvent coexister avec des ↘️ associées aux OGM. https://t.co/Ki2vbUwRte https://t.co/gpdmc7LAmt

YB

Yann Duroc est sur BlueSky

@DurocYann · X

@pgISYEB voici les sources evoquées https://t.co/61KOBSNp9O https://t.co/2ceuL5rm76 https://t.co/TVa3b36I11 https://t.co/Czu1MqoVYl https://t.co/utCkTplo3l

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

@OlivierFAUVEL1 @jul_ach @agritof80 Au contraire, selon la meta-analyse de référence financée par l’UE, ils ont permis de les baisser de 37%. https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq https://t.co/rGQOyzyMO9

SN

Soulèvement Néolibéral

@SlvmtYIMBY · X

@sabine_38 https://t.co/gpdmc7LAmt

BL

Baptiste Labeyrie

@bapt_labeyrie · X

@l_agroeconaute @gueguenmicrobio @marietouss1 Globalement : https://t.co/X2xLDF2CO0

YB

Yann Duroc est sur BlueSky

@DurocYann · X

Que je suis las … mais las qu’on en soit encore à affirmer des choses pareilles alors que 1- la réalité est plus complexe et nuancée cf meta analyse ici https://t.co/g2bUIPPKLq 2- continuer à présenter « les ogm » comme un ensemble uniforme critiquable avec 1 seule approche https://t.co/0e6IEEBZHy

YB

Yann Duroc est sur BlueSky

@DurocYann · X

@Taigasangare @QuentinC_ILM Bon je suis en

TS

Tschooo Siffert

@tschooo · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: „On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%.“ https://t.co/pEdpwfAIOd

SW

Skeptics in the Pub Wien

@ViennaSitP · X

@peter_simone Das widerspricht der wissenschaftlichen Evidenzlage: https://t.co/dpkqEgfjf7 Metastudie zum Anbau von gv-Pflanzen: Weniger Pflanzenschutzmittel, mehr Erträge. Die Vorteile sind in Entwicklungsländern sogar deutlich größer als in Industrieländern.

KR

Klaus Riede

@KlausRiede · X

@TimoKuentzle ah ja, danke, die https://t.co/DnlCWLQjPw #Metaanalyse...."Limitations Several of the original studies did not report sample sizes and measures of variance."...

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

Hier die Quellen und Belege für meine Behauptungen:

VG

Val Giddings

@prometheusgreen · X

@GMFreeze @cop28 no worries. here you go https://t.co/XmCuAUm3SO, https://t.co/chf1zhULEg, https://t.co/ynlOpOJsjI and https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc

EF

El gaucho francés

@ElGauchoFrances · X

@AmidesLobbies @AssoPollinis Les OGM n'augmenteraient pas le rendement?! "On average, GM technology adoption has [...], increased crop yields by 22%," https://t.co/5fNrJigwSi

SM

Simon Maechling

@simonmaechling · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @NetworkofIndig1 The best way to increase yields would be to adopt genetically modified crops, which reduce chemical use…

FO

First Officer

@Erst_Officer · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @NetworkofIndig1 The best way to increase yields would be to adopt genetically modified crops, which reduce chemical use…

SS

Stuart Strand

@stuartestrand · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @NetworkofIndig1 The best way to increase yields would be to adopt genetically modified crops, which reduce chemical use…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@NetworkofIndig1 The best way to increase yields would be to adopt genetically modified crops, which reduce chemical use, as well as increasing yields and farm revenue. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

YB

Yann Duroc est sur BlueSky

@DurocYann · X

Une meta-analyse montre une augmentation de 37% https://t.co/JV24B7BRGT

Ici une metanalyse +37% doi.org/10.1371/jour...

VG

Val Giddings

@prometheusgreen · X

@ThePublicSquare @ProfeErnesto1 The scientific literature and vast real world experience show the claims in this piece of negative impacts from GMO corn on ecology and human health are completely false; so too the claims of harms from associated glyphosate. https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc

RW

Richard Webster

@RichardWebste16 · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @IPESfood @AgroecologyGoal @EmileFrison Why is it you fail to mention the dramatic yield lags from organic crop producti…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@IPESfood @AgroecologyGoal @EmileFrison Why is it you fail to mention the dramatic yield lags from organic crop production? Yield lags of up to 70% will only ensure malnourishment and starvation are sustained. This is an utterly unethical attitude. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

HB

Hidde Boersma

@Hiddemhigh · X

@Cicero0123 @M_Kuipers @GreenpeaceNL https://t.co/AV1lpCZ2FX

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

@JostMaurinTAZ Hier der Link zu einer entsprechenden Sudie, finanziert von der EU und dem dt. Entwicklungshilfeministerium. Hat im Gegensatz zu manipulativen Umfragen auch gewisse Aussagekraft: https://t.co/aGgweIXa3d

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@WarraichRHassan @TimothyAWise @thenation @AGRA_Africa @Afsafrica @SAFCEI @agcconnect @GRAIN_org @IATP Over 50% of the 17+ million farmers that grow GM crops are in developing countries. It's great these farmers use fewer inputs and are more profitable. Evidence like this certainly refutes propaganda spread by some activist accounts. https://t.co/o6Ol0G7BJd

JD

Jon Paul Davis

@jonpauldavis · X

@Terrence_STR @SallyMayweather GMO crops have led to a 37% decrease in pesticide use when adopted. This is not a Monsanto issue. https://t.co/rnBhvM0O9p

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@IATP @foe_us This is yet another lies from this organic activist account. GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Always pleased to refute activist propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@SAagrotoxins @gmopundit @TimothyAWise @NatCounterPunch @StacyMalkan @Afsafrica @IATP Plant breeders' rights & patents result in higher yielding varieties. Why are you opposed to farmers being more profitable? I support lifting impoverished farmers out of poverty. GM crops increase farmer profits by 68%. It's great to see evidence like this https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

@fremont_gildas @maselli121 @GerardAraud @ziontree Cette meta analyse financée par l’UE relève une baisse de 37% des pesticides. Et en augmentant les rendements, on diminue la déforestation (l’agri en est la 1ere cause). Il n’y a pas de monoculture en

DA

Dr. Darren Abbey

@thebiologistisn · X

@KennethBarrows3 @SciSustAg On average, 22%. https://t.co/D3JaJKvSeS

SD

Steve Donoghue

@donnahude · X

@brianmlucey @greenparty_ie You can add GMOs to that taboo. Nothing against organic farming, its good for the soil and biodiversity, but you can't feed a population with it. The environmental benefits for GMOs are well documented,especially in reducing pesticide use. https://t.co/RI2vMrVKqb

SM

Simon Maechling

@simonmaechling · X

@donanderledes Of course, thanks for asking. https://t.co/OhTzKZivAo

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @derekrcarlson @CaulfieldTim It's utterly disgusting that you call improvements in food production, reduced chemical use and higher farm revenue evil. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SW

Skeptics in the Pub Wien

@ViennaSitP · X

@peter_simone @MartinSchulzeB @Die_Gruenen Kleinbäuerinnen in Entwicklungsländern, die echte Wahlfreiheit genießen, derweil so: Im Schnitt 37% weniger Pestizide, 22% mehr Ertrag und 68% mehr Profit, wenn sie Gv-Saatgut nutzen. Listen to the Scientists! https://t.co/dpkqEgfjf7

JM

JM Mulet

@jmmulet · X

@EvaC11 @HelenaRambla @srfunnes Creo que tu información está muy sesgada. https://t.co/9MHqKr9aar Todavía no me has respondido por qué te preocupa tanto el glifosato y tan poco el paraquat.

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

RT @TimoKuentzle: @ATFblindpost @derspiegel Also diese Studie hier, nur 1 Bsp. von vielen, hat schon 2014 rausgefunden, dass #Gentechnik de…

TK

Timo Küntzle

@TimoKuentzle · X

@ATFblindpost @derspiegel Also diese Studie hier, nur 1 Bsp. von vielen, hat schon 2014 rausgefunden, dass #Gentechnik den Pestizideinsatz um annähernd 40 % gesenkt hat. Finanziert von der EU u. dem dt. Entwicklungshilfeministerium. Sind Sie bereit, Ihre Meinung zu überdenken? https://t.co/aGgweIXa3d

SS

Stuart Strand

@stuartestrand · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @NonGMOProject Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to improving food security as GM technology adoption has…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@NonGMOProject Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to improving food security as GM technology adoption has increased crop yields by 22%. No one should support activist groups like this that are opposed to innovations that increase food production. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SW

Skeptics in the Pub Wien

@ViennaSitP · X

@JensKarg 2) Wirksamkeit von GVOs für Bauern (auch Entwicklungsländer) und Pestizidreduktion von @MatinQaim: https://t.co/dpkqEgfjf7

B

bettina

@bettygim · X

RT @agritof80: @nthierry @fmbreon Les OGM, notamment les OGM Bt, permettent de réduire les phytosanitaires.

C

ChristopheB.

@agritof80 · X

@nthierry @fmbreon Les OGM, notamment les OGM Bt, permettent de réduire les phytosanitaires.

SE

Sven Engel

@Popchen2 · X

https://t.co/xaZFK12vEO

ZK

Ze pp knill

@uphold_freedom · X

RT @Cobra_FX_: L’étude : https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

SW

Skeptics in the Pub Wien

@ViennaSitP · X

@dr_kaeufl @SvenjaSchulze68 @delarabur Gv-Saatgut generell hat sich diese Meta-Studie angesehen: https://t.co/T4rPcqDVKB "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. ...

AL

Ana De Lion

@anydel · X

RT @Cobra_FX_: L’étude : https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

AC

Antoine Copra

@Cobra_FX_ · X

L’étude : https://t.co/kvPzHOD0Cq

NO

Nikolai Ott

@replayNIKO · X

Sonst gibt es auch viel gutes von Qaim et. al., zB https://t.co/cmzK4sYo1W oder https://t.co/NgDm4E8pgx. Für Developing Countries empfiehlt sich auch Green (2012) https://t.co/9lUF9JAlsu. Gibt eine Vielzahl von guten Papers für die Beamten im Entwicklungsministerium.

B

bwspezi

@bwspezi · X

@SvenjaSchulze68 Wissenschaftsfeindliche Fake News aus einem Bundesministerium

WS

Wackes Seppi

@SeppiWackes · X

@RegnaultRoger @simonmaechling Klümper et Qaim, 2014 https://t.co/ciSmTiDcgY

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@audlemagronpaul @EuropePAN This is yet another deliberate lie by PAN. GM crops reduce pesticide use by 37%. It's great when evidence readily refutes propaganda like this. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @BryanHeit Thanks for publicly confirming you're opposed to 22% yield increases, which are vital to improving food security. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

CT

Christoph Tietje

@TietjeChristoph · X

@DonGiardino @AspiIrie @Europarl_DE Die Wissenschaft sieht das aber leider etwas anders: "The meta-analysis reveals robust evidence of GM crop benefits for farmers in developed and developing countries." https://t.co/zQnzN4nIcM

AB

Alvaro Díaz Bedregal

@adiazbedregal · X

RT @stuartsmyth66: @stopthespraybc @zoltan5kalman @intotheweedsdoc @usask GM crops reduce pesticide use. Always pleased to refute propagand…

SS

Stuart Smyth

@stuartsmyth66 · X

@stopthespraybc @zoltan5kalman @intotheweedsdoc @usask GM crops reduce pesticide use. Always pleased to refute propaganda with scientific evidence. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

TS

Tschooo Siffert

@tschooo · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: „On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%.“ https://t.co/1RzlsYhOss

AM

AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8

@AngelaTC · X

@BowTiedLowrider @RepThomasMassie I will amend my statement. If you are a farmer, or if you want to buy food that is not astronomically expensive, you need pesticides to improve crop yields, drought tolerance and disease resistance. GMO technology has reduced chemical pesticide use by https://t.co/l7nrEq1Yda

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdqk7M #gmo

RB

Rohit Bhatia

@BhatiaRohit10 · X

RT @APCoAB: GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by…

A

APCoAB

@APCoAB · X

GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries. https://t.co/busw7juFJr

FR

Franko Restović

@frankorestovic · X

@IanDJbrown2 @CBorgono @LoriAnnBurd Hi, you should read the following peer-reviewed article: https://t.co/k4LlxMmrdy

S

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @debunkdenialism: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

DΩ

Dr. Mindermast Ω

@DrMindermast · X

RT @RobertWager1: @Seed_Commons @stuartsmyth66 You know not of what you speak. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Cr…

MR

Michael Robin

@MiketheScribe · X

RT @RobertWager1: @Seed_Commons @stuartsmyth66 You know not of what you speak. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Cr…

RD

Robert Wager #donotdonatetoGreenpeace

@RobertWager1 · X

@Seed_Commons @stuartsmyth66 You know not of what you speak. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops Wilhelm Klümper and Matin Qaim * On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%.

A

APCoAB

@APCoAB · X

RT @rishityag: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops "Despite rapid adoption of GM crops by farmers in many countri…

S

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @rishityag: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops "Despite rapid adoption of GM crops by farmers in many countri…

RT

Rishi Tyagi

@rishityag · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops "Despite rapid adoption of GM crops by farmers in many countries, controversies about this technology continue. Uncertainty about GM crop impacts is one reason for widespread public suspicion". https://t.co/MxTdGoisdh https://t.co/nRPbOwi5Qz

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

RT @debunkdenialism: @donanderledes A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: "On average, GM technology adoption has r…

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

@donanderledes A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a

AA

AlainCo #JeSuisPrometheen e/acc

@alain_co · X

RT @debunkdenialism: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

S

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @debunkdenialism: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

CH

Cadence M Hewett

@spineless_trash · X

@GMOFreeUSA https://t.co/sR6JgdWsby https://t.co/qTJlHnbEgK

WJ

Wes Jones

@WesDJones · X

@AlainPannetier @TimothyAWise @HalBrow68884227 @AlanGuebert @IATP @FamilyFarmCo @tomphilpott @shawnsebastian @IanDJbrown2 @victor_suarez @nongmoreport Depends on the GMO, and the ability to use herbicides in place. Roundup ready was developed for this reason. As for yield size and profitability, this meta-analysis shows an increase in both due to GMO. https://t.co/vx9O09w04R

WJ

Wes Jones

@WesDJones · X

@TimothyAWise @HalBrow68884227 @AlainPannetier @AlanGuebert @IATP @FamilyFarmCo @tomphilpott @shawnsebastian @IanDJbrown2 @victor_suarez @nongmoreport https://t.co/vx9O09w04R

M

MaskedWannabeFarmer

@MaskedFarmer · X

RT @MatinQaim: @domos89 @GrainClub @wiko_greifswald @bmu @bmel @GrueneBundestag @uniGoettingen Hier der Link zur Meta-Analyse: https://t.co…

MQ

Matin Qaim

@MatinQaim · X

@domos89 @GrainClub @wiko_greifswald @bmu @bmel @GrueneBundestag @uniGoettingen Hier der Link zur Meta-Analyse: https://t.co/1l42aVys2v Außerdem ein neuerer Übersichtsartikel: https://t.co/jUcw6Fp7L7

OA

Oli Alix

@ocamd97 · X

RT @debunkdenialism: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

MQ

Matin Qaim

@MatinQaim · X

@BusseTanja @norwichruesse @testbiotech @OhneGentechnik Ja, dieselbe Leopoldina. Gentechnik und Gene-Editing können einen wichtigen Beitrag dazu leisten, den Einsatz chemischer Pestizide zu verringern. Für insektenresistente Bt-Pflanzen auch schon vielfach gezeigt. https://t.co/1l42aVys2v

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

W

wingdings

@wiingdiings · X

https://t.co/D3nNaQX8Ow , https://t.co/Nvw1uoSi6Z , https://t.co/Ci4EkLS0Nx , https://t.co/gdBryxaz6N

DD

Debunking Denialism

@debunkdenialism · X

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

S

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @OFABnigeria: #PLOSONE: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/ITsuoIYQmp

ON

OFAB Nigeria

@OFABnigeria · X

#PLOSONE: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/ITsuoIYQmp

VG

Val Giddings

@prometheusgreen · X

RT @AJStein_de: @PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers…

GV

gmopundit (David Tribe Ph.D.) Vinceremo

@gmopundit · X

RT @AJStein_de: @PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers…

AS

Alexander J. Stein

@AJStein_de · X

@PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers in developing countries, see e.g.: https://t.co/dFC9LLRZnH ; https://t.co/I9c0z0eVyy ; https://t.co/rG2Oiye8pR ; https://t.co/ypnokBRcdY & https://t.co/JJur2XlyNJ

GM tech adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22% and farmer profits by 68% http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629