Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The interactions reflect high engagement and interest, with posts discussing the detailed phylogenetic trees, the significance of the findings, and citing the original paper and figures, highlighting its importance in the field of insect evolution research. Words such as 'comprehensive,' 'monophyletic,' and references to 'phylogeny' demonstrate a deep understanding and appreciation of the work's scientific impact.
Most discussions recognize the study as a significant advancement in understanding insect evolution, supporting its findings.
The discussions show high interest, with references to detailed phylogenetic trees and comparisons to prior research.
Participants engage by referencing figures, methods, and implications, demonstrating thoughtful analysis.
The widespread sharing of figures and mention of the study as a 'gold standard' indicates high perceived impact.
Referencias El esquema de la filogenia que aparece en el tuit nº2 es una modificación de la filogenia publicada en este interesantísimo "paper": Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763–767. doi:10.1126/science.1257570
「コオロギはイナゴよりゴキブリ」に近いはガセ。 色と食性だけで分子進化系統樹を上書きする暴挙。 それが定説の様に流布されるTwitterの危さ。 https://t.co/kKVrahdlEU https://t.co/45v1vig6Bd
63) REFERENCIAS El gráfico del tuit nº3 es un pequeño fragmento de un esquema estupendo procedente de este interesantísimo trabajo: Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763–767. doi:10.1126/science.1257570
@Hcomosa This one sounds about accurate. (c) David K Yeates from a Science paper published in 2014 (DOI: 10.1126/science.1257570) https://t.co/5blTSzI8Tz
メモ2 https://t.co/VugIECuzzy
#icanhazpdf Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution - Misof et al. 2014
Explore how sequence alignment with MAFFT aids in understanding insect evolution, dating back 479 million years, and the development of flight 406 million years ago, providing clarity on insect phylogenetic…
This video explores insect evolution using genomic data and highlights the importance of bees for biodiversity and ecosystem health.
RT @hilow49484331: 甲殻類（crustaceans）と六脚類（hexapoda）を合わせて単系統になることは、分子系統解析で10年以上前から分かっていた。 甲殻類は側系統群になるため、分子系統の分類群としては用いない。 https://t.co/tMdzspy…
甲殻類（crustaceans）と六脚類（hexapoda）を合わせて単系統になることは、分子系統解析で10年以上前から分かっていた。 甲殻類は側系統群になるため、分子系統の分類群としては用いない。 https://t.co/tMdzspyhmJ https://t.co/0rM0L9SDqq
メモ2 https://t.co/VugIECuzzy
RT @prosopocoilusun: Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R. S., Donath, A., Mayer, C., ... & Zhou, X. (2014). Phylogenomics resolves…
Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R. S., Donath, A., Mayer, C., ... & Zhou, X. (2014). Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763-767. https://t.co/HZxn1yUbey
@brown_birds this might still be the gold standard https://t.co/Gh7XZNJdX5 but I used this for my last pub https://t.co/erN9x3H9l0
RT @FrVerheggen: @Hcomosa This one sounds about accurate. (c) David K Yeates from a Science paper published in 2014 (DOI: 10.1126/science.…
@Hcomosa This one sounds about accurate. (c) David K Yeates from a Science paper published in 2014 (DOI: 10.1126/science.1257570) https://t.co/5blTSzI8Tz
RT @koronanoukyuus1: 「コオロギはイナゴよりゴキブリ」に近いはガセ。 色と食性だけで分子進化系統樹を上書きする暴挙。 それが定説の様に流布されるTwitterの危さ。 https://t.co/kKVrahdlEU https://t.co/45v1vig6…
RT @koronanoukyuus1: 「コオロギはイナゴよりゴキブリ」に近いはガセ。 色と食性だけで分子進化系統樹を上書きする暴挙。 それが定説の様に流布されるTwitterの危さ。 https://t.co/kKVrahdlEU https://t.co/45v1vig6…
「コオロギはイナゴよりゴキブリ」に近いはガセ。 色と食性だけで分子進化系統樹を上書きする暴挙。 それが定説の様に流布されるTwitterの危さ。 https://t.co/kKVrahdlEU https://t.co/45v1vig6Bd
RT @evopalaeo: More awesome insect phylogeny figures today: This one from Misof et al 2014 https://t.co/JaLdEBnjNo https://t.co/FoG5E03I5O
@reraku 2017年に昆虫網の高次系統関係を決定づける論文が出ており、無翅昆虫を含む広義の昆虫として扱われるグループの単系統性が示されました。 最も近縁なグループとして甲殻類のムカシエビが示されています。 Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. (2017) Science 763-767
#icanhazpdf Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution - Misof et al. 2014
Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution https://t.co/DYGd7AIX6x
RT @ajblake05: @tyler_nelz Misof et al 2014 (https://t.co/418xfjfYAS)? This shirt is at least 10 years old, the design is probably older. I…
@tyler_nelz Misof et al 2014 (https://t.co/418xfjfYAS)? This shirt is at least 10 years old, the design is probably older. Isopoptera is separate from Blattodea and Strepsipterans are in limbo with the flies.
@merche12190 Gracias. Ese árbol filogenético de insectos se encuentra completo en el paper: Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution (2014). DOI: 10.1126/science.1257570 Se puede acceder al artículo aquí: https://t.co/qhP7Iry7rc
@Ghankel1 Por supuesto
@MothPotato Cool! I see Boreus was included here and indeed Mecoptera and Siphonaptera are each monophyletic: https://t.co/cX09bW4ofD
Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R. S., Donath, A., Mayer, C., ... & Niehuis, O. (2014). Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763-767.
Referencias El esquema de la filogenia que aparece en el tuit nº2 es una modificación de la filogenia publicada en este interesantísimo "paper": Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763–767. doi:10.1126/science.1257570
63) REFERENCIAS El gráfico del tuit nº3 es un pequeño fragmento de un esquema estupendo procedente de este interesantísimo trabajo: Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763–767. doi:10.1126/science.1257570
DB
K
FB
早糸
AD
DS
玉
加恐
P
KD
TP
な
P
RM
Oゴ
G
FO
AB
NW
DA