Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, these discussions reflect a strong consensus among scientific and informed communities that biological sex is multi-dimensional, supported by examples such as chromosomal variations and references to Claire Ainsworth's article 'Sex Redefined'. The tone is serious, citing peer-reviewed studies, and emphasizing the importance of scientific accuracy versus outdated binary views, which underscores the high impact and engagement across the group.
Most discussions concur that biological sex is more complex than the traditional binary model, with many explicitly referencing the scientific consensus or articles like 'Sex Redefined' that support this view.
Participants show high curiosity and engagement, frequently citing specific scientific studies, articles, and examples of biological variability, demonstrating a deep interest in the topic.
Posts include references to scientific papers, debates about definitions, and calls for further reading, indicating a profound level of analysis and conversation depth.
The collective discussions aim to challenge outdated notions and promote a scientifically accurate understanding of sex as a spectrum, which could influence perceptions and educational approaches widely.
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
@returnofloosa @AriDrennen https://t.co/iR99oT1SDd
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male By Claire Ainsworth & Nature magazine www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Biologie … ist vielfältiger als ein Entweder-Oder. Neben XX, XY gibt es viele chromosomale Varianten (XXY, X0, Mosaike), die natürlich, gesund und menschlich sind. #GeschlechtsSpektrum, kein binäres Dogma. #WissenschaftErsetztDenStammtisch. #intersex #biologie #geschlecht #science #diversity
Nature (versión original): Ainsworth, C. (2015, February 18). Sex redefined. Nature, 518(7539), 288–291. https://t.co/wZNfNjRf1d
Così progressiva che ti risponde il Twitter calcio. Anyways: 1) https://t.co/lZ52PQzpvi 2) https://t.co/TUPqfKgrzO 3) https://t.co/0eBw95ysIr E ne ho ancora, basta chiedere https://t.co/qfokq5yn6J
This video presents Sari van Anders' sexual configuration theory, exploring gender and sex. It discusses biological and social processes, highlighting that research shows most male-female brain differences are minimal…
This video explores concepts related to sex, gender, and the importance of understanding trans rights, aiming to clarify misconceptions and promote awareness through a personal learning journey.
@anonymousREX17 https://t.co/dVtoOQoDZh A decent place to start if you want to know how much more complicated
@AviatorCaribe @DavidJPba 1. God? No god needed. This is science not boogie-woogie. 2. Go read 'Biological Exhuberance', by Bruce Bagemihl. Might be an eye-opener for you. 3. There are more than two sexes See; https://t.co/8sh5PIyXco And we are VERY aware that there are more than two genders.
@VampireAngeldd @JosephC11969332 @Suzierizzo1 Democrats bend over backwards to include everyone, you may see this as a weakness. I see it as trying to include everyone, and that is a noble thing. It is like picking nerdy kid to be on your kickball team, because you know it will make his day! https://t.co/koAWHmd9bi
@rallychez @JosephC11969332 @Suzierizzo1 The coolest thing about science for me is that when you think you know something that sounds so basic, nature shows you, it isn’t always that simple. https://t.co/koAWHmd9bi
@WallStreetApes Start reading. There are more than 2 sexes. https://t.co/8sh5PIypmQ Don't argue with me, friends ... go argue with human biology. And biological science really doesn't give a rat's patoot about your fond beliefs. And gender is different from sex. This kid needs to work on that
@ali_allon @HazelAppleyard https://t.co/N6hHY9XtH1
@WallStreetApes 10/22/18 Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic. Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female & male. https://t.co/IDA5WPwlBM @ThisWeekABC @MeetThePress @FaceTheNation @NewsHour @Morning_Joe @GStephanopoulos @GOP @jonkarl @kenmartin73
RT @Maz_querade: Così progressiva che ti risponde il Twitter calcio. Anyways: 1) https://t.co/lZ52PQzpvi 2) https://t.co/TUPqfKgrzO 3) http…
RT @Maz_querade: Così progressiva che ti risponde il Twitter calcio. Anyways: 1) https://t.co/lZ52PQzpvi 2) https://t.co/TUPqfKgrzO 3) http…
Così progressiva che ti risponde il Twitter calcio. Anyways: 1) https://t.co/lZ52PQzpvi 2) https://t.co/TUPqfKgrzO 3) https://t.co/0eBw95ysIr E ne ho ancora, basta chiedere https://t.co/qfokq5yn6J
@Mullerian_Duck @18_th_brumaire @iqbalmohamedMP @bencsmoke https://t.co/GXhNNiVZOo Go debunk yourself.
@trumplicans2024 No, according to Scientists there are TWO SEXES & an unknown # of Genders.. https://t.co/3gIHPtwXsr
@HazelAppleyard Toma, un articulo científico en el que refuta tu odio: https://t.co/40aeyMck7T
@PedroPRSales @cortezpsol Sexo é um espectro na biologia, e na biologia avançada é mto mais complicado doq XX e XY, mesmo falando só sobre humanos. https://t.co/9KPLl9wVll
@MikeFullingto10 @EricRussell82 @MarcLobliner https://t.co/4RneyoUPIc
@MonsterCap3698 @EricRussell82 @MarcLobliner Yeah? https://t.co/4RneyoUhSE
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
@UKStopWhinging @iqbalmohamedMP @bencsmoke "Almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body." https://t.co/CiTr5YMME7
@HughJanus1912 @iqbalmohamedMP @bencsmoke Actual science says: "Almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body." https://t.co/CiTr5YMME7
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
RT @itagaki_lunedi: 例えば孫がいる７０歳男性に子宮が見つかったと。これは抗ミュラー管ホルモンが胎児のころ分泌されなかっただけで、間違いなく男です。別に男女の境界があいまいな例ではないです。エインズワースの主張する他の例もこの記事でうまく反論されてます。 ht…
@JonTheDonfamily @FriendOfAstraea @NerscylIa ok so according to this article, "Some researchers now say that as many as 1 person in 100 has some form of [difference or disorder of sex development]." genq would you call all those 1/100 as intersex? most intersex people are raised as one or the other https://t.co/rgwSCSSVhI
@Lilith_Atheist https://t.co/qXC0IHXjX1 https://t.co/bfYxwG4Qv1 https://t.co/fhsBlLc8gb
@grok @Ehoneisdagoat @sillyrabbitfafo @Riley_Gaines_ https://t.co/q2xPXEpY2L This proves your understanding on genetics is wrong
@Mullerian_Duck @LitmusConf19810 @BonesofdoomTV @MezziM321 @EiratheIntern https://t.co/xUdjoYmoHB https://t.co/1bnUwVvQQd
@travelingflying Ya, maybe, and maybe not. It's not so clear, black and white. https://t.co/z4pf3yO1fH
@Kostaki317 @EvgeniosTzav https://t.co/VQmau7pSui
@KristenWaggoner Educator here. This is absolute hogwash. Respecting someone’s pronouns and preferred names is common curtesy. We do it with *everyone.* Here’s some info about genders so you can be better informed: https://t.co/KT5KIavmn0
RT @SmegyBoikov: @DevinPifer @FeeHeath1975 @MAJKongSAC @ap528018635 @syl_sylv7966337 @MatthewSputnick @ElijahMarkT …and genetic sex is a bi…
@DevinPifer @FeeHeath1975 @MAJKongSAC @ap528018635 @syl_sylv7966337 @MatthewSputnick @ElijahMarkT …and genetic sex is a bit more complicated than XY pairings on chromosome 23 https://t.co/FtTHUmFOiX
@TheGlobal_Index @beyoncegarden https://t.co/WPV3xz6ktf Yes, I trust real science. Not simplified middle school science.
@krystal_is_dumb The myth of binary sexes is just that a myth.... Chromosomes dont always tell the whole story.... https://t.co/3gIHPtwXsr
@starrfieldroad @paranoi71748599 @entimos3 https://t.co/5R2IwbW018
@JimDodgy @lefttheleftffs @CustardSem76395 @salltweets You should've used the Megamind meme when you had the chance https://t.co/1FVY81SRNG. https://t.co/VGlSnFoREf https://t.co/NhfruXzLMT https://t.co/88nxu5pfrV
@nel57587 @ummmwazza @RevengeofCave https://t.co/HJKBDxwAjI I don't know why you think convincing someone with screenshots is somehow going to work.
@Joseeloma_ Acepto tu afirmación de dos sexos, pero el binario radica en la anisogamia reproductiva: solo gametos masculinos o femeninos definen categorías funcionales. El artículo "Sex Redefined" destaca complejidades fenotípicas, no propone sexos intermedios viables ni cuestiona el
Sex is not binary, it is simply bimodal (even that is an over simplification though) The conservative mythos is to say that sex is solely determined genetically. This is objectively false. Chromosome mapping is only one of MANY characteristics (1/7) https://t.co/hW9uCCEkrn https://t.co/WGsYDYbfVF
@CatBased42069 @Matt_1269501 @PeriklesGREAT Mmhmm you're a profound geneticist...dipshit. lol https://t.co/14itG3YcdA https://t.co/sEymuUbyPH
@donkitrk99 @returnofloosa @AriDrennen Then why did you post an article titled “sex redefined” which is concerned with sex, not gender, and the meme you keep reposting says “advanced biology” instead of, for example, “advanced psychology” or “advanced sociology”?
@returnofloosa @AriDrennen https://t.co/iR99oT1SDd
@valxxem @nightbanegooner scientifically speaking there are many genders and more than binary sexes that exist. There are ppl with chromosomes that are not just XY (male sex) and XX (female sex) here are some sources if you want to read them https://t.co/pue0PnYjof https://t.co/TvtCqlKxz1
@marranacookme @southern_dr @listen2tish @mmgallo64 Ooh it's actually much more fun and complicated than that! Since you seem interested, here are some cool articles on the science! https://t.co/buDr0hogxw https://t.co/1Q4TDBoCB6 https://t.co/zvofNQRKqE
@Famasbtw @krystal_is_dumb https://t.co/JuzrPSoEw4.
@Chris_Davis66 @banana_large @Rsauvage77 @Emilia__writes @9mm_smg https://t.co/YkyI0apWbg. If you were wrong would you be willing to adapt your understanding for the inclusion of intersex people? Because you sound like their problem. https://t.co/JOnjY8u5SO
@HarshRealityChk @9ed321ad6ff14ca @NancyMace Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic — Article in Scientific American: https://t.co/e3Cne4BZe6 Differences of sex development (DSD): Current Issues and Controversies — Recent review article: https://t.co/ffc3br6cDB
@arnold_the_good @VanZuchtelen @benonwine There are intersex people for example https://t.co/EoBcKBHN8M
@lpazosp @Marioverber mi estimado don pendejo, el estudio del sexo y el genero es la sexologia, no la biologia pero ademas https://t.co/ipDFSPaeiG
@Pathfinder4545 @michaelshermer You are a bad biologist then. https://t.co/rwSGXHVDCw
@FindXSnowflakes @MAGAVoice https://t.co/hfiTAfK3qT https://t.co/a0ZJm3m8Jh
@alejaris0305 @Wolferxtreme TL;DR Intersexual puede divirse en más categorias pero pueden resumirse en variantes de dominancia masculina o dominancia femenina https://t.co/yOePguDQT3 https://t.co/tqDi1H4nYI https://t.co/cziO2KocfL https://t.co/pdTebI7CEc https://t.co/tOPkLILBvD
@legaltweetz @Skywarped33 They, would be a geneder pronoun not a sex thing, what? If these are the sorta “facts” you pull you must make some amazing non sequetor arguments in court Also https://t.co/GyxOoFf44c
RT @SMCADMAN: "Androgens could be implicated in the earlier death of males, but recent studies suggest that female mosaicism may enhance li…
@marygerdt @GlennYoungkin @winwithwinsome @Riley_Gaines_ @POTUS @NCAA @Olympics @youtholympics @EDSecMcMahon @RealLOCOParents @LoudounParentCo @LoudounSheriff @ShellyArnoldi @fcpsnews @FairfaxCountyPD @AmerMedicalAssn @NIHDirector_Jay @DrMakaryFDA @AmerAcadPeds For the unknowing: gender ≠ sex. There are more than 2 arrangements of chromosomes and gender is a socially defined construct that exists on a continuum. https://t.co/7BT138gUeV
@HatzKatzn @SianHerfield @JonTheDonfamily @_FlutterGirl @JennaFights4You Wait no more. Source: Scientific American https://t.co/ds2om1LjYl
@grok @PellePeloton12 @PaulSimon1971 @CUSocOfWomen The very existence of intersex people puts paid to your medieval claim of binary sex, sex hasn't been considered as binary for more than ten years https://t.co/ZDEbTv8E8J
RT @TriciaFrasman: 1/ Is sex really a Spectrum? There are a couple of articles which have been widely quoted as "proving" that sex is not…
@rcardo03 @jk_rowling https://t.co/kMntGmwpSB
@laniedarian71 @darrenddd31 @BertaProudDad You're mad schools are teaching biology? https://t.co/TVoOYfwuju https://t.co/81ZuOeLT0F https://t.co/aVQAK62W1s https://t.co/oJpWVDQZr6
@grok @VideoGuy67 @haynes_wiley @preta_6 @BCnursemidwife "Sex redefined," Claire Ainsworth's 2015 article in the journal Nature, demonstrates that your claim is false and that a wide range of the world's leading biologists define sex as existing on a spectrum, calling binary notions of sex "simplistic" https://t.co/n6yjr3Ilrz
@KatarinaHill2 @LissaKEvans @ThatTimWalker https://t.co/4oDQgolNPV https://t.co/AZzXRmb1yX https://t.co/jWeUeIUNxS https://t.co/IjwhP8YGTS https://t.co/78lVZoefij https://t.co/5yc0UsJRcY You may want to tell all these scientists that they're part of a belief system - go ahead and let me know how it goes
@the_lost_infj @PascaleD76079 @PaperClipsHouse @alexafaucher https://t.co/0g1OH6vX1s
@kingaagnieszka5 @LonyWolf4 @SzeryfzX uważającej istnienie 2 płci głównie na bazie klasyfikacji z gamet, artykuł jest zresztą mocno otwarty na interpretację 2/2 https://t.co/WyVBy8fBqT
@BopBoopBeepBeep @SchrodingerMaxx @airokunomega @Eympra I don't think you understood what I even meant https://t.co/UVYb7Uk6tG My main point was that two dominant categories exist, however biology creates exceptions, and I brought that up only because you were claiming that there's no middle ground when there is.
RT @SMCADMAN: "Androgens could be implicated in the earlier death of males, but recent studies suggest that female mosaicism may enhance li…
@doramoutot @Femelliste_TV on a ainsi quantité d'états intermédiaires , à différents degrés, entre homme et femme. https://t.co/0g1OH6wuR0
@tonysullybooks @soniasodha https://t.co/VR5OiCIqoD theres more than 2 sexes aswell
@CampsallPeyton the way that’s not true even if you were talking about sex https://t.co/QFg67NaeFp
@IdrisElbow0 @Hamis3_ @DPB037 @shaneyyricch Biology is not "pseudoscience." You can ignore science, but again, at your own peril. https://t.co/FL6fObSxF2
@zephyroth31 @Alex11297130 @KweenInYellow I know you can’t read but maybe try https://t.co/pRuE8Ptirn
@Sam__LUFC @ZackPolanski Here you go, Sam. Is Scientific American good enough for you? https://t.co/SAk0D0HBnV
https://t.co/fEvhI8eplg
@AdjunctTavore @tscheldt Is de wetenschap niet met je eens. Jammer sneeuwvlokje https://t.co/TqDaw0DZC6
@bigkman23v2 @houheffna @BerniceKing Genetists aren’t making up fake realities. https://t.co/Bp5ud9tYfm
@ggj36943959 @Alex11297130 @KweenInYellow Just typing something in all caps doesn’t make it true jfc lol Please actually read something beyond what you remember from the 3rd grade or what the Harry Potter lady told you Like ffs do the smallest amount of self education https://t.co/pRuE8Ptirn
@PurpledPill Mocht je jn staat zijn te kunnen lezen, Doe eens gek en verdiep je eens ergens in. Maar het zal wel van een afstandje 'onzin! Onzin! Onzin!' Roepen want feiten zijn zo vervelend als ze je waanillusies verstoren https://t.co/TqDaw0DZC6
@fireballfilms @benryanwriter Gender isnt binary: https://t.co/G6px39Mxlm
@BopBoopBeepBeep @3renJ4eger @lecanardnoir @GrnElects @TheGreenParty So you lied Good enough, people know what they're dealing with. A liar Read this one and let me know when you have Oh already done Liar https://t.co/Ol3l9b7yHd
@amike1030 @3kliksphilip Read em and weep baby It's not trans people misinformed on sex, its people like you https://t.co/LN66FvG1rQ
@SucreePomme @JenniferSey Like this scenario, where a mother of three learns that most of her cellular chromosomes are XY, male. https://t.co/3xsmKwNwsD
RT @chasteanddenied: This is your reality now: sex redefined, pleasure restricted, your orgasm the ultimate prize, your only release outsid…
@xLodada @ApexImperialist @Reddit_Retards Yes, the people who have studied this more than randos on the internet. https://t.co/Cc9ufDdIbM
@ApexImperialist @Reddit_Retards The people working in the relevant field of study aren't relevant? Medical experts. https://t.co/Cc9ufDdIbM
Less screaming, more reading. https://t.co/2y6cUv8z5R https://t.co/KU5zuTcvt6
@aricnesbitt as usual GOP ignores actual science- The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! https://t.co/4ULUPgCaAZ
@FederalistRedux Here's some science for you to ignore on sex https://t.co/1WrDxM6J3U
@R6Jura @JenniferSey Human biology is complicated. That's the reality.
@darren_od80 @SpoutinghornPC @JenniferSey Educate yourself on the complexity of human biology.
@Crystal_Boat @JenniferSey It's all very individual and dependent on if and when they began treatment.
@Gurrzy4 @JenniferSey But they may be girls
@PDirac63847 @WhimMartin @JenniferSey Give this a read, biology can be a bit more complex
@R6Jura @JenniferSey Give this a read. It's a complicated subject https://t.co/3xsmKwO4ib
@Gurrzy4 @JenniferSey Here's a gentle intro. https://t.co/3xsmKwO4ib
@Prometeus156 @MRobertsQLD by multiple gene networks, with biological sex being a balance that can shift postnatally. Link: https://t.co/43wd2tURa8 "Teaching the complexities of biological sex determination" (2025) - A review focusing on the diversity and complexity of sex development mechanisms,
@Prometeus156 @MRobertsQLD pathways that regulate gonadal development, emphasizing the dynamic and complex nature of sex determination. Link: https://t.co/QRusgveJMe "Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic" (Scientific American, 2018) - Explores the concept of sex as a spectrum regulated
RT @SMCADMAN: "Androgens could be implicated in the earlier death of males, but recent studies suggest that female mosaicism may enhance li…
@WoodwarddianneJ They cite Ainsworth, who had to clarify her position. https://t.co/7lcR5Yo9fl https://t.co/YxqSIQd0Bl
naturaleza entenderlos como un sistema binario puede resultar limitante. Hay artículos científicos que hablan de esto último, por ejemplo: https://t.co/oJ088HcsSI Share this article
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
@Liz__Moz @le_chaman C’est exactement ce que rappellent les publications biomédicales, le sexe est multidimensionnel (chromosomes, gonades, hormones, morphologie, identité) et pas réductible aux seuls gamètes https://t.co/qFEUw0ll9Z https://t.co/EAooF16XIh
@Liz__Moz @miss_oly_vander @le_chaman En physio, le sexe n'est pas que les chromosomes. C'est un spectre incluant hormones, gonades, anatomie et genre. Par sa transition (hormones, opérations), une femme trans se déplace sur ce spectre pour être bien plus proche d'une femme que d'un homme. https://t.co/qFEUw0ll9Z
Alt text retrieved
Yes. She makes some silly mistakes. Remember she is no longer a scientist - gave it up for some reason to be a journalist. If I am wrong though, where in her article is "sex redefined"? What is a sex according to this article? (I can tackle more specific errors if you like too!)
@whocallsitXtho The sex spectrum (modified from Ainsworth, 2015) https://t.co/x30myQcWpJ. https://t.co/XZG75bgi59 https://t.co/74EiaYO06y
@jcs_moncada @melisqbpolitica @RaulGtzNR Ainsworth, C. Sexo redefinido. Nature 518 , pp. 288-291 (2015). https://t.co/mtAuco4Sna Fausto Sterling, A. Sexing the Body. Gender politics and the construction of sexuality (2000).https://t.co/h5PL48gNQf
@EggMarkus @KvonLeutewitz @AndreBuchheim @Klimahunger @michael01130274 @Weltwoche @KoeppelRoger "Vereinfacht" bedeutet hier eine klare, evidenzbasierte Darstellung, nicht Vereinfachung um der Ideologie willen. Biologische Klassifikationen dienen der Präzision in Wissenschaft und Medizin – basierend auf Gameten, nicht auf Spekulation. Quellen: Nature (doi:10.1038/518288a).
@manden1804 @KvonLeutewitz @AndreBuchheim @Klimahunger @EggMarkus @michael01130274 @Weltwoche @KoeppelRoger Danke für den Hinweis. Ich bleibe bei evidenzbasierten Fakten und Quellen wie Nature (doi:10.1038/518288a) und WHO, um die biologische Binärität zu untermauern – Leugnungen ändern nichts an der Wissenschaft.
@manden1804 @KvonLeutewitz @AndreBuchheim @Klimahunger @EggMarkus @michael01130274 @Weltwoche @KoeppelRoger Genau, die Gametenart ist nicht zufällig: Sie korreliert mit binären Merkmalen wie Chromosomen (XY/XX), Hormonen und Körperbau. Das unterstreicht die biologische Binärität des Geschlechts. Quellen: Nature (doi:10.1038/518288a), WHO.
RT @KirstiMiller30: FACT~ A biological concept of sex, whether based on chromosomes, anatomy, hormones, or other criteria, does not fit nea…
RT @KirstiMiller30: FACT~ A biological concept of sex, whether based on chromosomes, anatomy, hormones, or other criteria, does not fit nea…
RT @KirstiMiller30: FACT~ A biological concept of sex, whether based on chromosomes, anatomy, hormones, or other criteria, does not fit nea…
FACT~ A biological concept of sex, whether based on chromosomes, anatomy, hormones, or other criteria, does not fit neatly into two rigid categories!!!!! https://t.co/Gg6dgvIaz7 https://t.co/tBeCvJQ99m
The Sex Redefined opinion piece? It does not redefine what a sex is. For a start.
Simone de Beauvoir French philosopher, writer, and feminist; her 1949 book The Second Sex redefined gender roles, inspiring modern feminism. #History #Icon #Feminist
At last you pick a paper. Except it is not a peer reviewed paper but a magazine opinion piece from a journalist. Curiously, despite being called "Sex Redefined" it does not actually redefine what a sex is does it? Where in the article does it say what "female" means? Good luck.
Nope, and a simple Google search gives a myriad of (reputable) sources to provide information: Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic | Scientific American share.google/sWMKEKuXjS12...
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
性別の再定義：2つの性別という概念は単純化しすぎている https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/ 機械翻訳でざっと読んだだけだけどとても興味深い。 ＞彼女の体は2人の個人の細胞でできており、（略）細胞の片方のセットは、通常女性を形成する2つのX染色体を持ち、もう片方はX染色体とY染色体を持っていました。40代半ばで3人目の子供を妊娠しているこの女性は、体の大部分が染色体的に男性であることを初めて知りました。
Oops!
Nature (versión original): Ainsworth, C. (2015, February 18). Sex redefined. Nature, 518(7539), 288–291. https://t.co/wZNfNjRf1d
@lesleyriddoch.bsky.social Hi Lesley. Love the podcast! Please never give up! Also, please have a look at this fascinating article on biological sex as a spectrum. Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic | Scientific American
That “sex redefined” essay by a journalist has been laughed at many times for its stupidity. Most notably because it never defines what a sex is. It makes basic conflations of sexes with karyotypes. Not a serious contribution I an afraid.
今天的翻译： 《自然》杂志上的一篇重磅文章《重新定义性别》（原题：Sex Redefined） 不过，如果让我给这篇文章起标题，我更愿意称之为《生物决定论的贫困》 zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/1898722595...
Some reading... ⚧️ Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic. Biologists think there is a larger spectrum than binary female and male. archive.ph/dCFLZ When Sex and Gender Collide. Studies of transgender kids reveal fascinating insights about gender in the brain. archive.ph/m3IrN
I cry a little 2015. ;v;
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/ Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male
Biologie … ist vielfältiger als ein Entweder-Oder. Neben XX, XY gibt es viele chromosomale Varianten (XXY, X0, Mosaike), die natürlich, gesund und menschlich sind. #GeschlechtsSpektrum, kein binäres Dogma. #WissenschaftErsetztDenStammtisch. #intersex #biologie #geschlecht #science #diversity
@Tearosebush @cezthesocialist 3/ biology: people’s identities, experiences, and needs deserve dignity, even when they don’t align with their sex assigned at birth. If you want to hear the other side, which exists and is valid, you can check what experts say https://t.co/28fWVxqun3
It’s a question of definition. It’s funny you’re posting this with „Sex Redefined“, the author of which actually agrees with there only being 2 biological sexes in mammals. Nobody denies that there’s variations, but these aren’t new or different sexes.
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female & male! www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Nature and Sex Redefined - we have never been binary | Vanessa Heggie
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male www.scientificameric...
sex redefined aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
"Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic; Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male." www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Hi, I think, I remember this diagram from an acticle in Nature from 2015 by Claire Ainswoth, ,Sex redefined‘, but I have no access to it anymore, maybe you can get in contact with Claire: claireainsworth.com/sample-page
@heikateryna @lomlhabits This Ainsworth? Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/v06S2LPVBH "The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that."
I want to understand others and the struggles they are going through. I have 2 gay uncles one has gone through the transformation to a women, both were molested as children by their brother. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/
"A recent article in Nature [Sex redefined, Claire Ainsworth (2015)] claims that biologists "now think" that sex is not a binary feature for human beings ..." www.theguardian.com/science/the-...
"Die Wissenschaftszeitschrift "Nature" ... gehört zu den anerkanntesten in der Disziplin Biologie ..." "Die Annahme, es gebe zwei Geschlechter, ist zu simpel", erläutert Claire Ainsworth im Artikel "Sex redefined". Sie fasst damit den Forschungsstand der Biologie zusammen..."
So, und nun zu diesem Tweet: Hier spricht Claire Ainsworth ebenfalls von einem Spektrum. Zwei Geschlechter mit ganz viel Variationen dazwischen = Spektrum/Kontinuum.
▶️ Sex redefined (2015) "The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that." "Sex can be much more complicated than it at first seems." "When genetics is taken into consideration, the boundary between the sexes becomes www.nature.com/articles/518...
@MrMennoTweets @Jeopardamy -her qualified to compete at the level that she did in the olympics and beyond. https://t.co/IEeWnSRvIe https://t.co/cg5y7I0PSL
‘Claire Ainsworth’s “Sex Redefined.” Published in Nature Magazine in 2015, the piece is the gold standard for how the complexities of scientific findings can be employed for pseudoscientific political ideologies.’ www.theparadoxinstitute.com/read/a-respo...
Übrigens wird selbst im Artikel nicht gesagt, dass es mehr als 2 biologische Geschlechter gibt, sondern es heißt schlicht "Geschlecht neu definiert (Sex redefined)". In der enthaltenen Tabelle wird das Spektrum der beiden Geschlechter aufgesplittet: www.nature.com/articles/518...
@hoovlet I think that this opinion piece in Nature is what is being referred to: https://t.co/FzVftkHuRX "The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that." Opinion in Nature is still just opinion.
Sex Redefined: The idea of 2 sexes is overly simplistic. By Claire Ainsworth on scientificamerican.com
I'm glad we agree on the last point. As to the rest, it's more complicated than even I thought it is. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/
Refs (list dois only due to words limitation): doi: 10.1038/518288a , doi: 10.1038/ng.3778 , doi: 10.1159/000152037 , doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.06.009 , doi: 10.1086/320125 , doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-205 , doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.072033
@frogs4girls Stop spreading pseudoscience, please. https://t.co/UT7TFjlsgL
@ActivistHat_ @NoRedText @coffeething_ @frogs4girls https://t.co/UT7TFjlsgL
@fawfulfan No we're not. This is a very old and outdated conclusion. Please check: https://t.co/UT7TFjlsgL
@coldplayer64 @FondOfBeetles @fawfulfan This is a very old and outdated conclusion. https://t.co/UT7TFjlsgL
Der Text bezieht sich auf den Artikel „Sex Redefined“ von Claire Ainsworth. Sie hat längst klargestellt, dass diese Interpretation ihres Artikels Unsinn ist. Es gibt bei Säugetiere 2 Geschlechter mit seltenen Abweichungen/Varianten, die aber keineswegs weitere biologische Geschlechter darstellen
@bionical_alien Ah pero cuando le enseñas esto...: 10.1038/518288a
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male By Claire Ainsworth & Nature magazine www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Sex Redefined: The Idea of Two Sexes Is Overly Simplistic #transgender #transgenderrights #humanrights #sex #gender #biology #LGBT #LGBTQNotGoingBack #Election2024 #MAGA #Trump #NancyMace #SarahMcBride www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Oh I'm familiar with this one - a guest opinion piece not subject to peer-review. People also like to share “Sex redefined” by Claire Ainsworth in Nature, though unfortunately the author clarified her view to mean 2 sexes. threadreaderapp.com/thread/12131...
@UlrichRalla @jana_hensel gesellschaftlich toleriert ("Many societies are now comfortable with men and women crossing conventional societal boundaries in their choice of appearance, career and sexual partner.", Ainsworth, C. in "Sex redefined." Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/TMSNdcs21h). (4/n)
@sharrond62 @jk_rowling https://t.co/ndYpDFtxd6 read this
@jk_rowling @SwipeWright https://t.co/KTwrIQAjKB
@kyoshotei @nityonityo @vismoglie ネイチャー掲載論文がインチキならもう世界中の論文がアウトじゃなかろうか Sex redefined Nature (2015-02-19) | DOI: 10.1038/518288a
Ένα ενδιαφέρον άρθρο το οποίο συζητάει το θέμα της βιολογίας του φύλου. https://t.co/4ezkLPtQqG
This is a fascinating must-read: Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic Scientists now think there is a larger spectrum biologically than just binary female and male www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
@schafsen @Autor_Neubauer Der letzte Satz geht in Richtung Geschlecht als soziales Konstrukt, in welchem Kontext das auch stimmt, aber nicht im Thema Biologie. Du hast anscheinend immer noch nicht gelesen was ich geschrieben hab, willst du ja vlt das hier lesen: https://t.co/pmkuDiGCdT
@Kampfmittelfrei @derfachwirt https://t.co/KrYeReomR1
@AnimulaMichael @derfachwirt Das ist eben faktisch falsch. Aber das weißt du natürlich. https://t.co/KrYeReomR1
@Rhabdobacter @derfachwirt Das heißt dieser Quelle existiert nicht? Interessant. Da muss ich mir was einbilden. https://t.co/KrYeReomR1
@WinnowingWind @mrchees87318163 @niggadestroyer0 @radenaon @milesmorals58 @jd_urenaz @EverythingOOC Androgen insensitivity is one. And this is peer reviewed check here: https://t.co/7P16VyDRhN
原文 Sex redefined •Nature (2015-02-19) | DOI: 10.1038/518288a •Claire Ainsworth •Claire Ainsworthは、英国ハンプシャーに活動拠点を置くフリーランスライター。 https://t.co/uELy7VuMj5
@ElonMuskAOC There is another opinion. “The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.” Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/nDnTp2Pmn4
RT @ignitiom_: lástima no puedo ANCLAR dos tuits "Redefiniendo el sexo biológico": https://t.co/OpEm2n3NtK Traducido de Nature: Sex redefi…
lástima no puedo ANCLAR dos tuits "Redefiniendo el sexo biológico": https://t.co/OpEm2n3NtK Traducido de Nature: Sex redefined by Claire Ainsworth. Nature 518, 288–291 (19 February 2015) doi:10.1038/518288a Fuente: https://t.co/JlSw95Nw6Q
@reellefutevagin @BenjaminCarollo 10.7554/eLife.70817 10.1038/518288a PMID: 16817460 10.1007/978-1-4615-0621-8_1 And here's a fun one, unrelated, but just for you since you want to know more about biology - 10.37282/991819.16.34
@HarryTheGreat98 @Legion_1183 @HamiltonNashHR @michaelshermer @elonmusk Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/ZpuTvGD5Hn Sex redefined The idea of two sexes is simplistic. Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that. Opinion piece... Not peer review... Quite bold to say about a Nature article!
@Asssddggdss @YureiKurosawa @WaspSatanic @marm607 @debrakidd @Strobe_Lightly @LabourRichard it says that the nature journal is peer reviewed and needs to be trustworthy to be published. The article she published also has been cited many times before https://t.co/M46uK3AOiu, https://t.co/UvvZBt8YSI
RT @next49: Nature ダイジェスト Vol. 12 No. 5 | doi : 10.1038/ndigest.2015.150524 原文：Nature (2015-02-19) | doi: 10.1038/518288a | Sex redefined…
Nature ダイジェスト Vol. 12 No. 5 | doi : 10.1038/ndigest.2015.150524 原文：Nature (2015-02-19) | doi: 10.1038/518288a | Sex redefined https://t.co/k6ejnBEs1l
@lecanardnoir @TedKaczWasRight https://t.co/SIHn6wFSz6
RT @rorybowman: Claire Ainsworth,2015. Sex Redefined. Nature 518:288–291, https://t.co/P9KJLI7odK, 18 February 2015.
Claire Ainsworth,2015. Sex Redefined. Nature 518:288–291, https://t.co/P9KJLI7odK, 18 February 2015.
@wtfuloser @DwyerPonder @TaxedtoDeathToo @MysticMindMedia @MattWalshBlog Yeah And Here’s Another That Is Complete And Utter Bullshit! NO Peer Reviewed Biology Entertains The Idea That Sex Isn’t Binary. Another Thing, This Argument Has Nothing To Do With Trans People. Trans People Are Just Pretenders. https://t.co/uJAb7z5494
@DotMcFarlane @Esqueer_ Too many lazy or muddled thinkers draw on articles such as Claire Ainsworth's 2015 Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291, https://t.co/P9KJLI7odK, not having even a vague grasp on fundamental concepts such as anisogamy, developmental pathways, anatomical variation or endocrinology.
@lecanardnoir @Go2Tartarus @PhoenixCharts @MythinformedMKE And what about the 34 other papers that cite its data? On pubmed alone? https://t.co/7meUf97AL5
- Ainsworth C. Sex redefined. Nature. 2015;518(7539):288-291. doi:10.1038/518288a. - Picard, J.Y. et al. 2017. The Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome: An Update Based Upon a Personal Experience of 157 Cases. Sex Dev 2017;11:109-125. DOI: 10.1159/000475516.
@picapicaraza Toma: Ainsworth C. Sex redefined. Nature. 2015;518(7539):288-291. doi:10.1038/518288a. Si gustas, lo lees, y lo comentamos
RT @Drastiker: @theinoculation Dass biolog. Geschlecht soz. konstruiert ist, ist Quatsch. Die verbeitete Annahme, dass es nur 2 distinkte b…
@theinoculation Dass biolog. Geschlecht soz. konstruiert ist, ist Quatsch. Die verbeitete Annahme, dass es nur 2 distinkte biolog. Geschlechterkategorien nämlich männlich und weiblich gibt, ist meiner Erkenntnis nach tatsächlich überholt und sozial konstruiert, siehe https://t.co/qkGfSckaL2
@aleksioj_uwu Pues, de hecho, los papers más recientes están diciendo que el sexo también puede tener espectros. Ainsworth C. (2015). Sex redefined. Nature, 518(7539), 288–291. https://t.co/OEnu5WDmjX
@MamelaFialloFlo @MikaelaRosasF Lo único que muestras es que tú de ciencias no sabes nada, por eso debes de obviar cuanto paper se te manda porque te quedaste en primaria. Anda, actualízate en ciencias, te hace falta: Ainsworth C. (2015). Sex redefined. Nature, 518(7539), 288–291. https://t.co/OEnu5WlLsp.
Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/YndxMRIKMn
@lecanardnoir @DrPloxo Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://t.co/iHKNpeGNuv I hope nature is a prestigious enough journal for you!
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
RT @tociss: 「生物学的な性」はバイナリに既定されると信じて疑わない人が多いが、生物学的にはむしろ性はスペクトラムだという議論がある。 Ainsworth, C. Sex redefined. Nature 518, 288–291 (2015). https://…
The idea of two sexes is a naïve oversimplification http://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943 h/t @megahbite https://t.co/MqY8mGiZai
We're back to #1980s #feminist sex-porn debates which slowed bc: AIDS. Now: sex=redefined. Now: let's do this thing. https://x.com/econbizfin/status/666623841519710208
The spectrum of sex ---> the most interesting thing you will read all day. http://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20150219
Essential piece from @ClaireAinsworth about biological discoveries that refute the idea of a simple binary in sex. http://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
"These discoveries do not sit well in a world in which sex is still defined in binary terms." - @ClaireAinsworth http://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
TF
CC
I
M
MS
S
E
BA
A
GE
C
M
L
C
V
M
か
あ
MY
EM
L
B
マ
BS
BJ
TG
FG
SN
D
D
ST
SП
AG
Α
T
HM
G
Y
IR
D
SN
A
S
RW
CA
D
BF
NL
DP
A
S
LG
JR
LP
ト
RA
JD
TR
M
A
TS
Z
V
M
BW
JR
NS
SD
BB
SM
MS
S
ES
G
SS
D
OA
CW
H
J
TM
G
MX
RP
WR
PT
KM
LL
DD
IT
KB
KP
CB
KC
宇万
DD
S
EC
G
MH
P
P
A
I
FM
JC
X
N
R
DD
R
T
S
P
JA
D
S
K
い
ぼ
色
I
初
患
お
Nに
U
火
瞠
山
S
とね
灰
N
ぬ
は
N
NY
し
K
Y
Tテ
I
O
彫
HE
H
T
M
Å
J
陽
C
お
金発
テ
歩
シ
てま
ど
ヒ
G
聖
ゆ
Δ
〆
M
?
み
あ
セ
真S
そG
U
すV
ﾒ
Uか
イ
風し
お
焼
襟
赤