Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions emphasize the importance of IARC's evaluations by highlighting peer-reviewed scientific support and defending its methodological validity, as seen in references to numerous published papers. The tone underscores tensions between scientific consensus and industry criticism, with words like 'assault' and 'smearing' conveying a sense of conflict and urgency, illustrating a high-stakes debate over public health credibility.
Most discussions support the integrity and importance of the IARC evaluations, with some skepticism about criticisms from industry allies.
Participants are highly engaged with the topic, evident from mentions of scientific papers and debates over public health implications.
The discourse involves references to peer-reviewed research and commentary, indicating moderate in-depth engagement.
These discussions highlight the significance of IARC's work in shaping public health policies, despite ongoing debates.
A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such as Grimes. For example, see here in Environmental Health Perspectives: https://t.co/dU2ljdSsPB /8
@BioBeef @ucsc @ucanr @UCSC_SciCom @UofCalifornia @ucscgenomics @bonesandbugs Finally, real scientists have published around a half dozen peer reviewed papers (not Van Eenennaam blogs) calling on corporate attacks against IARC to stop. Here's a few: IARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans https://t.co/dU2ljdSsPB /continue
A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such as Grimes. For example, see here in Environmental Health Perspectives: https://t.co/O9YctWRJ2E /END https://t.co/212I0m166d
RT @DisInfoChron: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry su…
@IARCWHO https://t.co/V6b3X9Lprk
RT @thackerpd: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such…
This video introduces the link between environmental exposure and cancer, discussing recent research and evaluations by IARC on carcinogenic hazards. It highlights the importance of balanced hazard assessments for…
This video discusses environmental mutagens and their connection to cancer. It explores how certain environmental agents may contribute to cancer risk, highlighting the importance of understanding carcinogenic hazards…
‘ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE & CANCER CONNECTION’ I INTRODUCTION – I https://t.co/8uSZ9SeQ1b via @YouTube
RT @thackerpd: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such…
RT @DisInfoChron: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry su…
RT @DisInfoChron: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry su…
A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such as Grimes. For example, see here in Environmental Health Perspectives: https://t.co/O9YctWRJ2E /END https://t.co/212I0m166d
RT @thackerpd: A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such…
A horde of respected scientists have begun documenting the assault on IARC by apologists for the agrichemical industry such as Grimes. For example, see here in Environmental Health Perspectives: https://t.co/dU2ljdSsPB /8
@IARCWHO https://t.co/V6b3X9Lprk
@thackerpd @drdavidmichaels @EdwinKwong7 @DanielNarriasV @IronicProfessor @geneticmaize @IARCWHO Agrochemicalpharma propaganda against the IARC’s classifications led to a .@NIH evaluation Hundreds of scientists who rely on IARC info agreed on the effectiveness of the IARC. She smeared them because of Glyphosate??? smh https://t.co/kVTnbzgyBS https://t.co/zJdAQKVM09
@dogpants2000 @OnTheSpot2020 @JoeWakefield8 @jeffyz8 @TheCounter https://t.co/TXTlE0QDwk
RT @thackerpd: @BioBeef @ucsc @ucanr @UCSC_SciCom @UofCalifornia @ucscgenomics @bonesandbugs Finally, real scientists have published around…
@BioBeef @ucsc @ucanr @UCSC_SciCom @UofCalifornia @ucscgenomics @bonesandbugs Finally, real scientists have published around a half dozen peer reviewed papers (not Van Eenennaam blogs) calling on corporate attacks against IARC to stop. Here's a few: IARC Monographs: 40 Years of Evaluating Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans https://t.co/dU2ljdSsPB /continue
@A_GMurray @BumperCrop1 https://t.co/dHyqz3GjTN Respuesta de la IARC a esa campaña de desprestigio.
PT
TC
J
MP
DW
V
Z
H
RS
KS
MM