Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the discussions show a strong consensus that p-hacking is a pervasive problem in science, with many references to its potential to distort findings, such as calls to 'just say no' and explanations of how data manipulation occurs; the tone is serious and investigative, emphasizing both the importance and the need for awareness of issues like the replication crisis.
Many discussions acknowledge the serious issue of p-hacking and its role in scientific problems, indicating strong support for the importance of the article.
Social discussions reflect high curiosity and concern, referencing concepts like the 'replication crisis' and urging more awareness and action.
Posts actively engage with the topic through retweets, sharing related resources, and debating the implications, showing deep involvement.
Discussions highlight the widespread influence of p-hacking on research integrity, though some comments suggest the effect might be less destructive than feared.
These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in published literature. https://t.co/SytZ8udNrZ 2/10 https://t.co/jcdppSTUqK
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science Head et al. (2015) menerangkan (1) Apa itu P-Value? (2) Apa itu P-Hacking? (3) Apa dampak P-Hacking terhadap penelitian? (4) Gimana cara ngelakuin P-Hacking? (5) Gimana cara kita tahu apakah suatu penelitian telah di P-Hacked? https://t.co/MEZMth9x81
This paper explains p-hacking in detail. I will add some easy tips to escape being fooled by fraudulent research. See below Also see Dr Gohel’s thread above. 2/n https://t.co/oXTjcsCm7N
#Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science" https://t.co/IZLYriLFJg https://t.co/7a8dTkGYOW
졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. PLOS Biology, 13(3), e1002106. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 https://t.co/xYDvsjbFmP
The "replication crisis" in science should be renamed the "p-hacking crisis." A much better term to describe the problem. https://t.co/yFb8dZ2JJN
Discover the revolutionary concept of Registered Reports in scientific research. This video explores how this method promotes transparency and reduces biases, while also recognizing the challenges and future directions…
Can people sense the future? False research findings are published even in respected journals. The fields of neuroscience and psychology suffer from questionable statistics, inaccurate reporting, and lack of…
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science by Megan L Head & Luke Holman & Rob Lanfear & Andrew T Kahn & Michael D Jennions (2015)
@TheSGEM @HHSGov @SecKennedy And that's p-hacking https://t.co/dphztJ38XK Not pee hacking! (Felt I needed to clear that up) https://t.co/EZwCjiXjaS
RT @LarsLAndersen: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science http://t.co/cO3LsY9epp
@Hiroshi12337131 https://t.co/Kg2kmOaEAj これっすか？ちょこちょこ再解析論文出てますが
@Dandydinmore @FunLovingIan @kmpanthagani One such example. https://t.co/ij4YXdlww2
RT @jayjoseph22: The "replication crisis" in science should be renamed the "p-hacking crisis." A much better term to describe the problem.…
RT @jayjoseph22: The "replication crisis" in science should be renamed the "p-hacking crisis." A much better term to describe the problem.…
The "replication crisis" in science should be renamed the "p-hacking crisis." A much better term to describe the problem. https://t.co/yFb8dZ2JJN
RT @NTFabiano: These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in…
RT @NTFabiano: These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in…
RT @NTFabiano: These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in…
RT @NTFabiano: These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in…
These findings are from a perspective in @PLOSBiology which used text-mining to demonstrate that p-hacking is widespread in published literature. https://t.co/SytZ8udNrZ 2/10 https://t.co/jcdppSTUqK
RT @R3_JHSPH: #R3ReadToday Are we using p-values correctly in research? Check out Dr. Head et al.’s 2015 paper on 'P-hacking', a bias whi…
#R3ReadToday Are we using p-values correctly in research? Check out Dr. Head et al.’s 2015 paper on 'P-hacking', a bias which occurs 'when researchers collect or select data or statistical analyses until nonsignificant results become significant.' https://t.co/ef1YKyvG64 https://t.co/vbvwgbJsKV
@ClimateAudit I needed help here; maybe others do too. https://t.co/qjg45rsqpI
@PNdm7pCm7E3whGI @labsarekindest @Scoutastic1 @theredpillz1 @HerbsandDirt @AudaciousPundit Nothing like some good old P-hacking to fool the other uneducated antivaxers. https://t.co/mLMpzoWK2R https://t.co/YYjqZiZd8N
Just read this interesting article on P-hacking. https://t.co/bdTB35Fmu4
@metanutter @JMBecologist https://t.co/nKcoq2bIJk
@ScottAdamsSays The only thing worse than a court packer is a p-hacker. https://t.co/ebVyuHI4bL
@kevinnbass @JosephFraiman What they did was something called P-hacking: https://t.co/Lj25GmSiVE
@Mikel_Jollett P-values - that is rich: How about we force academia, or for that matter pharma to prove they can do basic science? https://t.co/gyKUNZuZwN https://t.co/b8PTnpwnQn
https://t.co/l01kDDUuxM
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science | PLOS Biology https://t.co/Ze17zYzBg6
@julie_conder @chantelle0090 #PSYC4180D https://t.co/hIW8YuGmOf
Check out the article below to find out more on how data is manipulated in research. Promote awareness about data manipulation, so journals accept all results not just newsworthy results! https://t.co/PzvEsvrYGi #PSYC4180 #AcademicTwitter @julie_conder @chantelle0090
nota https://t.co/ukvXYHGWvz
P-hacking (https://t.co/bYUcLhLnis) – or data dredging – is a problem in science as results can be manipulated to confirm an existing bias, or to make an article more likely to be printed in an academic journal.
@Mountainer96 @LexiiKon @malisurfer Nope nur zur deiner, man sollte sich auch mal mit den Problemen in der Wissenschaft auseinandersetzen bevor man den Mund dazu aufmacht. https://t.co/zmoHAezDCe https://t.co/NEKjL4bLDu https://t.co/vTXFzVUV39
@SportIsARight The philosophy paper at https://t.co/KIvoCZlO4b relies heavily on the research of Sonksen. The link you provide for all 15 of your Sonksen footnotes is . https://t.co/br532QfpuW. That page does not contain any of the information you claim as proof.
Note (pour plus tard) : https://t.co/v3y0Wixxwd #phacking #Mindfulness
@bpodgursky @MinnNighthawks @siicamore @jessesingal "A lot of this would be easy to check if the researchers would provide the data." My read suggests there was no accusation of p-hacking from Hanley per se but ample reason to suspect it given how the needed underlying data to check seems unavailable https://t.co/4A0QaDDNAf https://t.co/nUm9D6UsLL
Before going into #PSYC4180E I didn’t know how many researchers provided their findings with twisted results. Many researchers publish false findings for their own benefit. Do more research before and after viewing certain studies. #AcademicTwitter https://t.co/EuuDUU5fHM https://t.co/070GqbCVYn
Learn more about the consequences of P-Hacking https://t.co/RBU9jFFfR4 #PSYC4180D @julie_conder @chantelle0090
Found out from https://t.co/VSuPShwGUN about the existence of p-hacking and now I’m the worlds biggest skeptic. whats real anymore?
@MrCrowleyPQ @Pajarobere A los expertos en estadística les dejo este hermoso regalo para que se metan en la raja su “valor P estadísticamente significativo”. Que tengan un lindo día. Que hermoso concepto el p-hacking https://t.co/2EzzFzzZJX
@Jenneigh_Phie @AndyBCampbell https://t.co/wMjQpCipeM
@lcdriammdmph @StevePittelli I didn't see where it was said, "more N value or computing power will reveal the true positives," but that is a major aspect of "p-hacking," leading to the current replication crisis in science. https://t.co/FKqZyaprTq.
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science: https://t.co/dFxaI8hNyC
@TheWholeT00th Try this - and some of the references cited might be useful too https://t.co/SZsWCU0lIG
@aarit_ahuja Not sure which scientists this refers to. https://t.co/96zhliWN41
@LGBTFeednSeed I'm going to ruin your joke: At least 25 % of research is quite questionable. https://t.co/dFTO9rPiKA
RT @agdevresearch: What implications might P-Hacking have in agricultural development research? https://t.co/2WyogEge7q
What implications might P-Hacking have in agricultural development research? https://t.co/2WyogEge7q
They are also more rare in the published literature than p-values just below 0.05. https://t.co/sFO8o4RrMT https://t.co/QieGIWk39G
@fingiliha @echopapa_1 @echopapa_1 بیا کمک. من راستش نمیدونم. چون خودم ایران که بودم آمار رو یاد نگرفتم و اینجا سر کلاس بحثش شد. ذیل مدخل ویکی پدیای فارسی «سلاخی داده» میتونید ببینیدش https://t.co/KBZxiFtYzf این دو مقاله انگلیسی هم خیلی خوبن: https://t.co/erzAGqmwbJ https://t.co/8lmUqaloGH
https://t.co/fXjBMXJi3v
Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science #metascience https://t.co/UFUq1bglGj
RT @Nutradvance: "The data will tell you what you want if you torture it enough" (why study pre-registration is important) The Extent and…
"The data will tell you what you want if you torture it enough" (why study pre-registration is important) The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/QPdsub4mzE
@HustlerINTP @BretWeinstein @sbkaufman ...I suspect there is some room for legitimate disagreement. (2/2) The article, if you're interested: https://t.co/lRgC96hyex
RT @RajeevJayadevan: This paper explains p-hacking in detail. I will add some easy tips to escape being fooled by fraudulent research. See…
This paper explains p-hacking in detail. I will add some easy tips to escape being fooled by fraudulent research. See below Also see Dr Gohel’s thread above. 2/n https://t.co/oXTjcsCm7N
Further papers/books that came to mind revolving science, statistics, statistical significance, causal inference, p-hacking… - The Cult of Statistical Significance - The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science - The Book of Why
Este es el problema de la mayoria de los "estudios cientificos" actuales @jaimeraulmolina #PLOSBiology: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/DLCWMK8Vkf
Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. https://t.co/4a5gi46hIO
@SethSandler @naval https://t.co/Y4jInQdlfp
@deevybee @enemiesnet How about? https://t.co/gCxSFVWfaS
RT @Ahmad_Alshayea: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/DIQ7S1wDXy
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/DIQ7S1wDXy
RT @jayjoseph22: @ClinpsychLucy I can also confirm that your critics in #Psychiatry have found no genes shown to cause their major disorder…
RT @jayjoseph22: @ClinpsychLucy I can also confirm that your critics in #Psychiatry have found no genes shown to cause their major disorder…
RT @jayjoseph22: @ClinpsychLucy I can also confirm that your critics in #Psychiatry have found no genes shown to cause their major disorder…
@ClinpsychLucy I can also confirm that your critics in #Psychiatry have found no genes shown to cause their major disorders, after a 50-year search, and keep pushing twin and adoption studies based on false assumptions and/or obviously manipulated ("p-hacked") data. https://t.co/yFb8dYL8ld
@bcthomas @ConceptualJames Testing alternative hypotheses until you find one that suits your preferences is actually pretty terrible scientific practice. https://t.co/K3YEOzCtBO
5/ Ritchie excluded BG and (non-molecular) PG research from his analysis, even though p-hacked research is found in these fields. P-hacking is the practice of manipulating data to produce results that fall below the .05 level of statistical significance. https://t.co/yFb8dYL8ld
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/mOG3DQlsk1
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/mOG3DQlsk1
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/mOG3DQlsk1
Paper-nya Head et al. (2015) ini dapat diakses umum. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R. Kahn, A. T., Jennions, M. D. (2015). The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. PLOS Biology 13(3): e1002106. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 Link: https://t.co/btjUYlXJGO
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science Head et al. (2015) menerangkan (1) Apa itu P-Value? (2) Apa itu P-Hacking? (3) Apa dampak P-Hacking terhadap penelitian? (4) Gimana cara ngelakuin P-Hacking? (5) Gimana cara kita tahu apakah suatu penelitian telah di P-Hacked? https://t.co/MEZMth9x81
O en biología: https://t.co/anyhv5QynU https://t.co/wMIQauQTN4
@magnabosco @DrHAGarcia Above, I meant 'p-hacking' instead of 'r-hacking': https://t.co/Yl878EzbYz
RT @KirkDBorne: #Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The…
@GretaThunberg claims there's no deal to make with physics. Let me introduce you to a common phenomenon in science. Greta, we can make deals with physics on our own terms. Many post-doc's and PhD's do it. Guilty pleasures. "P-Hacking"
@BasselaereBart @thomsdejonghe @MDiependaele @BjornMallants @PVDAinVlaParl @pvdabelgie @dvdkerkh
@TarmoKetola @VesikHelen Toki jos ollaan lähellä arvoa 0.05 ja tilanne alkaakin kehittyä lämpimämpään suuntaan, niin tarpeen vaatiessa testiä voi aina vaihtaa ja hilata p-arvoa pienemmäksi. https://t.co/RWEaRy8Zd3
Welcome to the world of p-hacking. Here is your guide https://t.co/A3678DzU4M https://t.co/Y3RC3HOQed
@jasonsokolosky @DeclanWaugh I know the researchers. If you have evidence that they showed inflation bias (“p-hacking” or “selective reporting)" (see https://t.co/UdWGxdlUQE) then post it here for all to see.
@drkeithsiau Along those lines the concept of p-hacking which epidemiological and studies looking at outcomes from large datasets are guilty of. https://t.co/lBKBhhJq8l
@Glaceix You're p-hacking: https://t.co/5eCTsQduJO And wasting your time; PS's RNG is open-source and verifiable: https://t.co/yp3doc9bTz
@PhD_femme It's not logistically difficult, but it's emotionally difficult, is my guess. P-hacking and skewing negative to false positives is surprisingly common (https://t.co/9cGKsl38w4).
from Head et al. (2015) "The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science", 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 . Highly recommended. 3/3
Das Ausmaß von p-Hacking kann man schätzen - denn in dem Fall steigt der Anteil signifikanter Ergebnisse verdächtig über das erwartete Maß an. Das machen z.B. Head und Kollegen 2015 und kommen zu dem Schluss, dass p-Hacking verbreitet ist, aber https://t.co/rVUqqJIelY
RT @familyunequal: Here's a paper on p-hacking and publication bias: https://t.co/Wa3YDVCxzf
RT @familyunequal: Here's a paper on p-hacking and publication bias: https://t.co/Wa3YDVCxzf
Here's a paper on p-hacking and publication bias: https://t.co/Wa3YDVCxzf
Lots of interesting implications here. I’m reminded of https://t.co/vd0alUBEID https://t.co/Q0lDgiTUO2
@KazemiAlex @psirides @davidjvaughan @JAMA_current @JBraithwaite1 Confidence intervals are the way to avoid the simple dichotomy of P<0.5! And anyway, the humble p value is still useful; it’s p-hacking https://t.co/DVDqJ9s7m5 that give the often elegant p value a bad name! Furthermore, most of this arises from poor design rather than malice!
Interesting article. Apparently p-hacking is not that damaging to #research after all. https://t.co/xUC8FAsMa1
RT @KirkDBorne: #Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The…
RT @KirkDBorne: #Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The…
RT @KirkDBorne: #Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The…
RT @KirkDBorne: #Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The…
#Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/7rK9XPWQWW #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science" https://t.co/Ae7jckXJSl https://t.co/Sam7yJnvjn
#Statistics Experts Plead: "Just Say No to P-Hacking" https://t.co/MIm7KuzzA9 #DataScience #StatisticalLiteracy See "The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science" https://t.co/IZLYriLFJg https://t.co/7a8dTkGYOW
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
RT @simnalamburt: 졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015).…
졸라웃기네 그러나 컴공 통계조작도 만만치 않게 심각하구나 부끄러운 일이다.. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. PLOS Biology, 13(3), e1002106. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 https://t.co/xYDvsjbFmP
RT @philentropist: @KmrSnkrn https://t.co/OX5ipuM8wX https://t.co/P0xJ129eaF #pHacking
@KmrSnkrn https://t.co/OX5ipuM8wX https://t.co/P0xJ129eaF #pHacking
RT @harvard_data: Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
RT @harvard_data: Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
RT @harvard_data: Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
RT @harvard_data: Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
RT @harvard_data: Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
Paper: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science https://t.co/Ujrw83vcak
@Jesus_is_G_d @Caitanyadas1 @BSxploit @zypisfy @ChrisHirstFY3 @Seb_Aguanno @AtheistFurry @JimmySpencerUN @WTPatty @rupejonner2 @Loriniowa @COL314 @BillyPilgrim41 @TechsasRose @ScientiaPercept @TedPerkins10 @commonsensejan @mleffler5862 @homen2 @AwayFromTheKeys @tklforgiven @garym9999 @EvanLHarris2 @Atheist_1978 @S_A_Malcolm @ldschafer @Aron_Ra @harryhamilton99 @zalphaprime @John_ehmet @DubuissonPaul @JargleBargle @beantato @MaryVMos1 @Captainswoop1 @ErosMandex @Exoprotein1 @BruceEnberg @CanAgnosAtheist @sonjamotzkus @DustinWheelerLW @KittenKoder @custardsmaster @AtheistWorld @DeanoMartino1 @Wintersfall @hannibaltraven @wraith_169 @KitemanArgues 1st, thank you for an actual link and not another vague claim. The paper this article is based on is linked in the article. Here is the link directly to the paper. https://t.co/3I0zcBo290
PLoS Biology says P-hacking is no big deal, even though ubiquitous. Does this mean less social psych hand-wringing? http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106
NM
H
RJ
KB
J김
JS
CC
HH
黄
RP
N
KD
備
M
T
PB
YR
BE
DM
R
SP
JK
MM
MM
CA
IP
TM
MB
B
UW
Е
P
FB
T
A
Y
PD
PK
S
PB
SB
A
RS
AD
FS
IB
YP
PD
D
MJ
JM
DP
MN
FF
PC
C
DN
س
أا
RR
HA
DR
MM
FB
S
AD
TP
AR
SA
HL
NQ
PS
G
NP
E
X
MS
PC
CD
CD
FR
SD
KS
TA
MF
AA
U
역감
박수
퍼
내실
SB
P
욘
누와
R나
S
김
DA
크
막
제S
E
아
S
카
몬쉬
?
E
투
KS
G
AD
IA
HG
AM
IC
HI
P心