Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall sentiment shows genuine interest and moderate agreement with the idea that the forgetting curve has been reliably replicated, as illustrated by comments referencing the study's methodology and implications. Words like 'confirmed,' 'fascinating,' and questions about the validity of small sample sizes reflect curiosity and critical thinking, shaping a nuanced view of the research's significance.
Most of the discussions acknowledge the validity of the replication of Ebbinghaus' forgetting curve, with some skepticism about the sample sizes and the overall robustness.
Posts demonstrate strong curiosity about the study, highlighting its relevance and implications for learning and memory, e.g., mentions of reinforcement and educational relevance.
Participants actively reference specific aspects of the research, such as the small sample size (N=1) and the mathematical models used, indicating a moderate level of engagement.
While the discussions reinforce the importance of the findings, there is some doubt about its generalizability and real-world impact beyond controlled settings.
Researcher: @satyarakaaa Content Writer: @wildhemm Sumber: 1. https://t.co/47oLfASaLV 2. https://t.co/qLw3Kb4wHA 3. https://t.co/dgfBFb2deQ 4. https://t.co/qhL1GbLsiC 5. https://t.co/QY5uZZLM4H 6. The Psychology Book (DK)
An Interesting read #ForgettingCurve by #Ebbinghaus
@MihermanaElba @PascualGil1 Hay una curva del olvido bien conocida en psicología, la curva de Ebbinghaus que se ha replicado recientemente, por ejemplo: https://t.co/D9O0SZiHUd Todos en mayor o menor medida, olvidamos con el tiempo. Ahora bien, como dijo Cicerón, quien nunca supo nada puede olvidar ;-)
@EfratFurst @MrsJseducation I took the underlying data from this replication study and put it in an Excel. https://t.co/r1Qv3aHejV
Interesting that we see a lot of use of the Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve. I was taken aback to find that he himself did N=1 A new study has replicated it also N=1 https://t.co/qS4pqY2dRw
@TheTriarii If you're trying to retain it permanently, you can't treat it like cramming for a test. You have to apply the principles of Ebbinghaus's forgetting curve. https://t.co/ebEZ5IIcLu
Active recall is a highly effective study method often misused. In this video, I share common mistakes and strategies to enhance your active recall practices for better learning outcomes.
Most people are using practice questions all wrong which is a big problem because practice questions are the most effective study strategy you can use. This method enhances active recall and improves exam scores…
This video explores the replication of Ebbinghaus's classic forgetting curve using classical methods, examining how memory retention varies over time and analyzes factors like serial position and mathematical models…
This video explores Hermann Ebbinghaus's classic forgetting curve, demonstrating how memory declines over time and the impact of relearning intervals, with insights from recent replication studies.
This episode explores the biology behind learning strategies and features a case study analyzing memory and the classic forgetting curve, highlighting its reliable replication and significance in educational practices.
Did you know that we forget nearly 50% of what we’ve learned within an hour if it isn’t reinforced? Check out this fascinating study that dives into the #ForgettingCurve and why reinforcement is key: https://t.co/I64kyxOPo7 #landd #learninganddevelopment #reinforcedlearning
@smashEDITT Is it right that the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve is based on N=1 and has only been replicated once also with N=1 https://t.co/qS4pqY2dRw If so why is it used in Ed presentations with such authority?
@Larryferlazzo It's been replicated (very small-scale), but I'd still consider it a very rough approximation in controlled settings. It exists, but I don't think we'll ever really know the exact shape (since it's so context-dependent). Check out this study: https://t.co/XRBFFpLTSz
@vampiebat Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve (it is for a possible youtube video i would like to make (: )
@JohnMeuser I'm hearing a lot of stuff about cats. I don't see the connection to forgetting curves. A quick Google scholar search turns up this replication: https://t.co/ymxM3t0Syc The quoted ALEKS paper also sees exponential decay in retention Why are these flawed?
@TheLeeMcLaren @NatashaMDay This 100% applies to non-fiction as well. I don’t agree that it’s pointless at all. If working around the forgetting curve theory works for you then great, but it’s based on an observational study of literally 1 bloke. https://t.co/yr8lLFzcIx We all learn and relax in our own way
@tizitaglia @edutopia Aquí está el paper https://t.co/XJ4KlvAedP
@MrALott @RJPcoach @_ToddBeane @msceducation @CoachingFamily https://t.co/pz0eYutpwT
RT @daisychristo: @EfratFurst @MrsJseducation I took the underlying data from this replication study and put it in an Excel. https://t.co/r…
@EfratFurst @MrsJseducation I took the underlying data from this replication study and put it in an Excel. https://t.co/r1Qv3aHejV
@TheTriarii If you're trying to retain it permanently, you can't treat it like cramming for a test. You have to apply the principles of Ebbinghaus's forgetting curve. https://t.co/ebEZ5IIcLu
@Oh_inu_ one subject… https://t.co/msHOidcpIZ
RT @_avishwakarma: An Interesting read #ForgettingCurve by #Ebbinghaus
An Interesting read #ForgettingCurve by #Ebbinghaus
Ref: Murre, J. M., & Dros, J. (2015). Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PloS one, 10(7), e0120644.
@CMooreAnderson I believe N=1 for this curve and was replicated once with N=1 https://t.co/qS4pqY2dRw
@MihermanaElba @PascualGil1 Hay una curva del olvido bien conocida en psicología, la curva de Ebbinghaus que se ha replicado recientemente, por ejemplo: https://t.co/D9O0SZiHUd Todos en mayor o menor medida, olvidamos con el tiempo. Ahora bien, como dijo Cicerón, quien nunca supo nada puede olvidar ;-)
يطول الحديث في هذا الموضوع، خصوصًا عن الذاكرة والنسيان السريع .. هذه دراسة جيدة وثرية لمن أراد الاستزادة لتجربة هيرمان عن الذاكرة، ونسيانه (الأُسي) للمعلومات التي حفظها. https://t.co/MHSFL80e4s
Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve https://t.co/JTSb8uz4KH
@MathAndCobb One more: https://t.co/kUrrajFszy Ebbinghaus was one of first to study this back in 1880's so it is not a new concept.
https://t.co/pmmxpCUXHC
@_abipaige Im sure you have already referenced it but Ebbinghaus is also worth referencing https://t.co/ntAXwYYWI8
@wesleysamples @spenceraviav [2] J. M. J. Murre and J. Dros, “Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, p. e0120644, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120644. https://t.co/02pKZ9o13j
Researcher: @satyarakaaa Content Writer: @wildhemm Sumber: 1. https://t.co/47oLfASaLV 2. https://t.co/qLw3Kb4wHA 3. https://t.co/dgfBFb2deQ 4. https://t.co/qhL1GbLsiC 5. https://t.co/QY5uZZLM4H 6. The Psychology Book (DK)
#PLOSONE: Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve https://t.co/eIZxbeLC93
What I’ve always found fascinating about this replication of Ebbenhaus is that they even copied the sample size of N=1. https://t.co/fBkju7riAw
Interesting that we see a lot of use of the Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve. I was taken aback to find that he himself did N=1 A new study has replicated it also N=1 https://t.co/qS4pqY2dRw
@volksfilosoof @FransDroog @bijlesduits https://t.co/XlrAoYCv4A Klein beetje zoekwerk en de betrouwbaarheidsintervallen heb je zo gevonden. Wat precies in het artikel staat ben ik al weer vergeten...
@TomBSpencer https://t.co/BK3fyMuvYf this is good. Ebbinghaus’ findings confirmed by Murre and Dros https://t.co/0XcNvQBpdb
RT @FBpsy: Un clásico de clásicos que sí se replica: la curva del olvido de Ebbinghaus https://t.co/VhaMFHa6WC https://t.co/pOy9EG0ueb
RT @FBpsy: Un clásico de clásicos que sí se replica: la curva del olvido de Ebbinghaus https://t.co/VhaMFHa6WC https://t.co/pOy9EG0ueb
@BigmamaLgm @shige_LGM エビングハウスの忘却曲線ですね。 https://t.co/mczyrUsVF4 は，英語の図は正しいですが日本語の説明が誤り（計算も）です 元の数値は節約率なので忘れる割合ではありません https://t.co/LGth2IWfqy なお元データは古いですが2015年にも追試で確かめられています https://t.co/7rQCc2JCuZ