PubHawk
August 2015 PMID 26315443

PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

733
Peak: 15 in Aug 2023
across 7 sources since Jan 2019

Extended reach

1,060,953
potential audience

Total likes

5,181

Video views

146,586

Mentions per month

Jan 2019 – Nov 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News314 articles
  • Blogs198 articles
  • X / Twitter134 posts
  • Facebook69 posts
  • Reddit11 posts
  • YouTube5 videos
  • Bluesky2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone and choice of words reflect strong skepticism, with many emphasizing the low replication rates such as the 36% success in reproducing studies from the 2015 project, and calling out issues like questionable research practices and scientific misconduct. Phrases like 'reproducibility crisis,' 'pseudoscience,' and references to foundational projects and critical papers demonstrate deep engagement with the topic, although some comments dismiss the entire field as pseudoscience, signaling mixed perceptions about the actual impact.

AgreementStrong disagreement

Most discussions express strong skepticism about the reliability of psychological research, highlighting a reproducibility crisis.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high interest by referencing foundational studies, major reports, and debates on the reliability of psychology, indicating engagement with the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Several posts delve into critique and analysis, referencing specific projects like the Open Science Collaboration and discussing methodological flaws, but some remain dismissive.

ImpactLow impact

While many recognize the significance of the findings, some posts dismiss or question the overall impact, portraying psychology as fundamentally flawed or pseudoscientific.

Abstract in brief

  • Reproducibility is crucial in science, yet this study found that replicated effects in psychology research were only half as strong as the original findings, indicating a significant decline.
  • While 97% of the original studies had statistically significant results, only 36% of the replications achieved similar significance, raising concerns about the reliability of original studies.
  • The success of replication was more closely linked to the strength of the original evidence rather than the attributes of the researchers involved in either the original or replication studies.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jan Choutka
@jan_choutka · X

Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more reasonable to not trust psychology research than to trust it. https://t.co/CYmYUWrd75

Jun 26, 2023 · 35 likes · 7 shares · 1,681 followers View post →
Dr Cailbhe Doherty
@DohertyCailbhe · X

For educators (and their students) in the healthcare disciplines, this thread contains a lecture series I prepared to help students learn the ropes of research. The first is a beginners guide on 'How to Read a Research Paper' https://t.co/hAha2iVRw9 Feel free to share! https://t.co/47i8Hfb07T

Sep 13, 2022 · 29 likes · 5 shares · 782 followers View post →
Fourier Trans Form
@refractivewave · X

@bimbotheory yeah, the fact ~60% of studies are p-hacked quackery that can't be replicated is more relevant imo https://t.co/4JBUc4uD27 the field is fascist psuedoscience all the way down. neurologists and computer scientists talking about the computability of the brain have 1000x the rigor. https://t.co/vZrozuLma7

Sep 27, 2025 · 22 likes · 1 share · 702 followers View post →
Pat Savage (@PatrickESavage.bsky.social)
@PatrickESavage · X

@paulbloomatyale It is striking that the two biggest discoveries that come to mind of the last two decades are negative ones. I.e., many past psych "discoveries" were found to be: 1) ungeneralizable (https://t.co/gdsmzGlXlu), and 2) unreplicable (https://t.co/UBqCR4A0Ek)

Jan 29, 2023 · 20 likes · 1 share · 2,360 followers View post →
Jikkyleaks
@Jikkyleaks · X

@stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are linked to DARPA through grants. A few hours ago that was a "conspiracy theory". It seems to be a common theme in the psychology field. The majority of papers are apparently either fraud or statistically inept. https://t.co/hLTdIqUZwe

Aug 26, 2023 · 18 likes · 5 shares · 111,442 followers View post →
TaKu
@takusansu · X

@OokuboTact 「心理学の研究成果」は6割以上が再現不能　海外研究 https://t.co/SKIyBGl9Qj https://t.co/k9PkHmnqI8 なんて記事が前にありましたね。 今年の教育心理学年報でも研究の再現性に関して取り上げられています。(「再現性の危機」とか書いてある) 【心理学（科学）】と書かれると違和感が・・・

Dec 3, 2023 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 192 followers View post →

All mentions

sakanoue no fusigi
@seeker98747 · X

RT @PsychRabble: @alexolegimas @captgouda24 "No issues with replication in cognitive psych" goes a bit beyond the evidence. Replication rat…

Nov 7, 2025 · 1 share · 331 followers View post →
Inge Bonneux
@IBonnx · X

This 2015 bombshell exposed psychology's reproducibility crisis, with pioneers like @lakens driving reforms. Regrettably, medical research has yet to follow suit: 1/2 https://t.co/Vvnq8aBz3x

Nov 7, 2025 · 1,580 followers View post →
The Dark Fiddling Pirate Jussim
@PsychRabble · X

@alexolegimas @captgouda24 "No issues with replication in cognitive psych" goes a bit beyond the evidence. Replication rate here for cogpsych? 58%. https://t.co/jPT3tbcitz Replication rate here for cogpsych? 50%. https://t.co/8NMZRsQmM0 (However, I also agree that we should not throw out everything we

Nov 6, 2025 · 5 likes · 1 share · 24,480 followers View post →
Richard Le Blanc
@RHRLeBlanc · X

@irl_danB @cptgrumpus @JohnHolbein1 https://t.co/KCQad0cKXI https://t.co/KTTDfI2cCP

Nov 5, 2025 · 1 like · 780 followers View post →
Lemasive Förklarar
@LemasiveSwe · X

@fenixlarare https://t.co/kwkiqdBgiB https://t.co/hnk03nn4yt https://t.co/BbLxQy5R2L https://t.co/VnJRHZ4MoH https://t.co/UCxcLvr7wm https://t.co/doHRIGRjbv

Oct 3, 2025 · 37 followers View post →
Renegade Master
@ManneLaukkanen · X

@NarkiSanttu @mikamerano @AtteKaleva Jep. Juuri tuo kysymys tässä on noussut. Näinkin voisi tehdä: https://t.co/QIqCYbFz8M

Sep 30, 2025 · 1 like · 1,174 followers View post →
Renegade Master
@ManneLaukkanen · X

@mikamerano @AtteKaleva Jep. Esim. psykologiaa vaivaavaa replikointiongelmaa toivat esiin psykologit itse. https://t.co/QIqCYbFz8M

Sep 30, 2025 · 1,174 followers View post →
Fourier Trans Form
@refractivewave · X

@bimbotheory yeah, the fact ~60% of studies are p-hacked quackery that can't be replicated is more relevant imo https://t.co/4JBUc4uD27 the field is fascist psuedoscience all the way down. neurologists and computer scientists talking about the computability of the brain have 1000x the rigor. https://t.co/vZrozuLma7

Sep 27, 2025 · 22 likes · 1 share · 702 followers View post →
Aaron
@DataVisGuy · X

Sep 15, 2025 · 1 like · 368 followers View post →
Sheba Al-Hurra
@HurraSheba · X

@JeffYoungerShow In all frankness who cares what a psychologist says? Psychology is mostly pseudoscience - most of their ‘research’ cannot be replicated. It’s mostly bunk. Check out replication crisis. https://t.co/DmggMIl5Cv

Aug 12, 2025 · 1 like · 35 followers View post →
DocThats
@DocThats · X

RT @syugo_h: @DocThats @Book_Meyer なるほど。まあ、心理学の主要三誌に掲載された100の研究の6-7割が再現性がなかったなんて論文も話題になりましたよね。行動経済学も心理学もかなりオーバーラップしているところなんで、状況は似たようなものかと笑…

Aug 10, 2025 · 1 share · 247 followers View post →
堀田秀吾@明治大学法学部教授（法と言語と心理と脳科学）
@syugo_h · X

@DocThats @Book_Meyer なるほど。まあ、心理学の主要三誌に掲載された100の研究の6-7割が再現性がなかったなんて論文も話題になりましたよね。行動経済学も心理学もかなりオーバーラップしているところなんで、状況は似たようなものかと笑　 https://t.co/gPGyrqfoFO

Aug 10, 2025 · 1 like · 1 share · 2,952 followers View post →
Avidya rehab
@AvidyaRehab · X

@WaifuLover67 Attempted to replicate 100 published findings. Less than 40% were reproduced. https://t.co/XqlBQhsvxq Authors argued that psychology suffers from "poor operational definitions", "conceptual redundancy", and a "lack of unifying frameworks". They claim that psychological

Aug 7, 2025 · 264 followers View post →
абсентье
@mr_dilettante · X

Исследования вам в ленту: https://t.co/Bre8hVFNkl

Aug 2, 2025 · 3 likes · 571 followers View post →
абсентье
@mr_dilettante · X

@Saturnych А в чем проблема, если проводилось по научным схемам без отклонений? Причем психология не стопроцентно эффективна, это ж не гомеопатия. Вот исследования про воспроизводимость психологических экспериментов: https://t.co/Bre8hVFNkl

Aug 2, 2025 · 571 followers View post →
Anton Musil
@BlkoJa · X

@tichoruch Nějaké mé zdroje k tématu: https://t.co/UZIXt8Q540 https://t.co/Uy7cY7SFiu https://t.co/S9fXYZFHPO https://t.co/WRcjLrhyLZ https://t.co/Ok4XiM9tJG

May 17, 2025 · 3,645 followers View post →
Roe Jogan
@tepronnah · X

@BeBigMad @grok @dave504 Most of psychology is pseudoscience and can’t be replicated. That should also be common knowledge in psychology. Funny how not a single solid source for the original claim has been produced yet either, even hours later. https://t.co/NwFa4mukme

May 14, 2025 · 195 followers View post →
Ancient Tiger
@TigerAncient · X

@Damo__73_ @BarbaraPocock https://t.co/3I98qTTAW6

Apr 21, 2025 · 262 followers View post →
Eggpinete
@eggpinete · X

Baker, M. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature, 533, 452–454. https://t.co/cwzlfN8yUD Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://t.co/Bp75Uq0cDR

Apr 17, 2025 · 4 likes · 394 followers View post →
しっとりペンチ
@sittoripenchi · X

Open Science Collaboration. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716. PMID: 26315443.

Apr 15, 2025 · 2 likes · 137 followers View post →
Penguianonymous
@AlexBugov · X

@abelousovcom Что же. Как дела у психологических иследований с воспроизводимостью и фальсифицируемостью? Мне кажется, скиптецизм в отношении психологии вполне обоснован. Возможно когда-то она и станет наукой, но врятли в этом или следующем десятелетии. https://t.co/HntAWyf2s1

Apr 7, 2025 · 72 followers View post →
Israel Álvarez-Iniesta
@Alvarez_Iniesta · X

Pronto cumplirá 10 años uno de los estudios más importante en psicología científica: Las crisis de replicabilidad Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/94WhfgJoRp

Mar 18, 2025 · 1,446 followers View post →
Seducenaire
@venusphosis · X

@OzzyMag @Blueblur2023 @ItIsHoeMath This large-scale study aimed to replicate 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals: https://t.co/UMskGcja4o?

Feb 28, 2025 · 296 followers View post →
سُبانِسی
@Sobane30 · X

از 100 مقاله‌ی چاپ شده و peer review شده در حوزه روانشناسی در سه جورنال خفن، 64 تاشون با همون دیتایی که خود محقق ارائه کرده بود، نتیجه گرفته شده صحیح نبود! ینی نه این که حتی به خودشون زحمت برن بدن یه بار دیگه آزمایش کنن. همون دیتای طرف! https://t.co/l8h3Sc3Ros

Jan 17, 2025 · 2 likes · 403 followers View post →
adele kottarainen
@AKottarainen · X

@LauriAlk https://t.co/qHgv0TvSIW https://t.co/xNSdpbXpJZ https://t.co/46atw2VkBZ

Jan 15, 2025 · 3,170 followers View post →
Wiranto
@Shuffling_Freak · X

apparently, 2/3 of psychological research cannot be replicated. https://t.co/wYEmplp5TM the psychology field is practically unreliable, but it is the best that we got

Dec 25, 2024 · 166 followers View post →
oʞɐsɐ ɐɹnıɯ
@asarin · X

昨日ちょうどこれを学生に見せながら「散布図の上にある，星の王子さまのゾウを飲み込んだヘビみたいなやつは～」と説明したところ．https://t.co/lPOYUddnIP https://t.co/X4jix2l8hg https://t.co/5pB2yFuyZy

Oct 16, 2024 · 9 likes · 8,415 followers View post →
Andrei
@Andrei92744809 · X

@marakoshkin @naukoebholodoeb Всем даю принять к сведению. И тебе дам https://t.co/IdIINVAdCM

Jul 31, 2024 · 1 like · 107 followers View post →
Nick Litsardopoulos
@Nlitsardopoulos · X

@nntaleb https://t.co/CRHzoqABO7 https://t.co/Cfpb9dlT98

Jul 25, 2024 · 765 followers View post →
いしもちとうふ
@toufuworks · X

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/eQ6YvR54Ba

Jun 27, 2024 · 4 likes · 564 followers View post →
Rajesh Thipparapu
@Rajeshtipparapu · X

RT @peder_isager: @rafavsbastos @lakens @tunc_necip @JamesSteeleII Ok, a few suggestions - first, the classics of all classics in psycholog…

Jun 25, 2024 · 1 share · 281 followers View post →
Peder M Isager
@peder_isager · X

@rafavsbastos @lakens @tunc_necip @JamesSteeleII Ok, a few suggestions - first, the classics of all classics in psychological metascience: https://t.co/UtYYRpxi93

Jun 25, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share · 1,749 followers View post →
Andrei
@Andrei92744809 · X

@AnaskoBro Всем раздаю эту ссылку. https://t.co/IdIINVzFNe

May 2, 2024 · 107 followers View post →
Space Age Maximalist
@SpaceAgeHerr · X

@DionysianAgent Psychology can't even replicate half of the results in the field, and you think it should have laws? https://t.co/NY2BDcZzbG

Apr 13, 2024 · 8,938 followers View post →
Aoi
@bluemglory · X

RT @AlexBugov: @mr_s_black Вставлю и я свои 5 копеек и напомню, что психиатрии и психологии как науки все еще не существует. И доверять люд…

Apr 6, 2024 · 1 share · 808 followers View post →
Penguianonymous
@AlexBugov · X

@mr_s_black Вставлю и я свои 5 копеек и напомню, что психиатрии и психологии как науки все еще не существует. И доверять людям на основании того что они называют себя психологами/психиатрами, или даже имеею диплом можно будет лет через 100. https://t.co/HntAWyf2s1

Apr 6, 2024 · 3 likes · 1 share · 72 followers View post →
Louis R Nemzer
@BiophysicsFL · X

@lokitekone I think that's for psychology generally. Within behavioral economics, a lot of the honesty research (ironically enough) has been brought into question. But ideas like heuristics and the conjunction fallacy from the book are important https://t.co/g8Kz8iEjsR

Mar 27, 2024 · 1 like · 4,358 followers View post →
Gal Haimovich ☣
@grnfluoresceblg · X

@ArbleMatan @AMBLVit https://t.co/4Z6wtIJHiZ ובפסיכולוגיה בין שליש לחצי

Mar 24, 2024 · 2 likes · 2,511 followers View post →
Folin Claherty
@pillowcoolside7 · X

@RainyDreamDays @tfd_jrdy @esjesjesj https://t.co/acrhCafEYt. 100 studies

Mar 21, 2024 · 272 followers View post →
Andrei
@Andrei92744809 · X

@SLiphold @Mika_venerovna Кстати, о психологии :) https://t.co/IdIINVzFNe

Mar 12, 2024 · 107 followers View post →
Zr. Nabu Kudurru
@BrettButtliere · X

RT @BrettButtliere: check this paper out https://t.co/aOyqliPTtg

Mar 5, 2024 · 1 share · 559 followers View post →
Zr. Nabu Kudurru
@BrettButtliere · X

check this paper out https://t.co/aOyqliPTtg https://t.co/1OUpnUT5t6

Mar 4, 2024 · 1 share · 559 followers View post →
Roya
@RoyaMsadegh · X

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://t.co/sbEjYrF2C2 Only 36% of replications had statistically significant results compared to 97% of original studies.

Feb 18, 2024 · 12 likes · 1 share · 150 followers View post →
Penguianonymous
@AlexBugov · X

Пообщался с ИИ по поводу "эмоциональный интеллект". В ходе общения выснилось что статье сайнс исследовалалась воспроизводимость результатов психологических исследований. В рамках погрешности удалось воспроизвети 68%. А примерно треть их - туфта. https://t.co/HntAWyf2s1 https://t.co/ZJo7ISPw3t

Jan 31, 2024 · 72 followers View post →
NP AGARWAL世界一フォローを目指しますAiming best in world.
@np_grwl · X

RT @medical_xpress: Study offers a different explanation as to why only 36% of psychology studies replicate https://t.co/x1PVX29ypo https:/…

Jan 6, 2024 · 2 shares · 1,788 followers View post →
Medical Xpress
@medical_xpress · X

Study offers a different explanation as to why only 36% of psychology studies replicate https://t.co/x1PVX29ypo https://t.co/3fI5IR55dz

Jan 4, 2024 · 3 likes · 2 shares · 172,932 followers View post →
Velimir Gasparovic
@velimirgasp · X

@di_ana_o @rhelune https://t.co/niv6YbGLUG Behaviouristic experiments that claim to measure states such as happiness or loneliness are in fact measuring incommensurable self-reported levels, thus BS. It's explanationless science.

Jan 4, 2024 · 610 followers View post →
DeSci Foundation
@DesciFoundation · X

References: https://t.co/Nqo51dGfvl https://t.co/B7mixixc1Q https://t.co/FQAEdLTTDO https://t.co/4LLGJ1eKwH https://t.co/XROEEV5nWV https://t.co/zTCuuIktcR https://t.co/jRpJPI2F63

Dec 13, 2023 · 10,138 followers View post →
小谷優平 yuheikodani@言語聴覚士，川崎医療福祉大学，助教, Ph.D.
@B45KTCivYDZBh7G · X

"研究において再現性が理解されていないのは, 個人のインセンティブが再現性より新規性を優先させるから. 我々が知っていると思っていることが我々が真に知っているかどうか検証するには, やるべきことがある" このマインドは常に意識しなければならないと思っています. https://t.co/bBKa3RnXsI

Dec 13, 2023 · 4 likes · 358 followers View post →
黒木玄 Gen Kuroki
@genkuroki · X

RT @takusansu: @OokuboTact 「心理学の研究成果」は6割以上が再現不能　海外研究 https://t.co/SKIyBGl9Qj https://t.co/k9PkHmnqI8 なんて記事が前にありましたね。 今年の教育心理学年報でも研究の再現性に関して…

Dec 3, 2023 · 2 shares · 15,610 followers View post →
OokuboTact　おおくぼ（中２病中年）
@OokuboTact · X

RT @takusansu: @OokuboTact 「心理学の研究成果」は6割以上が再現不能　海外研究 https://t.co/SKIyBGl9Qj https://t.co/k9PkHmnqI8 なんて記事が前にありましたね。 今年の教育心理学年報でも研究の再現性に関して…

Dec 3, 2023 · 2 shares · 700 followers View post →
TaKu
@takusansu · X

@OokuboTact 「心理学の研究成果」は6割以上が再現不能　海外研究 https://t.co/SKIyBGl9Qj https://t.co/k9PkHmnqI8 なんて記事が前にありましたね。 今年の教育心理学年報でも研究の再現性に関して取り上げられています。(「再現性の危機」とか書いてある) 【心理学（科学）】と書かれると違和感が・・・

Dec 3, 2023 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 192 followers View post →
Open Research Leeds
@OpenResLeeds · X

Hearing from ⁦@healthpsycleeds⁩, ⁦@UniversityLeeds⁩ institutional lead for ⁦@ukrepro⁩ Citing important paper in context of psychology (relevant to all disciplines!) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science | Science https://t.co/c6R6YHt6ZW

Nov 20, 2023 · 1 like · 4,730 followers View post →
Irregular expression
@Michalek__ · X

@andrzejdragan @LeszBuk @TrajektoriaAI @Przegaa @futurism 36% to nie jest tak źle ;) https://t.co/6IJyUWkgWq

Nov 20, 2023 · 4 likes · 59 followers View post →
Joel Karjalainen
@karjalainenjjj · X

@KaijusE @JSiljanderFIN @AkiKangasharju @ahokasjaj @hanna_wass @EtlaNews @KauppalehtiFi Ei, mutta Arielyn ja Ginon todennäköisesti ovat. Esim. tässä jutussa aika hyvin kuvattu, mistä on kyse: https://t.co/CsuYpHcs9T Replikaatiokriisistä ks. esim.: https://t.co/PhKYwYjOfl

Oct 1, 2023 · 614 followers View post →
DziadekꙮPająk
@kleschby · X

@eintescha Психология или психиатрия? Это вообще разные вещи. У психологов исследования воспроизводятся так себе, судя по этому метаисследованию: https://t.co/dQijOEBOBu

Sep 23, 2023 · 323 followers View post →
PushFourLeft
@PushFourLeft · X

@aSinister @FredHikes @jgatta06 @NewNormality20 @GeorgeJeff9804 @Kenneth72712993 @phlannelphysics @LexWaters7 @jimdtweet @BubbasRanch @WayneAllanH @jgorman2424 @RoelofBoer @Rebecca74083947 @agentsinaction @IBergwiesel @priscian @NoelTurner194 @nonsequiturmeme @Michael_D_Crow @FreeSpeech4U_Me @nxgrs73 @3GHtweets @tor_lan @d_e_mol @Mark_A_Lunn @AdinoIsmath @roger_clague @evenminded121 @RandomRation @MikeDel21893959 @PvtMcAuslan @MartinJBern @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @DavidAHoward @automatrix66_KC @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @cmcateer3 @sjsimmons Nearly 70% of psychological research can be reproduced: https://t.co/PGQgPxoUYw

Sep 22, 2023 · 172 followers View post →
hroch32
@hroch32 · X

Zajímavý článek o reprodukovatelnosti výsledků. Mmj se v něm píše, že reprodukovatelnost výsledků více závisela na síle důkazů než na zkušenosti původního týmu (zjednodušeně). Moc se mi líbí jeho závěr, proč má smysl provádět replikace existujících studií. https://t.co/qiidIdBD8j https://t.co/vxikXz0Qde

Sep 8, 2023 · 6 likes · 1,298 followers View post →
John Hawks
@johnhawks.net · Bluesky

Great reading list on the replication crisis in psychology by Ethan Ludwin-Perry www.mod171.com/p/replicatio...

Sep 7, 2023 · 4 likes · 1 share View post →
Michael Bang Petersen
@M_B_Petersen · X

@GrundforskFond Reviewers also admit that they do not invest the needed effort & some even act "unfairly" (https://t.co/q6tMCX461m) Finally, the replication crisis clearly demonstrates that formal peer-review is in itself not a strong guard rail (https://t.co/gi6v2aBo3v) 9/18

Sep 7, 2023 · 6 likes · 30,525 followers View post →
Tuki Attuquayefio
@tuki_nii · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 28, 2023 · 167 shares · 448 followers View post →
Rick-S132 Diablo
@ElementHband · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 28, 2023 · 167 shares · 24 followers View post →
Topher Hübel
@topherhuebel · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 28, 2023 · 167 shares · 1,674 followers View post →
Gernot Horstmann
@GernotHorstman1 · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 8 followers View post →
Dr Flavia Santos
@flavinska72 · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 3,268 followers View post →
Psych #rstats Club | @psychrstats.bsky.social
@PsychRStats · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 1,156 followers View post →
Rajesh Thipparapu
@Rajeshtipparapu · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 281 followers View post →
Jake Elder
@Jake_Elder52 · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 981 followers View post →
AJ Thurston, PhD
@AJThurston · X

RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…

Aug 27, 2023 · 167 shares · 2,572 followers View post →
Julie Fish
@fishdippers · X

RT @Jikkyleaks: @stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are lin…

Aug 27, 2023 · 5 shares · 1,474 followers View post →
Craig https://x.com/i/status/1933868431683862762
@Aussie64CH · X

RT @Jikkyleaks: @stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are lin…

Aug 27, 2023 · 5 shares · 2,512 followers View post →
Terri Lewis
@terriblewis1 · X

RT @Jikkyleaks: @stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are lin…

Aug 26, 2023 · 5 shares · 2,906 followers View post →
Roxro
@RoxanaRo22 · X

RT @Jikkyleaks: @stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are lin…

Aug 26, 2023 · 5 shares · 301 followers View post →
Marek Bogacki
@documentavi · X

RT @Jikkyleaks: @stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are lin…

Aug 26, 2023 · 5 shares · 1,409 followers View post →
Jikkyleaks
@Jikkyleaks · X

@stuartbuck1 @PaoloCrosetto @paulrconnor @rikirikiroo @alexandrosM @NMLLPLaw @ShotsHeard @andre_quentin So, now you are linked to DARPA through grants. A few hours ago that was a "conspiracy theory". It seems to be a common theme in the psychology field. The majority of papers are apparently either fraud or statistically inept. https://t.co/hLTdIqUZwe

Aug 26, 2023 · 18 likes · 5 shares · 111,442 followers View post →
PushFourLeft
@PushFourLeft · X

@aSinister @PeterGi08603862 @GeorgeJeff9804 @Rebecca74083947 @jimdtweet @LexWaters7 @phlannelphysics @NoelTurner194 @jpgcrowley @3GHtweets @TypicalDeviant @nxgrs73 @sjsimmons @roger_clague @DaleGribble_666 @Mark_A_Lunn @BobPartridge16 @ItsTheAtmospher @evenminded121 @MartinJBern @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @tor_lan @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 “Science” https://t.co/PGQgPxoUYw

Jul 29, 2023 · 172 followers View post →
Daniele Fanelli
@DFanDaBiasedMan · X

8- Last because not least, is the monumental Reproducibility Initiative in Psychology by the @OSFramework , who took 100 studies from three prominent psychology journals. It was widely reported (and still cited) as finding a disappointing 37% DOI:10.1126/science.aac4716.

Jul 19, 2023 · 1 like · 445 followers View post →
Chad Bitt
@chad_bitt · X

@Skz_Aramat @la__lanterne @starmaxblue Pas vraiment. https://t.co/7r16sqRUFX

Jun 28, 2023 · 848 followers View post →
Todd Davenport
@sunsopeningband · X

A little intellectual humility is always a good idea when we think about thinking. https://t.co/UVC2WEudRm

Jun 27, 2023 · 5 likes · 1 share · 12,567 followers View post →
dr. virginia prior
@DrVirginiaPrior · X

https://t.co/CoYpoHBdma

Jun 26, 2023 · 960 followers View post →
1-800-FML
@800Fml · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 312 followers View post →
Peraoe
@Dorde03413272 · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 131 followers View post →
Rehzi Malzahn
@RehziRehzi · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 442 followers View post →
wearing N95s when you're in public saves lives
@masksaregood · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 337 followers View post →
2 X L
@EllenLuxnova1 · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 843 followers View post →
Christoph Ströck
@cstroeckw · X

RT @jan_choutka: Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more…

Jun 26, 2023 · 7 shares · 8,076 followers View post →
Jan Choutka
@jan_choutka · X

Reminder: more than half of studies in leading psychology journals could not be replicated. What does it mean? It is more reasonable to not trust psychology research than to trust it. https://t.co/CYmYUWrd75

Jun 26, 2023 · 35 likes · 7 shares · 1,681 followers View post →
Real Scientists DE
@realsci_DE · X

Die meisten von euch kennen das Reproducibility-Project. Die Open Science Collaboration hat 2015 diesen lesenswerten Artikel veröffentlicht: https://t.co/ZEr13UirKp

Jun 17, 2023 · 4 likes · 18,090 followers View post →
Todd W. DeVoe
@twdevoe · X

@Great_Briton_I @jasonpaisley @barlow2021 @hodgetwins @RobertKennedyJr @DrAseemMalhotra @RWMaloneMD @ClareCraigPath Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://t.co/cnS04ZQs1y Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243.

Apr 29, 2023 · 1 like · 360 followers View post →
FleurZeldenrust
@FleurZeldenrust · X

@leeflang_m True in the case of the bèta blockers, but apparently there was much 'sloppy science' in his other research discovered too. This might also give some insights? 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797 and 10.1126/science.aac4716 and 10.1001/jama.294.2.218

Apr 12, 2023 · 773 followers View post →
PushFourLeft
@PushFourLeft · X

@kaycB2805 @AugustinaJJD @Chasten @Mike_Pence https://t.co/PGQgPxoUYw

Mar 14, 2023 · 172 followers View post →
CodeForAutomation
@AutomationCode · X

@CubeSteve @Utterly_Jean @NonliberalE @AWULWarrior @Danny__Spring @in_the_sky34221 @gmack227 @Kathlee85952903 @Shama1Singh @prolifenanaki23 The "random blog" referenced a source from (https://t.co/EQ9nywKUtp) which itself has over 40 sources

Mar 2, 2023 · 1 like · 513 followers View post →
Dylan Wiliam
@dylanwiliam · X

@NateJoseph19 Maybe this: https://t.co/aSu0I0Oymj? Not necessarily evidence of bias—could just be evidence that lucky experiments are more likely to get published...

Mar 1, 2023 · 1 like · 125,840 followers View post →
Quentin
@truthandaction · X

Studies in the psychological sciences do not replicate well. What results do you trust? https://t.co/yjhVxzchOx

Feb 28, 2023 · 632 followers View post →
Pat Savage (@PatrickESavage.bsky.social)
@PatrickESavage · X

@paulbloomatyale It is striking that the two biggest discoveries that come to mind of the last two decades are negative ones. I.e., many past psych "discoveries" were found to be: 1) ungeneralizable (https://t.co/gdsmzGlXlu), and 2) unreplicable (https://t.co/UBqCR4A0Ek)

Jan 29, 2023 · 20 likes · 1 share · 2,360 followers View post →
©️ Il Caffè Letterario
@SalaLettura · X

RT @ImSophiaPLMS: @giulicast @UgoMorelli @RobertaPaliotti @colvieux @unvermouth @BersaniLeda @Ginestra21 @LaMerlettaia @GranataElena @crist…

Jan 24, 2023 · 1 share · 64,131 followers View post →
Lina M. 
@ImSophiaPLMS · X

@giulicast @UgoMorelli @RobertaPaliotti @colvieux @unvermouth @BersaniLeda @Ginestra21 @LaMerlettaia @GranataElena @cristinamucciol Quanto sono affidabili e riproducibili gli studi scientifici di psicologia? Poco, circa per il 40% https://t.co/YvcobsfcQ3 Fonte: Rivista #Science https://t.co/2L3wI2fDyn https://t.co/rmTaupWmS0

Jan 24, 2023 · 5 likes · 1 share · 3,641 followers View post →
べっこういも
@cone_biology · X

2015年の論文で面白いものを見つけた 心理学の論文100本の追試実験を行ったところ, 統計学的に再現性があると判断できたものは40にも満たなかったそうだ 心理学研究の再現性については以前から問題視されてきたが, それを可視化することの重要性だよな https://t.co/9lMKLEScUL

Jan 18, 2023 · 4 likes · 1,442 followers View post →
RichardGLolz
@RichardGLolz · X

@LauraSockol There are a number of papers that came out of this. Eg https://t.co/uWy8qbwlVN

Jan 3, 2023 · 245 followers View post →
Kenzo Nera
@KenzoNera · X

@jeremy_royaux Je suis prêt à le croire (sincèrement), mais as-tu par exemple sous la main des réplications pré-enregistrées qui ont pu établir la robustesse des phénomènes ? Des grandes entreprises de réplications des données publiées (type https://t.co/gsrwTkwVPR) ?

Dec 31, 2022 · 1,285 followers View post →
Finasteride Watch
@FinasterideInfo · X

@danwilliamsphil @briandavidearp Report on Brian Nosek's reproducibility project https://t.co/DqQNbszz0o

Dec 29, 2022 · 1 like · 818 followers View post →
Gregoire Quartier
@GregoireQuarti1 · X

@CoralieBorel @SenseurFR Ya un lien dans l'article. https://t.co/A5d8epupGK Mais je te le donne, comme ca c'est tout cuit.

Dec 7, 2022 · 289 followers View post →
Real Scientists DE
@realsci_DE · X

Im Bild seht ihr die Ergebnisse: Nur 36 dieser 100 Effekte konnten nochmals gezeigt werden!

Dec 6, 2022 · 11 likes · 18,090 followers View post →
Ana
@maevenam · X

@Yofinks @BadMedicalTakes https://t.co/kiRxenqcio

Nov 18, 2022 · 1 like · 143 followers View post →
Ryan Stewart
@rs_312 · X

RT @DohertyCailbhe: What are the most common kinds of study design in #sportscience and #alliedhealth #research?   (In <60-seconds)   Full…

Nov 15, 2022 · 2 shares · 302 followers View post →
UCD High Performance Gym
@UCD_HPG · X

RT @DohertyCailbhe: What are the most common kinds of study design in #sportscience and #alliedhealth #research?   (In <60-seconds)   Full…

Nov 15, 2022 · 2 shares · 2,382 followers View post →
Dr Cailbhe Doherty
@DohertyCailbhe · X

What are the most common kinds of study design in #sportscience and #alliedhealth #research?   (In <60-seconds)   Full video available here: https://t.co/hAha2iVRw9 https://t.co/t9U0WXLCeE

Nov 15, 2022 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 782 followers View post →
Rob Paulson
@bicycletootired · X

@HelmutLaughs @wil_da_beast630 No, but I do. Here, I'll help you out - read (this one article of many others I can offer) so you can actually sound educated on this matter. You just sound emotional. https://t.co/Csp8PUlvla

Nov 10, 2022 · 300 followers View post →
Figli Contesi '21
@FigliContesi_21 · X

@buttonslives @libsoftiktok The backslash to #Gender wars of woke sorcerer's apprentices, or #PoliticallyCorrect con artists of the marketing, is about accountability of "civil servants" abuse of power(for clientelism's #DarkMoney ) to exploit impunity from "obligation of results" https://t.co/jE5BjtybSy

Nov 3, 2022 · 456 followers View post →
Jim Bloom
@jimmyroybloom · X

RT @jimmyroybloom: https://t.co/zhCdlBisBd Towards cryo-electron tomography software integration, reproducibility, and validation

Oct 22, 2022 · 1 share · 2,399 followers View post →
Jim Bloom
@jimmyroybloom · X

https://t.co/zhCdlBisBd Towards cryo-electron tomography software integration, reproducibility, and validation

Oct 21, 2022 · 1 share · 2,399 followers View post →
Egil Moeller
@redhog_org · X

RT @kristinoster: Send an email to kristin.oster@ki.se or DM here. This is the paper for today, and we will read many more interesting pap…

Oct 20, 2022 · 1 share · 684 followers View post →
Brian Nosek (@briannosek@nerdculture.de)
@BrianNosek · X

2: The essay highlights the role of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology paper that appeared in 2015. I agree that the paper played an exemplar role in scholarly discussion and was a catalyst for change. $: https://t.co/EfELWoopez OA: https://t.co/tp43bHcPPW

Oct 19, 2022 · 9 likes · 28,341 followers View post →
Kristin Öster
@kristinoster · X

Send an email to kristin.oster@ki.se or DM here. This is the paper for today, and we will read many more interesting papers in the future! https://t.co/ARMZhRqVwA

Oct 6, 2022 · 1 like · 1 share · 854 followers View post →
Victor van Pelt
@victorvanpelt · X

Is the glass half empty or half full? 60% success rate is also not THAT different than what is reported in more diligent replication research in economics (61%) https://t.co/yby8yN9JNm and psychology (33-50%) https://t.co/VHESZ5ey7J Yet, they are far less optimistic.

Oct 4, 2022 · 404 followers View post →
Tom Chivers
@TomChivers · X

@william_woof @chrislintott I think I'm happy (at least in psych/social science) saying "false", per the percentage of failed replications in Nosek et al https://t.co/qNFIMlN2Tl

Sep 14, 2022 · 1 like · 54,203 followers View post →
Tom Chivers
@TomChivers · X

@petesivey in social science, at least, a majority of papers do not replicate (or didn't in 2015, the situation may have improved https://t.co/UM6BldN6ia) and this was predicted several years before

Sep 14, 2022 · 54,203 followers View post →
Niamh Murphy
@niamhphysio · X

RT @DohertyCailbhe: For educators (and their students) in the healthcare disciplines, this thread contains a lecture series I prepared to h…

Sep 13, 2022 · 5 shares · 1,989 followers View post →
Brian Caulfield
@CaulfieldBrian · X

RT @DohertyCailbhe: For educators (and their students) in the healthcare disciplines, this thread contains a lecture series I prepared to h…

Sep 13, 2022 · 5 shares · 1,500 followers View post →
Tara Cusack
@t_tcusack · X

RT @DohertyCailbhe: For educators (and their students) in the healthcare disciplines, this thread contains a lecture series I prepared to h…

Sep 13, 2022 · 5 shares · 490 followers View post →
Dr Cailbhe Doherty
@DohertyCailbhe · X

For educators (and their students) in the healthcare disciplines, this thread contains a lecture series I prepared to help students learn the ropes of research. The first is a beginners guide on 'How to Read a Research Paper' https://t.co/hAha2iVRw9 Feel free to share! https://t.co/47i8Hfb07T

Sep 13, 2022 · 29 likes · 5 shares · 782 followers View post →
横内美保子　Mihoko Yokouchi
@mibogon · X

@Midogonpapa 以下が発端となった“Science”の論文、批判への批判の論文、さらにそれに対する批判の論文のアブストラクトのようです。 https://t.co/TGL5O6ru0R https://t.co/X59V2MyDDE https://t.co/yELFlPZhFv

Aug 22, 2022 · 1 like · 679 followers View post →
Hiraishi Kai
@kaihiraishi · X

RT @repTeaTokyo: 伝説的論文というのはこれ。Reproducibility Project: Psychologyです。 Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of…

May 24, 2022 · 1 share · 3,026 followers View post →
ReproducibiliTea Tokyo
@repTeaTokyo · X

伝説的論文というのはこれ。Reproducibility Project: Psychologyです。 Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://t.co/tk3uujz0Kk

May 24, 2022 · 5 likes · 1 share · 716 followers View post →
Real Scientists DE
@realsci_DE · X

Überraschend viele Ergebnisse lassen sich nicht replizieren (https://t.co/5qTsHQTBdi, https://t.co/QtMe9kITUY, https://t.co/3wUtyeSGLi). In manchen Forschungsfeldern ist die Realisierbarkeit zwar höher als in anderen, aber insgesamt schaut es trotzdem nicht so toll aus.

Nov 15, 2021 · 4 likes · 18,090 followers View post →
Henrik Svedäng
@HSvedang · X

Japp, reproducerbarhet är så att säga kriteriet på vetenskap. https://t.co/9Q71f13qOg

Nov 3, 2021 · 1,118 followers View post →
Henrik Svedäng
@hsvedang.bsky.social · Bluesky

Japp, reproducerbarhet är så att säga kriteriet på vetenskap. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26315443/

Nov 3, 2021 View post →
Max Julien
@iamMikeMilligan · X

@CompareTheNames Psychology is one of the few disciplines where more than half of their premises don’t replicate in research. https://t.co/VOvgdJy0B8

Sep 4, 2021 · 106 followers View post →
Pvg
@p__v__g · X

Hi, good day, how y'all doin? How are my westernised/modernised, cosmetic "psychologists" doin? How does it feel having your memes used against you? :) DOI:  https://t.co/kHTGRhZcbu PMID: 26940865 PMID: 31346273.

May 26, 2021 · 39 followers View post →
Nick Litsardopoulos
@Nlitsardopoulos · X

@nntaleb And it is known they do so "Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results" https://t.co/ELxY8vs9nj

May 22, 2021 · 5 likes · 765 followers View post →
Pablo Menese Camargo
@pmenesecamargo · X

@cabana_alvaro @MicrobiomDigest La crisis de replicación ya esta arriba nuestro y hay gente haciendo cosas al respecto, recomiendo Nosek, B. (2015) https://t.co/Oi9ylvcNLe Calculo q en Uruguay empezaremos a debatir esto en unos 30 años, cuando le aflojemos a otros debates anacronicos de hace 30 años atras.

Mar 14, 2021 · 2 likes · 1,820 followers View post →
Bruce Long
@BruceRLong · X

https://t.co/hhKYHQvcAX https://t.co/A3b2H7b3wL

Oct 27, 2020 · 836 followers View post →
Princeton ReproducibiliTea
@Princeton_Tea · X

☕️

Mar 10, 2020 · 2 likes · 100 followers View post →
Kraut Klíck
@QIMP3G · X

RT @realsci_DE: 2015: Nosek et al. versuchen, klassische Forschungsergebnisse der Psychologie zu replizieren. Sie finden, dass sich davon l…

Jan 11, 2019 · 2 shares · 287 followers View post →
Ap_Saegge@ruhr.social
@Ap_Saegge · X

RT @realsci_DE: 2015: Nosek et al. versuchen, klassische Forschungsergebnisse der Psychologie zu replizieren. Sie finden, dass sich davon l…

Jan 11, 2019 · 2 shares · 943 followers View post →
Real Scientists DE
@realsci_DE · X

2015: Nosek et al. versuchen, klassische Forschungsergebnisse der Psychologie zu replizieren. Sie finden, dass sich davon lediglich ca. 39% bestätigen lassen. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. https://t.co/5qTsHQTBdi https://t.co/KaJytpiJDp

Jan 11, 2019 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 18,090 followers View post →