Psychon Bull Rev December 2015 PMID 26391034

The interface theory of perception: the future of the science of the mind?

Gregory Hickok

Download social card

Mentions

7
Peak: 2 in Nov 2019
across 3 sources since Nov 2019

Extended reach

13,027
potential audience

Total likes

98

Video views

1,931

Mentions per month

Nov 2019 – Jan 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter3 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone is one of curiosity and open-mindedness, exemplified by posts like 'Have a look at Hoffman's arguments' and mentions of sharing personal takes, which indicate both interest and moderate engagement. The use of phrases such as 'let me know your thoughts' suggests an inviting attitude without deep critique, aligning with a neutral impact level.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

The discussions reflect a cautious or neutral stance toward the publication, with no strong support or disagreement expressed.

InterestModerate interest

There is some curiosity about the arguments, indicated by comments asking for thoughts and sharing personal takes.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants are engaging by referencing the content and encouraging responses, though the involvement remains relatively light.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussions are somewhat impactful, mainly raising awareness and prompting contemplation, but they lack strong assertions of change or influence.

Abstract in brief

  • The interface theory of perception suggests that perception is not about revealing the true nature of objects and events in the world, but rather about creating a user-friendly interface that helps us survive.
  • The theory challenges traditional views by arguing that our perceptions are more about practical survival than about depicting reality accurately.
  • If this theory is correct, it could significantly change how scientists understand how the mind works and how we interpret the world around us.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Gary Lupyan
@glupyan · X

@CT_Bergstrom Here's my take on it as a cognitive science person: https://t.co/God1K8zKa2 (more responses here in the PB&R special issue: https://t.co/AXpmHxKSgt )

Nov 5, 2019 · 5 likes · 1 share · 4,023 followers View post →
Gregory Hickok
@GregoryHickok · X

@bigpicsoccer Have a look at Hoffman's arguments and let me know your thoughts. Here's a part of it. https://t.co/FtC1QYgmNi and my editorial comment on it https://t.co/kxBg5pNcTR

Jan 6, 2024 · 2 likes · 6,044 followers View post →

All mentions

Gregory Hickok
@GregoryHickok · X

@bigpicsoccer Have a look at Hoffman's arguments and let me know your thoughts. Here's a part of it. https://t.co/FtC1QYgmNi and my editorial comment on it https://t.co/kxBg5pNcTR

Jan 6, 2024 · 2 likes · 6,044 followers View post →
almaseelesoul
@almaseelesoul · X

RT @glupyan: @CT_Bergstrom Here's my take on it as a cognitive science person: https://t.co/God1K8zKa2 (more responses here in the PB&R sp…

Nov 5, 2019 · 1 share · 1,026 followers View post →
Gary Lupyan
@glupyan · X

@CT_Bergstrom Here's my take on it as a cognitive science person: https://t.co/God1K8zKa2 (more responses here in the PB&R special issue: https://t.co/AXpmHxKSgt )

Nov 5, 2019 · 5 likes · 1 share · 4,023 followers View post →