Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a strong consensus that moral framing influences political influence, with examples like 'put arguments in terms of what others hold dear' and references to research by Feinberg & Willer. The tone ranges from informative to advising, emphasizing the importance of understanding and aligning with others' values for meaningful engagement.
Most discussions acknowledge the effectiveness of moral reframing, especially emphasizing that aligning arguments with the audience's values can change opinions.
Participants show high interest, citing relevant research and sharing strategies for political persuasion, indicating engagement with the article's core concepts.
Comments include reflections on the research methods and implications, demonstrating thoughtful analysis beyond superficial remarks.
The discussions highlight practical applications, such as improving political dialogue and persuasion techniques, suggesting the study's relevance in real-world debates.
How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements using our own values. But if your aim is to convince, frame your argument using the values of the person you are discussing with https://t.co/WDdxyrCxOY
5/5 ומחקר עדכני יותר מחדד שימנים ושמאלנים לא בהכרח שונים בהיותם אתיים/מוסריים - אלא הם שונים בסוגים / ממדים שונים של המוסר/אתיקה שחשובה להם. הנה עוד על זה: https://t.co/1pArTfCC8z https://t.co/ouvZO7j1XT
This is a great article incorporating research by @WLouisUQ on making sure your arguments work. It reminds me of two really important papers: Put arguments in terms of what other people hold dear: https://t.co/Lh7tXwZSqp and LISTEN, don't judge: https://t.co/wFLTXDCZst https://t.co/VH1Y9aUCQP
@JohnHolbein1 @semrasevi @mitchellbosley Cool paper! Prior research on moral reframing is relevant to this study, e.g.,: https://t.co/tdHRQqzMSZ https://t.co/uNoQcTytHW
@dfreelon @Chanders @rasmus_kleis @shannimcg @kreissdaniel @prof_vaccari @sjjphd @LawrenceRegina @meredithdclark @davekarpf @DrAlliRich @silviowaisbord @nikkiusher @claesdevreese @zizip @propublica https://t.co/OVMJPWe3CL
Oops. Somehow the link to the paper got lost. Here it is: https://t.co/ZVwftVW3Sg https://t.co/6g1WAAzKNg
This video discusses how moral arguments influence political opinions and emphasizes the importance of aligning arguments with the audience's moral values to increase persuasion, based on research involving issues like…
In a polarized world, convincing others to change their opinions is challenging. This video discusses strategies for increasing the chances of persuading others by understanding and aligning with their moral values…
Explore how reframing moral arguments to align with the audience's values can increase persuasion in political debates, based on six research studies involving issues like same-sex marriage and health care.
@JohnHolbein1 @semrasevi @mitchellbosley Cool paper! Prior research on moral reframing is relevant to this study, e.g.,: https://t.co/tdHRQqzMSZ https://t.co/uNoQcTytHW
5/5 ומחקר עדכני יותר מחדד שימנים ושמאלנים לא בהכרח שונים בהיותם אתיים/מוסריים - אלא הם שונים בסוגים / ממדים שונים של המוסר/אתיקה שחשובה להם. הנה עוד על זה: https://t.co/1pArTfCC8z https://t.co/ouvZO7j1XT
⚖️ O argumentacji politycznej przy użyciu sądów moralnych W badaniu "From Gulf to Bridge: When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence?" (2015) poproszono uczestników o sformułowanie argumentów politycznych, które przekonają politycznych przeciwników.
@StefanFSchubert @RichardMCNgo @__nmca__ @saffronhuang @eschwitz @fierycushman @PeterSinger Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2015). From Gulf to Bridge: When Do Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1665–1681. https://t.co/sWrzhj5aBP
@dfreelon @Chanders @rasmus_kleis @shannimcg @kreissdaniel @prof_vaccari @sjjphd @LawrenceRegina @meredithdclark @davekarpf @DrAlliRich @silviowaisbord @nikkiusher @claesdevreese @zizip @propublica https://t.co/OVMJPWe3CL
@UICPT542 communication overcomes conservatives’ resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of personality and social psychology, 114(4), 599. 4 Feinberg & Willer (2015). From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence?. Personality and Social Psychology
All these examples have something in common. People chose to use language or act in a way that they thought against how THEY would act/understand. There's clear evidence that this is how people talk about politics, and when you change that....bam. 10/ https://t.co/vLvn6wMs4P
This is a great article incorporating research by @WLouisUQ on making sure your arguments work. It reminds me of two really important papers: Put arguments in terms of what other people hold dear: https://t.co/Lh7tXwZSqp and LISTEN, don't judge: https://t.co/wFLTXDCZst https://t.co/VH1Y9aUCQP
Oops. Somehow the link to the paper got lost. Here it is: https://t.co/ZVwftVW3Sg https://t.co/6g1WAAzKNg
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
Supplementary material has some examples https://t.co/DGoy5wcCNK
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
RT @andre_spicer: How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements usi…
How to convince someone who holds very different views to you? This study finds we spontaneously frame our arguements using our own values. But if your aim is to convince, frame your argument using the values of the person you are discussing with https://t.co/WDdxyrCxOY