J Womens Health (Larchmt) November 2015 PMID 26496048

Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening Mammography.

John D Keen, Karsten J Jørgensen

Mentions

14
Peak: 3 in Nov 2024
across 5 sources since Apr 2021

Extended reach

7,875
potential audience

Total likes

164

Video views

3,114

Mentions per month

Apr 2021 – Aug 2025

Where it's discussed

  • Facebook4 posts
  • News3 articles
  • Blogs3 articles
  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reveal skepticism about the benefits of early detection, with comments like 'I think the evidence of early detection is weak' and references to lead time bias, illustrating a cautious tone and focus on evaluating the true impact of screening rather than accepting traditional benefits at face value.

AgreementModerate agreement

Some posts question the effectiveness of screening, aligning with the article's notion that early detection may be misleading, but others show hesitancy or indirect support.

InterestModerate interest

Discussions demonstrate curiosity about the nuances of screening, with commenters questioning the evidence and biases involved.

EngagementNeutral engagement

Comments reflect some engagement through critical thinking about biases like lead time bias, but overall lack detailed debate or probing.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions highlight concerns about the potential overestimation of screening benefits, indicating moderate awareness of the implications.

Abstract in brief

  • Screening mammography can sometimes cause harm or have no effect, as it may increase unnecessary surgeries without effectively reducing advanced disease or mortality.
  • Interpreting screening success based on survival rates and early detection can be misleading due to biases like leadtime and selection bias, making it difficult to assess true benefits.
  • A deeper understanding of tumor biology is essential for accurate evaluation of screening's benefits, emphasizing that early detection may occur late in a tumor’s development, and women should be supported in making informed choices about screening.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jeffrey Dach MD
@jeffreydachmd · X

@PGtzsche1 @CDCgov @WHO @NIH Keen JD, Jørgensen KJ. "Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening Mammography." J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24(10):831-838. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5221.

Aug 4, 2025 · 2,886 followers View post →
indefatigable (margaret)
@Indefatigabl_ · X

@LibbyMbc I think the evidence of early detection is weak Lead time bias. I think the survival benefits come from better treatments. https://t.co/1qjk9VibTT

Apr 12, 2021 · 1,876 followers View post →

All mentions

Jeffrey Dach MD
@jeffreydachmd · X

@PGtzsche1 @CDCgov @WHO @NIH Keen JD, Jørgensen KJ. "Four Principles to Consider Before Advising Women on Screening Mammography." J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24(10):831-838. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5221.

Aug 4, 2025 · 2,886 followers View post →
indefatigable (margaret)
@Indefatigabl_ · X

@LibbyMbc I think the evidence of early detection is weak Lead time bias. I think the survival benefits come from better treatments. https://t.co/1qjk9VibTT

Apr 12, 2021 · 1,876 followers View post →